Search

Background and objectivesOcrelizumab improved clinical and MRI measures of disease activity and progression in three phase 3 multiple sclerosis (MS) studies. Post hoc analyses demonstrated a correlation between the ocrelizumab serum concentration and the degree of blood B-cell depletion, and body weight was identified as the most influential covariate on ocrelizumab pharmacokinetics. The magnitude of ocrelizumab treatment benefit on disability progression was greater in lighter vs heavier patients. These observations suggest that higher ocrelizumab serum levels provide more complete B-cell depletion and a greater delay in disability progression. The current post hoc analyses assessed population exposure-efficacy/safety relationships of ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing and primary progressive MS.MethodsPatients in OPERA I/II and ORATORIO were grouped in exposure quartiles based on their observed individual serum ocrelizumab level over the treatment period. Exposure-response relationships were analyzed for clinical efficacy (24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), annualized relapse rate [ARR], and MRI outcomes) and adverse events.ResultsOcrelizumab reduced new MRI lesion counts to nearly undetectable levels in patients with relapsing or primary progressive MS across all exposure subgroups, and reduced ARR in patients with relapsing MS to very low levels (0.13-0.18). A consistent trend of higher ocrelizumab exposure leading to lower rates of CDP was seen (0%-25% [lowest] to 75%-100% [highest] quartile hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals; relapsing MS: 0.70 [0.41-1.19], 0.85 [0.52-1.39], 0.47 [0.25-0.87], and 0.34 [0.17-0.70] vs interferon β-1a; primary progressive MS: 0.88 [0.59-1.30], 0.86 [0.60-1.25], 0.77 [0.52-1.14], and 0.55 [0.36-0.83] vs placebo). Infusion-related reactions, serious adverse events, and serious infections were similar across exposure subgroups.DiscussionThe almost complete reduction of ARR and MRI activity already evident in the lowest quartile, and across all ocrelizumab-exposure groups, suggests a ceiling effect. A consistent trend of higher ocrelizumab exposure leading to greater reduction in risk of CDP was observed, particularly in the relapsing MS trials, and was not associated with a higher rate of adverse events. Higher ocrelizumab exposure may provide improved control of disability progression by reducing disease activity below that detectable by ARR and MRI, and/or by attenuating other B-cell-related pathologies responsible for tissue damage.Classification of evidenceThis analysis provides Class III evidence that higher ocrelizumab serum levels are related to greater reduction in risk of disability progression in patients with multiple sclerosis. The study is rated Class III because of the initial treatment randomization disclosure that occurred after inclusion in the open-label extension.Trial registration informationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01247324 (OPERA I), NCT01412333 (OPERA II), and NCT01194570 (ORATORIO).

Background and purposeRequiring a walking aid is a fundamental milestone in multiple sclerosis (MS), represented by an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥6.0. In the present study, we assess the effect of ocrelizumab (OCR) on time to EDSS score ≥6.0 in relapsing MS.MethodsTime to EDSS score ≥6.0 confirmed for ≥24 and ≥48 weeks was assessed over the course of 6.5 years (336 weeks) in the double-blind period (DBP) and open-label extension (OLE) period of the OPERA I (NCT01247324) and OPERA II (NCT01412333) studies.ResultsTime to reach EDSS score ≥6.0 was significantly delayed in those initially randomized to OCR versus interferon. Over 6.5 years, the risk of requiring a walking aid confirmed for ≥24 weeks was 34% lower among those who initiated OCR earlier versus delayed treatment (average hazard ratio [HR] DBP + OLE 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.95; p = 0.024); the risk of requiring a walking aid confirmed for ≥48 weeks was 46% lower (average HR DBP+OLE 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83; p = 0.004).ConclusionThe reduced risk of requiring a walking aid in earlier initiators of OCR demonstrates the long-term implications of earlier highly effective treatment.

ObjectiveTo assess over 3 years of follow-up the effects of maintaining or switching to ocrelizumab (OCR) therapy on clinical and MRI outcomes and safety measures in the open-label extension (OLE) phase of the pooled OPERA: I/II studies in relapsing multiple sclerosis.MethodsAfter 2 years of double-blind, controlled treatment, patients continued OCR (600 mg infusions every 24 weeks) or switched from interferon (IFN)-β-1a (44 μg 3 times weekly) to OCR when entering the OLE phase (3 years). Adjusted annualized relapse rate, time to onset of 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP)/improvement (CDP), brain MRI activity (gadolinium-enhanced and new/enlarging T2 lesions), and percentage brain volume change were analyzed.ResultsOf patients entering the OLE phase, 88.6% completed year 5. The cumulative proportion with 24-week CDP was lower in patients who initiated OCR earlier vs patients initially receiving IFN-β-1a (16.1% vs 21.3% at year 5; p = 0.014). Patients continuing OCR maintained and those switching from IFN-β-1a to OCR attained near complete and sustained suppression of new brain MRI lesion activity from years 3-5. Over the OLE phase, patients continuing OCR exhibited less whole brain volume loss from double-blind study baseline vs those switching from IFN-β-1a (-1.87% vs -2.15% at year 5; p < 0.01). Adverse events were consistent with past reports and no new safety signals emerged with prolonged treatment.ConclusionCompared with patients switching from IFN-β-1a, earlier and continuous OCR treatment up to 5 years provided sustained benefit on clinical and MRI measures of disease progression.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that earlier and continuous treatment with OCR provided sustained benefit on clinical and MRI outcomes of disease activity and progression compared with patients switching from IFN-β-1a. The study is rated Class III because of the initial treatment randomization disclosure that occurred after inclusion in OLE.Clinical trial identifiersNCT01247324/NCT01412333.

Background: The current standard endpoint to assess disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials is the time to the first confirmed disability progression, which excludes subsequent progression events. Including recurrent progression events may permit a more comprehensive assessment of treatment effects on disability progression. Objective: To propose a definition of recurrent disability progression events and to compare time-to-first and recurrent event analysis. Methods: Recurrent disability progression events were defined by expanding the recommended first event definition. Marginal recurrent event methods (negative binomial model, Lin–Wei–Yang–Ying model) were compared with Cox regression in data from three randomized controlled trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), and in simulated randomized controlled trial data. Results: The recurrent event analyses included a substantially larger number of progression events compared with the time-to-first-event analyses (+7.5% and +9.9% in the RMS trials and +22.7% in the PPMS trial). The increase in the number of events resulted in more precise treatment effect estimates and a corresponding gain in statistical power. Conclusion: Our results support the use of recurrent event data analysis, especially in progressive MS trials, to improve estimates of treatment effects, increase statistical power, and better capture the clinically meaningful long-term disability progression experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ocrelizumab is an intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody approved for relapsing and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Shortening the infusion to 2 hours may reduce the total site stay from 5.5-6 hours (approved infusion duration including mandatory premedication/observation) to 4 hours, which may reduce patient and site staff burden. Objectives: To investigate the safety profile of ocrelizumab when administered over a shorter infusion period, using primary results from ENSEMBLE PLUS. Methods: ENSEMBLE PLUS is a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (trial registration: NCT03085810). In ENSEMBLE, patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting MS (18-55 years; treatment-naive; disease duration ≤3 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0-3.5) receive ocrelizumab 600-mg infusions every 24 weeks for 192 weeks. In ENSEMBLE PLUS, ocrelizumab (600 mg) administered over the approved infusion time (3.5 hours; conventional duration), is compared with a 2-hour infusion (shorter duration); the initial infusion (2 x 300 mg) duration remains unaffected. The ENSEMBLE PLUS primary end point is the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first randomized infusion (frequency/severity assessed during and 24 hours postinfusion). Results: As of September 2019, 291 and 289 patients were randomized to the conventional and shorter infusion groups, respectively. Following the first randomized infusion, 67 patients (23.1%) in the conventional and 71 patients (24.6%) in the shorter infusion group had IRRs, from which 17.9% vs 31.0% were throat irritation and 25.4% vs 23.9% were fatigue, respectively. Most IRRs were mild or moderate; >98% of all IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups. No IRRs were life threatening, serious, or fatal; 1 severe IRR occurred in both the conventional (laryngeal inflammation [second randomized dose]) and shorter duration groups (fatigue [first randomized dose]). No IRR-related discontinuations occurred. During the first randomized dose, 14 (4.8%) and 25 (8.7%) patients in the conventional and shorter infusion groups had IRRs leading to infusion interruption/slowing, respectively. Conclusions: Primary analysis suggests that the frequency/severity of IRRs are comparable between conventional and shorter infusions. No new safety signals were detected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The current standard endpoint to assess disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials is the time to the first confirmed disability progression, which excludes subsequent progression events. Including recurrent progression events may permit a more comprehensive assessment of treatment effects on disability progression., Objective: To propose a definition of recurrent disability progression events and to compare time-to-first and recurrent event analysis., Methods: Recurrent disability progression events were defined by expanding the recommended first event definition. Marginal recurrent event methods (negative binomial model, Lin-Wei-Yang-Ying model) were compared with Cox regression in data from three randomized controlled trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), and in simulated randomized controlled trial data., Results: The recurrent event analyses included a substantially larger number of progression events compared with the time-to-first-event analyses (+7.5% and +9.9% in the RMS trials and +22.7% in the PPMS trial). The increase in the number of events resulted in more precise treatment effect estimates and a corresponding gain in statistical power., Conclusion: Our results support the use of recurrent event data analysis, especially in progressive MS trials, to improve estimates of treatment effects, increase statistical power, and better capture the clinically meaningful long-term disability progression experience.