Search

BACKGROUND: Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone has shown improved progression-free and overall survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We aimed to assess these regimens in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: ELOQUENT-1 is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 185 hospitals, oncology practices, and research centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated, symptomatic myeloma and not candidates for high-dose therapy plus HSCT, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone using an interactive voice response system, stratified by the International Staging System (ISS; stage I-II vs III), age (

Background: Eflapegrastim (Rolontis®, Efla) is a long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), consisting of a recombinant human G-CSF analog conjugated to a human IgG4 Fc fragment via a short polyethylene glycol linker. Efla is not a biosimilar and represents the first myeloid growth factor innovation in more than 15 years. In preclinical studies with chemotherapy-induced neutropenic rats, Efla showed ~3-fold higher exposure in serum and higher exposure in bone marrow at similar doses compared to pegfilgrastim (Peg). The duration of neutropenia (DN) was shown to be significantly shorter with Efla vs Peg when administered on the same day or 24-hours post-chemotherapy. Additionally, the DN after Efla administered on the same day as chemotherapy was similar to the DN 24 hours post-chemotherapy. Moreover, in two Phase 3 studies that randomized a total of 643 patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) to either Efla (3.6 mg G-CSF n=314) or Peg (6 mg G-CSF n=329) given ~ 24 hours after docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC), the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) was statistically noninferior in patients treated with Efla compared to Peg. As a standard of practice, G-CSF products require administration 24 hours after chemotherapy. Since Efla preclinical and clinical results suggest that the increased activity of Efla may provide effective prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia when administered on the same day as chemotherapy, the purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of giving Efla same-day (at 3 different dosing timepoints) in patients receiving TC for the treatment of ESBC. Study Design and Methods : This is a randomized, schedule finding, multicenter, Phase 1, open-label study evaluating the same-day administration of 13.2 mg/0.6 mL Efla following IV infusion of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) in patients with ESBC. Treatment: On Cycle 1, Day 1, patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to Efla dose administration schedules of 0.5, 3, and 5 hours after TC. In Cycles 2-4, Efla will be administered ~ 24 hours following the administration of TC for all treatment arms. Clinical Endpoints: The primary endpoint is DSN (ANC Inclusion Criteria: This study is enrolling histologically confirmed (operable stage I-IIIA) patients with ESBC, who are >18 years of age, are candidates for neoadjuvant or adjuvant TC, have an ECOG of Exclusion Criteria: Patients will be excluded if they have an active or concurrent malignancy, or locally recurrent/metastatic or bilateral breast cancer, a life-threatening disease, a known sensitivity or previous reaction to E. coli derived products, exposure to a G-CSF agent within 3 months, history of bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, radiotherapy or surgery within 30 days, are pregnant or are breast-feeding. Statistical Methods: A sample size of 15 patients per dosing schedule arm was determined to provide adequate precision for the 95% CI of the DSN and secondary endpoints, including PK parameters, assuming a standard deviation of 1.0 days based on the prior studies. A safety evaluation will be performed once the first three patients in each arm have completed Cycle 1. Target Accrual: 45 patients (15 subjects/arm). Enrollment began in April 2020. Disclosures Schwartzberg: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: clinical investigator for trial. Francis:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: clinical investigator for trial. Osama:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: clinical investigator for trial. Modiano:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: clinical investigator for trial. Bharadwaj:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: clinical investigator for trial. Chawla:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bhat:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lebel:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tchekmedyian:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: clinical investigator for trial.

Lessons LearnedTKM-080301 showed a favorable toxicity profile at the studied dose. TKM-080301 targeting PLK1 through small interfering RNA mechanism did not demonstrate improved overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma compared with historical control. Preliminary antitumor activity as shown in this early-phase study does not support further evaluation as a single agent.BackgroundPolo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Knockdown of PLK1 expression by PLK1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) in an HCC cell line showed reduced expression in RNA-induced silencing complex and a reduction in cell proliferation.MethodsA 3 + 3 dose escalation plus expansion cohort at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was implemented. Patients with HCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, and Child-Pugh score A received TKM-080301 as an intravenous infusion once every week for 3 consecutive weeks, repeated every 28 days.ResultsThe study enrolled 43 patients. The starting dose of TKM-080301 was 0.3 mg/kg, and MTD was declared at 0.75 mg/kg. Following the development of grade 4 thrombocytopenia in two subjects on the expansion cohort, the MTD was redefined at 0.6 mg/kg. Four patients did not have any evaluable postbaseline scan. Of the other 39 subjects who had received at least 0.3 mg/kg, 18 subjects (46.2%) had stable disease (SD) by independent RECIST 1.1 criteria. By Choi criteria, eight subjects (23.1%) had a partial response (PR). For 37 assessable subjects, with 2 subjects censored, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.04 months. Median survival for the whole study population was 7.5 months.ConclusionTKM-080301 was generally well tolerated. In this early-phase study, antitumor effect for TKM 080301 was limited. Further evaluation as a single agent in large randomized trials is not warranted.

Background: Eflapegrastim (Rolontis®, Efla) is a long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), consisting of a recombinant human G-CSF analog conjugated to a human IgG4 Fc fragment via a short polyethylene glycol linker. Efla is not a biosimilar and represents the first myeloid growth factor innovation in more than 15 years. In preclinical studies with chemotherapy-induced neutropenic rats, Efla showed ~3-fold higher exposure in serum and higher exposure in bone marrow at similar doses compared to pegfilgrastim (Peg). The duration of neutropenia (DN) was shown to be significantly shorter with Efla vs Peg when administered on the same day and 24-hours post-chemotherapy. Additionally, the DN after Efla administered on the same day as chemotherapy was similar to the DN 24 hours post-chemotherapy. Moreover, in two Phase 3 studies that randomized a total of 643 patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) to either Efla (3.6 mg G-CSF n=314) or Peg (6 mg G-CSF n=329) given ~ 24 hours after docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) administration, the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) was statistically noninferior in patients treated with Efla compared to Peg. As a standard of practice, G-CSF products require administration 24 hours after chemotherapy. Since Efla preclinical and clinical results suggest that the increased activity of Efla may provide effective prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia when administered on the same day as chemotherapy, the purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of Efla same-day (3 different dosing timepoints) in patients receiving TC for treatment of ESBC. Trial Design: This is a randomized, schedule finding, multicenter, Phase 1, open-label study evaluating the same-day administration of 13.2 mg/0.6 mL Efla (3.6 mg G-CSF) following IV infusion of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) in patients with ESBC. Patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to Efla dose schedules of 0.5, 3, and 5 hours after TC. The primary endpoint is DSN (ANC 18 years of age, are candidates for neoadjuvant or adjuvant TC chemotherapy, have an ECOG of Citation Format: Lee S. Schwartzberg, Jawad Francis, Hlalah Osama, Manuel Modiano, Jayaram Bharadwaj, Shanta Chawla, Gajanan Bhat, Francois Lebel, Nishan Tchekmedyian. Open-label, phase 1 study to evaluate duration of severe neutropenia after same-day dosing of eflapegrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (NCT04187898) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-06-01.

Background: High tumor GR expression is associated with poor prognosis in estrogen receptor (ER) negative early-stage breast cancer. Co-treatment with M, a GR antagonist, potentiates effects of chemotherapy in ER- breast cancer xenograft studies. Herein we describe results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study of M plus E, with an ongoing dose expansion cohort in pts with GR+ TNBC. Objectives: Determine 1) safety and tolerability, 2) recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of M + E, and 3) characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of M in pts with GR+ TNBC. Methods: Eligibility: 1) relapsed/refractory breast, ovarian, prostate, urothelial, sarcoma, or non-small cell lung cancer; 2) 2-5 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease; 3) ECOG PS 0-1; and 4) adequate end-organ function. Study used a 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. After a 7 day lead-in of M alone, M was administered by mouth daily in combination with E given IV on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. Results: 13 pts in Part 1 Dose escalation with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with M+E: 5 TNBC, 8 GR+ tumors, 2 GR- tumors, and 3 of unknown GR status. Pts were treated at 3 dose levels (DL)[M mg/d, E mg/m2]: 3 at DL1 [600, 1.1] 4 at DL-1a [300, 1.4], and 6 at DL-1 [300, 1.1]. Median duration of treatment was 90+ days. Neutropenia leading to delay of E was dose limiting in 4 pts. CTAE Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 10 pts over all DL, but easily managed (9 pts with growth factor support). Other grade 3+ toxicities were neuropathy (2 pts) and onycholysis (1 pt). No other significant toxicity was noted. RP2D was determined as 300mg/d M and 1.1mg/m2 E. At this DL there were no DLTs. PK of M and E were as predicted from published literature with no evidence of drug-drug interaction (DDI). A total of 6 pts received this dose (3 TNBC; 3 MBC). All 3 TNBC were GR+. 1 had partial response, 1 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. A phase I/II study of M+E is now in progress. To date, 3 GR+ TNBC pts have been treated for a median of 28+ days. Conclusion: M + E is a novel combination designed to improve antitumor activity. It is well tolerated with evidence of clinical activity and no evidence of DDI. RP2D is 300mg M + E 1.1mg/m2. Study is ongoing in expansion phase where recruitment is limited to pts with GR+ TNBC. Additional PK and clinical data will be presented. Citation Format: Wilks S, Modiano M, Spira A, Becerra C, Walling J, Nguyen D, Baker G, Conzen SD, Nanda R. Phase 1 study of GR antagonist mifepristone (M) in combination with eribulin (E) in advanced solid tumors, with dose expansion in patients (pts) with GR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-21.

Background: The release of ATP from dying cancer cells in response to platinum-based chemotherapy increases extracellular immunosuppressive adenosine (A), which binds to and activates the A2a and A2b receptors on immune cells resulting in an ineffective anti-tumor immune response. Concomitant adenosine receptor blockade may therefore enhance the therapeutic efficacy of some chemotherapeutic agents. AB928, the first clinical-stage small molecule dual adenosine receptor antagonist, is highly potent, pharmacodynamically active, and has been well tolerated in dose escalation studies as a single agent or in combination with chemo/immunotherapy. Methods: ARC-3 (NCT03720678) is a Phase 1/1b, open-label study in participants (pts) with advanced CRC. Phase 1 escalation identified AB928 150 mg orally once daily as the recommended dose in combination with standard mFOLFOX-6. Phase 1b expansion is ongoing and includes at least 15 and up to 40 pts. Eligible pts must have unresectable or mCRC, ECOG performance status 0-1, and at least one RECIST measurable lesion. Phase 1 eligibility included up to 5 lines of prior therapy; Phase 1b is similarly scoped. Exploratory biomarker analyses include immunohistochemistry of the adenosine axis, tumoral next gene sequencing, and tumor/blood immune correlates. Results: As of 27Dec19, 21 pts received AB928 150 mg + mFOLFOX-6: 7 in Phase 1 and 14 in Phase 1b. All previously treated pts (n=12) were FOLFOX- and/or FOLFIRI-experienced. Prior metastatic therapies range from 3 to 5 in Phase 1 escalation and 0 to 3 in Phase 1b expansion. Adverse events (AEs) reported in >30% of pts included fatigue, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia. AEs related to AB928 occurred in 13 pts and were mostly mild to moderate. AB928-related Grade 3 AEs reported by 3 pts were diarrhea, AST increase, and neutropenia; there were no Grade 4-5 AB928-related AEs. Out of 15 evaluable pts, by investigator assessment, the disease control rate was 100% with 2 partial responses (13%; 1 confirmed, 1 pending confirmation) and 13 stable disease (87%). Of pts with stable disease, 6/13 (46%) had tumor shrinkage >15%. Median time on treatment was 15.4 (range: 1.7 - 40.6+) and 11.9 (range: 2.7 - 15.7+) weeks for Phase 1 and Phase 1b, respectively, with initiation of Phase 1b dosing on 09Sep19. Enrollment up to 40 pts is proceeding based on early efficacy gates; 15 pts are currently receiving study treatment. Conclusions: AB928 with mFOLFOX-6 has been well tolerated without significant evidence of additive toxicity in pts with mCRC. Combination treatment was associated with disease control in all evaluable pts, including those with microsatellite stable and RAS/BRAF mutated mCRC. Additional updates on the safety, clinical activity, and correlative biomarker results for all escalation/expansion pts will be presented. Citation Format: Michael Cecchini, Manuel Modiano, Fadi Braiteh, Olivia S. Gardner, Houston N. Gilbert, Daniel DiRenzo, Lisa Seitz, Matt J. Walters, Fangfang Yin, Rachel Woloski, Melissa C. Paoloni, Ki Y. Chung. Efficacy and safety of AB928 plus modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6) in participants with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Initial results at the recommended dose for expansion (ARC-3) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-387.

BACKGROUND. Seribantumab (MM‐121) is a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody that binds to human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3/ErbB3) to block heregulin (HRG/NRG)‐mediated ErbB3 signaling and induce receptor downregulation. This open‐label, randomized phase 1/2 study evaluated safety and efficacy of seribantumab plus erlotinib in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the activity of seribantumab plus erlotinib, versus erlotinib alone, in patients with EGFR wild‐type tumors and describe the potential predictive power of HRG. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients with EGFR wild‐type NSCLC were assigned randomly to receive seribantumab + erlotinib or erlotinib alone. Patients underwent pretreatment core needle biopsy and archived tumor samples were collected to support prespecified biomarker analyses. RESULTS. One hundred twenty‐nine patients received seribantumab + erlotinib (n = 85) or erlotinib alone (n = 44). Median estimated progression‐free survival (PFS) in the unselected intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population was 8.1 and 7.7 weeks in the experimental and control arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.822; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–1.828; p = 0.63), and median estimated overall survival was 27.3 and 40.3 weeks in the experimental and control arm, respectively (HR, 1.395; 95% CI, 0.846 to 2.301; p = .1898) In patients whose tumors had detectable HRG mRNA expression, treatment benefit was observed in the seribantumab + erlotinib combination (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16–0.76; p = .008). In contrast, in patients whose tumors were HRG negative, the HR was 2.15 (95% CI, 0.97–4.76; p = .059, HRG‐by‐treatment interaction, p value = .0016). CONCLUSION. The addition of seribantumab to erlotinib did not result in improved PFS in unselected patients. However, predefined retrospective exploratory analyses suggest that detectable HRG mRNA levels identified patients who might benefit from seribantumab. An ongoing clinical trial of seribantumab, in combination with docetaxel, is underway in patients with advanced NSCLC and high HRG mRNA expression (NCT02387216). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. The poor prognosis of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underscores the need for more effective treatment options, highlighting the unmet medical need in this patient population. The results of this study show that a novel biomarker, heregulin, may help to identify patients with advanced NSCLC who could benefit from treatment with seribantumab. On the basis of the observed safety profile and promising clinical efficacy, a prospective, randomized, open‐label, international, multicenter phase II trial (SHERLOC, NCT02387216) is under way to investigate the efficacy and safety of seribantumab in combination with docetaxel in patients with heregulin‐positive advanced adenocarcinoma.

Summary Background Highly emetogenic chemotherapy induces emesis in almost all patients in the absence of prophylaxis. Guidelines recommend use of a neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist in conjunction with a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist and corticosteroid in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. We aimed to assess rolapitant, an NK-1 receptor antagonist, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer after administration of cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Methods We conducted two global, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trials (HEC-1 and HEC-2) at 155 cancer centres (76 in HEC-1 and 79 in HEC-2) in 26 countries (17 in HEC-1 and 14 in HEC-2). We enrolled patients with cancer aged 18 years or older, who had not previously been treated with cisplatin, with a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher, and a predicted life expectancy of 4 months or longer. We used an interactive web-based randomisation system to randomly assign patients to treatment. Patients were stratified by sex and randomly allocated to either oral rolapitant (180 mg dose; rolapitant group) or a placebo that was identical in appearance (active control group) about 1–2 h before administration of highly emetogenic chemotherapy. All patients received granisetron (10 μg/kg intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally) on day 1, and dexamethasone (8 mg orally) twice daily on days 2–4. Every cycle was a minimum of 14 days. In up to five subsequent cycles, patients were allowed to receive the same study drug they were assigned in cycle 1, unless removed at the clinician's discretion. Patients could also choose to leave the study at any point. Efficacy analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population (comprising all patients who received at least one dose of study drug at a cancer centre compliant with Good Clinical Practice [GCP]). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (no emesis or use of rescue medication) in the delayed phase (>24–120 h after initiation of chemotherapy) in cycle 1. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01499849 and NCT01500213. Both studies have been completed. Findings Between Feb 21, 2012, and March 12, 2014, 532 patients in HEC-1 and 555 patients in HEC-2 were randomly assigned to treatment. 526 patients in HEC-1 (264 rolapitant and 262 active control) and 544 in HEC-2 (271 rolapitant and 273 active control) received at least one dose of study drug at a GCP-compliant site and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the rolapitant group had complete responses in the delayed phase than did patients in the active control group (HEC-1: 192 [73%] vs 153 [58%]; odds ratio 1·9, 95% CI 1·3–2·7; p=0·0006; HEC-2: 190 [70%] vs 169 [62%]; 1·4, 1·0–2·1; p=0·0426; pooled studies: 382 [71%] vs 322 [60%]; 1·6, 1·3–2·1; p=0·0001). The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. The most commonly reported treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the rolapitant versus active control groups were headache (three [ vs two [ vs four [ vs three [ vs three [ vs 14 [5%]; HEC-2: 16 [6%] vs 14 [5%]), anaemia (HEC-1: one [ vs one [ vs two [ vs two [ vs two [ Interpretation Rolapitant in combination with a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone is well-tolerated and shows superiority over active control for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the at-risk period (120 h) after administration of highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Funding TESARO, Inc.

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ziv-aflibercept in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This single arm, multicentre phase II trial enrolled patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. Patients received intravenous ziv-aflibercept 6 mg kg−1, pemetrexed 500 mg m−2, and cisplatin 75 mg m−2, every 21 days for up to six cycles. Maintenance administration of ziv-aflibercept was to continue until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or other cause for withdrawal. The co-primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Planned sample size was 72 patients. Results: The study was closed prematurely because of three confirmed and two suspected cases of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS). A total of 42 patients were enrolled. Median age was 61.5 years; 55% were male, 86% Caucasian and 50% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS)=0. A median of four cycles of ziv-aflibercept was administered. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were nausea (69%) and fatigue (67%), with hypertension (36%) as the most common grade 3/4 TEAE. Of the 38 evaluable patients, ORR was 26% and median PFS was 5 months. Conclusion: Cases of RPLS had been observed in other studies in the ziv-aflibercept clinical development programme but the rate observed in this study was higher than previously observed. This might be related to declining renal function and/or hypertension. Although ORR and PFS were in accordance with most historical first-line NSCLC studies, this combination of ziv-aflibercept/cisplatin/pemetrexed will not be further explored in NSCLC.

BACKGROUND Rolapitant, a novel neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist, provided effective protection against chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in a randomized, double‐blind phase 3 trial of patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy or an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimen. The current analysis explored the efficacy and safety of rolapitant in preventing CINV in a subgroup of patients receiving carboplatin. METHODS Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral rolapitant (180 mg) or a placebo 1 to 2 hours before chemotherapy administration; all patients received oral granisetron (2 mg) on days 1 to 3 and oral dexamethasone (20 mg) on day 1. A post hoc analysis examined the subgroup of patients receiving carboplatin in cycle 1. The efficacy endpoints were as follows: complete response (CR), no emesis, no nausea, no significant nausea, complete protection, time to first emesis or use of rescue medication, and no impact on daily life. RESULTS In the subgroup administered carboplatin‐based chemotherapy (n = 401), a significantly higher proportion of patients in the rolapitant group versus the control group achieved a CR in the overall phase (0‐120 hours; 80.2% vs 64.6%; P < .001) and in the delayed phase (>24‐120 hours; 82.3% vs 65.6%; P < .001) after chemotherapy administration. Superior responses were also observed by the measures of no emesis, no nausea, and complete protection in the overall and delayed phases and by the time to first emesis or use of rescue medication. The incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events was similar for the rolapitant and control groups. CONCLUSIONS Rolapitant provided superior CINV protection to patients receiving carboplatin‐based chemotherapy in comparison with the control. These results support rolapitant use as part of the antiemetic regimen in carboplatin‐treated patients. Cancer 2016;122:2418–2425. © 2016 American Cancer Society., The efficacy of rolapitant, a neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist with a long duration of action, was examined in a subgroup of 401 patients with cancer who received carboplatin‐based chemotherapy in a phase 3 trial. In this population, a single oral dose of rolapitant (180 mg) combined with granisetron and dexamethasone provided statistically superior protection against chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in the delayed and overall phases in comparison with granisetron and dexamethasone alone, and it was well tolerated.

Purpose This study compared disease-free survival (DFS) obtained with two different regimens of adjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer. Methods Women (who had performance status [PS] of 0 to 1) with operable, histologically confirmed, stage I to III adenocarcinoma of the breast were eligible. Patients had undergone primary surgery with no residual tumor. Treatments were as follows: arm 1 was doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for four cycles (ie, AC-P); and arm 2 was doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks. Results Overall, 1,830 patients were enrolled and 1,801 were treated: arm 1 (n = 906; AC→P) and arm 2 (n = 895; AP-WP). Overall, patients had a PS of 0 (88%), had estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor–positive disease (52%), had one to three positive nodes (46%), and were postmenopausal (57%); the median age was 52 years. Currently, 1,640 patients (90%) are alive. The 6-year DFS was 79% to 80% in both groups. Disease relapse was the cause of death for 83 patients in arm 1 and in 66 patients of arm 2. Overall 6-year survival rates were 82% and 87% in arms 1 and 2, respectively. Reasons for patients being taken off study treatment included toxicity (13% in arm 1 v 20% in arm 2), progressive disease or recurrence (7% v 5%), and consent withdrawn (9% v 8%), respectively. The most frequent toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia and leukopenia followed by neuropathy, myalgia, nausea, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, and vomiting. Conclusion The results indicate that the AP-WP regimen is an equally effective and tolerable option for the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk breast cancer. The substitution of paclitaxel for cyclophosphamide results in comparable effectiveness of the regimen.

Imexon is an aziridine-derived iminopyrrolidone which has synergy with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Gemcitabine is a standard therapy for pancreatic cancer. We performed a phase I trial of imexon and gemcitabine to evaluate safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received therapy in sequential cohorts on regimen A (n = 19; imexon 200 or 280 mg/m² intravenously (IV) over 30 min days 1–5, 15–19 and gemcitabine 800 or 1,000 mg/m² IV over 30 min on days 1,8,15 every 28 days) or regimen B (n = 86; imexon 280–1,300 mg/m² IV over 30–60 min days 1, 8, and 15 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² IV over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days). One hundred five patients received 340 treatment cycles (median 2, range 1–16). Patient characteristics: median age 63, 61% male, ECOG PS 0/1 50%/50%, 93% metastatic. DLT was abdominal cramping and pain, often with transient, acute diarrhea. Best response was confirmed partial response (PR) in 11.4%, 8.9% unconfirmed PR, and 48.1% with stable disease. There was a dose proportional increase in imexon AUC across the doses tested with terminal half life 69 min at the MTD and no alteration of gemcitabine pharmacokinetics. The recommended phase II dose of imexon is 875 mg/m² with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. DLT was acute abdominal pain and cramping. Encouraging antitumor responses support further evaluation of this combination in advanced pancreatic cancer.

We conducted a community-based pilot study to train Hispanic cancer survivors as promotoras (lay health educators) to encourage their social contacts to obtain breast and cervical cancer screening. Promotoras were recruited from a private oncologist's practice at a Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP). Five Hispanic women were trained to serve as promotoras by attending a 12-week course. They shared cancer screening information with family and social contacts and encouraged them to obtain Papanicolaou smears and/or mammograms. Study endpoints included the number of women recruited and trained to serve as promotoras, the number of contacts made per promotora, and the number of contacts who were screened; data were based on contact logs maintained for 1 year. Screening examinations were documented by a postcard returned by the contact or by review of community health clinic records. Five promotoras contacted 141 (range = 24-49 per promotora) women to share cancer screening information. Fifty Hispanic women obtained screening after contact with a promotora. Twenty-nine underwent mammography (ages 25-58) and 43 received a Papanicolaou smear (ages 23-62). Hispanic female cancer survivors can be trained as promotoras. Screening information conveyed by a promotora can successfully prompt Hispanic women to obtain mammography and Papanicolaou smears.

Purpose: VNP40101M is a new alkylating agent that demonstrated broad anti-tumor activity in murine tumor models. A phase I trial was initiated to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of VNP40101M by short IV infusion. Study design: The starting dose was 3 mg/m2 every four weeks, and was escalated in successive cohorts as follows: 6, 12, 24, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg/m2. Beyond 100 mg/m2, dose increments were 25%. Initially, 1–2 patients were assigned to a dose level. Intra-patient dose escalation was permitted. With the first instance of a drug-related ≥ grade 2 adverse event, all dose levels required assessment of 3–6 patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the first cycle and any cycle with a change in dose. Results: Twenty-six patients in 13 dose levels ranging from 3–305 mg/m2 were evaluated. Dose-related thrombocytopenia was the major toxicity, with the nadir occurring at a median of day 27. At 305 mg/m2, six of eight patients developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia, including one event that met the definition for DLT. Other dose-related toxicities included moderate granulocytopenia, anemia, and a mild infusion-related syndrome consisting of acute headache and facial flushing. The granulocyte nadir occurred at a median of day 34, and recovery of both thrombocytopenia and neutropenia to < grade 2 occurred at a median of day 43. VNP40101M peak plasma concentrations and AUC were linear with dose. The elimination half-life was short and estimated to be approximately 15 minutes. Conclusions: The MTD and recommended dose for phase II trials is 305 mg/m2 every six weeks. Phase II trials in less heavily pre-treated patient populations are warranted.

We compared median time to treatment failure of men with asymptomatic, hormone refractory, progressive prostate cancer treated with mitoxantrone plus prednisone versus prednisone alone.In a multicenter phase III trial 120 men with asymptomatic, progressive, hormone refractory prostate cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with mitoxantrone and prednisone or prednisone alone. Patients received 12 mg./m. mitoxantrone intravenously once every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and 5 mg. prednisone twice daily with or without mitoxantrone. Time to treatment failure was assessed as an aggregate end point comprised of time to disease progression, time to toxicity or death, or time to initiation of alternate therapy.Median followup was 21.8 months. Median time to treatment failure and median time to progression were the same: time to treatment failure and time to progression in the mitoxantrone and prednisone group was 8.1 months compared to 4.1 months in the prednisone alone group (p = 0.017 versus p = 0.018). More patients (27 or 48%) treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone achieved a 50% or greater reduction in prostate specific antigen levels than those who received only prednisone (15 or 24%, p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in median survival between the 2 groups, which was 23 and 19 months, respectively. Death was mainly attributable to disease progression.Patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer who are asymptomatic but had progressive disease had a significantly higher response rate when treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone as demonstrated by the 50% or greater decrease in prostate specific antigen compared to treatment with prednisone alone. Time to treatment failure was significantly prolonged in the chemotherapy treated group but survival rates were not different.

Purpose. To perform a phase I and pharmacokinetics study of 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP) a new ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor using a single intravenous (2-h) schedule every 4 weeks. 3-AP was given at a starting dose of 5 mg/m2 with escalation based on a modified Fibonacci scheme. Patients and methods. A total of 27 patients with advanced cancer were entered into the study. Doses of 3-AP ranged from 5 mg/m2 to 105 mg/m2. Blood and urine samples were collected and 3-AP was measured by HPLC. Results. A total of 46 courses were evaluable. One patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia at the lowest dose level, and one patient had grade 3 anemia. Two patients developed grade 3 coagulation abnormalities. The only other toxicities of more than grade l occurring in more than 10% of patients were fever and asthenia. No toxicities were observed at the highest dose level. Peak serum concentration of 3-AP increased linearly with dose. No tumor responses were observed in this heavily pretreated population, although eight patients had stabilization of their disease. Conclusions. Relevant tumor inhibitory concentrations were achieved without significant toxicity using doses up to 105 mg/m2 on this single intravenous dose schedule. Prolonged administration schedules and combinations with other cytotoxic agents, strategies predicted to have greater antitumor efficacy according to preclinical studies, are under investigation.

3539 Background: VEGF-A and ANG-2 have complementary roles in regulation of tumor angiogenesis. Targeting VEGF-A with BEV in combination chemotherapy (CT) in mCRC has proven to increase PFS and OS. ANG-2 is overexpressed and associated with poor outcome of mCRC pts receiving BEVcontaining treatment. Hence, dual blockade of VEGF-A and ANG-2 by the bispecific mAb VAN with standard CT may improve clinical activity in mCRC. Methods: All pts received mFOLFOX-6 and were randomized 1:1 to also receive intravenous VAN 2000 mg every other week (Q2W) (Arm A) or BEV 5 mg/kg Q2W (Arm B). The primary end point was investigator assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Key eligibility criteria included pts with non-resectable mCRC, no prior therapy for advanced disease, PS 0-1, adequate organ functions, and no history of GI fistula/perforation or intraabdominal abscess within the last 6 months. Results: 192 pts were randomized (Arms A/B, n = 95/97) by 39 sites in 7 countries, between Oct 2014 and May 2016. Median follow-up was 17.6 months (range 2.8 – 20.7). In the ITT population (n = 189; Arms A/B, n = 94/95), median PFS in Arms A and B was 11.3 and 11.0 months (stratified hazard ratio (HR) 1.00 (95%CI 0.64-1.58; p = 0.985)), respectively. Objective response rate was 52.1% vs 57.9%. Relevant prognostic factors incl. RAS/BRAF status and tumor sidedness were balanced between arms and did not significantly influence outcome. Baseline plasma ANG-2 levels were prognostic in both arms but not predictive for response to VAN. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) grade ≥ 3 was similar (Arms A/B, 83.9%/82.1%); AEs grade ≥ 3 attributed to the mode of action of VAN/BEV included hypertension (37.6%/18.9%), hemorrhage (2.2%/1.1%), thromboembolic events (venous 6.5%/2.1%; arterial 1.1%/3.2%) and GI perforations incl. GI fistula & abdominal abscess (10.6%/8.4%). Conclusions: The combination of VAN and FOLFOX did not improve PFS and was associated with a marked increase in hypertension compared with BEV plus FOLFOX. Our results strongly suggest that ANG-2 is not a relevant therapeutic target in the setting of first line mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02141295.

KRN330 is a recombinant, fully-human monoclonal antibody directed against A33, a surface differentiation antigen that is uniformly expressed in 95 % of colorectal cancers. A previous Phase 1 study of single-agent KRN330 identified a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 3 mg/kg q2w and preliminary evidence of clinical activity among patients with advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This Phase 1/2 trial sought to assess the safety and activity of second-line KRN330 plus irinotecan in patients with mCRC. Patients with mCRC who showed disease progression after FOLFOX/CapOx received intravenous doses of KRN330 (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg qw or q2w) plus irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation. The MTD of KRN330 with irinotecan in 19 patients was 0.5 mg/kg qw in the Phase 1 study with gastrointestinal effects and neutropenia being the predominant dose-limiting toxicities. In the Phase 2 study, the most frequent treatment-related Grade ≥3 toxicities in 44 patients were fatigue (15.9 %), neutropenia (13.6 %), leukopenia (6.8 %), diarrhea (4.5 %), and dehydration (4.5 %). Objective response rate (ORR) was 4.5 % and disease control rate was 45.5 % for the intent-to-treat population. Median progression-free survival was 87 days (95 % CI, 43-136 days). The prespecified ORR of KRN330 plus irinotecan was not met. Further investigation of KRN330 plus other agents may be warranted.

BACKGROUND Rates of response to systemic chemotherapy among patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma rarely exceed 25– 30%, and complete responses are rare. The liver is the most common site of metastasis; however, regional therapies have not improved survival rates. The Southwest Oncology Group designed a clinical trial combining hepatic arterial chemoembolization with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in an attempt to increase the complete response rate and prolong the time to disease progression. METHODS Patients with documented liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma were treated with two or three cycles of chemoembolization using a collagen suspension with doxorubicin, mitomycin C, and cisplatin. Subsequently, systemic chemotherapy with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin was initiated. Patients were assessed for response at 12-week intervals, with treatment continuing until disease progression. RESULTS Thirty-one eligible, evaluable patients were treated. One complete and 8 partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 29%. Fifty-eight percent of patients survived 1 year, and the median survival for the whole cohort was 14 months. The median time to progression was 8 months. Seven patients (23%) experienced Grade 4 toxicity and 21 patients (67%) had Grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The response rate in this trial was comparable to that achieved with systemic chemotherapy consisting of a fluorinated pyrimidine–based regimen for patients with this disease. No improvement in complete response rate or time to progression was observed compared with the Southwest Oncology Group's experience with systemic therapy. The authors are not planning to study this regimen further as a treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1999;86:775–81. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND This double blind parallel group study assessed the acute antiemetic efficacy of four oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in cancer patients receiving their first course of intravenous chemotherapy with doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide. METHODS Patients were randomized to receive 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg of dolasetron mesylate 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy and were monitored for nausea and emetic episodes for the next 24 hours. RESULTS Three hundred and nineteen cancer patients at 32 sites completed the study. Most patients were female (81%); of this group, 69% had breast carcinoma. A highly statistically significant linear trend demonstrating improved response with higher doses was detected for complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), for complete plus major response (0-2 emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), and for patient visual analog scale assessments of nausea (P = 0.001) and general satisfaction with antiemetic therapy (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events were noted. The most frequent adverse event was mild, self-limiting headache, which has been reported with other drugs in this class. CONCLUSIONS Single oral doses of dolasetron mesylate were found to be effective in preventing acute emesis in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 1997; 79:1216-24. © 1997 American Cancer Society.

e12550Background: GR is highly expressed in TNBC and is associated with a poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) early stage breast cancer. Treatment with MIFE potentiates the effects of chemotherapy (ctx) in TNBC xenografts. Here we describe the results of an ongoing trial including outcomes to date in all patients with GR+ TNBC treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Objectives: To determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of the MIFE+E combination in pts with GR+ TNBC at the RP2D. Methods: Eligibility: Phase 1, pts with solid tumors; Phase 2, pts with GR+ TNBC; up to 5 prior ctx regimens for advanced disease; ECOG PS 0-1; adequate end-organ function. Design: 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. After a 7-day lead-in of oral daily MIFE alone, MIFE was continued daily and E was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Results: 16 pts with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in Phase 1 (3 with GR+ TNBC). MTD/RP2D was MIFE 300 mg/day + E 1.1 mg/m2. To d...

BACKGROUND: Pixantrone dimaleate (pixantrone) has been shown to have antitumor activity in leukemia and lymphoma in vitro models and to lack delayed cardiotoxicity associated with mitoxantrone in animal models. FND-R, a combination regimen of fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and rituximab, has been shown to be an effective regimen for low-grade lymphomas. METHODS: This dose-escalation study, with an expansion cohort, was conducted to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of FPD-R, in which pixantrone was substituted for mitoxantrone in the FND-R regimen, in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Escalated doses of pixantrone were administered to newly enrolled patients on day 2 of each 28-day cycle of FPD-R. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 29 enrolled patients received at least 1 cycle of FPD-R (median, 5 cycles). Pixantrone 120 mg/m2 was identified as the recommended dose in this regimen. Grade 3-4 adverse events were primarily hematologic; grade 3-4 lymphopenia occurred in 89% of patients and leukopenia in 79%. No patients developed congestive heart failure or grade 3-4 cardiac adverse events. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreases occurred in 8 (29%) patients, and most were grade 1 or 2, transient, and asymptomatic. The overall response rate was 89%. Estimated survival was 96% after 1 year and 92% after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The FPD-R regimen was well-tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent NHL. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Hepatic arterial chemoembolization (CE) with a mixture of particulate collagen and chemotherapeutic agents was evaluated as therapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. This article describes the characteristics sequential pattern of change seen on liver CT scans following CE. Thirty CT scans were performed on seven patients who had undergone a total of 11 CE procedures. All patients had baseline, immediate postprocedural, and follow-up CT exams at 1 to 2 month intervals following CE. Immediate post-procedural CT scans mapped the area of embolization owing to the density of the contrast mixed with the CE agents. Some lesions seen easily on baseline were more difficult to see as they became isodense with normal liver. Reflux of embolic material into the cystic artery and gallbladder wall was also observed on postprocedural scans in three patients. In all patients, early follow-up scans (1 month after CE) demonstrated changes in lesions seen on baseline scans consistent with tumor necrosis. This was corroborated by a decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. In three patients, however, low attenuation regions developed in areas in which there had been no lesion before. The significance of these is uncertain, but the low CEA values and the subsequent evolution in appearance of these sites on CT suggest that they were regions of hepatic ischemia/infarction as opposed to heretofore unidentifiable metastases, now "unmasked." Intermediate follow-up scans (2-3 months) revealed maximal effect on tumor volume, with a decrease of > or = 25% in five of seven patients (71%). Late follow-up scans (> or = 3 months after the last CE) confirmed recurrent disease and new lesions in all cases.

The purpose of this exploratory study was to provide information on older Hispanic women's access to and use of breast cancer screening services. Interviews were conducted with 150 Hispanic women, 47 to 93 years of age, in a southwestern city. The results indicated that differences in use and compliance with recommended screening guidelines were due primarily to differences in access to the health care system and attitudes about preventive care. Targeted strategies for these women have to be developed and implemented to ensure that they receive the necessary information to avail themselves of breast cancer screening procedures.

Purpose Imexon, a pro-oxidant small molecule, has antitumor activity in preclinical models. The drug induces apoptosis through accumulation of reactive oxygen species. The purpose of this trial was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of imexon in patients with advanced cancers. Patients and Methods Forty-nine patients with metastatic cancer received intravenous imexon over 30 to 45 minutes for 5 consecutive days (one course) every other week (days 1 through 5 and 15 through 19) monthly. Doses were initially escalated using an accelerated trial design and then a modified Fibonacci method. Plasma imexon levels and six different thiols were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography assays. Results There were 13 dose levels evaluated, from 20 mg/m2/d to 1,000 mg/m2/d. The MTD recommended for phase II studies was 875 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 2 weeks (n = 9 patients). The two dose-limiting toxicities at 1,000 mg/m2/d involved grade 3 abdominal pain and fatigue and grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred in one patient each. Other common toxicities included nausea and vomiting (58%) and constipation (63%); both were managed well with prophylactic medications. One partial response was obtained in a heavily pretreated patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Pharmacokinetic studies showed dose-independent clearance, with a 95-minute mean half-life. Plasma thiol studies showed a dose- and area under the curve–dependent decrease in cystine levels 8 hours after dosing at ≥ 750 mg/m2/d. Conclusion The phase II recommended dose of imexon is 875 mg/m2/d for 5 days every other week. A decrease in plasma thiols did correlate with imexon exposure.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pixantrone (BBR2778) when substituted for etoposide in the ESHAP regimen in patients with aggressive relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nineteen patients received protocol therapy, consisting of pixantrone 80 mg/m2 over 1 h on day 1, methylprednisolone 500 mg on days 1 - 5, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 - 4, and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2 on day 5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days, in the outpatient setting. Dose limiting toxicity, consisting of bone marrow suppression, occurred at the first dose level (80 mg/m2), which was defined as the recommended dose. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mainly hematologic. Only one patient had grade 4 febrile neutropenia. No significant decreases in ejection fraction greater than 20% occurred. Overall response rate was 58%, with 37% complete and 21% partial responses. Six of the 11 responders (55%) underwent stem cell transplant. Median time to progression and overall median survival were 5.7 months and 14.5 months, respectively. There is no significant interaction between pixantrone and the combined drugs. The recommended dose of pixantrone in combination with methylprednisolone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (PSHAP) is 80 mg/m2. PSHAP is an active salvage regimen and should be further evaluated as a pretransplant cytoreductive regimen.

209 Background: Rolapitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, showed efficacy in CINV prevention in patients (pts) receiving MEC (anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC) and other regimens) in a global phase 3 trial. Recent anti-emetic guidelines consider AC based regimens to be highly emetogenic. In this post hoc analysis, the efficacy and safety of rolapitant was assessed in Cycle 1 in pts receiving non-AC MEC, and in the subset of pts receiving carboplatin-based MEC. Methods: In a double-blind, active-controlled study, pts were randomized to oral rolapitant 180 mg or placebo 1–2 hours before MEC. All pts received granisetron 2 mg oral on days 1-3 and oral dexamethasone 20 mg on day 1. Complete response (CR = no emesis + no use of rescue medication), no emesis, and no nausea were assessed in overall (0-120 h), acute (0-24 h), and delayed ( > 24-120 h) phases. Results: CR was significantly (P < 0.01) higher with rolapitant than active control in overall and delayed phases in the carboplatin subset and in all 3 phases in the non-AC population (Table). No emesis rates were significantly (p < 0.05) higher with rolapitant in the carboplatin subset in the overall phase. No nausea rates were significantly (P < 0.05) higher with rolapitant in the overall and delayed phases in carboplatin-based MEC. Incidences of treatment-related AEs in Cycle 1 with rolapitant vs. active control were 11.3% vs. 6.7% in the carboplatin-based subset. Most common AEs with rolapitant and active control were constipation, fatigue, and headache. Conclusions: Rolapitant was superior to active control in preventing CINV in pts receiving non-AC MEC, including in the subgroup receiving carboplatin. Rolapitant was well tolerated with low incidence of AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01500226. [Table: see text]

208 Background: Rolapitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, demonstrated efficacy in the prevention of CINV in pts receiving moderately- or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC; HEC). In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes in pts receiving AC-based therapy, now considered HEC. Methods: This double-blind, active-controlled study randomized pts to oral rolapitant 180 mg plus granisetron 2 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg or granisetron/dexamethasone alone (active control). Complete response (CR = no emesis and no use of rescue medication), no emesis, no significant nausea, and time to emesis or rescue medication during overall, acute, and delayed phases and treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) are presented. Results: 703 pts received AC-based therapy, of which 97% had breast cancer. CR was significantly higher for rolapitant vs. active control for delayed and overall phases in pts receiving AC-based therapy (Table). Time to first emesis or use of rescue medication was significantly longer with rolapitant vs. active control (between-group comparison, p = 0.032); median was not reached in either treatment arm. A significantly greater proportion of pts on rolapitant (73.0%) vs. active control (60.2%) had no emesis during the overall phase (p < 0.001). Rates of no significant nausea were similar for rolapitant (63.7%) and active control (62.4%) in the overall phase (p = 0.728). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) during Cycle 1 occurred in 8.7% and 8.8% of pts on rolapitant vs. active control. Most frequent TRAEs were constipation (2.9% vs. 2.7%), fatigue (2.3% vs. 2.2%), and headache (2.3% vs. 3.3%). Conclusions: Rolapitant was superior to active control in preventing CINV during delayed and overall phases after AC-based chemotherapy. The safety profiles of the rolapitant and control arms were similar. These results are consistent with those of the overall pt population in this study. Clinical trial information: NCT01500226. [Table: see text]

9622 Background: Rolapitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, showed efficacy for prevention of CINV in patients (pts) receiving MEC (anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (A/C) and other regimens) in a ...

e12070 Background: GR expression is associated with a poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) early stage breast cancer. Co-treatment with MIFE potentiates the effects of chemotherapy (ctx) in ER- breast cancer xenograft studies. Here we describe the results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study of MIFE+E, with an ongoing dose expansion cohort in pts with TNBC. Objectives: To determine the safety and tolerability of MIFE+E, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of MIFE+E, and to characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of MIFE+E in pts with GR+ TNBC. Methods: Eligibility: relapsed/refractory advanced solid tumors; up to 5 prior ctx regimens for advanced disease; ECOG PS 0-1; and adequate end-organ function. Design: 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. After a 7 day lead-in of oral daily MIFE alone, MIFE was continued daily and E was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. Results: To date, 13 pts with metastatic breast cancer (5 have TNBC) have been treated with MIFE+E: 7 GR+ tumors, 3 GR-...

144 Background: PSMA is a validated target that is overexpressed selectively on prostate cancer cells. PSMA ADC is a fully human IgG1 antibody conjugated to the microtubule disrupting agent MMAE which binds to PSMA-positive cells, inducing cytotoxicity. A phase 1 study showed activity and tolerability at doses from 1.8-2.5 mg/kg. We have enrolled 119 mCRPC pts who progressed following abi/enz in a phase 2 trial of PSMA ADC. Methods: mCRPC pts (83 taxane experienced (TE) and 36 chemo-naïve (CN)) were administered PSMA ADC 2.5 or 2.3 mg/kg IV Q3 wk for up to 8 cycles. 95% of pts received prior abi and/or enz treatment. Safety, antitumor activity (including PSA, CTCs, and tumor imaging) and exploratory biomarkers were assessed. Results: In all treated pts, PSA declines of ≥30% and ≥50% were 30% and 14%, respectively (n=113); CTC counts showed a decline of ≥50% in 78% of pts and conversion from ≥5 to

Purpose Exatecan mesylate is a hexacyclic, water-soluble, topoisomerase-1 inhibitor. Exatecan has single-agent and combination activity with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. A multicenter, randomized, phase III trial comparing exatecan plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer was conducted. Patients and Methods Eligibility criteria included Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60%, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and no prior chemotherapy. Radiation alone for locally advanced disease was permitted. Patients were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis. For the exatecan plus gemcitabine arm, exatecan 2.0 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 were administered on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Gemcitabine alone was dosed at 1,000 mg/m2 up to 7 weeks in the first cycle, then once a week for the first 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle. Tumor assessment was performed every 6 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. An intent-to-treat analysis was used. Results From August 2001 to January 2003, 349 patients were randomly assigned, 175 to exatecan plus gemcitabine and 174 to gemcitabine alone. Twenty-four patients (6.9%) were not treated. The median survival time was 6.7 months for exatecan plus gemcitabine and 6.2 months for gemcitabine alone (P = .52). One complete response (CR; < 1%) and 11 partial responses (PRs; 6.3%) were observed in the exatecan plus gemcitabine treatment group, and one CR (< 1%) and eight PRs (4.6%) were observed in the gemcitabine-alone group. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were higher for the exatecan plus gemcitabine arm versus the gemcitabine alone arm; neutropenia (30% v 15%) and thrombocytopenia (15% v 4%). Conclusion Exatecan plus gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine alone with respect to overall survival in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

The topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, topotecan, was tested in 48 eligible patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The patients had no prior chemotherapy and a Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Topotecan was administered intravenously at 1.5 mg/m2/day for five days and repeated every 21 days. The major toxicity was hematologic with 19 out of 48 (40%) patients having grade IV granulocytopenia and 4 out of 48 (8%) patients demonstrating grade IV thrombocytopenia. Two patients (4%) demonstrated partial response. Thirty patients have died and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival is 9 months (95% confidence interval; 7-16 months). Topotecan in this dose and schedule does not appear active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

We compared docetaxel plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) with fluorouracil plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable node-positive breast cancer.We randomly assigned 1491 women with axillary node-positive breast cancer to six cycles of treatment with either TAC or FAC as adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The primary end point was disease-free survival.At a median follow-up of 55 months, the estimated rates of disease-free survival at five years were 75 percent among the 745 patients randomly assigned to receive TAC and 68 percent among the 746 randomly assigned to receive FAC, representing a 28 percent reduction in the risk of relapse (P=0.001) in the TAC group. The estimated rates of overall survival at five years were 87 percent and 81 percent, respectively. Treatment with TAC resulted in a 30 percent reduction in the risk of death (P=0.008). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 65.5 percent in the TAC group and 49.3 percent in the FAC group (P0.001); rates of febrile neutropenia were 24.7 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively (P0.001). Grade 3 or 4 infections occurred in 3.9 percent of the patients who received TAC and 2.2 percent of those who received FAC (P=0.05); no deaths occurred as a result of infection. Two patients in each group died during treatment. Congestive heart failure and acute myeloid leukemia occurred in less than 2 percent of the patients in each group. Quality-of-life scores decreased during chemotherapy but returned to baseline levels after treatment.Adjuvant chemotherapy with TAC, as compared with FAC, significantly improves the rates of disease-free and overall survival among women with operable node-positive breast cancer.

Purpose: Protein kinase C-α has been implicated in malignant transformation and proliferation. Based on in vivo superadditive interaction between the protein kinase C-α antisense oligonucleotide LY900003 (Affinitak, ISIS 3521) and cisplatin, we designed this phase I/II trial of LY900003 with cisplatin/gemcitabine Experimental Design: The safety of the combination, as well as potential pharmacokinetic interactions, was evaluated in the phase I portion of the trial. The phase II portion evaluated the antitumor activity of the combination in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB/IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: Seven patients received 18 cycles of the combination during the phase I portion. Dose-limiting toxicity was only observed in one of six evaluable patients (grade 3 fatigue). However, due to a relatively high frequency of thrombocytopenia, cisplatin 80 (mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) were recommended for the phase II portion. Antitumor activity was observed in two patients (one with NSCLC and one with pancreatic carcinoma), and prolonged stabilization was observed in two others. No pharmacokinetic interactions occurred. In the phase II portion, 55 NSCLC patients received the combination at two gemcitabine doses [1,000 mg/m2, n = 44 (original cohort); 1,250 mg/m2, n = 11 (expanded cohort)]. Fourteen of 39 evaluable patients in the original cohort had a response rate (1 complete response and 13 partial responses; response, 36%), whereas 2 of 9 evaluable patients in the expanded cohort experienced partial response (combined response rate, 33%). The median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months, whereas the median time response to progression for the 48 patients with evaluable response was 4.4 months (confidence interval, 3.5–5.5 months). Intent to treat median survival time was 8.9 months. Forty-eight percent of the patients experienced catheter-related events. Conclusions: LY900003 can be administered safely in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine and is associated with antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC. Better characterization of subsets of patients most likely to benefit from this combination therapy is needed.

A Phase I study in patients with advanced cancer was conducted to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose of Triapine, a new, potent small-molecule inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase.Triapine was administered by 2-h i.v. infusion daily for 5 days. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 5 mg/m(2)/day, but was reduced to 2 mg/m(2)/day after the first patient developed a hepatic adverse event. The dose was subsequently escalated using a modified Fibonacci scheme in cohorts of 3-6 patients. After the 12 mg/m(2)/day dose level, the study design was amended to permit 100% dose escalation in single-patient cohorts until the first episode of a drug-related grade 2 adverse event or dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). On reaching a dose of 96 mg/m(2)/day, the study was amended to determine the safety and tolerability of the 96-mg/m(2) dose administered daily for 5 days every 2 weeks in an expanded cohort of patients.A total of 32 patients received treatment. During the dose escalation phase of the study, grade 2-4 drug-related adverse events were first observed at a dose of 96 mg/m(2)/day. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was the primary toxicity observed among four patients treated at this dose, which occurred in the week after treatment and resolved to grade 1 or lower by day 15. Fifteen patients were subsequently treated at the 96-mg/m(2) dose, daily for 5 days, with courses repeated every 2 weeks. The most common nonhematological toxicities for the latter schedule were asthenia, fever, nausea and vomiting, mucositis, decreased serum bicarbonate, and hyperbilirubinemia, and were predominantly grade 1-2 in severity and rapidly reversible. Hematological toxicity on the every-other-week schedule consisted of leukopenia (grade 4 in 93% in at least one course) and anemia (grade 2 in 71%, grade 3 in 22%). Thrombocytopenia was less common and was grade 3-4 in severity in only 22%. Triapine showed linear pharmacokinetic behavior although interpatient variability was relatively high. Peak concentrations at the 96-mg/m(2)/day dose averaged 8 microM, and the mean elimination T(1/2) ranged from 35 min to 3 h, with a median value of approximately 1 h. Cumulative urinary recovery averaged 1-3% of the administered dose, suggesting that the elimination of Triapine was primarily through metabolism. No partial or complete responses were observed.Triapine administered at a dose of 96 mg/m(2) by 2-h i.v. infusion daily for 5 days on an every-other-week schedule demonstrates an acceptable safety profile. Serum concentrations that surpass in vitro tumor growth-inhibitory concentrations are achieved for brief periods of time each day and are sufficient to produce myelosuppression, the expected consequence of ribonucleotide reductase inhibition. Phase II trials are indicated but will proceed with a daily-for-4-days schedule to reduce the incidence of grade 4 leukopenia. The safety profile also supports the initiation of Phase I combination trials with other anticancer agents.

8051 Background: Heregulin induced activation of ErbB3 has been implicated as a mechanism of resistance to many targeted therapies such as EGFR-TKIs in preclinical models. MM-121 is a monoclonal an...

9633 Background: Rolapitant is a highly selective competitive long acting NK-1 receptor antagonist that demonstrated efficacy in a large randomized phase 2 dose-finding study. This study evaluated ...

TPS8118^ Background: Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone recognized as a key facilitator of cancer cell growth and survival. Ganetespib is a resorcinolic Hsp90 inhibitor that has shown single-agent acti...