Search

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 is revolutionizing healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus among experts as to the possible applications of telemedicine in the proctologic field. Methods A group of 55 clinical practice recommendations was developed by a clinical guidance group based on coalescence of evidence and expert opinion. The Telemedicine in Proctology Italian Working Group included 47 Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery nominated experts evaluating the appropriateness of each clinical practice recommendations based on published RAND/UCLA methodology in 2 rounds. Results Stakeholder median age was 53 years (interquartile range limits 40–60), and 38 (81%) were men. Nine (19%) panelists reported no experience with telemedicine before the pandemic. Agreement was obtained on a minimum of 3 to 5 years of practice in the proctologic field before starting teleconsultations, which should be regularly paid, with advice and prescriptions incorporated into a formal report sent to the patient by e-mail along with a receipt. Of the panelists, 35 of 47 (74%) agreed that teleconsultation carries the risk of misdiagnosis of cancer, thus recommending an in-person assessment before scheduling any surgery. Fifteen additional clinical practice recommendations were re-elaborated in the second round and assessed by 44 of 47 (93.6%) panelists. The application of telemedicine for the diagnosis of common proctologic conditions (eg, hemorrhoidal disease, anal abscess and fistula, anal condylomas, and anal fissure) and functional pelvic floor disorders was generally considered inappropriate. Teleconsultation was instead deemed appropriate for the diagnosis and management of pilonidal disease. Conclusion This e-consensus revealed the boundaries of telemedicine in Italy. Standardization of infrastructures, logistics, and legality remain to be better elucidated.

Summary: Background/Objective: A preoperative reliable classification system between clinical and computed tomography (CT) findings to better plan surgery in acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) is lacking. We studied the inter-observer agreement of CT scan data and their concordance with the preoperative clinical findings and the adherence with the intraoperative status using a new classification of diverticular disease (CDD). Methods: 152 patients operated on for acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were studied with CT scan within 24 h before surgery and CT images were blinded reanalyzed by 2 couples of radiologists (A/B). Kappa value evaluated the inter-observer agreement between radiologists and the concordance between CDD, preoperative clinical findings and findings at operation. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the predicting values of CT classification and CDD stage at surgery on postoperative outcomes. Results: Overall inter-observer agreement for the CDD was high, with a kappa value of 0.905 (95% CI = 0.850–0.960) for observers A and B, while the concordance between radiological and surgical findings was weak (kappa values = 0.213 and 0,248, respectively and 95% CI = 0.106 to 0.319 and 95% CI = 0.142 to 0.355, respectively). When overall morbidity, mortality and the need of a terminal colostomy were considered as main endpoints no concordance was observed between surgical and radiological findings and the CDD (P=NS). Conclusions: The need for a more accurate classification of ACD, able to better stage this emergency, and to provide surgeons with reliable information for the best treatment is advocated. Keywords: Acute complicated diverticulitis, Inter-observer agreement, CDD, CT scanning, Operative findings, Predicting value

Aim: Pilonidal sinus or Pilonidal Disease (PD) is a relatively common, benign but challenging condition. Although commonly encountered in practice, its ideal treatment is controversial. One of the most validated treatments is video-assisted surgery. In this context, very similar endoscopic techniques have been published under different names. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the differences among these proposed techniques and their outcomes. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed during all stages of this systematic review. A systematic search of the English literature was performed on multiple databases from 1 January 2014 to 3 April 2022. The primary outcome measure was the IDEAL framework stage of innovation. The key secondary outcome measures were the adherence to the IDEAL reporting guidelines, the Blencowe framework and the core outcome set (COS) for studies evaluating the introduction and evaluation of novel surgical techniques, the qualitative assessment using appropriate tools, the procedural variations and outcomes of each technique. Results: A total of 38 articles were included reporting a very similar technique under eight different acronyms. The number of patients varied from 9 to 250. Mean follow-up ranged from 1 to 60 months. There was only one published study of IDEAL 3. The majority (58%) were IDEAL 2a studies. Reporting of domains in the IDEAL reporting guidelines and Blencowe framework was poor, with most studies not reporting the component steps of procedures or efforts to standardize them. Half of COS domains were markedly underreported. The quality of the evidence was categorized as having a risk of bias from moderate to critical level in all nine comparative non-randomized series. Postoperative complications occurred in 0%–6% of cases, including surgical site infection, poor or failed wound healing bleeding, granuloma, haematoma, and pain requiring intervention. The recurrence rate varied from 0% to 22%. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that reporting on technical aspects of interventions for PD is poor, thus warranting a better-quality control of surgical techniques. It is advisable to group all endoscopic procedures under the umbrella term of ‘endoscopic sinusectomy’, thus embracing the two main principles of this technique, that is, video assistance and PD ablation.

Objectives Accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is essential to stopping the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the recently introduced MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel and to compare it to the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Test. Methods The MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel consists of five assays targeting different sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Accuracy was determined using national and international proficiency panels including 27 samples. For clinical evaluation, 101 residual clinical samples were analyzed and results compared. Samples had been tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA with the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Test. Results When accuracy was tested with the MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel, 25 of 27 (92.6%) samples revealed correct results. When clinical samples were analyzed with the MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel and compared to the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Test, 100 samples showed concordant results. One sample was found to be inconclusive with the MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel. When time-to-results were compared, the new assay showed longer total and hands-on times. Conclusions The MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel showed a good performance and proved to be suitable for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory. Especially during phases of shortage of reagents and/or disposables, the new test system appears as beneficial alternative to standard assays used for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Background: Surgical treatment of anal fistulas is still a challenge. The aims of this study were to evaluate the adoption and healing rates for the different surgical techniques used in Italy over the past 15 years. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study of patients affected by simple and complex anal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin who were surgically treated in the period 2003–2017. Surgical techniques were grouped as sphincter-cutting or sphincter-sparing and as technology-assisted or techno-free. All patients included in the study were followed for at least 12 months. Results: A total of 9,536 patients (5,520 simple; 4,016 complex fistulas) entered the study. For simple fistulas, fistulotomy was the most frequently used procedure, although its adoption significantly decreased over the years (P < .0005), with an increase in sphincter-sparing approaches; the overall healing rate in simple fistulas was 81.1%, with a significant difference between sphincter-cutting (91.9%) and sphincter-sparing (65.1%) techniques (P = .001). For complex fistulas, the adoption of sphincter-cutting approaches decreased, while sphincter-sparing techniques were mildly preferred (P < .0005). Moreover, there was a significant trend toward the use of technology-assisted procedures. The overall healing rate for complex fistulas was 69.0%, with a measurable difference between sphincter-cutting (81.1%) and sphincter-sparing (61.4%; P = .001) techniques and between techno-free and technology-assisted techniques (72.5% and 55.0%, respectively; P = .001). Conclusion: Surgical treatment of anal fistulas has changed, with a trend toward the use of sphincter-sparing techniques. The overall cure rate has remained stable, even if the most innovative procedures have achieved a lower success rate.

INTRODUCTION Preservation of kidney and renal function is the goal of nonoperative management (NOM) of renal trauma (RT). The advantages of NOM for minor blunt RT have already been clearly described, but its value for major blunt and penetrating RT is still under debate. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis on NOM for RT, which was compared with the operative management (OM) with respect to mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement was followed for this study. A systematic search was performed on Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and PubMed for studies published up to December 2015, without language restrictions, which compared NOM versus OM for renal injuries. RESULTS Twenty nonrandomized retrospective cohort studies comprising 13,824 patients with blunt (2,998) or penetrating (10,826) RT were identified. When all RT were considered (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades 1-5), NOM was associated with lower mortality and morbidity rates compared to OM (8.3% vs 17.1%, odds ratio [OR] 0.471; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.404-0.548; P

5-Fluorouracil is commonly used for gastrointestinal cancer treatment in an adjuvant setting; however, the toxicity can lead to a reduction, delay, or discontinuation of treatment. We retrospectively investigated the association between the 5-fluorouracil degradation rate (5-FUDR) and genetic polymorphisms of TSER, DPYD, and MHTFR with toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX. Pretreatment 5-FUDR and MTHFR A1298T or C677T, TSER, and DPYD gene polymorphisms were characterized in stages II-III colorectal cancer patients. Patients were classified into three metabolic classes according to the 5-FUDR value. Association with toxicities was evaluated retrospectively using logistic regression analysis. Overall, 126 patients were selected (35 women, 91 men). Seven patients were poor metabolizers, 116 patients were normal metabolizers and three patients were ultra-rapid metabolizers. The median 5-FUDR was 1.53 ng/ml/10 cells/min (range: 0.42-2.57 ng/ml/10 cells/min). Severe, rate-limiting toxicities (grades 3-4) were encountered in 22.2% of patients. No associations between MTHFR or TSER polymorphisms and toxicity were detected, whereas 5-FUDR showed a statistically significant association with toxicity (P=0.0047). The DPYD heterozygous mutation was detected in only one patient, who showed grade 4 hematological toxicity and a lower 5-FUDR value. The 5-FUDR value seems not to be affected by MTHFR and TSER polymorphisms. Compared with the available pharmacogenomics tests, the pretreatment evaluation of 5-FUDR increases the proportion of identified colorectal patients at high risk for severe toxicity. Thus, it appears to be a suitable pretreatment toxicity biomarker in a subgroup of patients in whom dose-intensity maintenance is the key factor.

Proctology is one of the surgical specialties that suffered the most during COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from a cross-sectional worldwide web survey, we aimed to snapshot the current status of proctologic practice in Italy with differences between three macro areas (North, Centre, South). Specialists affiliated to renowned scientific societies with an interest in coloproctology were invited to join a 27-item survey. Predictive power of respondents’ and hospitals’ demographics on the change of status of surgical activities was calculated. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 04392245). Of 299 respondents from Italy, 94 (40%) practiced in the North, 60 (25%) in the Centrer and 82 (35%) in the South and Islands. The majority were men (79%), at consultant level (70%), with a mean age of 46.5 years, practicing in academic hospitals (39%), where a dedicated proctologist was readily available (68%). Southern respondents were more at risk of infection compared to those from the Center (OR, 3.30; 95%CI 1.46; 7.47, P = 0.004), as were males (OR, 2.64; 95%CI 1.09; 6.37, P = 0.031) and those who routinely tested patients prior to surgery (OR, 3.02; 95%CI 1.39; 6.53, P = 0.005). The likelihood of ongoing surgical practice was higher in the South (OR 1.36, 95%CI 0.75; 2.46, P = 0.304) and in centers that were not fully dedicated to COVID-19 care (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.88; 8.50, P

Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common disease of the natal cleft, which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Various operative management options are available, but the ideal technique is still debatable. Recurrent PD after surgical treatment is frequent event for the 25–30% of cases. The present study evaluated endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) in recurrent and multi-recurrent PD. Of the consecutive prospective patients with recurrent PD, 122 were enrolled in a prospective international multicenter study conducted at a secondary and tertiary colorectal surgery centers. Primary endpoint was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes: healing rate/time, morbidity rate, re-recurrence rate, and patient’s quality of life (QoL). Complete wound healing rate was occurred in 95% of the patient, with a mean complete wound healing time of 29 ± 12 days. The incomplete healing rate (5%) was significantly related to the number of external openings (p = 0.008), and recurrence was reported in six cases (5.1%). Normal daily activity was established on the first postoperative day, and the mean duration before patients returned to work was 3 days. QoL significantly increased between the preoperative stage and 30 days after the EPSiT procedure (45.3 vs. 7.9; p

Background: Robotic right colectomy (RRC) is a complex procedure, offered to selected patients at institutions highly experienced with the procedure. It is still not clear if this approach is worthwhile in enhancing patient recovery and reducing post-operative complications, compared with laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC). Literature is still fragmented and no meta-analyses have been conducted to compare the two procedures. This work aims at reducing this gap in literature, in order to draw some preliminary conclusions on the differences and similarities between RRC and LRC, focusing on short-term outcomes. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies comparing RRC and LRC, and meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Peri-operative outcomes (e.g., morbidity, mortality, anastomotic leakage rates, blood loss, operative time) constituted the study end points. Results: Six studies, including 168 patients undergoing RRC and 348 patients undergoing LRC were considered as suitable. The patients in the two groups were similar with respect to sex, body mass index, presence of malignant disease, previous abdominal surgery, and different with respect to age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. There were no statistically significant differences between RRC and LRC regarding estimated blood loss, rate of conversion to open surgery, number of retrieved lymph nodes, development of anastomotic leakage and other complications, overall morbidity, rates of reoperation, overall mortality, hospital stays. RRC resulted in significantly longer operative time. Conclusions: The RRC procedure is feasible, safe, and effective in selected patients. However, operative times are longer comparing to LRC and no advantages in peri-operative and post-operative outcomes are demonstrated with the use of the robotic surgical system.

Andrea Mingoli,1,2 Marco La Torre,1,2 Gioia Brachini,1,2 Gianluca Costa,3 Genoveffa Balducci,3 Barbara Frezza,3 Giovanna Sgarzini,4 Bruno Cirillo1,2 1Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; 2Department of Surgery P Valdoni, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; 3Surgical Department of Clinical Sciences, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; 4Department of Surgery, SGiovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy Introduction: Hollow viscus injuries (HVIs) are uncommon but potentially catastrophic condi­tions with high mortality and morbidity rates. The aim of this study was to analyze our 16-year experience with patients undergoing surgery for blunt or penetrating bowel trauma to identify prognostic factors with particular attention to the influence of diagnostic delay on outcome. Methods: From our multicenter trauma registry, we selected 169 consecutive patients with an HVI, enrolled from 2000 to 2016. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed to assess determinants of mortality, morbidity, and length of stay by univariate and multivariate analysis models. Results: Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 15.9% and 36.1%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 23±7 days. Morbidity was independently related to an increase of white blood cells (P=0.01), and to delay of treatment >6 hours (P=0.033), while Injury Severity Score (ISS) (P=0.01), presence of shock (P=0.01), and a low diastolic arterial pressure registered at emergency room admission (P=0.02) significantly affected postoperative mortality. Conclusion: There is evidence that patients with clinical signs of shock, low diastolic pressure at admission, and high ISS are at increased risk of postoperative mortality. Leukocytosis and delayed treatment (>6 hours) were independent predictors of postoperative morbidity. More effort should be made to increase the preoperative detection rate of HVI and reduce the delay of treatment. Keywords: bowel injuries, hollow viscus injuries, abdominal blunt trauma, trauma, traumatic bowel perforation, BIPS

Background/Aims The prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is poor. The serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level has been identified as a prognostic indicator of recurrence and reduced overall survival. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative prognostic factors and to create a prognostic model able to assess the early recurrence risk for patients with resectable PAC. Methods A series of 177 patients with PAC treated surgically at the St. Andrea Hospital of Rome between January 2003 and December 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to identify preoperative prognostic indicators. Results A preoperative CA 19-9 level >228 U/mL, tumor size >3.1 cm, and the presence of pathological preoperative lymph nodes statistically correlated with early recurrence. Together, these three factors predicted the possibility of an early recurrence with 90.4% accuracy. The combination of these three preoperative conditions was identified as an independent parameter for early recurrence based on multivariate analysis (p=0.0314; hazard ratio, 3.9811; 95% confidence interval, 1.1745 to 15.3245). Conclusions PAC patient candidates for surgical resection should undergo an assessment of early recurrence risk to avoid unnecessary and ineffective resection and to identify patients for whom palliative or alternative treatment may be the treatment of choice.

Background: During the last few years, the gastric cancer nodal staging has been extensively revised. Lately, a new system emerged in this field with the purpose of implementing the prognostic stratification: the lymph-node ratio (LNR). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in relation to cancer survivors undergoing resection for gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: Off 227 patients undergoing surgical resection for gastric cancer at our Department, 129 curative gastric resections with more than 15 nodes harvested were selected. The LNR was calculated and patients were stratified into 6 subgroups based on the ratio values. The subgroups were compared for data analysis. Survivals were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the mean follow-up period was 40 months. ROC curves were calculated in order to analyze the performance of the LNR system. Results: LNR stratification correlated with the stage of the disease, with the rate of patients undergoing chemotherapy and patients presenting with a relapse of disease at follow-up. Moreover, an increased ratio correlated with a worse overall, a disease-free and a disease-specific survival of the patients. The ROC curves documented a significant performance of the stratification system with the endpoints of disease-free and disease-specific survivals. Conclusion: LNR stratification correlated with cancer-related survivals in our case series. It is a reliable system that might improve current nodal staging and thereby the identification of patients with a higher risk of recurrence or cancer-related mortality.

