1. Host, reproductive, and lifestyle factors in relation to quantitative histologic metrics of the normal breast
- Author
-
Mustapha Abubakar, Alyssa Klein, Shaoqi Fan, Scott Lawrence, Karun Mutreja, Jill E. Henry, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Maire A. Duggan, and Gretchen L. Gierach
- Subjects
Breast cancer ,Etiology ,Risk factors ,Parity ,Body mass index ,Race ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background Emerging data indicate that variations in quantitative epithelial and stromal tissue composition and their relative abundance in benign breast biopsies independently impact risk of future invasive breast cancer. To gain further insights into breast cancer etiopathogenesis, we investigated associations between epidemiological factors and quantitative tissue composition metrics of the normal breast. Methods The study participants were 4108 healthy women ages 18–75 years who voluntarily donated breast tissue to the US-based Susan G. Komen Tissue Bank (KTB; 2008–2019). Using high-accuracy machine learning algorithms, we quantified the percentage of epithelial, stromal, adipose, and fibroglandular tissue, as well as the proportion of fibroglandular tissue that is epithelium relative to stroma (i.e., epithelium-to-stroma proportion, ESP) on digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained normal breast biopsy specimens. Data on epidemiological factors were obtained from participants using a detailed questionnaire administered at the time of tissue donation. Associations between epidemiological factors and square root transformed tissue metrics were investigated using multivariable linear regression models. Results With increasing age, the amount of stromal, epithelial, and fibroglandular tissue declined and adipose tissue increased, while that of ESP demonstrated a bimodal pattern. Several epidemiological factors were associated with individual tissue composition metrics, impacting ESP as a result. Compared with premenopausal women, postmenopausal women had lower ESP [β (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) = −0.28 (− 0.43, − 0.13); P
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF