Search

Table of microinjected drugs

Microinjection of olaratumab does not inhibit PDGFRα, ERK, or S6 phosphorylation.

All adverse events reported on the study

Supplementary Legend

Distinct drug induced phenotypes and apoptotic responses specific to drug mechanism of action are seen at sites of CIVO microinjection.

Purpose:A persistent issue in cancer drug development is the discordance between robust antitumor drug activity observed in laboratory models and the limited benefit frequently observed when patients are treated with the same agents in clinical trials. Difficulties in accurately modeling the complexities of human tumors may underlie this problem. To address this issue, we developed Comparative In Vivo Oncology (CIVO), which enables in situ investigation of multiple microdosed drugs simultaneously in a patient's tumor. This study was designed to test CIVO's safety and feasibility in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS).Patients and Methods:We conducted a single arm, prospective, 13-patient pilot study. Patients scheduled for incisional biopsy or tumor resection were CIVO-injected 1 to 3 days prior to surgery. Saline or microdoses of anticancer agents were percutaneously injected into the tumor in a columnar fashion through each of eight needles. Following excision, drug responses were evaluated in the injected tissue.Results:The primary objective was met, establishing CIVO's feasibility and safety. Device-related adverse events were limited to transient grade 1 nonserious events. In addition, biomarker evaluation of localized tumor response to CIVO microinjected drugs by IHC or with NanoString GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler demonstrated consistency with known mechanisms of action of each drug, impact on the tumor microenvironment, and historic clinical activity.Conclusions:These results are an advance toward use of CIVO as a translational research tool for early evaluation of investigational agents and drug combinations in a novel approach to phase 0 trials.See related commentary by Sleijfer and Lolkema, p. 3897

Representative images of tumors from patients who received radiation treatment.

Device performance

Clinical Trial Design

Increased phosphorylation of PDGFR� and downstream effectors in an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma displaying a lack of apoptotic response to microdosed doxorubicin.

Purpose/Objectives: Tumor responses to cancer treatments are highly context-specific and often involve complex interactions between the anti-cancer therapy, genetically diverse tumor cells, and a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). All preclinical models fall short in capturing this complexity. CIVO (Comparative In Vivo Oncology) is an intratumoral microdose injection research tool intended to bridge the translational gap between preclinical and clinical studies by enabling in situ assessment of up to 8 oncology drugs or drug combinations simultaneously within a patient’s tumor. The CIVO Phase 0 model was established under FDA’s exploratory IND guidelines for microdosing. A Master Protocol was then developed, enabling ongoing evaluation of multiple investigational drugs and combinations without a need for stand-alone new protocols. Each investigational drug or combination is specified as a substudy of the Master Protocol, thus reducing administrative burden to clinical site staff and creating an infrastructure to ensure quality data and oversight of patient safety. This is a multi-center, open-label Phase 0 Master Protocol designed to study the localized pharmacodynamics (PD) of anti-cancer therapies within the TME when administered intratumorally in microdose quantities via the CIVO device. The safety of intratumoral microdose administration via the CIVO device will also be evaluated. Materials/Methods: Approximately 12 subjects are expected to be enrolled per substudy. All substudies will evaluate subjects ≥18 years with a diagnosis of solid tumors with scheduled surgical intervention. Eligible subjects have at least one lesion (primary or recurrent tumor or effaced metastatic lymph node) ≥2 cm in the shortest diameter that is surface accessible for CIVO injection. Each substudy will define the tumor type and specific eligibility criteria for enrollment. The study visits consist of screening, CIVO injection, surgical intervention, and two follow-up visits. All patients will be injected by the CIVO device containing microdose quantities of drugs specified in respective substudies. The CIVO device can be configured with 3, 5, or 8 needles and the device configuration will be assigned on a per-patient basis, dependent upon lesion size. Following surgical resection, the injected portion of the tumor will undergo central PD biomarker analysis. At the time of submission, the study is open for enrollment with 1 substudy enrolling Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) patients and 1 substudy enrolling HNSCC or soft tissue sarcoma patients. The Master Protocol was established to efficiently add substudies and accommodate evaluation of a wider repertoire of new agents in order to continually inform and de-risk drug development via the CIVO platform. Clinical trial information: NCT04541108. Citation Format: Karthik Rajasekaran, Jason G. Newman, Robert G. Maki, Thomas J. Ow, Vikas Mehta, Kenneth R. Gundle, Daniel R. Clayburgh, Ryan J. Li, Mercedes Porosnicu, Cherie-Ann O. Nathan, Alice Tang, Beryl A. Hatton, Kimberly H. Sottero, Gloria Kung, Marc O. Grenley, Kirsten Anderson, Richard A. Klinghoffer. A phase 0 master protocol utilizing a novel intratumoral microdosing approach for simultaneously evaluating multiple drugs and drug combinations in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT216.