Background/aim Grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a life-threatening complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), with its surgical management remaining under debate. Occasionally, POPF is associated with a compromised anastomotic Roux-limb. Our series focused to this sort of grade C mixed fistula. Patients and methods Between April 2004 and March 2014, 5 out of 12 patients with grade C POPF were classified as grade C mixed POPFs. Surgery consisted of associating resection of the anastomotic jejunal segment with resection and closure of the pancreatic stump. Results Four patients suffered from a grade C mixed POPF discharging into a single dehiscent site; 1 patient was found with two dehiscent points in all (pancreatic anastomosis and jejunal rim). For all of them, the described surgical procedure resulted in complete recovery. Conclusion For grade C pancreatico-digestive POPF, resecting anastomotic jejunal segment during dismantling of the pancreatico-digestive anastomosis appears a very promising surgical technique.

Leiomyosarcomas of the inferior vena cava (IVCLMS) are a very rare tumor accounting for fewer than 700 cases reported in the literature. A systematic overview and analysis of IVCLMS is here presented with the intent to produce a complete analytical study of epidemiology, histopathology, radiological diagnosis, surgical treatment, palliation, and survival outcomes of this tumor.

Background Survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is poor. Several prognostic factors such as the status of the resection margin, lymph node status, or tumor grading have been identified. Aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio (LNR) for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods Data were collected from 101 patients who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients were divided into four groups according to the absolute LNR (0, 0–0.199, 0.2–0.399, >0.4). Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic effect. Results The actuarial 3- and 5-year survival rates were 32 and 17%, respectively. The median survival was 19 months. Patients with LNR 0/0–0.199/0.2–0.399/>0.4 survived 40.2/30.5/18.1, and 13.6 months, respectively (P = 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, lymph node status was not found to be a significant prognostic factor; on the contrary LNR >0.2 (P = 0.007), positive resection margin (P = 0.001), and grading (P = 0.05) were significantly related to survival. Conclusion LNR is a more powerful predictor of survival than the lymph node status in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011; 104:629–633. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Purpose To present a case of partially thrombosed 5 cm wide aneurysm of the origin of common hepatic artery with occlusion of common hepatic artery distal to the aneurysm and proper hepatic artery revascularized by gastroduodenal and superior mesenteric arteries. Case report After a preliminary 3D rotational angiography evaluation a stent graft was deployed in the celiac axis to exclude the common hepatic artery and the aneurysm taking the advantage of developed complete collateral liver blood supply. Two year CT follow up showed stent patency without clinical and radiological evidence of visceral ischemic damage. Clinical and technical considerations are discussed. Conclusions The positive mid-term outcome confirms the efficacy of endovascular exclusion with stent graft, in the treatment of hepatic artery aneurysm in selected cases.

Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AI) are potent suppressors of aromatase activity. The aim of this study was to measure the incidence of adverse effects in breast cancer patients treated with AI-based adjuvant therapy and the relationship with the CYP19A1 genotypes.Forty-five postmenopausal breast cancer patients (46-85 yrs) in AI adjuvant treatment were genotyped for the rs4646 polymorphisms of CYP19A1 gene and three variations were identified. Toxicities were registered at each follow-up medical examination, and classified in accord with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.Twenty-four (53.3%) patients presented the GG genotype; 19 (42.2%) the GT, and 2 (4.4%) the TT. The AI treatment was Anastrazole for 35 patients (77.8%) and Letrozole for the others (n=10; 22.2%). Osteoporosis was significantly associated with the GG genotype (p=0.001). Treatment discontinuation (TD) was observed in 6 cases (13.3%). The only parameter able to predict TD was the appearance of severe arthralgia/myalgia (Odds Ratio, OR=23.75; p=0.009), when adjusted for age and AI treatment.Our results suggest that CYP19A1 polymorphic variants may influence susceptibility to develop AI-related side effects. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the role of the aromatase gene (CYP19A1) polymorphisms in predicting adverse effects to AI-based therapy.Üçüncü jenerasyon aromataz inhibitörleri (Aİ) aromataz aktivitesinin potent supresörleridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Aİ bazlı adjuvan terapi ile tedavi edilen meme kanserli hastalarda advers etkilerin insidansını ve CYP19A1 genotipleri ile ilişkisini belirlemekti.Aİ adjuvan tedavisindeki 45 postmenopozal meme kanserli hasta (46–85 yaş) CYP19A1 geninin RS4646 polimorfizmleri için genotiplendirildi ve üç varyasyon tanımlandı. Toksisiteler her takipteki tıbbi muayenede kaydedildi ve Advers Olaylar için Ortak Terminoloji Kriterleri ile uyumlu olarak sınıflandırıldı.Yirmi dört (%53,3) hasta GG, 19’u (%42,2) GT ve 2’si (%4,4) TT genotipi gösterdi. Aİ tedavisi 35 hasta (%77,8) için Anastrozol ve diğerleri (n=10; %22,2) için Letrozol idi. Osteoporoz, GG genotipi ile anlamlı olarak ilişkiliydi (p=0,001). Tedaviye devam etmeme (TD) 6 olguda (%13,3) görüldü. Yaşa ve Aİ tedavisine göre düzeltildiğinde, TD’yi öngörebilecek tek parametre şiddetli artralji/miyalji oluşumu idi (Odds Oranı, OR=23,75; p=0,009).Bulgularımız CYP19A1 polimorfik varyantların Aİ ile ilişkili yan etkiler geliştirme duyarlılığını etkileyebileceğini düşündürmektedir. Aİ bazlı terapilerin advers etkilerini öngörmede aromataz gen (CYP19A1) polimorfizminin rolünü doğrulamak için ileri prospektif çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Fecal incontinence surgery is still young, associated with elevated morbidity and with variable long-term outcomes (Findlay and Maxwell-Armstrong Int J Colorectal Dis 26: 265–273, 2011). Artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) is still considered an optional surgical treatment together after conservative and less-invasive surgical procedures failure.

