1. Survival of Patients Identified as Candidates for Intestinal Transplantation: A 3-Year Prospective Follow-Up
- Author
-
Loris, Pironi, Alastair, Forbes, Francisca, Joly, Virginie, Colomb, Malgorzata, Lyszkowska, André, Van Gossum, Janet, Baxter, Paul, Thul, Xavier, Hébuterne, Manuela, Gambarara, Frederic, Gottrand, José M, Moreno Villares, Bernard, Messing, Olivier, Goulet, Michael, Staun, J M, Woodward, Pironi, Lori, Forbes, A., Joly, F., Colomb, V., Lyszkowska, M., Van Gossum, A., Baxter, J., Thul, P., Hébuterne, X., Gambarara, M., Gottrand, F., Moreno Villares, J. M., Messing, B., Goulet, O., and Staun, M.
- Subjects
INTESTINAL TRANSPLANTATION ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Gastrointestinal Diseases ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Gastroenterology ,High morbidity ,Intestinal failure ,Internal medicine ,Small bowel transplant ,HOME PARENTERAL NUTRITION FAILURE ,Humans ,Medicine ,Prospective Studies ,Child ,Prospective cohort study ,Transplantation ,Hepatology ,business.industry ,Patient Selection ,Middle Aged ,INTESTINAL FAILURE ,Confidence interval ,Intestines ,Parenteral nutrition ,HOME PARENTERAL NUTRITION ,Child, Preschool ,Female ,Parenteral Nutrition, Home ,business ,Central venous catheter ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Background & Aims: The US Medicare indications for intestinal transplantation are based on failure of home parenteral nutrition. The American Society of Transplantation also includes patients at high risk of death from their primary disease or with high morbidity intestinal failure. A 3-year prospective study evaluated the appropriateness of these indications. Methods: Survival on home parenteral nutrition or after transplantation was analyzed in 153 (97 adult, 56 pediatric) candidates for transplantation and 320 (262 adult, 58 pediatric) noncandidates, enrolled through a European multicenter cross-sectional survey performed in 2004. Kaplan–Meier and chi-square test statistics were used. Results: The 3-year survival was 94% (95% CI, 92%–97%) in noncandidates and 87% (95% CI, 81%–93%) in candidates not receiving transplants (P = .007). Survival was 80% (95% CI, 70%–89%), 93% (95% CI, 86%–100%), and 100% in parenteral nutrition failure, high-risk primary disease, and high-morbidity intestinal failure, respectively (P = .034). Fifteen candidates underwent transplantation. Six died, including all 3 of those who were in hospital, and 25% of those who were at home at time of transplantation (P = .086). Survival in the 10 patients receiving a first isolated small bowel transplant was 89% (95% CI, 70%–100%), compared with 85% (95% CI, 74%–96%) in the candidates with parenteral nutrition failure not receiving transplants because of central venous catheter complications, or 70% (95% CI, 53%–88%) in those with parenteral nutrition–related liver failure (P = .364). Conclusions: The results confirm home parenteral nutrition as the primary therapeutic option for intestinal failure and support the appropriateness and potential life-saving role of timely intestinal transplantation for patients with parenteral nutrition failure.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF