Search

Purpose: Electroencephalography (EEG) is commonly used in neurology, but there is variability in how neurologists interpret EEGs, potentially from variability in EEG teaching. Little is known about how EEG teaching is done to prepare neurologists for professional practice., Methods: We interviewed a group of EEG experts to characterize their teaching practices around continuous EEG (cEEG). We used signature pedagogy as a framework to analyze and interpret the data., Results: We identified pervasive and characteristic forms of cEEG teaching. Teaching is based on apprenticeship, relying on "learning by doing" in the context of real-life clinical practice. There are habitual steps that learners take to anchor teaching, which typically occurs during rounds. There is a common language and core knowledge that trainees need to master early in their training., Conclusions: There are pervasive characteristic forms of cEEG teaching. These findings can help facilitate instructional design and implementation of complementary or enhanced cEEG teaching practices., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.)

Dravet syndrome is a severe epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by (febrile) seizures, behavioural problems and developmental delay. Eighty per cent of patients with Dravet syndrome have a mutation in SCN1A, encoding Nav1.1. Milder clinical phenotypes, such as GEFS+ (generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus), can also arise from SCN1A mutations. Predicting the clinical phenotypic outcome based on the type of mutation remains challenging, even when the same mutation is inherited within one family. This clinical and genetic heterogeneity adds to the difficulties of predicting disease progression and tailoring the prescription of anti-seizure medication. Understanding the neuropathology of different SCN1A mutations may help to predict the expected clinical phenotypes and inform the selection of best-fit treatments. Initially, the loss of Na+-current in inhibitory neurons was recognized specifically to result in disinhibition and consequently seizure generation. However, the extent to which excitatory neurons contribute to the pathophysiology is currently debated and might depend on the patient clinical phenotype or the specific SCN1A mutation. To examine the genotype-phenotype correlations of SCN1A mutations in relation to excitatory neurons, we investigated a panel of patient-derived excitatory neuronal networks differentiated on multi-electrode arrays. We included patients with different clinical phenotypes, harbouring various SCN1A mutations, along with a family in which the same mutation led to febrile seizures, GEFS+ or Dravet syndrome. We hitherto describe a previously unidentified functional excitatory neuronal network phenotype in the context of epilepsy, which corresponds to seizurogenic network prediction patterns elicited by proconvulsive compounds. We found that excitatory neuronal networks were affected differently, depending on the type of SCN1A mutation, but did not segregate according to clinical severity. Specifically, loss-of-function mutations could be distinguished from missense mutations, and mutations in the pore domain could be distinguished from mutations in the voltage sensing domain. Furthermore, all patients showed aggravated neuronal network responses at febrile temperatures compared with controls. Finally, retrospective drug screening revealed that anti-seizure medication affected GEFS+ patient- but not Dravet patient-derived neuronal networks in a patient-specific and clinically relevant manner. In conclusion, our results indicate a mutation-specific excitatory neuronal network phenotype, which recapitulates the foremost clinically relevant features, providing future opportunities for precision therapies., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Objectives: In patients with an ovarian mass, a risk of malignancy assessment is used to decide whether referral to an oncology hospital is indicated. Risk assessment strategies do not perform optimally, resulting in either referral of patients with a benign mass or patients with a malignant mass not being referred. This process may affect the psychological well-being of patients. We evaluated cancer-specific distress during work-up for an ovarian mass, and patients' perceptions during work-up, referral, and treatment., Methods: Patients with an ovarian mass scheduled for surgery were enrolled. Using questionnaires we measured (1) cancer-specific distress using the cancer worry scale, (2) patients' preferences regarding referral (evaluated pre-operatively), and (3) patients' experiences with work-up and treatment (evaluated post-operatively). A cancer worry scale score of ≥14 was considered as clinically significant cancer-specific distress., Results: A total of 417 patients were included, of whom 220 (53%) were treated at a general hospital and 197 (47%) at an oncology hospital. Overall, 57% had a cancer worry scale score of ≥14 and this was higher in referred patients (69%) than in patients treated at a general hospital (43%). 53% of the patients stated that the cancer risk should not be higher than 25% to undergo surgery at a general hospital. 96% of all patients were satisfied with the overall work-up and treatment. No difference in satisfaction was observed between patients correctly (not) referred and patients incorrectly (not) referred., Conclusions: Relatively many patients with an ovarian mass experienced high cancer-specific distress during work-up. Nevertheless, patients were satisfied with the treatment, regardless of the final diagnosis and the location of treatment. Moreover, patients preferred to be referred even if there was only a relatively low probability of having ovarian cancer. Patients' preferences should be taken into account when deciding on optimal cut-offs for risk assessment strategies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) is a new non-invasive technique developed as treatment option for drug resistant epilepsy. A few studies have been carried out showing that the efficacy and tolerability of ta-VNS is comparable with traditional implanted VNS but the feasibility of the therapy has been poorly described. This study aimed to explore potential clinical benefits of ta-VNS and to evaluate adaptation, compliance, as well as the usability of the device from a service design perspective., Methods: A prospective, multicenter, clinical, investigator-initiated trial was conducted using the NEMOS® ta-VNS device. After eight weeks baseline, all subjects started ta-VNS with individually adjusted currents for four hours per day for six-months (first endpoint) followed by optional 12 months follow-up (second endpoint). The primary outcome was six months retention rate of ta-VNS therapy. Secondary outcomes included the user retention rate at 12 months follow-up, compliance, changes in scores of psychometric measures. For the study of feasibility, a service design questionnaire on medical devices used in the home was developed., Results: In total 37 subjects had been included in the study after 45 months where the study was prematurely terminated due to recruitment problems and due to a high drop-out rate. Twenty-two subjects (59 %) completed the first six months of the study and in total six subjects (16 %) completed the following 12 months follow-up. The reasons for discontinuation were a mixture of medical and practical issues of which the majority were related to a combination of both. Those, who managed to continue to use ta-VNS throughout the study, gave generally higher scores for the device usability and compatibility with lifestyle. The study turned out to be inadequately powered to reach any conclusion in terms of the clinical benefits of ta-VNS but present an example of difficulties that are encountered in conducting high-quality studies with digital devices., Conclusion: The feasibility of ta-VNS therapy showed to be relatively modest which is most likely due to practical usability issues and lifestyle fits. The results of this study stress the importance of generating data based on patients experiences at an early stage during the development phase and when designing clinical trials on medical devices that depend on patient's active participation and motivation., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the healthcare resources in a tertiary center related to exclusive use of non-enzyme inducing anti-seizure medications relative to concomitant use of enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications in patients with refractory epilepsy., Methods: In this retrospective case-time-control study, we compared the effects of two anti-seizure medication strategies: exclusively non-inducing anti-seizure medications (NIND) or a combination of NIND and inducing anti-seizure medications (IND+). The primary outcome parameter was the number of consultations with relevant healthcare professionals in our tertiary center, assessed with a negative binomial regression model, adjusting for several covariates like blood drug level and time interval (TI). Results from statistical models were visualized to explore the contribution of all covariates on the outcome in the total population and in subgroups., Results: From the 21538 patients with refractory epilepsy referred to our center 1648 patients met the inclusion criteria. The regression model showed that the IND + strategy was significantly associated with fewer consultations compared to the NIND strategy (p < 0.001), reflected in an incidence risk ratio (IRR) of 0.844 (0.799-0.890). Visualization of subgroups, defined by anti-seizure medications strategy, revealed patterns in contribution of blood drug level measurements on the outcome. Although sex was not included as a covariate in the regression model, as it was eliminated by the backward-elimination approach, visualization of this subgroup showed differences in effects of blood drug level and TI., Conclusion: For patients with refractory epilepsy in our tertiary center, treatment following the IND + strategy is associated with fewer consultations with healthcare professionals compared to the NIND strategy. Comprehensive visualization of the results facilitated the exploration of effects of covariates across subgroups., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive description of the multicomponent self-management intervention for adults with epilepsy, ZMILE., Rationale or Theory: Acquiring self-management skills has been shown to play a vital role in enabling patients with epilepsy overcoming (health-related) struggles in daily life and coping with limitations their condition poses on them. ZMILE is a course consisting of education (to increase concordance to treatment), goal-setting (proactive coping), and self-monitoring., Resources Needed: The course is guided by two nurse practitioners and each patient is allowed to bring one family member or friend. Self-monitoring plays an important role and can be done through e-Health tools or written diaries., Processes Involved: During and after the course, patients are required to work toward a personally defined goal using a five-step approach by means of pro-active coping. Moreover, patients are expected to use self-monitoring tools to reflect on their own behavior and identify ways to optimize medication intake when required., Quantification: ZMILE is provided in an outpatient setting over five weekly group sessions and one booster session. From the start, patients are encouraged to set individual goals. Each group session will have a different theme but part of every session is reflecting on personal goals and to learn from eachother., Conclusions: The ZMILE-intervention has been evaluated and may be a promising intervention in terms of effectiveness and feasibility for adults with epilepsy, relatives, and professionals. We present the adapted version which can be implemented in clinical practice.

