Search

A 76-year-old woman presented with severe mitral valve regurgitation 6 years after mitral valve repair with Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, W.L. Gore & Associates Inc) neochords and ring annuloplasty. Echocardiography revealed a ruptured neochord. During successful mitral valve replacement, the explanted Gore-Tex neochords were found to be stiff and calcified, with a fracture. Electron microscopy was used to examine the explant and a control neochord. There was disruption of the microstructure with extensive calcium infiltration at the fracture point. Although this is a rare cause of late repair failure, it warrants yearly follow-up with echocardiography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our objective was to analyze the causes, timing, and results of reoperation after primary repair for acute type A dissection. Methods: One hundred and four consecutive patients underwent a reoperation after previous type A aortic dissection repair (1972 to 2008). Supracoronary ascending aorta replacement (SCAR) was commonly performed during primary repair and it was associated with aortic root replacement in 13 cases and with hemiarch replacement in 26 patients. Progression of aortic dilatation was seen in 91 patients (87%), aortic regurgitation in 21 (20%), and false aneurysm in 15 patients (14%). A redo Bentall procedure was performed in 34 cases, arch replacement in 42 patients, and thoracoabdominal aorta replacement in 20 patients. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (range 0.3 to 23.8 years). Results: The in-hospital mortality after redo surgery was 7.7%. The global survival rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 92%, 82%, and 58%, respectively. Proximal reoperations were more frequent in patients who had SCAR and flap extension into the aortic root. Patients with an unresected intimal tear and distal extension of dissection flap experienced a higher rate of aortic arch and thoracoabdominal aorta redo procedures. Conclusions: More extensive acute dissection repair results in a lower rate of reoperation. Mortality for redo surgery after type A acute dissection repair is acceptable. This finding should be taken into account in proposing a widespread of more complex and extensive surgery for type A acute dissection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Human allografts and pulmonary autografts offer many advantages as an aortic valve and root substitute. The progressive degeneration of the aortic allograft and the pulmonary autograft has been seen as an important disadvantage, and the need for a reoperation has been perceived as challenging and risky for the patients. Methods: Between March 1992 and October 2009, 53 consecutive patients (mean age 50 ± 13 years; 38 male), who had a previous aortic root replacement, underwent redo surgery for failure of the aortic homograft (n = 42) or the pulmonary autograft (n = 11). The median follow-up (available for 47 of 51 patients) was 44 months. Results: Structural valve deterioration was the main indication for reoperation on the homograft (86%), with an earlier presentation in patients who received homografts from donors more than 55 years old. Failure of the pulmonary autograft occurred primarily because of severe aortic regurgitation predominantly due to dilation of the autograft (n = 5) and autograft valve prolapse (n = 5). The total in-hospital mortality was 3.8% (n = 2). No deaths occurred among patients who previously underwent a Ross procedure. The course was complicated in 25 cases (48%). The cumulative 1-year, 5-year, and 8-year survival rates were 92%, 90%, and 77%, respectively. No late deaths were encountered after reoperation on the pulmonary autograft (maximum follow-up 218 months). Freedom from reoperation (excluding early in-hospital operation) for recurrent aortic valve or root pathology was 97% at 8 years. Conclusions: Reoperation after freestanding homograft and pulmonary autograft root replacement can be accomplished safely. The total postoperative morbidity rate is still high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aortic false aneurysm is a rare complication after cardiac surgery. Aortic dissection, infection, arterial wall degeneration, and poor surgical technique are recognized as risk factors for the occurrence of postsurgical false aneurysm. Despite some recent reports about percutaneous false aneurysm exclusion, a complex surgical reoperation is needed in most of the cases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our experience in 43 patients who received a reoperation for postsurgical aortic false aneurysm in the last 14 years. Thirty-three patients were male. The mean age was 60 ± 12 years. Most of the patients received prior aortic surgery on the aortic root, the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, and the descending thoracic aorta (38 patients). False aneurysm was diagnosed during follow-up evaluation in the absence of any symptoms in 23 cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses on 18 perioperative variables were performed. Results: In-hospital mortality was 6.9% (3 patients). The postoperative course was complicated in 17 cases (39%). At multivariate analysis, a preoperative history of coronary artery disease and postoperative sepsis were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 94%, 79%, and 68%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation was 86% at 1 year and 72% at 5 and 10 years. Conclusions: Despite a high postoperative complication rate, a reoperation for postsurgical aortic false aneurysm can be performed with acceptable mortality and good mid-term and long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The increasing use of biologic conduits and the advances in reparative aortic root procedures has increased the number of patients who may require reoperation on the aortic root. Although the primary operation yields excellent results with a low risk for morbidity and mortality, reoperation on the aortic root is still challenging. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively our experience in 46 patients (38 men; mean age, 57 ± 11 years) who underwent aortic root reoperations in the last 7 years. Of these, 42 had received prior aortic root replacement. The indications for reoperation included prosthesis infection in 16, false aneurysm in 16, and degenerative or postdissection aneurysm and valve prosthesis failure. Aortic root re-replacement was performed in 39 patients (85%) and closure of false aneurysm in 7. Univariate and multivariate analysis on 22 perioperative variables were performed. Results: In-hospital mortality was 6.5% (3 patients). The postoperative course was complicated in 19 (41%). At multivariate analysis, perioperative myocardial infarction was a risk factor for hospital mortality (2 patients). Survival was 88% at 1 year and 74% at 5 years. No differences were found in survival according to redo indication. Freedom from reoperation on the aortic root was 100% at 1 year and 90% at 5 years. Conclusions: Reoperation on the aortic root can be performed with acceptable mortality and good midterm and long-term outcome; however, the postoperative complication rate is still high. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Aim: Aortic valve-sparing operation has been progressively widely performed for the treatment of aortic root aneurysm. Nowadays, this procedure has been proposed even in presence of a bicuspid aortic valve, severe aortic regurgitation or in primary aortic dissection repair. We present our ten-year experience focusing on mid-term echocardiographic follow-up., Methods: Between June 2002 and February 2012, 139 patients (mean age of 61±12 years) underwent aortic valve-sparing operation with valve reimplantation. Twenty-seven patients (19%) had bicuspid aortic valve; in eighteen cases (13%) cusp motion or anatomical abnormalities concurred in determining aortic regurgitation and needed an adjunct cusp repair. A Gelweave Valsalva™ graft was implanted in all the patients., Results: The mortality pre-discharge was 0.7% (1 patient). The cumulative 1-year, 5-years and 8-years survival rates were 99%, 93% and 87% respectively. Postoperative aortic regurgitation more than mild degree (>2+/4+) was the only significant risk factors for redo aortic valve surgery Freedom from reoperation due to aortic valve regurgitation was 96% at 1 year, 90% at 5 years and 86% at 8 years. When comparing freedom from reoperation in patients with bicuspid vs tricuspid aortic valve, no differences were found (P=0.31) and the rate of aortic valve reoperation was significantly higher (P<0.001) in patients who received leaflet's repair., Conclusion: The durability of valve reimplantation was found to be excellent in patients with tricuspid aortic valve and normal or nearly normal cusps. Cusp prolapse and complication after cusp repair turned out to be the main causes for early failure.

Background: The prevalence of thyroid disease in patients with cardiac disease can be as high as 11.2%. Combined thyroid and cardiovascular surgery has rarely been reported., Methods: Ten patients (6 female, 4 male, age range 51-73 years) had total thyroidectomy and cardiac surgery in the same procedure in our surgical department. Six patients had coronary artery disease; four patients had valvulopathy. The thyroid goiter was retrosternal in 6 patients., Results: Mean stay in the intensive care unit was 46.4 hours; the postoperative course was complicated by transient right laryngeal nerve palsy in one case and by transient hypocalcemia in the patients in whom a parathyroid autotransplantation was performed (n = 3). There was one case of hemodynamic compromise needing vasoactive drug support; the mean hospital stay was 8.4 days., Conclusions: Our experience and our review of the literature suggest that a single-stage procedure is safe and feasible and must be preferred to different operations as it has an acceptable peri-operative and anesthesiological risk., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)