The purpose of this study was to examine the longitudinal relationship between Positivity (POS), defined as a stable disposition to view at experience under a positive outlook, and physical and psychological functioning in a sample of cancer patients immediately after diagnosis and one year later.A total of 110 patients (40% males) with pulmonary, colorectal and breast cancer, aged 30-75 (M age = 59.62; SD = 10.33), have been prospectively enrolled between 2012 and 2013, at the S. Andrea Hospital in Rome. All patients were previously aware of their diagnosis. A follow-up one year after diagnosis was conducted. We used structural equation modeling in order to analyse the specific effects of POS on functioning impairment from diagnosis to follow up.POS was associated with less functioning impairment both at diagnosis and follow-up assessments. Furthermore, POS level at diagnosis continued to be associated with less functioning impairment one year later, after controlling for its stability.Patients with higher level of POS tended to report less symptoms associated with negative affect such as anxiety and despondency and to preserve their habitual relationships and social roles. POS may act as a basic disposition that sustains patients' efforts to deal efficaciously with severe illness, by complying with medical treatment and using cognitive strategies that enable individuals to cope with concurrent and prospective challenges of illness.

Background The role of preoperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases is still highly controversial. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current evidence on this topic. Methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies published from January 2003 up to and including January 2014 regarding patients with initially resectable colorectal liver metastases. Data were examined for information about indications, operation, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, perioperative results, and survival. Results Fourteen retrospective studies published between 2003 and 2014 satisfied the inclusion criteria, including 1607 patients who underwent pre-operative chemotherapy and liver resection (NEO-CHT group), and 1785 patients submitted to hepatectomy with or without post-operative chemotherapy (SURG group). Postoperative mortality rates ranged from 0 to 5% in the NEO-CHT group and from 0 to 4% in SURG group. Complications ranged from 7 to 63% in both groups. Adopted pre-operative chemotherapy protocols were highly heterogeneous. The 5-year overall survival rates ranged from 38.9 to 74% in the NEO-CHT group and from 20.7 to 56% in the SURG group, with no significant difference in seven of eight studies. Discussion This review shows that there is a lack of clear evidence on the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable colorectal metastases in the literature. The majority of studies were retrospective and there was high heterogeneity among them in the treatment protocols. The EORTC 40983 trial and the majority of retrospective studies did not find any overall survival advantage in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Additional high-quality studies (randomized) are needed to shed light on this topic.

Background About 10% of pancreatic cancer patients are aged ≤50 at diagnosis and defined as Early Onset Pancreatic Cancer (EOPC). There is limited information regarding risk factors for EOPC occurrence and their outcome. Aim To investigate risk factors, presentation features and outcome of EOPC patients. Methods Consecutive, histologically confirmed, pancreatic cancer patients enrolled. Data regarding environmental and genetic risk factors, clinical and pathological information, treatment and survival were recorded. EOPC patients (aged ≤50 at diagnosis) were compared to older subjects. Results Twenty-five of 293 patients (8.5%) had EOPC. There was no difference regarding sex distribution, medical conditions and alcohol intake between EOPC and older subjects. EOPC patients were more frequently current smokers (56% vs 28% p = 0.001) and started smoking at a significantly lower mean age (19.8 years, 95%CI 16.7–22.9) as compared to older patients (26.1, 95%CI 24.2–28) (p = 0.001). Current smoking (OR 7.5; 95%CI 1.8–30; p = 0.004) and age at smoking initiation (OR 0.8 for every increasing year; 95%CI 0.7–0.9; p = 0.01) were significant and independent risk factors for diagnosis of EOPC. There were no differences regarding genetic syndromes and pancreatic cancer family history. EOCP presented less frequently with jaundice (16% vs 44%, p = 0.006) and had a higher rate of unresectable disease, albeit not significantly (84% vs 68%, p = 0.1). EOPC patients were more frequently fit for surgery or chemotherapy than their counterpart, resulting in similar stage-specific survival probability. Conclusion EOPC seems related to active and early smoking but not to familial syndromes. Young patients display aggressive disease but not worse outcome.

Background & Aims: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends a colectomy in presence of high risk T1 colon polyps considering the risk of incomplete lymph node dissection or presence of residual disease. We evaluated the outcomes of segmental versus standard colon resection for high risk T1 colon cancers, in order to demonstrate if segmental colectomy (SegCR) allows same short-term and oncological results compared to standard radical colectomy (StaCR).Methods. A matched case-control study on patients who had undergone segmental versus standard colon resection was performed. One-hundred and two patients with high risk T1 colon cancer after endoscopic polypectomy, divided in 2 homogeneous groups of 51 cases, were analyzed, and intra-operative, post-operative and oncological data were compared.Results. Segmental colectomy allowed less operative time and intra-operative blood loss compared to StaCR (p < 0.001). Hospital stay after SegCR was shorter compared to StaCR (p < 0.001). No differences were found in terms of overall morbidity and mortality rates. Five-year actuarial overall, disease-free and disease-specific survival after StaCR were similar to SegCR (87%, 96% and 95% vs. 88%, 97% and 94%, respectively, p = 0.51, p=0.33, p=0.78).Conclusions. According to our findings, SegCR can be a valid alternative to StaCR for high risk T1 colon polyps. Segmental colectomy allows better peri-operative outcomes compared to StaCR ensuring the same oncological long-term outcomes.

Background and aims Survival after surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is poor. Several prognostic factors such as the status of the resection margin, lymph node status, or tumour grading have been identified. The aims of the present study were to evaluate and compare the prognostic assessment of different lymph nodes staging methods: standard lymph node (pN) staging, metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in pancreatic cancer after pancreatic resection. Materials and methods Data were retrospectively collected from 143 patients who had undergone R0 pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Survival curves (Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models), accuracy, and homogeneity of the 3 methods (LNR, LODDS, and pN) were compared to evaluate the prognostic effects. Results Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LODDS and LNR were an independent prognostic factors, but not pN classification. The scatter plots of the relationship between LODDS and the LNR suggested that the LODDS stage had power to divide patients with the same ratio of node metastasis into different groups. For patients in each of the pN or LNR classifications, significant differences in survival could be observed among patients in different LODDS stages. Conclusion LODDS and LNR are more powerful predictors of survival than the lymph node status in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. LODDS allows better prognostic stratification comparing LNR in node negative patients.

Nodal status is an important prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer. Log odds of positive nodes (LODDS) (log of the ratio between the number of positive nodes and the number of negative nodes) are a new effective indicator of prognosis. The aim of the study is to evaluate if LODDS are superior to N stage and lymph nodal ratio (LNR). Prognostic efficacy of pN, nodal ratio, and LODDS was analyzed and compared in a group of 177 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative gastrectomy. pT, pN, LNR, and LODDS were all significantly correlated with 5-year survival. Multivariate analyses showed significant values as prognostic factor for pN, LNR, and LODDS. A Pearson test demonstrated no significant correlation between LODDS and retrieved nodes. In patients with less than 15 examined nodes, LODDS classification and pN were significantly correlated with survival, whereas LNR classification was not significantly related. LODDS are not correlated with the extension of the lymphadenectomy and are able to predict survival even if less than 15 nodes are examined. They permit an effective prognostic stratification of patients with a nodal ratio approaching 0 and 1. Further studies are needed to clarify their role and if they are capable of guaranteeing some advantages over pN and LNR.

Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is a complex procedure, offered to selected patients at institutions highly experienced with the procedure. It is still not clear if this approach may enhance patient recovery and reduce postoperative complications comparing to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), as demonstrated for other abdominal procedures. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies comparing MIPD and OPD. Perioperative outcomes (e.g., morbidity and mortality, pancreatic fistula rates, blood loss) constituted the study end points. Metaanalyses were performed using a random-effects model. Results For the metaanalysis, 8 studies including 204 patients undergoing MIPD and 419 patients undergoing OPD were considered suitable. The patients in the two groups were similar with respect to age, sex and histological diagnosis, and different with respect to tumor size, rate of pylorus preservation, and type of pancreatic anastomosis. There were no statistically significant differences between MIPD and OPD regarding development of delayed gastric emptying (DGE), pancreatic fistula, wound infection, or rates of reoperation and overall mortality. MIDP resulted in lower post-operative complication rates, less intra-operative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, lower blood transfusion rates, higher numbers of harvested lymph nodes, and improved negative margin status rates. However, MIPD was associated with longer operating times when compared to OPD. Conclusions The MIPD procedure is feasible, safe, and effective in selected patients. MIPD may have some potential advantages over OPD, and should be performed and further developed by use in selected patients at highly experienced medical centers.

To report a meta-analysis of the studies that compared the laparoscopic with the open approach for colon cancer resection.Forty-seven manuscripts were reviewed, 33 of which employed for meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. The results were differentiated according to the study design (prospective randomized trials vs case-control series) and according to the tumor's location. Outcome measures included: (1) short-term results (operating times, blood losses, bowel function recovery, post-operative pain, return to the oral intake, complications and hospital stay); (2) oncological adequateness (number of nodes harvested in the surgical specimens); and (3) long-term results (including the survivals' rates and incidence of incisional hernias) and (4) costs.Meta-analysis of trials provided evidences in support of the laparoscopic procedures for a several short-term outcomes including: a lower blood loss, an earlier recovery of the bowel function, an earlier return to the oral intake, a shorter hospital stay and a lower morbidity rate. Opposite the operating time has been confirmed shorter in open surgery. The same trend has been reported investigating case-control series and cancer by sites, even though there are some concerns regarding the power of the studies in this latter field due to the small number of trials and the small sample of patients enrolled. The two approaches were comparable regarding the mean number of nodes harvested and long-term results, even though these variables were documented reviewing the literature but were not computable for meta-analysis. The analysis of the costs documented lower costs for the open surgery, however just few studies investigated the incidence of post-operative hernias.Laparoscopy is superior for the majority of short-term results. Future studies should better differentiate these approaches on the basis of tumors' location and the post-operative hernias.

Tailgut cysts, also known as retrorectal cystic hamartomas, are congenital lesions derived by an abnormal remnant of the postanal primitive hindgut, consisting of unilocular or multilocular cysts usually lined by squamous, transitional, or glandular epithelium. Malignant transformation is an uncommon event, and it mainly involves the neuroendocrine or glandular epithelium; other histotypes are sporadic. Here, we report, for the first time, the clinicopathological features of a transitional cell carcinoma that arose in a tailgut cyst.

Laparoscopic surgery is recognized as an established technique for several abdominal disorders. Aim of the present investigation was to assess the level of expertise of senior residents and to evaluate the role of the animal model on advanced laparoscopic training.Overall, 60 residents underwent a training session on a porcine model under the guidance of experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Of these, 30 residents underwent a box-trainer preparation before starting the surgical procedure on the animal model, while a group of 20 repeated the course 3 months after the first session. Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) was used to evaluate technical proficiency.Senior residents presented low mean scores for all the GOALS domains for both for the minor and major surgical procedure. The box-trainer led to an improvement in suturing skills (P0.001). Comparison of the mean GOALS scores from the first to the second laparoscopic session demonstrated a significant improvement on the duration of the procedures (P0.05), onset of major complications (P=0.01), need of the tutor (P=0.08), and confidence in treating intraoperative bleeding (P=0.01).National Resident Training Programs should take into consideration the present quality of training and attempt to develop alternative methods of training for laparoscopic surgery, such as, the animal model laboratory.

Background. The prognosis of gastric cancer patients still remains poor. The aim of this study was investigating the prognostic value of several clinical/pathological/molecular features in a consecutive series of gastric cancers.Methods. 150 R0 gastrectomies plus 77 gastric cancer patients evaluated for the HER2 overexpression were selected. Survival was calculated and patients stratified according to the stage, the T-stage, the LNRs, the LNH, and the HER2 scoring system. ROC curves were calculated in order to compare the performance of the LRN and LNH systems.Results. Prognosis correlated with the stage and with the T-stage. We documented a statistical correlation between the LNRs and the survival. Conversely, a LNH > 15 did not correlate with the outcomes. The ROC curves documented a significant performance of the LRN system, whereas a statistical correlation was documented for the LNH exclusively with the endpoint of disease-free survival. We documented a trend of worse prognosis for patients with an HER2 overexpression, even though it was not of statistical value.Conclusion. The LNR and the evaluation of the HER2 overexpression might be useful since they correlate with survival, might identify patients with a higher risk of recurrence, and might select patients for a tailored medical treatment.

Background Morbidity and mortality rates after pancreatic resection still remain high. The surgical Apgar score (SAS) has been recently introduced as predictive value of perioperative outcomes after pancreatic surgery. Aim of the study was to detect significant parameters affecting post-operative outcomes in pancreatic surgery, and to evaluate the role of SAS in predicting morbidity, pancreatic fistulas and mortality. Materials and methods Data were collected from 143 patients who had undergone pancreatic resection for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma. Pre-operative and intra-operative parameters were statistically analyzed to evaluate their potential prognostic effects. Results A low SAS ( p = 0.001), hypo-albuminemia ( p = 0.003), and the need for blood transfusions ( p = 0.05) were significant independent predictors of postoperative morbidity. The SAS was demonstrated to significantly predict major complications ( p = 0.001) surgical site infections ( p = 0.001) and mortality ( p = 0.001). Conclusion The SAS provides a simple, immediate, and objective means of measuring patient outcomes in surgery. This score should be used to identify patients at high risk of major complications and death after pancreatic surgery and may be useful to optimize the use of postoperative critical care beds and hospital resources.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) is an effective option for the treatment of various colorectal conditions. However, its implementation in surgical practice is still limited, and there are no clear guidelines for residency training requirements or evaluation of the level of expertise. The aim of this study was to assess the level of practical expertise of senior residents regarding LCRS in an animal porcine model. At the Department of Biosciences of Rome, Tecnopolo of Castel Romano, 50 senior residents underwent training sessions on a porcine model under the direction of attending laparoscopic surgeons. A total of 20 residents underwent box trainer preparation before starting the surgical procedure on the animal model; and a group of 6 repeated the course 3 months after the first session. Overall, 90 % of the residents needed help during the surgical procedures, and only 9 residents (18 %) showed a high level of confidence when performing the surgery. Video-trainer preparation helped residents increase their laparoscopic ability (p = 0.04). Residents who attended two training courses showed significant improvement regarding the duration of the procedures, rate of complications, and the need of a tutor. The study demonstrated that the experience of senior surgical residents in regard to performing LCRS is less than ideal. A national training program should carefully consider the present quality of training in Italy and attempt to develop and integrate alternative methods for teaching laparoscopic surgery, perhaps by having an animal model laboratory.

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, T4 colon cancers have been sub-divided into T4a and T4b, resulting in a stage II sub-classification (T3N0, T4aN0, and T4bN0). This study was aimed: (a) to investigate the impact of the AJCC 7th edition stage II sub-classification on the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of colon cancer patients who underwent surgical resection and (b) to compare the last three AJCC editions for identifying stage II patients with high-risk of progression. One hundred seventy-eight stage II colon cancers out of 682 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection were selected. T4N0 were sub-divided in accordance with the AJCC 7th edition. Mean follow-up was 41.9 months. Kaplan–Meier method was employed to estimate the survival curves. OS analysis documented a significant difference between stage-sub-groups using the 6th edition; conversely, this difference was not seen if the 7th edition was applied (p = 0.03 and 0.12, respectively). Stage II DFS analysis reported a significant difference using both the AJCC 6th and 7th editions (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). A significant difference was reported on stage II DSS analysis using the AJCC 6th edition (p = 0.03); however, when the 7th edition was applied, a substantial discrepancy between survival curves was noted with T3N0 and T4aN0 displaying similar outcomes (p = 0.006). The AJCC 7th edition is a reliable classification that might implement the identification of those stage II colon cancer patients with high-risk of progression, recurrence, and cancer mortality.

Background Current international guidelines on colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment suggest performing adjuvant chemotherapy only in Stage II patients presenting with high-risk prognostic factors. Aim of the study was to a the impact of these parameters on the survival of Stage IIa CRC patients, focusing on the prognostic value of the number of harvested lymph nodes (NHLN). Patients and Methods Out of 651 CRC patients undergoing surgical resection, 204 T3-N0-M0 were selected and reviewed. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were adapted for the evaluation of the prognostic factors. Results The 5 years actuarial DFS, DSS, and OS rates of patients with a NHLN >12 were significantly better compared to those of patients with a NHLN 12 was the only independent parameter of statistical significance influencing DFS, DSS, and OS. Conclusions According to our findings, the NHLN is the main predictor of survival in Stage IIa CRC patients. This would appear to suggest the need of a better stratification of Stage IIa CRC patients, sub-dividing patients with more or less than 12 NHLN. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012; 106:469–474. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

An association between hospital surgical volume and short- and long-term outcomes after pancreatic surgery has been demonstrated. Identification of specific factors contributing to this relationship is difficult. In this study, the authors evaluated if margin status can be identified as a measure of surgical quality, affecting overall survival, as a function of hospital pancreaticoduodenectomy volume. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Two models for analysis were created, dividing the 18 studies identified into quartiles and two quantiles based on the average annual hospital pancreatectomy volume. Regression modeling and analysis of variance were used to find an association between hospital volume, margin status, and survival. Increasing hospital volume was associated with a significantly increased negative margin status rate: 55 per cent for low-volume, 72 per cent for medium-volume, 74.3 per cent for high-volume, and 75.7 per cent for very high-volume centers ( P = 0.008). The negative margin status rates were 64 per cent and 75.1 per cent for volume centers with less and more than 12 pancreaticoduodenectomies/year, respectively ( P = 0.04). Low-volume centers negatively affected both margin positive resection and 5-year survival rates, compared with high-volume centers. Margin status rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy could, therefore, be considered a measure of quality for selection of hospitals dedicated to pancreatic surgery.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of perioperative death in surgical patients. A variety of clinical scoring systems have been developed to predict adverse cardiovascular events. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a sensitive and specific predictor of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and predicts first cardiovascular event and death in the general population. We present a prospective, single-center, observational cohort study of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and evaluate the role of BNP in predicting adverse cardiac events.A total of 205 patients were included in the study. All patients were assessed by a cardiological clinical evaluation, a 12-lead ECG report, and a preoperative and postoperative blood sample for plasmatic BNP assessment. The primary end point was the predictive power of preoperative BNP levels for adverse cardiac events until 30 days after discharge.Thirty-one of 205 (15%) patients had adverse cardiac events in the postoperative period up to 30 days after discharge. Five patients (2.4%) of these died of cardiac events. Preoperative BNP values were significantly increased in the 31 patients compared to the other patients in the postoperative period [mean = 112.93 pg/ml (range = 5-2,080) vs. 178.99 pg/ml (range = 5-3,980); median = 117 vs. 23 pg/ml; 95% CI = 49-181; p0.0001]. At logistic regression, a preoperative BNP value of36 pg/ml was the only effective predictor of adverse cardiac events.We have demonstrated that elevated preoperative BNP levels are independent predictors of adverse cardiac events in a cohort of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery in a general surgery department, and this is the first study about this specific cohort of patients.

Survival rates after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are poor; however, several tumor-related prognostic factors have been identified. There is increasing evidence that additional patient-related prognostic factors, such as ongoing systemic inflammatory response, are associated with poor outcomes in patients with common solid tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the modified glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Data were collected from 101 patients who had undergone pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Tumor and host factors were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate their potential prognostic effects.An elevated mGPS was associated with lower overall survival rate after pancreatic resection. The median actuarial survival rate for patients with an mGPS of 0, 1, or 2 was 37.2, 11.5, and 7.3, respectively (p = 0.0001). The Cox proportional hazards model, including all the parameters statistically significant at univariate analysis, demonstrated that mGPS, lymph node ratio (LNR), and positive resection margins were independent negative prognostic factorsMargin involvement, LNR, and the preoperative mGPS were identified as independent predictors of survival in patients undergoing potentially curative pancreatic resection. Based on the present results and existing validation literature, the mGPS should be included in the routine assessment of patients with pancreatic cancer to better stratify patients for entry into therapeutic trials.

The most frequent cause of treatment failure following surgery for gastric cancer is peritoneal metastasis. The ability to predict the likelihood of peritoneal recurrence should improve the therapeutic approach to gastric cancer. Cytological analysis of peritoneal washings is thought to be useful for direct detection of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCC) isolated during peritoneal washing in patients with gastric cancer, have been demonstrated to be significantly and independently related to the prognosis, influencing both early recurrence and poor survival, so that since 1998 the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC) recommend peritoneal wash cytology (PWC) for the local staging. In Western countries PWC is not uniform practice, because of several controversies regarding the low sensitivity rate of conventional cytology, the correct application of molecular diagnosis (immunostaining and RT_PCR) and the exact role of PWC in the clinical practice. The authors examine the current apply of peritoneal washing in gastric cancer, emphasizing the clinical implication of peritoneal cytology by analyzing the different modality and techniques to perform it (conventional cytology, immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR), when to achieve it during the diagnostic or clinical work-up (at the staging or during the surgical treatment), and who will get a benefit (all patients or selected patients).

Survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is poor. Several prognostic factors such as the status of the resection margin, lymph node status, or tumor grading have been identified. Aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio (LNR) for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Data were collected from 101 patients who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients were divided into four groups according to the absolute LNR (0, 0-0.199, 0.2-0.399,0.4). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic effect.The actuarial 3- and 5-year survival rates were 32 and 17%, respectively. The median survival was 19 months. Patients with LNR 0/0-0.199/0.2-0.399/0.4 survived 40.2/30.5/18.1, and 13.6 months, respectively (P = 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, lymph node status was not found to be a significant prognostic factor; on the contrary LNR0.2 (P = 0.007), positive resection margin (P = 0.001), and grading (P = 0.05) were significantly related to survival.LNR is a more powerful predictor of survival than the lymph node status in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma.