1. Characterizing Lung Particulates Using Quantitative Microscopy in Coal Miners With Severe Pneumoconiosis
- Author
-
Hua, Jeremy T., Cool, Carlyne D., Lowers, Heather A., Go, Leonard H.T., Zell-Baran, Lauren M., Sarver, Emily A., Almberg, Kirsten S., Pang, Kathy D., Majka, Susan M., Franko, Angela D., Vorajee, Naseema I., Cohen, Robert A., and Rose, Cecile S.
- Subjects
Keyence Corp. ,Image processing -- Computer programs -- Comparative analysis ,Microscope and microscopy -- Comparative analysis ,Mineral industry -- Comparative analysis ,Coal industry -- Comparative analysis ,Electronics industry -- Comparative analysis ,Mining industry -- Comparative analysis ,Coal miners -- Comparative analysis ,Air pollution -- Comparative analysis ,Image processing software ,Electronics industry ,Health - Abstract
* Context.--Current approaches for characterizing retained lung dust using pathologists' qualitative assessment or scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) have limitations. Objective.--To explore polarized light microscopy coupled with image-processing software, termed quantitative microscopy-particulate matter (QM-PM), as a tool to characterize in situ dust in lung tissue of US coal miners with progressive massive fibrosis. Design.--We developed a standardized protocol using microscopy images to characterize the in situ burden of birefringent crystalline silica/silicate particles (mineral density) and carbonaceous particles (pigment fraction). Mineral density and pigment fraction were compared with pathologists' qualitative assessments and SEM/EDS analyses. Particle features were compared between historical (born before 1930) and contemporary coal miners, who likely had different exposures following changes in mining technology. Results.--Lung tissue samples from 85 coal miners (62 historical and 23 contemporary) and 10 healthy controls were analyzed using QM-PM. Mineral density and pigment fraction measurements with QM-PM were comparable to consensus pathologists' scoring and SEM/EDS analyses. Contemporary miners had greater mineral density than historical miners (186 456 versus 63 727/[mm.sup.3]; P = .02) and controls (4542/[mm.sup.3]), consistent with higher amounts of silica/silicate dust. Contemporary and historical miners had similar particle sizes (median area, 1.00 versus 1.14 [micro][m.sup.2]; P = .46) and birefringence under polarized light (median grayscale brightness: 80.9 versus 87.6; P = .29). Conclusions.--QM-PM reliably characterizes in situ silica/silicate and carbonaceous particles in a reproducible, automated, accessible, and time/cost/labor-efficient manner, and shows promise as a tool for understanding occupational lung pathology and targeting exposure controls., Analysis of lung histopathology and retained dust particulate may improve diagnostic accuracy and exposure assessment in patients with occupational lung disease, especially when workplace exposure measurements are limited. For example, [...]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF