Search

Background Several studies have reported a positive correlation between serum drug concentrations and endoscopic remission in patients with Crohn's disease. Aim To examine the association between the concentrations of cytokine blockers (infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab) and endoscopic remission of small bowel lesions. Method This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a single tertiary referral centre. Patients with Crohn's disease who received maintenance cytokine blocker therapy were recruited from April 2018 to May 2020. We performed balloon-assisted enteroscopy and collected serum samples to measure drug concentrations. The primary endpoint was the relationship between the concentrations of cytokine blockers and endoscopic remission in the small bowel. Results We enrolled 143 patients, 66, 44 and 33 of whom were receiving infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab, respectively. Enteroscopic findings showed that the rate of endoscopic remission of small bowel lesions was significantly lower than that of colonic lesions (P 5, 14 and 4 µg/mL were nearly 5.3-, 9.4- and 14.7-times more likely to exhibit endoscopic remission of the small bowel, respectively. Conclusions Cytokine blocker treatment was less efficacious for small bowel inflammation than colonic inflammation. Higher serum concentrations were needed to achieve endoscopic remission of small bowel lesions.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease that causes chronic inflammation in the colon. 5-aminosalicylic acid and immunosuppressive medications such as corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologic agents are used to treat these patients. However, patients with UC who receive immunosuppressive medications may be at risk for certain opportunistic infections. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of those opportunistic infections, and its pathogenic role has been implicated in refractory UC, but its pathogenicity should be further investigated. Here, we report a surgical case of refractory UC that demonstrated a serologically post-infected pattern of EBV at admission but that later had a high load of EBV in both the peripheral blood and colonic mucosa. These findings suggest that EBV may have been reactivated in the colon, after which it damaged the colonic mucosa and aggravated inflammation in this patient with UC. Thus, EBV might lead to severity and a refractory response against corticosteroids and anti-TNFα agents, necessitating emergency surgery. Viral surveillance for EBV in patients with refractory UC may facilitate understanding of the patient's pathophysiology and predicting response to medications, and the development of antiviral intervention for those patients may improve their prognosis.

It is important to objectively assess Crohn's disease (CD) activity in patients treated with antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF). Detection of healing by endoscopy (endoscopic healing) associates with patient outcome, based on evidence from studies of ileocolonoscopy. We assessed endoscopic healing after treatment, based on findings from balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), in patients with CD.We performed a post-hoc analysis of data from a clinical trial from 116 patients with CD (46 with ileal and 70 with ileocolonic type) who received induction and then maintenance therapy with anti-TNF agents from January 2013 through March 2018 at a single center in Japan. We compared findings from BAE before induction therapy and then again during maintenance therapy (median 13 months later). Endoscopic healing was defined as the modified simple endoscopic score for CD below 5. We also collected data on previous treatments, makers of inflammation, and disease type.Before treatment, small bowel ulcerations were present in 114 patients (98%); 42 patients (60%) with ileocolonic disease had colon ulcerations. During maintenance therapy, 41/114 patients (36%) had small bowel endoscopic healing; all the patients with small bowel endoscopic healing also had colonic endoscopic healing. Colonic endoscopic healing was observed in 33/42 patients (79%). The proportion of patients with small bowel endoscopic healing was significantly lower than that of colonic endoscopic healing (P.001). Among all patients, failure to achieve small bowel endoscopic healing was significantly associated with structuring or penetrating disease (P = .014), lack of concomitant treatment with immunomodulators (P = .015), and having received previous treatment with an anti-TNF agents (P = .018).In a post-hoc analysis of patients with CD treated with anti-TNF agents, we found small bowel ulcerations, detected by BAE, to be more difficult to heal than colon ulcerations.

