Search

Objectives:Family carers of people with dementia often experience difficulty in accessing information, services and adequate support. Admiral Nurses, registered nurses specialising in dementia, provide holistic and person-centred support to families living with dementia. This study assessed the effectiveness of the Admiral Nurses' approach from the perspective of family carers who had accessed their service. Method:A questionnaire was developed with input from family carers and Admiral Nurses and questions were based around the Admiral Nursing Standards. 685 questionnaires were sent out in total to carers in receipt of care from three different regions in England. Results:207 questionnaires (30.2% response rate) were analysed. Admiral Nurses' knowledge and skills and their interventions were found helpful by 81.5% and 82.6% of respondents, respectively (mean values). Respondents also rated them effective in developing rapport (96.5%, mean value) and recognising and supporting the needs of the dyad (85.8%, mean value). More varied views were expressed in relation to activities and stimulation for the person with dementia, and to advice around medications and their effects, with around a third (n= 57, 31% andn= 63, 33.9%, respectively) of respondents finding Admiral Nurses not helpful, whilst 24.6% (n= 46) thought so in relation to care coordination. A higher number of contacts with Admiral Nurses (5+) and carer gender (female) were significant predictors of carers' satisfaction. Conclusion:Whilst some aspects of supporting carers are performed less well from the carers' perspective, overall family carers in receipt of Admiral Nursing support perceived their family-centred approach as helpful/effective. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: There is a growing consensus worldwide that palliative care needs to be both more inclusive of conditions other than cancer and to improve. This paper explores some common challenges currently faced by professionals providing palliative care for patients with either cancer or dementia across five countries. Method: One focus group (n = 7) and 67 interviews were conducted in 2012 across five countries: England, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Norway, with professionals from dementia, cancer and palliative care settings. Results: The interviews revealed five common challenges faced across the five countries: communication difficulties (between services; and between professionals, and patients and their families); the variable extent of structural/functional integration of services; the difficulties in funding of palliative care services; problematic processes of care (boundaries, definitions, knowledge, skills and inclusiveness) and, finally, time constraints. Conclusion: These are not problems distinct to palliative care, but they may have different origins and explanations compared to other areas of health care. This paper explored deeper themes hidden behind a discourse about barriers and facilitators to improving care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Palliative care for people with dementia is often sub-optimal. This is partly because of the challenging nature of dementia itself, and partly because of system failings that are particularly salient in primary care and community services. There is a need to systematize palliative care for people with dementia, to clarify where changes in practice could be made. To develop a model of palliative care for people with dementia that captures commonalities and differences across Europe, a technology development approach was adopted, using mixed methods including 1) critical synthesis of the research literature and policy documents, 2) interviews with national experts in policy, service organisation, service delivery, patient and carer interests, and research in palliative care, and 3) nominal groups of researchers tasked with synthesising data and modelling palliative care. Discussion: A generic model of palliative care, into which quality indicators can be embedded. The proposed model includes features deemed important for the systematisation of palliative care for people with dementia. These are: the division of labour amongst practitioners of different disciplines; the structure and function of care planning; the management of rising risk and increasing complexity; boundaries between disease-modifying treatment and palliative care and between palliative and end-of-life care; and the process of bereavement. Summary: The co-design approach to developing a generic model of palliative care for people with dementia has placed the person needing palliative care within a landscape of services and professional disciplines. This model will be explored further in the intervention phase of the IMPACT project. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]