Therapeutic options for patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy represent an important unmet need. Addressing this unmet need was the main factor driving the drug discovery program that led to the synthesis of padsevonil, a first-in-class antiepileptic drug candidate that interacts with two therapeutic targets: synaptic vesicle protein 2 and GABA A receptors. Two PET imaging studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to identify optimal padsevonil target occupancy corresponding to levels associated with effective antiseizure activity in rodent models. Optimal padsevonil occupancy associated with non-clinical efficacy was translatable to humans for both molecular targets: high (>90%), sustained synaptic vesicle protein 2A occupancy and 10-15% transient GABA A receptor occupancy. Rational dose selection enabled clinical evaluation of padsevonil in a Phase IIa proof-of-concept trial (NCT02495844), with a single-dose arm (400 mg bid). Adults with highly treatment-resistant epilepsy, who were experiencing ≥4 focal seizures/week, and had failed to respond to ≥4 antiepileptic drugs, were randomized to receive placebo or padsevonil as add-on to their stable regimen. After a 3-week inpatient double-blind period, all patients received padsevonil during an 8-week outpatient open-label period. The primary endpoint was ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency. Of 55 patients randomized, 50 completed the trial (placebo n  = 26; padsevonil n  = 24). Their median age was 36 years (range 18-60), and they had been living with epilepsy for an average of 25 years. They were experiencing a median of 10 seizures/week and 75% had failed ≥8 antiepileptic drugs. At the end of the inpatient period, 30.8% of patients on padsevonil and 11.1% on placebo were ≥75% responders (odds ratio 4.14; P  = 0.067). Reduction in median weekly seizure frequency was 53.7% and 12.5% with padsevonil and placebo, respectively (unadjusted P  = 0.026). At the end of the outpatient period, 31.4% were ≥75% responders and reduction in median seizure frequency was 55.2% (all patients). During the inpatient period, 63.0% of patients on placebo and 85.7% on padsevonil reported treatment-emergent adverse events. Overall, 50 (90.9%) patients who received padsevonil reported treatment-emergent adverse events, most frequently somnolence (45.5%), dizziness (43.6%) and headache (25.5%); only one patient discontinued due to a treatment-emergent adverse event. Padsevonil was associated with a favourable safety profile and displayed clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy. The novel translational approach and the innovative proof-of-concept trial design maximized signal detection in a small patient population in a short duration, expediting antiepileptic drug development for the population with the greatest unmet need in epilepsy., (© The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Objective: The main objective of this cohort study is to determine the prevalence and incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs) over 7 years follow-up, in institutionalized adults with refractory epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID)., Methods: Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) were performed in 2009 and 2016. Vertebrae T4-L4 were assessed using quantitative morphometry. Severity of VFs was graded as 1 (mild; 20-25% reduction in height), 2 (moderate; 25-40% reduction) or 3 (severe; >40% reduction) according to the method described by Genant. Prevalent VFs were analyzed at baseline. VFs (grade 1, 2 or 3) present at follow-up, but not at baseline, were considered new VFs. Worsening VFs were defined as VFs with at least one grade deterioration at follow-up, compared to baseline (grade 1 to 2 or 3, or grade 2 to 3). Patients were treated with anti-osteoporosis treatment according to the Dutch guideline., Results: Baseline and follow-up DXA and VFA could be obtained in 141 patients (87 male) aged between 18-79 years old (mean 44.8 ± 15.7). At baseline, 56 patients had at least one prevalent VF. Patients with a prevalent VF were significantly older than patients without (49.2 ± 13.7 vs 41.9 ± 16.4, p < .01). After 7 years follow-up, 38 new VFs occurred in 27 patients and 15 patients had a worsening VF, leading to an overall cumulative incidence of 27.0%. VF incidence was significantly higher in patients with at least one prevalent VF at baseline (48.2% vs 12.9%, respectively, p < .01) compared to no VF., Significance: In adults with refractory epilepsy VFA is challenging, due to physical and behavioral aspects, resulting in a substantial proportion of unevaluable vertebrae and scans. Nevertheless, 40% of the patients had a VF at baseline and after 7 years follow-up, 27% had at least one new and/or worsening VF despite adequate anti-osteoporosis treatment., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Brivaracetam (BRV) is indicated for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures with or without secondary generalisation in patients 4 years of age and older in the European Union (EU). An ongoing 12-month, prospective, non-interventional post-marketing study (EP0077; NCT02687711) is collecting real-world information on patients receiving treatment with adjunctive BRV in Europe. In this study, BRV is prescribed according to routine clinical practice and the EU Summary of Product Characteristics. This second interim analysis assessed effectiveness, tolerability and health-related quality of life outcomes for up to 6 months of treatment. At the cut-off date (13 April 2018), 266 patients from five countries had attended Visit 1, 24.1 % (64/266) had completed the study, 37.6 % (100/266) were ongoing, and 38.3 % (102/266) had discontinued. In total, 261 patients had at least one dose of BRV and were included in the analyses. Patients had a mean time since epilepsy diagnosis of 23.2 years, a mean of eight lifetime AEDs (sum of AEDs discontinued prior to study entry and concomitant at study entry), and a median of five focal seizures per 28 days during the 3-month retrospective Baseline. 66.3 % of patients initiated BRV at a dose within the recommended starting range (50-100 mg/day) and 87.1 % of patients received BRV modal doses within the recommended dose range (50-200 mg/day) during the study. Retention rates were 79.1 % (N = 239) at 3 months and 62.1 % (N = 211) at 6 months. The 50 % responder rates for focal seizures were 46.8 % (N = 139) at 3 months and 53.6 % (N = 97) at 6 months. The proportions of patients who were seizure-free were 10.7 % (21/196) and 7.5 % (15/199) at 3 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. Median percent reductions in focal seizure frequency per 28 days from Baseline to 3 and 6 months were 34.6 % (N = 139) and 53.3 % (N = 97), respectively. Overall, 44.2 % of patients had an improvement and 15.4 % had a worsening in Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 total score from Baseline to 6 months (N = 52). At least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was reported in 51.0 % (133/261) of patients, and 34.5 % (90/261) of patients had drug-related TEAEs. The most common drug-related TEAEs (≥5% of patients) were drug ineffective (7.7 %), seizure (6.5 %), and fatigue (6.1 %). In this 6-month interim analysis, BRV showed effectiveness when used in clinical practice in five European countries. BRV was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The ketogenic diet (KD), containing high levels of fat and low levels of carbohydrates, has been used to treat refractory epilepsy since the 1920s. In the past few decades, there has been more interest in less restrictive KDs such as the modified Atkins diet (MAD)., Purpose: Our aim was to review all evidence regarding the efficacy and tolerability of the KD and MAD from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy., Methods: We reviewed the current literature using Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (using PubMed). We implemented predefined criteria regarding dataextraction and study quality., Results: We identified five RCTs that generated seven publications and recruited 472 children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy (≤ 18 years). The primary outcome (seizure frequency reduction (SFR) ≥ 50%) was attained in 35-56.1% of the participants in the intervention group, compared with 6-18.2% in the control group. Our meta-analysis underlined the significant efficacy of the KD compared with the control group: RR = 5.1 (95% CI 3.18-8.21, p < 0.001). Additionally, only two studies mentioned possible biomarkers to objectively evaluate the efficacy. Secondary outcomes, such as seizure severity and quality of life, were studied in three trials, leading to indecisive generalization of these findings. Gastro-intestinal adverse effects were the most prevalent, and no severe adverse effects were reported., Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity between all studies, the beneficial results underline that dietary interventions should be considered for children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy who are not eligible for epilepsy surgery. Future studies should be multi-center and long-term, and evaluate potential biomarkers and adverse effects.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) is not routinely performed, although this can guide the dosage regimen to achieve greater efficacy and safety. Levetiracetam (LEV) has been introduced as an AED with an almost perfect pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Nonetheless, recent research challenges this statement and therefore we aimed to explore factors that modify LEV PK. Age and enzyme-inducing drugs (EIDs) appear to be major factors influencing the PK profile of LEV. Therefore, 30-50% lower dosages should be used in the elderly (> 65 years of age) and the dosing regimen should be guided by monitoring SDC (TDM). In contrast, higher LEV dosages are necessary in children aged between 2 months and 12 years (compared to adults) due to a 30-70% increase of LEV clearance (CL). Higher dosages are also required if a patient receives EIDs, again due to a higher CL of LEV (range 24-60%). This could also be true for pregnant women. LEV TDM is currently not common in the clinical setting due to the wide therapeutic range and the low prevalence of side-effects. However, LEV dose should on the one hand be increased in certain physiological situations (pregnancy, neonates) and patients on EIDs (especially carbamazepine). On the other hand, dose reductions are necessary when the LEV CL is impaired (elderly). Nevertheless, current data to support regular LEV TDM are lacking. Prospective research is needed to explore the importance of LEV TDM in elected patient groups; i.e. neonates, elderly, patients on EIDs and pregnant women., (Copyright © 2018 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) can be an efficacious add-on treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, who are not eligible for surgery. Evidence of VNS efficacy in children with intellectual disability (ID) is scarce., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to review all available VNS data in the pediatric population (≤18 years old) and focus on the subpopulation with ID since appropriate treatment of these children is often challenging and complex., Methods: Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed and MEDLINE were used to collect all research associated to VNS and ID (or synonyms) leading to a total of 37 studies. Seven studies showed the results of patients with ID and those without separately; thereby only these studies were included in the VNS meta-analysis., Results: Our meta-analysis showed that VNS was less effective in pediatric epilepsy patients with ID compared to those without ID (Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis; p = 0.028, OR 0.18 (CI 95% 0.039-0.84)). However, there were no prospective controlled studies. Numerous studies reported quality of life (QoL) improvements in this subpopulation. The most common adverse events were transient and well tolerated. Side effects on cognition and behavior were not reported., Discussion: These results might be a reason to consider VNS early on in the treatment of this subgroup. The significantly greater amount of retrospective studies, differences in follow-up (FU), lack of control data, heterogeneous series and limited number of patients could have biased the outcome measurements. Hence, current data do not exclude VNS for children with drug-resistant epilepsy and ID but should be interpreted with caution., (Copyright © 2017 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands., Methods: A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events. Costs consisted of drugs, medical and non-medical costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of our results., Results: 14,723 patients were eligible for cenobamate in 2022. Although cenobamate adds a gross budget impact of €12,686,30, the displacement of other drugs yields a total impact on the drug budget of €3,722,596 over 5 years. Adopting cenobamate resulted in a medical cost savings of €13,499,498 due to less resource use, and non-medical cost savings of €22,144,054 due to reduced productivity losses. Overall, savings generated at medical and non-medical cost level offset the gross drug budget impact of cenobamate, resulting in a saving of €31,920,955 over 5 years. Results were robust in the sensitivity/scenario analyses., Conclusion: Treatment with cenobamate is associated with both medical and non-medical cost savings, which offset the increase in drug budget and result in a significant potential budget saving. The higher the market share of cenobamate, the larger the budget savings. We acknowledge several limitations; Complex scenarios such as drug interactions, stopping/switching drugs, and multiple drug use were not taken into account. The long-term efficacy and safety of cenobamate and its comparators remains uncertain. Future real-world data are needed to confirm our findings.

Background: With the growing use of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a treatment for refractory epilepsy, there is a growing demand for complete removal or replacement of the VNS system. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete removal or replacement of the VNS system and provide an extensive description of our surgical technique., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our patient registry for all VNS surgeries performed between January 2007 (the year of our first complete removal) and May 2014. In order to assess patient satisfaction, a written questionnaire was sent to patients or their caregivers. Additionally, we reviewed all literature on this topic., Results: The VNS system was completely removed in 22 patients and completely replaced in 13 patients. There were no incomplete removals. Revision surgery was complicated by a small laceration of the jugular vein in two patients and by vocal cord paralysis in one patient. Seizure frequency was unaltered or improved after revision surgery. Electrode-related side effects all improved after revision surgery. Twenty-one studies reported a total of 131 patients in whom the VNS system was completely removed. In 95 patients, the system was subsequently replaced. The most frequently reported side effect was vocal cord paresis, which occurred in four patients., Conclusions: Complete removal or replacement of the VNS system including lead and coils is feasible and safe. Although initial results seem promising, further research and longer follow-up are needed to assess whether lead replacement may affect VNS effectiveness.