Mucosal healing is an important treatment target in patients with ulcerative colitis.To explore the optimal colonoscopic strategy to determine the risk for clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis.We enrolled 325 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical and biochemical remission from April 2018 to March 2019. Five colonic segments were endoscopically and histologically assessed systematically. For endoscopic evaluation, we used three different modes of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS): "original," "worst affected," and "pancolonic." The Geboes score was used for histological evaluation. We prospectively followed up the patients and defined clinical relapse as the primary endpoint.Within 1 year after colonoscopy, 18.2% of patients experienced a clinical relapse. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed areas under the curve of 0.755, 0.817, and 0.852 for the "original," "worst affected," and "pancolonic" groups, respectively; hence, pancolonic UCEIS obtained the highest predictive value. Using the pancolonic UCEIS cutoff value of 3, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that patients with endoscopic activity had a significantly lower relapse-free rate than those with endoscopic remission (P 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated endoscopic (pancolonic UCEIS3) and histological (Geboes3.0) activities as independent risks for relapse (HR: 3.96 and 3.48, respectively). Combining pancolonic UCEIS ≤3 and Geboes score ≤3.0 to provide 1-year relapse avoidance was 92.0% sensitive and 97.0% specific.Evaluating disease remission by complete colonoscopy is relevant, and the combination of pancolonic endoscopic and histological evaluations may appropriately evaluate mucosal healing.

Although 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) is the therapy of first choice in ulcerative colitis (UC), some patients cannot tolerate it because of side effects. Previous reports have not investigated whether 5-ASA intolerance is associated with the risk of colectomy.To investigate the associations between 5-ASA tolerance and colectomy among UC patients METHODS: The data of UC patients who visited any of three hospitals during 2014-2018 in and around Tokyo, Japan, were retrospectively obtained from the medical records. Patients were categorized as (a) tolerant to any 5-ASA compounds ("tolerant to 5-ASA") and (b) patients who were intolerant to one or more 5-ASA compounds leading to refrainment from their further use ("intolerant to 5-ASA"). The association between 5-ASA tolerance and colectomy was examined by Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for sex, age, smoking and extent of colitis.Of 1788 patients, 1684 were "tolerant to 5-ASA" while 104 were "intolerant to 5-ASA". Colectomy was performed in 43 (2.6%) of the patients tolerant to 5-ASA and 12 (11.5%) of the patients intolerant to 5-ASA. After adjusting for all covariates, the risk of undergoing colectomy was higher in the "intolerant to 5-ASA" group than in the "tolerant to 5-ASA" group (hazard ratio: 4.92; 95% confidence interval: 2.58-9.38).Patients in whom 5-ASA was discontinued due to intolerance had a higher risk of undergoing colectomy than patients tolerant to their first, second or third 5-ASA compounds.

Background 5-Aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are the key drugs in induction and maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC). Some UC patients are involved in 5-ASA intolerance after induction of oral 5-ASA compounds. There is no evidence of the prognosis including the risk of colectomy in 5-ASA intolerant UC patients. Methods The aim of this study is to establish the prognosis of 5-ASA intolerant UC patients in a multicenter cohort study. A retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database (2014–2018) of 1,574 UC patients was carried out and a total of 1,286 patients treated with oral 5-ASA compounds were enrolled. We compared the risk of colectomy and biologics induction between patients (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA compound (1079), (ii) intolerant to first 5-ASA compound but tolerant to other 5-ASA compound (107) and (iii) intolerant to 5-ASA compound and withdrawal of 5-ASA (100). Results We identified 1,286 patients with UC, of which 40 patients (3.1%) resulted in colectomy and 247 patients (19%) treated with biologics. Colectomy rate in patients (iii) intolerant to 5-ASA and withdrawal of 5-ASA were higher than (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA and (ii) intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA (9.0%, 2.7%, 1.9%, respectively). (iii) Patients withdrawal of 5-ASA showed higher risk of colectomy compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (Hazard ratio (HR) 4.71, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 2.04–10.8). The risk of colectomy among (ii) patients intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA showed no significant difference compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.43–1.35). The biologics induction rate in (iii) patients withdrawal of 5-ASA was significantly higher than (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA and (ii) intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA (37%, 18%, 16%, respectively). Also (iii) patients withdrawal of 5-ASA showed higher risk of induction with biologics compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (HR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.50–3.68). Those risk among (ii) patients intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA showed no significant difference compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.43–1.35). Conclusion Patients with UC who had 5-ASA intolerance and withdrew from 5-ASA showed poor prognosis. We should consider trying other 5-ASA compounds even if the patients had intolerance to one 5-ASA compound.