Purpose/Objectives: The human tumor microenvironment (TME) has a dramatic impact on cancer prognosis and therapeutic response, but accurate models of the native TME do not exist. The Comparative In Vivo Oncology (CIVO) platform was developed as a means to assess the effect of investigational agents on the native TME in a Phase 0 microdosing study. CIVO was clinically validated using approved agents and is used for the first time here to assess the impact of an investigational agent - the SUMOylation inhibitor TAK-981 - on the native human TME in HNSCC. Materials/Methods: Eligible subjects have a confirmed HNSCC diagnosis, ECOG 0-2, and planned surgical resection. Injectable tumors were at the primary site or within cervical lymph nodes but had to be surface-accessible and ≥ 2cm. TAK-981 or control microdoses were simultaneously administered via a CIVO device and co-injected with a fluorescent tracking marker for injection site identification and visualization. Tumors were resected 24 or 72 hours after injection, processed, and then analyzed at a central site. Multiplexed biomarker staining and molecular profiling via GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling were performed to capture pharmacodynamic responses in the native TME. Results: As of January 2022, 8 subjects provided informed consent and were enrolled, and no adverse events associated with the injection procedure or microdoses have been reported. Biomarker analysis demonstrated TAK-981 distribution around the injection site accompanied by reduction of SUMOylation. Dose-dependent elevation of IFN1 signaling was also observed in TAK-981-exposed areas within the TME. Elevated IFN1 signaling was accompanied by TME reconfiguration, with increased macrophage M1 polarization and activation of dendritic cells, NK cells, and CD8+ T cells. TAK-981 exposure was also associated with upregulation of CXCL10, PD-L1, and an IFNγ gene expression signature predictive of response to immune checkpoint blockade. Conclusion: IT microdosing with CIVO provided early insights into complex functional responses induced by the investigational agent TAK-981 that can only be accurately evaluated in the intact, native TME of a patient’s tumor. SUMO pathway inhibition in HNSCC tumors following TAK-981 exposure led to functional activation of multiple immune cell types, effectively shifting the local TME toward an inflamed “hot” state, highlighting TAK-981’s potential as an immune stimulating agent for treating patients with solid tumors. These data were generated while TAK-981 was still in Phase I dose escalation trials (via IV administration), highlighting CIVO’s ability to safely study investigational agents. Further evaluation of TAK-981 alone and in combination with other agents is ongoing in this Phase 0 CIVO microdosing trial. Citation Format: Jeffrey Houlton, Harrison Cash, Haodong Xu, Paul L. Swiecicki, Keith Casper, Steven B. Chinn, Daniel R. Clayburgh, Ryan J. Li, Robert J. Christian, Aaron Halfpenny, Annemieke van Zante, Beryl A. Hatton, Kimberly Sottero, Marc O. Grenley, Connor Burns, Jason Frazier, Jonathan Derry, Gloria Kung, Emily Beirne, Nathan J. Schauer, Atticus Turner, Wendy Jenkins, Kirsten Anderson, Richard A. Klinghoffer, Dennis Huszar, Allison Berger, Karuppiah Kannan. Intratumoral (IT) microdosing of the investigational SUMOylation Inhibitor TAK-981 in a phase 0 CIVO trial demonstrates the reactivation of type I Interferon (IFN1) signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT139.

A persistent issue in cancer drug development is the discordance between robust antitumor drug activity observed in laboratory models and the limited benefit frequently observed when patients are treated with the same agents in clinical trials. Difficulties in accurately modeling the complexities of human tumors may underlie this problem. To address this issue, we developed ComparativeWe conducted a single arm, prospective, 13-patient pilot study. Patients scheduled for incisional biopsy or tumor resection were CIVO-injected 1 to 3 days prior to surgery. Saline or microdoses of anticancer agents were percutaneously injected into the tumor in a columnar fashion through each of eight needles. Following excision, drug responses were evaluated in the injected tissue.The primary objective was met, establishing CIVO's feasibility and safety. Device-related adverse events were limited to transient grade 1 nonserious events. In addition, biomarker evaluation of localized tumor response to CIVO microinjected drugs by IHC or with NanoString GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler demonstrated consistency with known mechanisms of action of each drug, impact on the tumor microenvironment, and historic clinical activity.These results are an advance toward use of CIVO as a translational research tool for early evaluation of investigational agents and drug combinations in a novel approach to phase 0 trials.

To facilitate decision making in the oncology clinic, technologies have recently been developed to independently inject and assess multiple anticancer agents directly in a patient's tumor. To increase the flexibility of this approach beyond histological readouts of response, contrast-enhanced MRI was evaluated for the detection of cell death in living tumors after injection.A six-needle arrayed microinjection device designed to provide head-to-head comparisons of chemotherapy responses in living tumors was used. Xenografted non-Hodgkin lymphoma tumors in athymic Nude-Foxn1(nu) mice were injected either with different doses of vincristine or with one needle each of vincristine, doxorubicin, bendamustine, prednisolone, mafosfamide, and a vehicle control. To assess drug responses, measurements of enhancement by T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI were made for individual sites at 24, 48, and 72 h after injection. For comparison, histological evaluations of cell death were obtained after tumor resection.Measurements of MRI enhancement at injection sites showed a significant (P 0.001) positive regression slope as a function of vincristine dose. Average MRI measurements were closely correlated with cell death by hematoxylin and eosin staining (R = 0.81; P = 0.001).Contrast-enhanced MRI has the potential to replace or augment histological analyses of tumor responses to microinjected doses of chemotherapy agents with potential application in selecting optimal chemotherapy regimens. Magn Reson Med 76:946-952, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

SummaryMany tissues in higher animals undergo dynamic homeostatic growth, wherein damaged or aged cells are replaced by the progeny of resident stem cells. To maintain homeostasis, stem cells must respond to tissue needs. Here we show that in response to damage or stress in the intestinal (midgut) epithelium of adult Drosophila, multiple EGFR ligands and rhomboids (intramembrane proteases that activate some EGFR ligands) are induced, leading to the activation of EGFR signaling in intestinal stem cells (ISCs). Activation of EGFR signaling promotes ISC division and midgut epithelium regeneration, thereby maintaining tissue homeostasis. ISCs defective in EGFR signaling cannot grow or divide, are poorly maintained, and cannot support midgut epithelium regeneration after enteric infection by the bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila. Furthermore, ISC proliferation induced by Jak/Stat signaling is dependent upon EGFR signaling. Thus the EGFR/Ras/MAPK signaling pathway plays central, essential roles in ISC maintenance and the feedback system that mediates intestinal homeostasis.