Search

Rapid growth in population, industry, urbanization and intensive agriculture have led to soil and water pollution by various contaminants. Nanoremediation has become one of the most successful emerging technologies for cleaning up soil and water contaminants due to the high reactivity of nanomaterials (NMs). Numerous publications are available on the use of NMs for removing contaminants, and the efficiencies are often improved by modifications of NMs with polymers, clay minerals, zeolites, activated carbon, and biochar. This paper critically reviews the current state-of-the-art NMs used for sustainable soil and water remediation, focusing on their applications in novel remedial approaches, such as adsorption/filtration, catalysis, photodegradation, electro-nanoremediation, and nano-bioremediation. Insights into process performances, modes of deployment, potential environmental risks and their management, and the consequent societal and economic implications of using NMs for soil and water remediation indicate that widespread acceptance of nanoremediation technologies requires not only a substantial advancement of the underpinning science and engineering aspects themselves, but also practical demonstrations of the effectiveness of already recognized approaches at real world in-situ conditions. New research involving green nanotechnology, nano-bioremediation, electro-nanoremediation, risk assessment of NMs, and outreach activities are needed to achieve successful applications of nanoremediation at regional and global scales.

This study evaluates the arsenic adsorption behavior of Fe-exchanged smectite and phosphate-bound kaolinite, in soil, tap water and double distilled water in the presence of competing anions such as silicate, phosphate, and sulfate, and at variable pH values. The maximum amounts of As adsorbed in soil are 620.6 and 607.6 µg g–1 at pH 5 by Fe-exchanged smectite and phosphate-bound kaolinite, respectively. The pH-modified Freundlich equation fits well (R2 > 0.96) to the adsorption data, distinguishing the effect of pH on adsorption. The coefficients of pH-value are 0.04 and 0.05 for phosphate-bound kaolinite and Fe-exchanged smectite, suggesting that low pH is suitable for the adsorption. The As adsorption is decreased in tap water at low pH compared to the soil due to the presence of iron (Fe2+/3+), sulfate, and bicarbonate in tap water. Among the competing anions in distilled water, phosphate is the most interfering anion for As adsorption. The competition coefficients of As-phosphate binary adsorption derived from the Sheindorf equation are 3.93 and 0.56 for Fe-exchanged smectite and phosphate-bound kaolinite at pH 5. The Fe-exchanged smectite can be used more effectively than phosphate-bound kaolinite for As remediation in systems having low pH (pH ≈5) and high phosphate concentration.

This study evaluates the arsenic adsorption behavior of Fe-exchanged smectite and phosphate-bound kaolinite, in soil, tap water and double distilled water in the presence of competing anions such as silicate, phosphate, and sulfate, and at variable pH values. The maximum amounts of As adsorbed in soil are 620.6 and 607.6 µg g–1 at pH 5 by Fe-exchanged smectite and phosphate-bound kaolinite, respectively. The pH-modified Freundlich equation fits well (R2 > 0.96) to the adsorption data, distinguishing the effect of pH on adsorption. The coefficients of pH-value are 0.04 and 0.05 for phosphate-bound kaolinite and Fe-exchanged smectite, suggesting that low pH is suitable for the adsorption. The As adsorption is decreased in tap water at low pH compared to the soil due to the presence of iron (Fe2+/3+), sulfate, and bicarbonate in tap water. Among the competing anions in distilled water, phosphate is the most interfering anion for As adsorption. The competition coefficients of As-phosphate binary adsorption derived from the Sheindorf equation are 3.93 and 0.56 for Fe-exchanged smectite and phosphate-bound kaolinite at pH 5. The Fe-exchanged smectite can be used more effectively than phosphate-bound kaolinite for As remediation in systems having low pH (pH ≈5) and high phosphate concentration.

In order to enhance the efficiency of metal immobilisation, bentonite clay was pillared with polyhydroxy aluminium complexes. The pillared bentonite was systematically characterised by multiple techniques including x-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The clay product was assessed for its metal removal efficiency from aqueous systems through batch experiments with variables in pH, amount of adsorbent and initial metal concentration. The adsorption data were fitted with Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of pillared bentonite was 61.4, 32.3 and 50.3 mg g− 1 for Cu (II), Zn (II) and Ni (II), respectively. The immobilisation efficiency of pillared bentonite was assessed by greenhouse pot culture experiment with amaranth as the test crop. Amendment of soil with pillared bentonite at 2.5% significantly improved the plant growth as well as reduced the bioavailable metals in the metal spiked soils. The study demonstrated that pillared bentonite could potentially be used for addressing heavy metal pollutions by immobilising the metals in the contaminated soil.