1. National Institutes of Health: Gender Differences in Radiology Funding
- Author
-
Leilynaz Malekafzali, Sadia R Qamar, Sunghan Jung, Marc Jutras, Priya Das, and Faisal Khosa
- Subjects
Male ,Prioritization ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Biomedical Research ,education ,Scopus ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Continuous variable ,03 medical and health sciences ,Sex Factors ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,health care economics and organizations ,Gender disparity ,Financing, Organized ,Nih funding ,United States ,National Institutes of Health (U.S.) ,Bibliometrics ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Portfolio ,Female ,Radiology ,Psychology - Abstract
Rationale and Objective Radiology has traditionally remained one of the most male-dominated specialties, although a higher proportion of women are now beginning to occupy roles as academic radiologists than their male counterparts. The present study investigated trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding within Diagnostic Radiology stratified by gender, and correlated with measures of academic output, including h-index. Materials and Methods Data on funding was obtained from the online NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditure and Results for fiscal years 2016–2019, and information regarding each Principal Investigator (PI) was obtained from the Scopus database and departmental websites. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed on collected data for statistical comparison of continuous variables. Results Of the 2929 grants included in this analysis, 1789 (61.07%) were awarded to male PIs and 1140 (38.9%) to female PIs. Among PIs holding a PhD degree, male PIs had a higher mean grant amount ($619,807.00) compared to female PIs ($158,486.00). Conclusion Although female representation within academic radiology has been increasing, the mean NIH grants awarded to women is less than that awarded to men. Reasons for this are numerous and may include differential prioritization of career objectives among men and women, although such rationalization is inevitably speculative in nature. Significant gender differences in NIH funding were seen at the PhD level, and the strongest correlation between NIH funding and academic output was observed for the h-index of female PIs. These results underscore the fact that women are ostensibly being held to a higher academic standard than men in terms of funding decisions.
- Published
- 2022