Search

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the need for making testing readily available was recognized as an important factor for individuals to help make informed decisions, including to isolate or seek care, and for policymakers to control transmission. Toward this end, FIND and the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator funded 16 rapid operational research studies and one implementation project in Africa, the Caribbean, and Asia evaluating the utility, acceptability, and feasibility of different community-based SARS-CoV-2 testing approaches. Here, we discuss common factors and challenges encountered during study implementation. We note six key factors essential for success: 1) collaboration and partnerships; 2) buy-in of local stakeholders, including communities; 3) access to affordable supplies; 4) flexible financing; 5) effective approval systems; and 6) a skilled and motivated workforce. We also note various challenges that must be addressed to fully capitalize on these success factors. In particular, ethics committees are often not well equipped to assess operational research during outbreaks. Outbreaks, especially of novel pathogens, are unpredictable, and transmission dynamics are even more likely to change if the pathogen is prone to frequent mutations, such as SARS-CoV-2. Research that aims to evaluate strategies for curbing transmission must hence be easily and swiftly adaptable. This requires flexibility from researchers, funders, staff conducting the studies, and ethics and other approval committees. International guidelines for evaluating operational research protocols in outbreaks are needed to provide timely evidence to enable informed decisions by individuals, communities, and policymakers, thereby reducing both the human and the economic impact of outbreaks.

Objectives: Assess whether near-point-of-care (POC) viral load testing at the first antenatal care visit (ANC1) increased the proportion of women taking antiretroviral therapy who were virally suppressed at delivery through expedited clinical action., Design: Difference-in-difference analysis., Methods: At 20 public sector facilities in Zimbabwe, 10 implemented near-POC viral load testing at ANC1 (August 2019 to November 2020) and 10 used centralized viral load testing at ANC1. Study endpoints included time to result received, clinical action, and unsuppressed viral load (UVL; >1000 copies/ml) at delivery., Results: Of 1782 women, only 46% came for ANC1 before their third trimester. Preimplementation, 28% of women received viral load testing at ANC1, increasing to 86% during implementation. In the near-POC viral load arm, women were more likely to receive their result within 30 days of ANC1 sample collection compared with the centralized laboratory arm [54 versus 14%, relative risk (RR): 4.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82-9.55], as well as receive clinical action among those with UVL (63 versus 8%, RR 7.88; 95% CI 1.53-40.47). However, we did not observe significant changes in risk of UVL at delivery with near-POC viral load (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95-1.10)., Conclusion: ANC1 viral load coverage was initially low. Near-POC viral load testing at ANC1 dramatically improved the timeliness of result receipt by patients and clinical action for those with an UVL. Although we did not observe a significant impact of provision of near-POC viral load at ANC1 on re-suppression at delivery, potentially because of late presentation for ANC1, continued near-POC viral load testing during pregnancy and delivery may reduce UVL and mother-to-child transmission risk., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cervical cancer screening programs that use visual inspection with acetic acid to identify women with pre-cancerous lesions in Zimbabwe have had limited success due to challenges with human resource constraints and patient acceptability. Nucleic acid amplification tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) have been endorsed by the World Health Organization for cervical cancer screening, along with self-collection of samples. As evidence shows self-collected sampling to be acceptable and preferable, Zimbabwe's Ministry of Health and Child Care (MOHCC) required a comparative analysis on the agreement between self- and clinician-collected samples for testing with Hologic Aptima HPV mRNA assay, to determine if self-collected samples could be used as another method to increase coverage of cervical cancer screening programs., Methods: In four public health facilities in Zimbabwe from July to August 2020, self- and clinician-collected HPV samples were obtained from HIV-positive women aged 30-49 years for HPV testing., Results: A total of 280 self- and clinician-collected samples were tested and results were found to have good agreement (κ: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.82). HPV prevalence was 43.0% (95% CI: 37.0%-49.3%) for self-samples and 48.0% (95% CI: 41.0%-54.2%) for clinician-samples., Conclusions: Self-collected sampling had good agreement with clinician-collected and its inclusion in the national cervical cancer screening policy by Zimbabwe's MOHCC is expected to increase testing coverage, especially among underserved communities such as women living with HIV, as well as decentralize access to cervical cancer screening services for lower-level facilities and increase the geographical scope of where HPV testing can be offered through the country., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Near-point-of-care (POC) testing for early infant diagnosis (EID) and viral load expedites clinical action and improves outcomes but requires capital investment. We assessed whether excess capacity on existing near-POC devices used for TB diagnosis could be leveraged to increase near-POC HIV molecular testing, termed integrated testing, without compromising TB services., Design: Preimplementation/postimplementation studies in 10 health facilities in Malawi and 8 in Zimbabwe., Methods: Timeliness of EID and viral load test results and clinical action were compared between centralized and near-POC testing using Somers' D tests (continuous indicators) and risk ratios (RR, binary indicators); TB testing/treatment rates and timeliness were analyzed preintegration/postintegration., Results: With integration, average device utilization increased but did not exceed 55%. Despite the addition of HIV testing, TB test volumes, timeliness, and treatment initiations were maintained. Although few HIV-positive infants were identified, near-POC EID testing improved treatment initiation within 1 month by 57% compared with centralized EID [Malawi RR: 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-2.52], and near-POC viral load testing significantly increased the proportion of patients with elevated viral load receiving clinical action within 1 month (Zimbabwe RR: 5.26, 95% CI 3.38-8.20; Malawi RR: 3.90, 95% CI 2.58-5.91)., Conclusion: Integrating TB/HIV testing using existing multidisease platforms is feasible and enables increased access to rapid diagnostics without disrupting existing TB services. Our results serve as an example of a novel, efficient implementation model that can increase access to critical testing services across disease silos and should be considered for additional clinical applications., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Point-of-care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing has been shown to dramatically decrease turnaround times from sample collection to caregiver result receipt and time to ART initiation for HIV-positive infants compared to centralized laboratory testing. As governments in sub-Saharan Africa implement POC EID technologies, we report on the feasibility and effectiveness of POC EID testing and the impact of same-day result delivery on rapid ART initiation within national programmes across six countries., Methods: This pre-/post-evaluation compared centralized laboratory-based (pre) with POC (post) EID testing in 52 facilities across Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal and Zimbabwe between April 2017 and October 2019 (country-dependent). Data were collected retrospectively from routine records at health facilities for all infants tested under two years of age. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare time-to-event outcomes, visualized with Kaplan-Meier curves, and the Somers' D test was used to compare continuous outcomes., Results: Data were collected for 2892 EID tests conducted on centralized laboratory-based platforms and 4610 EID tests on POC devices with 127 (4%) and 192 (4%) HIV-positive infants identified, respectively. POC EID significantly reduced the time from sample collection to caregiver result receipt (POC median: 0 days, IQR: 0 to 0 vs. centralized: 35 days, IQR: 26 to 56) and time from sample collection to ART initiation for HIV-positive infants (POC median: 1 day, IQR: 0 to 7 vs. centralized: 39 days, IQR: 26 to 57). With POC testing, 72% of infants received results on the same day as sample collection; HIV-positive infants with a same-day diagnosis had six times the rate of ART initiation compared to those diagnosed one or more days after sample collection (HR: 6.39; 95% CI: 3.44 to 11.85)., Conclusions: Same-day diagnosis and treatment initiation for infants is possible with POC EID within routine government-led and -supported public sector healthcare facilities in resource-limited settings. Given that POC EID allows for rapid ART initiation, aligning to the World Health Organization's recommendation of ART initiation within seven days, its use in public sector programmes has the potential to reduce overall mortality for infants with HIV through early treatment initiation., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.)