Purpose: Children with epilepsy are more likely to have behavioral problems compared to children without epilepsy. Literature suggests that levetiracetam leads to behavioral side-effects in children with epilepsy. The objective of this study is to provide a better overview of the frequency and variety of behavioral side-effects, which can be initiated by levetiracetam therapy in children with epilepsy., Method: Electronic databases used in the search were PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and Embase. Studies were eligible for inclusion when they included children from one month to 18 years of age with a diagnosis of epilepsy, used levetiracetam, had other AEDs on a stable regimen for at least two months, reported about behavioral side-effects and had a follow-up of at least two weeks. Quality assessments and data collection were carried out for all eligible studies., Results: Thirteen studies, including 727 patients using levetiracetam, were included in this systematic review. Three randomized controlled trials showed a total of 62 behavioral side-effects in 203 patients, effects which led to discontinuation of levetiracetam in only two of 102 patients (2.0%). Hostility, nervousness and aggression were reported mostly. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant relative risk of 2.18 for the total number of behavioral side-effects for levetiracetam versus placebo. Observational studies showed mixed results with both behavioral deteriorations and improvements following levetiracetam., Conclusion: Based on the findings in this systematic review, children using levetiracetam have a risk of developing several behavioral side-effects such as aggression, hostility and nervousness compared to children who do not use levetiracetam., (Copyright © 2014 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Human brown adipose tissue (BAT) activity is inversely related to obesity and positively related to energy expenditure. BAT is highly innervated and it is suggested the vagus nerve mediates peripheral signals to the central nervous system, there connecting to sympathetic nerves that innervate BAT. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is used for refractory epilepsy, but is also reported to generate weight loss. We hypothesize VNS increases energy expenditure by activating BAT., Methods and Findings: Fifteen patients with stable vns therapy (age: 45 ± 10 yrs; body mass index; 25.2 ± 3.5 kg/m(2)) were included between January 2011 and June 2012. Ten subjects were measured twice, once with active and once with inactivated VNS. Five other subjects were measured twice, once with active VNS at room temperature and once with active VNS under cold exposure in order to determine maximal cold-induced BAT activity. BAT activity was assessed by 18-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose-Positron-Emission-Tomography-and-Computed-Tomography. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) was significantly higher when VNS was turned on (mean change; +2.2%). Mean BAT activity was not significantly different between active VNS and inactive VNS (BAT SUV(Mean); 0.55 ± 0.25 versus 0.67 ± 0.46, P = 0.619). However, the change in energy expenditure upon VNS intervention (On-Off) was significantly correlated to the change in BAT activity (r = 0.935, P<0.001)., Conclusions: VNS significantly increases energy expenditure. The observed change in energy expenditure was significantly related to the change in BAT activity. This suggests a role for BAT in the VNS increase in energy expenditure. Chronic VNS may have a beneficial effect on the human energy balance that has potential application for weight management therapy., Trial Registration: The study was registered in the Clinical Trial Register under the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01491282.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in children with intractable epilepsy on seizure frequency and severity and in terms of tolerability and safety., Method: In this study, the first randomized active controlled trial of its kind in children, 41 children (23 males; 18 females; mean age at implantation 11y 2mo, SD 4y 2mo, range 3y 10mo-17y 8mo) were included. Thirty-five participants had localization-related epilepsy (25 symptomatic; 10 cryptogenic), while six participants had generalized epilepsy (four symptomatic; two idiopathic). During a baseline period of 12 weeks, seizure frequency and severity were recorded using seizure diaries and the adapted Chalfont Seizure Severity Scale (NHS3), after which the participants entered a blinded active controlled phase of 20 weeks. During this phase, half of the participants received high-output VNS (maximally 1.75mA) and the other half received low-output stimulation (0.25mA). Finally, all participants received high-output stimulation for 19 weeks. For both phases, seizure frequency and severity were assessed as during the baseline period. Overall satisfaction and adverse events were assessed by semi-structured interviews., Results: At the end of the randomized controlled blinded phase, seizure frequency reduction of 50% or more occurred in 16% of the high-output stimulation group and in 21% of the low-output stimulation group (p=1.00). There was no significant difference in the decrease in seizure severity between participants in the stimulation groups. Overall, VNS reduced seizure frequency by 50% or more in 26% of participants at the end of the add-on phase The overall seizure severity also improved (p<0.001)., Interpretation: VNS is a safe and well-tolerated adjunctive treatment of epilepsy in children. Our results suggest that the effect of VNS on seizure frequency in children is limited. However, the possible reduction in seizure severity and improvement in well-being makes this treatment worth considering in individual children with intractable epilepsy., (© The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology © 2012 Mac Keith Press.)

Objectives: The vagus nerve has important immunological and anti-inflammatory actions that might be relevant to the beneficial effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Therefore, we conducted an exploratory study on VNS effects on cytokine levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of children suffering from refractory epilepsy. Moreover, as predictors of the response are lacking, we also aimed to determine if cytokine changes predict the clinical response., Methods: VNS was performed according to a randomized double-blind design: plasma levels were compared between patients who received 20 weeks of high output (therapeutic) (n = 21) or low output (active control) stimulation (n = 20). Thereupon, all patients received high output stimulation for another 19 weeks; levels during this period were compared to baseline. Interictal interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 were determined by ELISA., Results: No significant changes were found between high and low output groups and between the last 19 weeks of stimulation and baseline. Changes in interleukin-1β correlated with improved IQ (τ = 0.42, p < 0.01). Lower baseline plasma levels of interleukin-6 were associated with more seizure frequency reduction [R(2) = 0.105 (1, 35), p = 0.050]., Conclusion: Interictal cytokine levels were not altered by VNS but baseline interleukin-6 predicted the clinical response. In the future, patient selection may be aided by determination of the cytokine profile of the patient., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a moderately effective adjunctive treatment for patients suffering from medically refractory epilepsy and is explored as a treatment option for several other disorders. The present review provides a critical appraisal of the studies on VNS in animal models of seizures and epilepsy. So far, these studies mostly applied short-term VNS in seizure models, demonstrating that VNS can suppress and prevent seizures and affect epileptogenesis. However, the mechanism of action is still largely unknown. Moreover, studies with a clinically more relevant setup where VNS is chronically applied in epilepsy models are scarce. Future directions for research and the application of this technology in animal models of epilepsy are discussed., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Seizures are associated with high intracellular calcium levels. However, conditions characterized by high intracellular calcium levels, such as stroke or traumatic brain injury, do not always evoke epilepsy. We hypothesized that polymorphisms in calcium-related genes CACNA1E and Camk2d contribute to the individual variability in seizure susceptibility. The distribution of one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the CACNA1E and one in the Camk2d gene was determined in Sprague-Dawley rats that were subjected to amygdala kindling or hyperthermia-induced seizures. The pre-kindling afterdischarge threshold was significantly lower in rats with the CACNA1E GG genotype (45.2+/-6.7microA) than in the GT genotyped animals (79.3+/-53.7microA). Among hyperthermia treated rats, the Camk2d G allele was more frequent among rats that did not display behavioral seizures during hyperthermia (67%) than in animals that did show behavioral seizures during hyperthermia (52%, chi(2)(1)=3.847, p=0.05). SNPs in CACNA1E and Camk2d genes are associated with the individual variability in seizure susceptibility in two experimental seizure models., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a moderately effective anti-epileptic treatment. Clinically relevant animal models that are suitable to study the mechanism of action of VNS are not available. The aim of the current study was to develop a clinically relevant animal model for VNS-treated epilepsy that can be used to study the mechanism of action of VNS., Methods: The anticonvulsive effect of VNS was studied in fully kindled rats by measuring behavioral and electrophysiological parameters. Afferent vagus nerve activation was confirmed by quantifying nNOS immunoreactive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS)., Results: VNS rats had more nNOS immunoreactive cells/mm(2) in the NTS than shams. VNS induced a >25% decrease in stage 5 duration (S5D) in 32% of rats. Prior to VNS this type of responders suffered from seizures with a longer total seizure duration (TSD) than non-responders. In 21% of rats VNS resulted in a >25% decrease in TSD. This type of responders had a shorter TSD prior to VNS than non-responders. In 29% of rats VNS resulted in >200% increase in stage 5 latency (S5L). This type of responders had higher kindling rates than non-responders., Conclusion: The VNS-treated kindled rat is a clinically relevant animal model because it is a chronic epilepsy model that responds to VNS with effects that are comparable to the effects of VNS in epilepsy patients. In addition, this study demonstrates that VNS-treated kindled