Search

Purpose The purpose of this study was to establish the degree of compliance with the fast track (enhanced recovery) protocol in habitual clinical practice and to determine which measures are fundamental for achieving the results obtained by applying the entire protocol. Methods Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter trial was conducted. Participating hospitals prospectively recorded data from at least ten consecutive patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer who were applied some or all of the items comprising the enhanced recovery protocol. The data were analyzed both globally and dividing the sample into the two groups of patients. Results Data on 363 patients from 25 hospitals were recorded, one hundred seventy-three in the "non-fast track" group and 190 in the "fast track" group. The non-fast track group complied with a mean of 5.4 (+/- 1.8) items and the fast track group with a mean of 8.4 (+/- 1.8) items. The mean functional hospital stay was 7.3 (+/- 5.1) days in the non-fast track group and 6.2 (+/- 5.1) days in the fast track group (p

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was originally designed for the removal of rectal tumors, principally incipient adenomas, and adenocarcinomas up to 20 cm from the anal verge. However, with the evolution of the technique and the increase in surgeons' experience, new indications have emerged and TEM may now be used in place of other surgical procedures which are associated with higher morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate our group's use of TEM or transanal endoscopic operations (TEO) for conditions other than rectal tumors.An observational study of TEM (using Wolf equipment) or TEO (using Storz equipment) for indications other than excision of rectal tumors was conducted from June 2004 to July 2012.Four hundred twenty-four procedures were performed using TEM/TEO: removal of adenocarcinomas in 148 (34.9 %) patients, adenomas in 236 (55.7 %), post-polypectomy excision in 12 (2.8 %), removal of neuroendocrine tumors in 8 (1.9 %), and atypical indications in 20 (4.7 %). Atypical indications were pelvic abscess (3), benign rectal stenoses (2), rectourethral fistula after prostatectomy (3), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (3), endorectal condylomata acuminata (1), rectal prolapse (2), extraction of impacted fecaloma in the rectosigmoid junction (1), repair of traumatic and iatrogenic perforation of the rectum (2), and presacral tumor (3).The use of TEM/TEO in atypical indications may benefit patients by avoiding surgical procedures associated with greater morbidity.

The prevalence of terminal parastomal hernia (PH) after colostomy placement may be as high as 50%. The effect of the PH may range from discomfort to life-threatening complications. Surgical procedures for repairing PH are difficult to perform and present a high-failure rate.To reduce the incidence of PH by implanting a lightweight mesh in the sublay position.Randomized, controlled, prospective study. Patients were scheduled for permanent end colostomy surgery to treat cancer of the lower third of the rectum, performed by the same colorectal surgery team. An Ultrapro lightweight mesh was inserted in the sublay position in the study group. Using simple randomization, the sample size required was estimated to be 27 per group. Patients were followed-up clinically and radiologically with abdominal computed tomography by an independent clinician and a radiologist who were all blind to the aims of the study, 1 month and every 6 months after surgery.: The groups were homogeneous in terms of their clinical and demographic characteristics. Surgical time and postoperative morbidity were similar in the 2 groups. Mortality was 0. No mesh intolerance was reported. In the clinical follow-up (median: 29 months, range: 13-49), 11/27 (40.7%) hernias were recorded in the control group compared with 4/27 (14.8%) in the study group (P = 0.03). Abdominal computed tomography identified 14/27 (44.4%) hernias in the control group compared with 6/27 (22.2%) in the study group (P = 0.08).Parastomal placement of a mesh reduces the appearance of PH. The technique is safe, well-tolerated, and does not increase morbidity rates.

Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice. Method A cross-sectional, descriptive observational study was carried out, assessing the clinical and radiological prevalence of PH in 75 patients with an end colostomy operated on since 1997. Clinical examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Abdominal CTs were assessed by a single radiologist. Results PH was observed clinically in 33 (44%) of 75 patients and 27 (82%) were symptomatic. Using the classification 0 (Normal), I (Hernial sac containing stoma loop), II (Sac containing omentum), III (Sac containing a loop other than stoma), radiological PH was observed in 35 (47%) patients. Clinical/radiological concordance (Kappa index = 0.4) increased proportionally with sac size. All type-III PHs (n = 9) were symptomatic. The combined prevalence of PH detected by one or other method was 60.8%. Conclusion Clinical and radiological prevalence of PH is high. As there is no gold standard for PH detection, we recommend a combination of the two methods. A new classification for use in clinical practice is proposed.