Search

Objectives: Chronic pain is a common symptom in Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS), affecting 11–60% of patients, but the link between COVID-19 and chronic pain remains unclear. This study assesses healthcare resource utilization (HRU) for pain management among French COVID-19 survivors, using the National French Claims Database (SNDS). We analyzed medical consultations, rehabilitation services, diagnostic procedures, and medication dispensing to identify PACS-related pain patterns and their impact on the healthcare system. Methods: The cohort included 68,822 patients hospitalized during the first COVID-19 wave (March–June 2020), with 13,939 ICU survivors. HRU was assessed for six months pre- and post-hospitalization in four areas: (1) medical consultations and rehabilitation; (2) pain-related medication dispensing; (3) neuropathic diagnostic procedures; (4) hospital admissions for chronic pain. A post–pre ratio (PP-Ratio) compared post-COVID to pre-COVID HRU. Results: Significant changes in HRU were observed, particularly for ICU survivors. Neurology consultations (PP-Ratio 1.41) and outpatient physical therapy (PP-Ratio 1.69) increased. Dispensing of strong opioids, antiepileptics, anxiolytics, and hypnotics rose, while NSAID use decreased. Hospitalizations for chronic pain also increased (PP-Ratio 1.52). Similar trends were seen among ICU survivors, with notable increases in opioid and antiepileptic use. No distinct PACS-related pain patterns emerged. Conclusions: Non-specific increases in HRU for pain management were found following COVID-19 hospitalization, likely due to disease severity and ICU care rather than PACS-related chronic pain. Further research is needed to explore long-term pain outcomes in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The contribution of occupational exposures to the cancer burden can be estimated using population-attributable fractions, which is of great importance for policy making. This paper reviews occupational carcinogens, and presents the most relevant risk relations to cancer in high-income countries using France as an example, to provide a framework for national estimation of cancer burden attributable to occupational exposure.Methods: Occupational exposures that should be included in cancer burden studies were evaluated using multiple criteria: classified as carcinogenic or probably carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs volumes 1-114, being a primary occupational exposure, historical and current presence of the exposure in France and the availability of exposure and risk relation data. Relative risk estimates were obtained from published systematic reviews and from the IARC Monographs.Results: Of the 118 group 1 and 75 group 2A carcinogens, 37 exposures and 73 exposure-cancer site pairs were relevant. Lung cancer was associated with the most occupational carcinogenic exposures (namely, 18), followed by bladder cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ionising radiation was associated with the highest number of cancer sites (namely, 20), followed by asbestos and working in the rubber manufacturing industry. Asbestos, bis(chloromethyl)ether, nickel and wood dust had the strongest effect on cancer, with relative risks above 5.Conclusions: A large number of occupational exposures continues to impact the burden of cancer in high-income countries such as France. Information on types of exposures, affected jobs, industries and cancer sites affected is key for prioritising policy and prevention initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Little is known about post-hospital health care resource use (HRU) of patients admitted for severe COVID-19, specifically for the care of patients with postacute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS)., Objective: A list of HRU domains and items potentially related to PACS was defined, and potential PACS-related HRU (PPRH) was compared between the pre- and post-COVID-19 periods, to identify new outpatient care likely related to PACS., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with the French National Health System claims data (SNDS). All patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between February 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020 were described and investigated for 6 months, using discharge date as index date. Patients who died during index stay or within 30 days after discharge were excluded. PPRH was assessed over the 5 months from day 31 after index date to end of follow-up, that is, for the post-COVID-19 period. For each patient, a pre-COVID-19 period was defined that covered the same calendar time in 2019, and pre-COVID-19 PPRH was assessed. Post- or pre- ratios (PP ratios) of the percentage of users were computed with their 95% CIs, and PP ratios>1.2 were considered as "major HRU change.", Results: The final study population included 68,822 patients (median age 64.8 years, 47% women, median follow-up duration 179.3 days). Altogether, 23% of the patients admitted due to severe COVID-19 died during the hospital stay or within the 6 months following discharge. A total of 8 HRU domains were selected to study PPRH: medical visits, technical procedures, dispensed medications, biological analyses, oxygen therapy, rehabilitation, rehospitalizations, and nurse visits. PPRs showed novel outpatient care in all domains and in most items, without specificity, with the highest ratios observed for the care of thoracic conditions., Conclusions: Patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 during the initial pandemic wave had high morbi-mortality. The analysis of HRU domains and items most likely to be related to PACS showed that new care was commonly initiated after discharge but with no specificity, potentially suggesting that any impact of PACS was part of the overall high HRU of this population after hospital discharge. These purely descriptive results need to be completed with methods for controlling for confusion bias through subgroup analyses., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05073328; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05073328., (©Mikhail Dziadzko, Manon Belhassen, Eric Van Ganse, Fabrice Heritier, Marjorie Berard, Claire Marant-Micallef, Frederic Aubrun. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 11.09.2024.)