Search

In recent years, with the increasing patient population, the need for complex and patient-centric medications has increased enormously. Traditional manufacturing techniques such as direct blending, high shear granulation, and dry granulation can be used to develop simple solid oral medications. However, it is well known that "one size fits all" is not true for pharmaceutical medicines. Depending on the age, sex, and disease state, each patient might need a different dose, combination of medicines, and drug release pattern from the medications. By employing traditional practices, developing patient-centric medications remains challenging and unaddressed. Over the last few years, much research has been conducted exploring various additive manufacturing techniques for developing on-demand, complex, and patient-centric medications. Among all the techniques, nozzle-based additive manufacturing platforms such as pressure-assisted microsyringe (PAM) and fused deposition modeling (FDM) have been investigated thoroughly to develop various medications. Both nozzle-based techniques involve the application of thermal energy. However, PAM can also be operated under ambient conditions to process semi-solid materials. Nozzle-based techniques can also be paired with the hot melt extrusion (HME) process for establishing a continuous manufacturing platform by employing various in-line process analytical technology (PAT) tools for monitoring critical process parameters (CPPs) and critical material attributes (CMAs) for delivering safe, efficacious, and quality medications to the patient population without compromising critical quality attributes (CQAs). This review covers an in-depth discussion of various critical parameters and their influence on product quality, along with a note on the continuous manufacturing process, quality by design, and future perspectives.

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASD) are one of the most adopted technologies for improving the solubility of novel molecules. Formulation of ASDs using solvent free methods such as hot melt extrusion (HME) has been in the spotlight off-lately. However, early-stage formulation development is tricky and a difficult bridge to pass due to limited drug availability. Material-sparing techniques (theoretical & practical) have been used for selecting suitable polymeric carriers for formulating ASDs. However, these techniques have limitations in predicting the effect of process parameters. The objective of this study is to use both theoretical and practical material-sparing techniques to optimize a polymer for the developing Triclabendazole (TBZ) ASDs. Initial screening by theoretical approaches suggested that TBZ is highly miscible with Kollidon®VA64 (VA64) and poorly miscible with Parteck®MXP (PVA). However, results from ASDs prepared using SCFe were opposite to these predictions. ASDs prepared using either technique and both VA64 and PVA showed >200x increase in solubility. Each formulation released >85% of drug in less than 15 mins. Although the thermodynamic phase diagram suggested that VA64 was the ideal polymer for TBZ-ASDs, it has certain limitations in factoring the different elements during melt-processing and hence, practical approaches like SCFe could help in predicting the drug-polymer miscibility for HME processing., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are among the most popular and widely studied solubility enhancement techniques. Since their inception in the early 1960s, the formulation development of ASDs has undergone tremendous progress. For instance, the method of preparing ASDs evolved from solvent-based approaches to solvent-free methods such as hot melt extrusion and Kinetisol ® . The formulation approaches have advanced from employing a single polymeric carrier to multiple carriers with plasticizers to improve the stability and performance of ASDs. Major excipient manufacturers recognized the potential of ASDs and began introducing specialty excipients ideal for formulating ASDs. In addition to traditional techniques such as differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and X-ray crystallography, recent innovations such as nano-tomography, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray microscopy support a better understanding of the microstructure of ASDs. The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent advancements in the field of ASDs with respect to formulation approaches, methods of preparation, and advanced characterization techniques.

The objective of the present investigations was to demonstrate the applicability of DSC combined with response surface methodology as a material-sparing tool for determination of the processing conditions for HME during initial stages of development. Mefenamic acid (MFA) and Eudragit EPO (EPO) were used as a model drug and the polymeric carrier, respectively. Initial screening was performed using film-casting, polarized light microscopy, and TGA analysis to determine the levels for the experimental design. A Box-Behnken design was used to study the effect of the independent parameters, viz. drug loading, heating rate, and processing temperature, on the dependent parameters, viz. residual crystallinity and drug degradation. The results showed a quadratic relationship between independent and dependent parameters. Based on the design space, MFA-EPO dispersions with 20% drug loading were prepared using HME and vacuum compression molding (VCM). Both the HME and VCM samples did not show any signs of residual crystallinity. However, degradation of MFA was observed in VCM sample and the HME filaments processed at 100 rpm, but not at 150 rpm. The results demonstrate that DSC has potential to be a material-sparing tool to optimize drug loading and processing temperature for HME and will help product development using HME cost-effective., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interest The authors report no conflict of interest in conducting this research. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article., (Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The objective of the present investigations was to assess the use of thermodynamic phase diagrams and the Gibbs free energy of mixing, ΔG mix , for the screening of the polymeric carriers by determining the ideal drug-loading for an amorphous solid dispersion formulation and optimum processing temperature for the hot-melt extrusion of a non-glass-forming drug. Mefenamic acid (MFA) was used as a model non-glass-forming drug and four chemically distinct polymers with close values of the solubility parameters, viz. Kollidon® VA64, Soluplus®, Pluronic® F68, and Eudragit® EPO, were used as carriers. The thermodynamic phase diagrams were constructed using the melting point depression data, Flory-Huggins theory, and Gordan-Taylor equation. The Gibbs free energy of mixing was estimated using the values of the drug-polymer interaction parameter, χ, and Flory-Huggins theory. The rank order miscibility of MFA in the four polymeric carriers estimated based on the difference in the values of their solubility parameters, Δδ, did not correlate well with the thermodynamic phase diagrams and Gibbs free energy plots. The study highlights the limitation of using the solubility parameter method in screening the polymeric carriers for poorly glass-forming drugs and reiterates the applicability of thermodynamic phase diagrams and Gibbs free energy plots in determining the ideal drug-loading and optimum processing temperature for hot-melt extrusion., (Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to optimize the melt granulation process of fenofibrate using twin-screw granulator. Initial screening was performed to select the excipients required for melt granulation process. A 3 × 3 factorial design was used to optimize the processing conditions using the % drug loading (X 1 ) and screw speed (X 2 ) as the independent parameters and granule friability (Y 1 ) % yield (Y 2 ) as the dependent parameters. The effect of the independent parameters on the dependent parameters was determined using response surface plots and contour plots. A linear relationship was observed between % drug loading (X 1 ) and % friability (Y 1 ) and a quadratic relationship was observed between the independent parameters (X 1 and X 2 ) and % yield (Y 2 ). The processing conditions for optimum granules were determined using numerical and graphical optimization and it was found that 15% drug loading at 50 rpm results in maximum % yield of 82.38% and minimum friability of 7.88%. The solid-state characterization of the optimized granules showed that the drug turned from crystalline state to amorphous state during melt granulation process. The optimized granules were compressed into tablets using Purolite® as the super disintegrating agent. The optimized formulation showed >85% drug release in 0.75% SLS solution within 60 min., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)