Search

Phase I studies have shown that AMG 151 activates glucokinase, a key enzyme in glucose homeostasis. The present randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIa study evaluated the dose-effect relationship of the glucokinase activator AMG 151 relative to placebo on fasting plasma glucose ( FPG) in 236 patients (33-35 patients per arm) with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. Patients received oral AMG 151 at 50, 100 or 200 mg twice daily, AMG 151 at 100, 200 or 400 mg once daily or matching placebo for 28 days. A significant linear dose-effect trend was observed with the twice-daily regimen (p = 0.004) for change in FPG to day 28. No trend was observed with the once-daily regimen. A higher incidence of hypoglycaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia was observed with AMG 151 administration. AMG 151 significantly reduced FPG when administered twice daily but not when administered once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: A post hoc analysis used pooled STRIVE/ReSTORE trial data to determine outcomes with rezafungin versus caspofungin by Candida species and antifungal susceptibility., Methods: The efficacy and safety of once weekly rezafungin 400/200 mg versus once daily caspofungin 70/50 mg was demonstrated in the randomized, double-blind phase 2 STRIVE (NCT02734862) and phase 3 ReSTORE (NCT03667690) trials involving adults with candidaemia and/or invasive candidiasis. In this analysis, data were pooled for patients with a documented Candida infection within 96 hours of randomization who also received ≥1 dose of study drug. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by Candida species and baseline MICs. Susceptibility was determined using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing E.Def 7.4 broth microdilution methodology, with Tween 20-supplemented medium for rezafungin., Results: A total of 294 patients were included (rezafungin: N = 139, caspofungin: N = 155). Susceptibility testing at baseline identified three rezafungin non-susceptible isolates. Day 14 global cure rates were numerically similar between groups for C. albicans (rezafungin: 61.0% [36/59], caspofungin: 65.2% [45/69]) and C. tropicalis (rezafungin: 70.4% [19/27], caspofungin: 63.6% [14/22]), but higher with rezafungin than caspofungin for C. glabrata (rezafungin: 71.1% [27/38], caspofungin: 60.0% [21/35]) and C. parapsilosis (rezafungin: 78.6% [11/44], caspofungin: 55.6% [15/27]). Day 30 all-cause mortality rates were numerically similar between groups for C. albicans (rezafungin: 22.0% [13/59], caspofungin: 18.8% [13/69]) and C. glabrata (rezafungin: 15.8% [6/38], caspofungin: 11.4% [4/35]), but higher with caspofungin than rezafungin for C. tropicalis (rezafungin: 18.5% [5/27], caspofungin: 31.8% [2/22]) and C. parapsilosis (rezafungin: 7.1% [1/14], caspofungin: 29.6% [8/27]). Day 5/14 mycological eradication rates were numerically similar between treatments for C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, but higher with rezafungin for C. glabrata and C. tropicalis. Outcomes by Candida species were not associated with treatment-specific MICs., Discussion: Rezafungin appears to be an effective treatment for candidaemia/invasive candidiasis irrespective of baseline Candida species., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

A significant unmet need remains for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who fail to respond to first-line treatment or experience an early relapse. Tinostamustine, a novel alkylating deacetylase inhibitor, inhibits tumor cell growth and slows disease progression in models of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. This was a Phase I, multicenter, open-label, two-stage trial investigating the safety and efficacy of tinostamustine in patients ≥ 18 years with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematological malignancies, including HL. Stage 1 involved dose-escalation to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tinostamustine, optimal infusion time and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Stage 2 confirmed the safety and efficacy of the RP2D in expansion cohorts of selected R/R hematological malignancies. Ten patients with heavily pre-treated HL entered dose-escalation, with nine patients experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) considered to be related to study treatment-primarily hematological toxicities. MTD was 100 mg/m 2 tinostamustine over 60 min and signals of efficacy were observed for patients with HL. In Stage 2, all 20 patients with HL experienced ≥ 1 TEAE, which were principally hematological or gastrointestinal. There were no tinostamustine-related deaths in either stage of the study. Overall response rate in Stage 2 was 37% (2 complete responses, 5 partial responses; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%, 62%) and median progression-free survival 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.2-9.4 months). Tinostamustine is a promising new therapeutic approach for the treatment of patients with R/R classical HL with limited options. This study demonstrates a predictable and manageable safety profile with signals of efficacy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02576496., (© 2024 The Author(s). Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Invasive candidiasis/candidemia (IC/C) is associated with a substantial health economic burden driven primarily by prolonged hospital stay. The once-weekly IV echinocandin, rezafungin acetate, has demonstrated non-inferiority to caspofungin in the treatment of IC/C. This paper reports a post hoc pooled exploratory analysis of length of stay (LoS) for hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays in two previously published clinical trials (ReSTORE [NCT03667690] and STRIVE [NCT02734862], that compared rezafungin with daily IV caspofungin (stable patients in the caspofungin group who met relevant criteria could step down to fluconazole after 3 days or more)., Methods: LoS outcomes were analysed descriptively in the pooled modified intention to treat (mITT) population (all patients who had a documented Candida infection in line with trial requirements and received at least one dose of study drug). In addition, to adjust for an imbalance between treatment groups in the proportion receiving mechanical ventilation at baseline, a generalised linear model with mechanical ventilation as a binary covariate was applied. Responses to an exploratory question in the phase 3 trial on possible earlier discharge with weekly rezafungin are also reported., Results: 294 patients were included (rezafungin 139, caspofungin 155), of whom 126 (43%) had ICU admission. Patients treated with rezafungin had a numerically shorter LoS than with caspofungin in all analyses. Mean total LoS was 25.2 days, vs 28.3 days with caspofungin, and mean ICU LoS was 16.1 vs 21.6 days for rezafungin and caspofungin, respectively. After adjustment for mechanical ventilation status the difference in ICU LoS was 4.1 days, a relative difference of 24% (95% CI -11%, 72%). Physicians would have considered earlier discharge for 16% of patients (30/187) with weekly rezafungin, an average of 5-6 days earlier., Conclusions: Rezafungin may enable shorter hospital and ICU LoS in IC/C compared with daily IV caspofungin, with accompanying savings in resource use. Further research is needed to confirm this in the real-world setting., Trial Registration: NCT03667690 (ReSTORE; September 12, 2018); NCT02734862 (STRIVE; April 12, 2016)., Competing Interests: Declarations Data and availability of materials Data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from Sara Dickerson, Sara.Dickerson@mundipharma.com. Ethics approval and consent to participate Both the STRIVE and ReSTORE trials were in conducted in accordance with current country and local regulations, the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice, and the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics committees or institutional review boards at participating sites approved the protocols and all amendments. All patients, or their legally authorised representative, provided written informed consent. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests PMH reports grants or contracts from Baxter, Cytosorbents, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Baxter, Cytosorbents, and Pfizer; honoraria from Baxter, and Cytosorbents; and support for attending meetings from Mundipharma, and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. MB reports honoraria from and membership of data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Angelini, Cidara, Gilead, Menarini, MSD, Pfizer, and Shionogi, outside of the submitted work. OAC reports grants or contracts from Amplyx, Basilea, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Cidara, German Center for Infection Research, European Union Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (101037867), F2G, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, MSD, Mundipharma, Octapharma, Pfizer, and Scynexis; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amplyx, Biocon, Biosys, Cidara, Da Volterra, Gilead, IQVIA, Janssen, Matinas, MedPace, Menarini, Molecular Partners, Noxxon, Octapharma, Pardes, Pfizer, Pharma Support America, Scynexis, and Seres; honoraria from Abbott, AbbVie, Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana/United Medical/Knight, Hikma, MedScape, MedUpdate, Merck/MSD, Mylan, Noscendo, Pfizer, and Shionogi; payment for expert testimony from Cidara; data safety monitoring board or advisory board membership for Actelion, Allecra, Cidara, Entasis, IQVIA, Janssen, MedPace, Paratek, Pharma Support America, Pulmocide, Shionogi, and The Prime Meridian Group; a patent at the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DE 10 2021 113 007.7); stocks from CoRe Consulting; outside of the submitted work. HD reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Gilead, MSD, Mundipharma, Shionogi, Viatris, outside of the submitted work. JF was an advisor/consultant and received grant support and honoraria for talks on behalf of Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. MK reports grants from Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation and consulting fees from Merck, Pfizer, and Shionogi, outside of the submitted work. PP reports grants from Astellas, Gilead, Scynexis, and Cidara; fees for scientific advisory board from F2G, Matinas, TFF, Basilea outside of the submitted work. JP Reports no conflict of interest. JV reports consulting fees from and membership of data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F2G and consulting fees from Cidara