Search

Purpose: Cannabis utilization has increased over time for recreational and medical purposes due to its legalization or decriminalization. The effects of cannabis use on opioid utilization are not well understood. The primary objective was to evaluate the total opioid utilization, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), in hospitalized trauma patients that tested positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on a urine drug screen (UDS)., Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study in a level 1 trauma center between 10/17/17 and 12/31/19. Adult trauma patients (aged 15 years and older) who had a UDS completed within 48 h of hospital arrival were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded for a hospitalization >14 days, death within 24 h, severe alcohol withdrawal, prescribed cannabinoids, high daily opioid use prior-to-arrival, or transitioned to hospice or palliative care. Group assignments were determined based on the presence or absence of THC on the UDS., Results: The analysis included 750 patients with 160 (21 %) THC positive patients. The population were primarily male (64.6 %), median age of 56 years [IQR 35-72], with blunt (93 %) injuries from motor vehicle crash or falls (79 %). The THC group was more likely to have other substances present, including amphetamines, benzodiazepines, opiates, and cocaine. The THC group had a higher median injury severity score (10 [IQR 5-17] vs. 9 [5-14], p = 0.0056), and maximum abbreviated injury score (3 [IQR 2-3] vs. 2 [IQR 2-3], p = 0.0009). The THC group had a total higher median opioid utilization during the hospitalization (155 [IQR 68-367] vs. 62 [IQR 13-175] MME; p < 0.0001), which included higher opioid use in the emergency department, floor, and intensive care unit. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes except the THC group was more likely to receive an opioid prescription at discharge and more likely to require mechanical ventilation. Based on multivariable regression analyses, other variables were associated with increased opioid utilization., Conclusion: Pre-existing THC exposure may be associated with an increased hospital opioid utilization in a trauma population. However, other variables may also play a role in opioid utilization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this study have nothing to disclose concerning possible financial or personal relationships with commercial entities that may have a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of this study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: It is unclear if protective childhood experiences (PCEs), like emotional support and economic stability, exert influence on adulthood adjustment. Prior research suggests PCEs can promote childhood resilience through increased social connection. In contrast, research has demonstrated potential life-long negative impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on psychological health. This study examined the role of PCEs and ACEs in psychological symptoms following potentially traumatic events (PTE) in adults., Methods: Participants (N = 128) were adults admitted to two Level 1 Trauma Centers following violence, motor-vehicle crashes, or other accidents. Participants reported childhood experiences and completed assessments of depression, PTSD, and social support at one, four, and nine months post-PTE., Results: Structural Equation Modeling was used to simultaneously model PCEs and ACEs as predictors of psychological symptoms over time, with potential mediation through social support. PCEs overall did not directly affect psychological symptoms nor indirectly through social support. However, the emotional support component of PCEs had an indirect effect on psychological symptoms at baseline through social support. ACEs predicted greater psychological symptoms at baseline and over time., Conclusion: PCEs consisting of childhood emotional support indirectly promote adjustment in adults after PTEs through initial social support, while ACEs exert direct effects on psychological symptoms.

Introduction: Social support is a key protective factor in the psychological adjustment of individuals to traumatic events. However, since March 2020, extant research has revealed evidence of increased loneliness, social isolation, and disconnection, likely due to COVID-19 pandemic-related recommendations that restricted day-to-day contact with others., Methods: In this investigation, we applied a case-control design to test the direct impacts of the pandemic on social support in United States adults recovering from a significant injury caused by PTSD-qualifying, traumatic events (e.g., motor vehicle crashes, violence, etc.). We compared individuals who experienced trauma during the pandemic, the "cases" recruited and evaluated between December 2020 to April 2022, to trauma-exposed "controls," recruited and evaluated pre-pandemic, from August 2018 through March 9, 2020 (prior to changes in public health recommendations in the region). Cohorts were matched on key demographics (age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, income) and injury severity variables. We tested to see if there were differences in reported social support over the first 5 months of adjustment, considering variable operationalizations of social support from social network size to social constraints in disclosure. Next, we tested to see if the protective role of social support in psychological adjustment to trauma was moderated by cohort status to determine if the impacts of the pandemic extended to changes in the process of adjustment ., Results: The results of our analyses suggested that there were no significant cohort differences, meaning that whether prior to or during the pandemic, individuals reported similar levels of social support that were generally protective, and similar levels of psychological symptoms. However, there was some evidence of moderation by cohort status when examining the process of adjustment. Specifically, when examining symptoms of post-traumatic stress over time, individuals adjusting to traumatic events during COVID-19 received less benefit from social support., Discussion: Although negative mental health implications of the pandemic are increasingly evident, it has not been clear how the pandemic impacted normative psychological adjustment processes. These results are one of the first direct tests of the impact of COVID-19 on longitudinal adjustment to trauma and suggest some minimal impacts., Competing Interests: The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Mitchell, Gawlik, Baugher, George, Muakkassa, Mallat, Gunstad, Delahanty and Coifman.)

Minimally invasive surgery has found many applications in general surgery. The role of laparoscopy in trauma has been debated as a diagnostic, as well as therapeutic, tool in hemodynamically stable patients. This study evaluated laparoscopy in the trauma population. A retrospective review of all laparoscopies performed in hemodynamically stable trauma patients from 1996 until 2006 was conducted. Mechanisms of injury, perioperative data, and demographic variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Student's t test. Exploratory diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on 102 patients. Laparoscopy was negative for 65 per cent of patients; 12 per cent of these were converted to laparotomy due to adhesions, hemoperitoneum, or surgeon preference. None of the conversions revealed intra-abdominal injury at laparotomy. An injury was diagnosed at laparoscopy in the remaining 35 per cent, with 55 per cent conversion rate to repair the injury. Therapeutic laparoscopy included serosal repair, hemorrhage control, diaphragmatic repair, and other standard laparoscopic treatments. No patient required re-exploration, there were no missed injuries or other complications, and no patient died in this study. Laparoscopy has an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in selected hemodynamically stable trauma patients. Using a minimally invasive approach can reduce the potential morbidity of negative laparotomy.