Introduction: In many low- and middle-income countries, HIV viral load (VL) testing occurs at centralized laboratories and time-to-result-delivery is lengthy, preventing timely monitoring of HIV treatment adherence. Near point-of-care (POC) devices, which are placed within health facility laboratories rather than clinics themselves (i.e. "true" POC), can offer VL in conjunction with centralized laboratories to expedite clinical decision making and improve outcomes, especially for patients at high risk of treatment failure. We assessed impacts of near-POC VL testing on result receipt and clinical action in public sector programmes in Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Malawi, Senegal, Tanzania and Zimbabwe., Methods: Routine health data were collected retrospectively after introducing near-POC VL testing at 57 public sector health facilities (2017 to 2019, country-dependent). Where possible, key indicators were compared to data from patients receiving centralized laboratory testing using hazard ratios and the Somers' D test., Results: Data were collected from 6795 tests conducted on near-POC and 17614 tests on centralized laboratory-based platforms. Thirty-one percent (2062/6694) of near-POC tests were conducted for high-risk populations: pregnant and breastfeeding women, children and those with suspected failure. Compared to conventional testing, near-POC improved the median time from sample collection to return of results to patient [six vs. sixty-eight days, effect size: -32.2%; 95% CI: -41.0% to -23.4%] and to clinical action for individuals with an elevated HIV VL [three vs. fourty-nine days, effect size: -35.4%; 95% CI: -46.0% to -24.8%]. Near-POC VL results were two times more likely to be returned to the patient within 90 days compared to centralized tests [50% (1781/3594) vs. 27% (4172/15271); aHR: 2.22, 95% CI: 2.05 to 2.39]. Thirty-seven percent (340/925) of patients with an elevated near-POC HIV VL result had documented clinical follow-up actions within 30 days compared to 7% (167/2276) for centralized testing., Conclusions: Near-POC VL testing enabled rapid test result delivery for high-risk populations and led to significant improvements in the timeliness of patient result receipt compared to centralized testing. While there was some improvement in time-to-clinical action with near-POC VL testing, major gaps remained. Strengthening of systems supporting the utilization of results for patient management are needed to truly capitalize on the benefits of decentralized testing., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.)

Background: HIV Viral Load and Early Infant Diagnosis technologies in many high burden settings are restricted to centralized laboratory testing, leading to long result turnaround times and patient attrition. GeneXpert (Cepheid, CA, USA) is a polyvalent near point-of-care platform and is widely implemented for Xpert MTB/RIF diagnosis. This study sought to evaluate the operational feasibility of integrated HIV VL, EID and MTB/RIF testing in new GeneXpert platforms., Methods: Whole blood samples were collected from consenting patients due for routine HIV VL testing and DBS samples from infants due for EID testing, at three rural health facilities in Zimbabwe. Sputum samples were collected from all individuals suspected of TB. GeneXpert testing was reserved for all EID, all TB suspects and priority HIV VL at each site. Blood samples were further sent to centralized laboratories for confirmatory testing. GeneXpert polyvalent testing results and patient outcomes, including infrastructural and logistical requirements are reported. The study was conducted over a 10-month period., Results: The fully automated GeneXpert testing device, required minimal training and biosafety considerations. A total of 1,302 HIV VL, 277 EID and 1,581 MTB/RIF samples were tested on a four module GeneXpert platform in each study site. Xpert HIV-1 VL testing was prioritized for patients who presented with advanced HIV disease, pregnant women, adolescents and suspected ART failures patients. On average, the study sites had a GeneXpert utilization rate of 50.4% (Gutu Mission Hospital), 63.5% (Murambinda Mission Hospital) and 17.5% (Chimombe Rural Health Centre) per month. GeneXpert polyvalent testing error rates remained lower than 4% in all sites. Decentralized EID and VL testing on Xpert had shorter overall median TAT (1 day [IQR: 0-4] and 1 day [IQR: 0-1] respectively) compared to centralized testing (17 days [IQR: 13-21] and 26 days [IQR: 23-32] respectively). Among patients with VL >1000 copies/ml (73/640; 11.4%) at GMH health facility, median time to enhanced adherence counselling was 8 days and majority of those with documented outcomes had re-suppressed VL (20/32; 62.5%). Median time to ART initiation among Xpert EID positive infants at GMH was 1 day [IQR: 0-1]., Conclusion: Implementation of near point-of-care GeneXpert platform for integrated multi-disease testing within district and sub-district healthcare settings is feasible and will increase access to VL, and EID testing to priority populations. Quality management systems including monitoring of performance indicators, together with regular on-site supervision are crucial, and near-POC test results must be promptly actioned-on by clinicians for patient management.