and Scynexis, outside of the submitted work. IB and NM report being employees of Mundipharma. TS reports being an employee of and holding stocks in Cidara Therapeutics. GRT reports grants and consulting fees from Amplyx, Astellas, Cidara, F2G, and Manye; grants from Merck; and data safety monitoring board membership for Pfizer, outside of the submitted work., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Rezafungin is an echinocandin approved in the US and EU to treat candidaemia and/or invasive candidiasis. This post-hoc, pooled analysis of the Phase 2 STRIVE and Phase 3 ReSTORE trials assessed rezafungin versus caspofungin in patients with candidaemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) at randomisation., Methods: STRIVE and ReSTORE were randomised double-blind trials in adults with systemic signs and mycological confirmation of candidaemia and/or IC in blood or a normally sterile site ≤ 96 h before randomisation. Data were pooled for patients in the ICU at randomisation who received intravenous rezafungin (400 mg loading dose then 200 mg once weekly) or caspofungin (70 mg loading dose then 50 mg once daily) for ≤ 4 weeks. Outcomes were Day 30 all-cause mortality (primary outcome), Day 5 and 14 mycological eradication, time to negative blood culture, mortality attributable to candidaemia/invasive candidiasis, safety, and pharmacokinetics., Results: Of 294 patients in STRIVE/ReSTORE, 113 were in the ICU at randomisation (rezafungin n = 46; caspofungin n = 67). At baseline, ~ 30% of patients in each group had impaired renal function and/or an Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II score ≥ 20. One patient (in the caspofungin group) was neutropenic at baseline. Day 30 all-cause mortality was 34.8% for rezafungin versus 25.4% for caspofungin. Day 5 and 14 mycological eradication was 78.3% and 71.7% for rezafungin versus 59.7% and 65.7% for caspofungin, respectively. Median time to negative blood culture was 18 (interquartile range, 12.6-43.0) versus 38 (interquartile range, 15.9-211.3) h for rezafungin versus caspofungin (stratified log-rank P = 0.001; nominal, not adjusted for multiplicity). Candidaemia/IC-attributable deaths occurred in two rezafungin patients versus one caspofungin patient. Safety profiles were similar between groups. Overall, 17.4% (rezafungin) versus 29.9% (caspofungin) of patients discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events. Rezafungin exposure following the initial 400-mg dose was comparable between patients in the ICU at randomisation (n = 50) and non-ICU patients (n = 117)., Conclusions: Rezafungin was well tolerated and efficacious in critically ill, mainly non-neutropenic patients with candidaemia and/or IC. This analysis provides additional insights into the efficacy and safety of rezafungin in the ICU population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Rezafungin, a novel, once-weekly echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC) was noninferior to caspofungin for day 30 all-cause mortality (ACM) and day 14 global cure in the phase 3 ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690). We conducted preplanned subgroup analyses for patients with a positive culture close to randomization in ReSTORE., Methods: ReSTORE was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial in patients aged ≥18 years with candidemia and/or IC treated with once-weekly intravenous rezafungin (400 mg/200 mg) or once-daily intravenous caspofungin (70 mg/50 mg). This analysis comprised patients with a positive blood culture drawn between 12 hours before and 72 hours after randomization or a positive culture from another normally sterile site sampled between 48 hours before and 72 hours after randomization. Efficacy endpoints included day 30 ACM, day 14 global cure rate, and day 5 and 14 mycological response. Adverse events were evaluated., Results: This analysis included 38 patients randomized to rezafungin and 46 to caspofungin. In the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively, day 30 ACM was 26.3% and 21.7% (between-group difference [95% confidence interval], 4.6% [-13.7%, 23.5%]), day 14 global response was 55.3% and 50.0% (between-group difference, 5.3% [-16.1%, 26.0%]), and day 5 mycological eradication was 71.1% and 50.0% (between-group difference, 21.1% [-0.2%, 40.2%]). Safety was comparable between treatments., Conclusions: These findings support the efficacy and safety of rezafungin compared with caspofungin for the treatment of candidemia and/or IC in patients with a positive culture close to randomization, with potential early treatment benefits for rezafungin., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. A. S.: grants from Pfizer and Gilead and honoraria for lectures and advisory boards from Pfizer, MSD, Shionogi, Angelini, and Menarini. P. M. H.: grants or contracts from Baxter, Cytosorbents, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Baxter, Cytosorbents, and Pfizer; honoraria from Baxter and Cytosorbents; and support for attending meetings from Mundipharma and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. O. A. C.: grants or contracts from Cidara, F2G, Gilead, MedPace, MSD, Mundipharma, Pfizer, and Scynexis; consulting fees from AbbVie, AiCuris, Cidara, Gilead, IQVIA, Matinas, MedPace, Pfizer, PSI, and Scynexis; honoraria for lectures from Abbott, AbbVie, Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals/Hikma, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana/United Medical/Knight, Medscape, medupdate, Merck/MSD, Noscendo, Pfizer, and Shionogi; payment for expert testimony from Cidara; participation on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board or advisory board from Cidara, IQVIA, Janssen, Medpace, PSI, Pulmocide, and Shionogi. M. C.: research funding from F2G, Cidara, Shionogi, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Janssen, and served as a speaker and advisory board membership for Gilead, Pfizer, and MSD. M. B.: consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, Pfizer, Menarini, Shionogi, Angelini, and Gilead; and Data and Safety Monitoring Board or advisory board participation for Cidara and Mundipharma. H. D.: fees from Mundipharma for serving on expert boards and conferences. M. K.: funding from the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation. B. J. K.: served on the independent data review committee for Cidara. N. M.: is an employee of Mundipharma Research Ltd. P. P.: grants from and data review committee membership for Cidara and Melinta; grants from Astellas, Scynexis, and Merck; and advisory board membership for F2G and Matinas. T. S.: employee and shareholder of Cidara Therapeutics. J. A. V.: research and consulting for Astellas, Amplyx, Cidara, F2G, Melinta, and Scynexis and served on the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for F2G. G. R. T.: research and consulting for Astellas, Amplyx, Cidara, F2G, Mayne, Melinta, Mundipharma, and Scynexis and served on the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Pfizer. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Abstract: Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) mature natural killer cell and T-cell lymphoma have limited treatment options. To evaluate pralatrexate's performance and factors influencing its safety and efficacy in R/R peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), we performed a pooled analysis of data from 4 similarly designed, regulatory-mandated prospective clinical trials. Of 221 patients (median age, 59 years; 67.0% male) in the study population, 48.9% had PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), 21.3% angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and 11.8% ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 2.56 months (range, 0.03-24.18) and had a 40.7% objective response rate with a median duration of response of 9.1 months, progression-free survival 4.6 months, and overall survival 16.3 months. The most common treatment-related all-grade adverse events were stomatitis, thrombocytopenia, white blood cell count decrease, pyrexia, and vomiting. Subgroup exploratory analyses suggest improved efficacy with 1 prior line of chemotherapy vs 2 or ≥4 prior lines; PTCL-NOS or ALCL vs transformed mycosis fungoides; chemotherapy and transplant before pralatrexate vs chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy with other nontransplant treatments. In conclusion, these pooled analysis results further support using pralatrexate in patients with R/R PTCL. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of subgroups analyses., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Extended dosing of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) darbepoetin alfa (DA) once biweekly or monthly reduces anaemia treatment burden. This observational study assessed outcomes and dosing patterns in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKD-NoD) commencing extended dosing of DA., Methods: Adult CKD-NoD patients starting extended dosing of DA in Europe or Australia in June 2006 or later were followed up until December 2012. Outcomes included haemoglobin (Hb) concentration, ESA dosing, mortality rates and receipt of dialysis and renal transplantation. Subgroup analyses were conducted for selected outcomes., Results: Of 6035 enrolled subjects, 5723 (94.8%) met analysis criteria; 1795 (29.7%) received dialysis and 238 (3.9%) underwent renal transplantation. Mean (standard deviation) Hb concentration at commencement of extended dosing was 11.0 (1.5) g/dL. Mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] Hb 12 months after commencement of extended dosing (primary outcome) was 11.6 g/dL (11.5, 11.6) overall and was similar across countries, with no differences between subjects previously treated with an ESA versus ESA-naïve subjects, subjects with versus without prior renal transplant or diabetics versus non-diabetics. Weekly ESA dose gradually decreased following commencement of extended DA dosing and was similar across subgroups. The decrease in weekly DA dose was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of patients receiving iron therapy. Hb concentrations declined following changes in ESA labels and treatment guidelines. The mortality rate (95% CI) was 7.06 (6.68, 7.46) deaths per 100 years of follow-up. Subjects alive at study end had stable Hb concentrations in the preceding year, while those who died had lower and declining Hb concentrations in their last year., Conclusions: Long-term, extended dosing of DA maintained Hb concentrations in patients already treated with an ESA and corrected and maintained Hb in ESA-naïve patients., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.)

Background: Limited prospective data are available on the long-term safety of darbepoetin alfa (DA) for treating anemia in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: In this prospective, phase IV, observational registry study, children ≤16 years of age with CKD anemia and receiving DA were observed for ≤2 years. Adverse events (AEs), DA dosing, hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, and transfusions were recorded., Results: A total of 319 patients were included in the analysis (mean age, 9.1 years), 158 (49.5%) of whom were on dialysis at study entry. Of 434 serious AEs reported in 162 children, the most common were peritonitis (10.0%), gastroenteritis (6.0%), and hypertension (4.1%). Six patients (1.9%) died (unrelated to DA). Four patients (1.3%) experienced six serious adverse drug reactions. The geometric mean DA dose range was 1.4-2.0 μg/kg/month. Mean baseline Hb concentration was 11.1 g/dl; mean values for children receiving and not receiving dialysis at baseline ranged between 10.9 and 11.5 g/dl and 11.2-11.7 g/dl, respectively. Overall, 48 patients (15.0%) received ≥1 transfusion., Conclusions: No new safety signals for DA were identified in children receiving DA for CKD anemia for ≤2 years. Based on Hb concentrations and transfusion requirements, DA was effective at managing anemia in these patients.

Introduction: There is scant real-world information on switching treatment for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (PEG-Epo) to darbepoetin alfa (DA). TRANSFORM was a multi-center, observational study designed to describe the time course of hemoglobin (Hb) concentration (primary outcome measure) and other parameters of clinical management of anemia in European hemodialysis patients in clinical practice before and after a switch from PEG-Epo to DA., Methods: Eligible subjects were adult patients with CKD dialyzed at European dialysis centers for ≥26 weeks and treated with PEG-Epo for ≥14 weeks immediately prior to being switched to DA and no earlier than January 2011. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent doses and Hb values were recorded for the 14-week pre-switch and 26-week post-switch periods., Results: Of the 1,027 eligible patients enrolled at 42 hemodialysis centers in 7 European countries, 785 were included in analyses. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) Hb was generally stable: 11.19 (11.11, 11.26), 11.48 (11.40, 11.57), and 11.29 (11.20, 11.37) g/dL at month -1 pre-switch and months 3 and 6 post-switch, respectively. The geometric mean (95% CI) PEG-Epo dose at month -1 was 27.4 (26.0, 28.8) µg/week; DA dose was 29.4 (27.9, 30.9), 23.3 (21.9, 24.9), and 25.6 (24.1, 27.1) µg/week at months 1, 4, and 6, respectively. The geometric mean (95% CI) dose ratio at switching was 1.06 (1.01, 1.11). When stratifying by dose-ratio categories <0.8, 0.8-1.2, and >1.2 at switching, mean DA dose and Hb converged within narrow ranges by month 6 post-switch: 23.9-27.0 µg/week and 11.1-11.5 g/dL, respectively. Hb excursions <10 g/dL were less frequent post-switch versus pre-switch., Conclusion: Mean Hb values remained within a narrow range following switching from PEG-Epo to DA in this population of hemodialysis patients. Time trends of mean Hb and DA dose indicate that physicians titrated DA doses post-switch, to attain Hb concentrations comparable to those attained pre-switch with PEG-Epo.

Aim: While darbepoetin alfa (DA) can be administered once monthly (QM) to maintain haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKD-ND), the QM use of DA for anaemia correction has not been previously investigated., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, active-controlled study, adult subjects with CKD-ND, Hb levels <10 g/dL, and not treated with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent were randomized 1:1 to receive DA every 2 weeks (Q2W) or QM for 33 weeks with initial doses of 0.75 μg/kg Q2W or 1.5 μg/kg QM. Subjects were treated to target Hb levels of 10-12 g/dL and ≥1 g/dL increase from baseline. The primary end-point was Hb change between baseline and the evaluation period (weeks 29-33), with a non-inferiority margin of -0.5 g/dL., Results: Three hundred and fifty-five subjects received ≥1 dose of DA. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in Hb between baseline and the evaluation period was 2.16 (1.98-2.33) g/dL for the Q2W group and 1.97 (1.80-2.14) g/dL for the QM group, the mean (95% CI) difference in Hb change being -0.19 (-0.43 to 0.05) g/dL. Most subjects (97.9% Q2W; 98.1% QM) achieved a Hb level ≥10.0 g/dL and ≥1.0 g/dL increase in Hb from baseline. Mean DA (SD) weekly equivalent doses over the evaluation period were 0.20 (0.23) and 0.27 (0.31) μg/kg per week for the Q2W and QM groups, respectively. Safety profiles were similar between groups., Conclusion: In subjects with CKD-ND, QM dosing was non-inferior to Q2W dosing for anaemia correction and had a similar safety profile., (© 2014 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Introduction: There is limited information published on switching erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from darbepoetin alfa (DA) to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (PEG-Epo) outside the protocol of interventional clinical studies. AFFIRM (Aranesp Efficiency Relative to Mircera) was a retrospective, multi-site, observational study designed to estimate the population mean maintenance dose conversion ratio [DCR; dose ratio achieving comparable hemoglobin level (Hb) between two evaluation periods] in European hemodialysis patients whose treatment was switched from DA to PEG-Epo., Methods: Eligible patients had received hemodialysis for ≥ 12 months and DA for ≥ 7 months. Data were collected from 7 months before until 7 months after switching treatment. DCR was calculated for patients with Hb and ESA data available in both evaluation periods (EP; Months 1 and 2 were defined as the pre-switch EP, and Months 6 and 7 as the post-switch EP). Red blood cell transfusions pre- and post-switch were quantified., Results: Of 302 patients enrolled, 206 had data available for DCR analysis. The geometric mean DCR was 1.17 (95% CI 1.05, 1.29). Regression analysis indicated a non-linear relationship between pre- and post-switch ESA doses; DCR decreased with increasing pre-switch DA dose. The geometric mean weekly ESA doses were 24.1 μg DA in the pre-switch EP and 28.6 μg PEG-Epo in the post-switch EP. Mean Hb was 11.5 g/dL in the pre-switch EP and 11.4 g/dL in the post-switch EP. There were 16 transfusions and 34 units transfused in the pre-switch period, versus 48 transfusions and 95 units transfused post-switch. Excluding patients receiving a transfusion within 90 days of or during either EP, the DCR was 1.21 (95% CI 1.09, 1.35)., Conclusion: In these hemodialysis patients switched from DA to PEG-Epo the DCR was 1.17 and 1.21 after accounting for the effect of transfusions. The number of transfusions and units transfused increased approximately threefold from the pre-switch to the post-switch period.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is an almost inevitable complication of advanced kidney failure. The introduction of the calcimimetic cinacalcet for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on dialysis was based on its ability to reduce elevated levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Subsequent clinical studies confirmed the beneficial effects of cinacalcet on biochemical parameters reflecting mineral disturbances and bone disease. In this review we summarise the impact of cinacalcet on biochemical, intermediate and clinical outcomes. We also present previously unpublished mineral metabolism data from 144 Dutch dialysis patients treated with cinacalcet who participated in the pan-European ECHO observational study. Although secondary hyperparathyroidism tended to be more severe in our Dutch cohort, compared with the entire ECHO cohort, cinacalcet was nevertheless effective in reducing PTH in these patients. Two recent clinical studies evaluated, respectively, the efficacy of cinacalcet in improving the intermediate endpoint of cardiovascular calcifications (ADVANCE trial), and its impact on clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events (EVOLVE trial). The ADVANCE trial provided evidence that cinacalcet may indeed improve calcification in both large arteries and cardiac valves. The EVOLVE trial, however, did not meet its clinical primary endpoint (time to all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for unstable angina, heart failure or a peripheral vascular event), although secondary and sensitivity analysis suggested a beneficial effect. The clinical implications of these important studies are also addressed in this review.