Background and aim The treat-to-target strategy has emerged in ulcerative colitis management. Mucosal healing is the best target, albeit not in induction therapy of acute diseases as clinical conditions vary over a short duration. To determine the targets during induction therapy for acute ulcerative colitis, we identified markers to predict mucosal healing at 3 and 12 months of initiating the induction therapy. Methods This single-center prospective observational study enrolling 61 adult patients hospitalized for disease exacerbation collected the partial Mayo scores, ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity, fecal markers, and laboratory data (0 day, 2 weeks, and 3 and 12 months) of initiating induction therapy. Results At 2 weeks, patients with mucosal healing at 3 months had had lower partial Mayo and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity scores and higher white blood cell count and total cholesterol than those without mucosal healing. At 3 months, patients with mucosal healing at 12 months had had lower partial Mayo and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity scores than those without mucosal healing. A kinetic analysis demonstrated a difference in the partial Mayo scores and total cholesterol and albumin levels at 2 weeks and in the ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity, fecal calprotectin, and fecal immunochemical tests at 3 months between patients who achieved mucosal healing at 12 months and those who did not. Conclusions Partial Mayo scores and total cholesterol levels act as short-term therapeutic targets during induction therapy in patients with acute ulcerative colitis. Mucosal healing at 3 months correlates to longer time mucosal healing.

BACKGROUND AND AIM A missense variant of the nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X-type motif 15 (NUDT15) gene (R139C) predisposes Asian patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to thiopurine-induced leukopenia. This study evaluates the long-term effect of NUDT15 R139C heterozygosity on hematological parameters during thiopurine administration. METHODS We enrolled 83 Japanese IBD patients who were on anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents and had used thiopurine. NUDT15 R139C was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction. We retrospectively reviewed patient clinical charts to collect data on white blood cell (WBC) count, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), hemoglobin, and platelet count during the 24 months following thiopurine initiation. RESULTS The included patients had either Crohn's disease (54; 65.1%) or ulcerative colitis (29; 34.9%). Genotyping of NUDT15 R139C identified 62 patients (74.7%) of genotype C/C and 21 (25.3%) of genotype C/T. The median dose of thiopurine was lower in the C/T group than in the C/C group after starting thiopurine. At 6 months, the mean WBC count of the C/T group became significantly lower than that of the C/C group (P = 0.008) and remained lower through the 24 months. The C/T group developed grade 2-4 leukopenia by 6 months, which persisted through 12-24 months. The mean MCV in the C/T group became higher than that of the C/C group after 3 months. CONCLUSIONS NUDT15 R139C heterozygosity affected the WBC count and MCV for 24 months after thiopurine administration. Our results indicate that careful monitoring of leukopenia and dose adjustment are necessary throughout treatment in IBD patients heterozygous for the NUDT15 R139C.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a useful marker for assessing the activity of intestinal inflammation. However, most studies have used ileocolonoscopy to evaluate the association of FC with intestinal inflammation, and it is not clear whether FC is useful for the evaluation of small-bowel Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to determine the usefulness of FC for predicting intestinal inflammation evaluated by balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE), which can visualize the deep small intestine. METHODS This was a cross-sectional, observational study involving 69 CD patients, 39 of whom had only small-bowel disease. The extended simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn's disease (eSES-CD) was calculated based on the findings of BAE. Mucosal healing was defined as an eSES-CD of 0. RESULTS In all CD patients, FC levels were correlated with the eSES-CD (r = 0.663, P