rats can be used to study the mode of action of VNS using immunohistochemical techniques., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate whether it is better to use blood beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) or urinary ketones to monitor ketogenic diet (KD)., Method: In 33 patients on KD we measured ketosis in two different ways. At the 3-monthly visits to the clinic we measured BHB in capillary blood obtained by finger-prick and the level of ketones in the urine using a urine dipstick. If the patient was able to collect urine, the urinary ketones were also measured every day at home. We compared the degree of ketosis with seizure reduction., Results: BHB measured during the 3-monthly visits correlated with seizure reduction at 3 and 6 months (p=0.037 and 0.019, respectively). Urinary ketones measured at the same time did not correlate at any visit. The averaged values of the daily measured ketones in the urine did not correlate either., Conclusions: BHB correlates better with seizure reduction than do ketones in urine. It is, therefore, better to use BHB to monitor KD even if BHB is measured less frequently than urinary ketones., (Copyright 2009 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine long-term retention, percentage of patients withdrawing because of adverse events, percentage of patients achieving seizure freedom, safety profile of the new anti-epileptic drugs lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate., Methods: All patients treated with lamotrigine, levetiracetam or topiramate in the Epilepsy Centre were identified. Each drug was analyzed from introduction of the drug in the Netherlands up to a final assessment point 2 years later., Results: Data from 1066 patients were included: 336 for lamotrigine, 301 for levetiracetam, 429 for topiramate. Two-year retention rates were 69.2% (lamotrigine), 45.8% (levetiracetam), 38.3% (topiramate); (LTG vs. LEV at p<0.001; LTG vs. TPM at p<0.001; LEV vs. TPM at p=0.005). Seizure freedom rates were lowest for lamotrigine and highest for levetiracetam. Adverse events played a role in drug discontinuation in 154/429 patients (35.9%) on topiramate, 52/336 patients (15.5%) on lamotrigine (p<0.001), 68/301 patients (22.5%) on levetiracetam (p<0.001). Mood and general CNS-effects are common in patients on lamotrigine and levetiracetam, and neurocognitive side effects are most prevalent in patients on topiramate. A positive effect on cognition is frequently noted in patients on lamotrigine., Conclusion: A drug that is only modestly efficacious but has a favourable safety profile may look better than a drug that is more efficacious but produces clinically meaningful adverse events. Therefore, a drug's retention rate is mainly determined by its side effect profile. As a consequence, retention rate was highest for lamotrigine and lowest for topiramate. Intermediate retention rates were seen with levetiracetam use.

Objective: To review the effects of non-oral administration of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on risk markers for atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease.Non-oral postmenopausal HT appears not to increase venous thromboembolic risk, whereas the effect on coronary heart disease risk is less clear., Design: Systematic review of literature obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from 1980 until and including April 2006. Terms for "postmenopausal hormone therapy" and for "non-oral administration" were combined in the search., Setting: Randomized clinical trials., Patient(s): Postmenopausal women, both healthy and with established cardiovascular disease or specified cardiovascular risk factors, Intervention(s): Non-oral HT (e.g., transdermal or intranasal) compared with oral HT or no treatment/placebo., Main Outcome Measure(s): Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, C-reactive protein (CRP), cell adhesion molecules, markers of endothelial dysfunction, coagulation, and fibrinolysis., Result(s): Seventy-two studies investigating either transdermal or intranasal administration were included. For non-oral HT, decreases in lipoprotein(a), cell adhesion molecules, and factor VII generally were significant, resistance to activated protein C (APCr) was slightly increased, and other markers including CRP and homocysteine did not change. Compared with oral HT, changes in CRP and APCr were smaller, changes in cell adhesion molecules and some fibrinolytic parameters tended to be smaller, whereas changes in other factors including lipoprotein(a) and homocysteine did not differ., Conclusion(s): Potentially unfavorable changes seen with oral HT on two important markers, CRP and APCr, are substantially smaller with non-oral HT. Non-oral HT has minor effects on the other cardiovascular risk markers studied. Therefore, compared with oral HT, non-oral HT appears be safer with respect to atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease risk.