Search

Repetitive subconcussive head impacts (RSHI) are believed to induce sub‐clinical brain injuries, potentially resulting in cumulative, long‐term brain alterations. This study explores patterns of longitudinal brain white matter changes across sports with RSHI‐exposure. A systematic literature search identified 22 datasets with longitudinal diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data. Four datasets were centrally pooled to perform uniform quality control and data preprocessing. A total of 131 non‐concussed active athletes (American football, rugby, ice hockey; mean age: 20.06 ± 2.06 years) with baseline and post‐season data were included. Nonparametric permutation inference (one‐sample t tests, one‐sided) was applied to analyze the difference maps of multiple diffusion parameters. The analyses revealed widespread lateralized patterns of sports‐season‐related increases and decreases in mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) across spatially distinct white matter regions. Increases were shown across one MD‐cluster (3195 voxels; mean change: 2.34%), one AD‐cluster (5740 voxels; mean change: 1.75%), and three RD‐clusters (817 total voxels; mean change: 3.11 to 4.70%). Decreases were shown across two MD‐clusters (1637 total voxels; mean change: −1.43 to −1.48%), two RD‐clusters (1240 total voxels; mean change: −1.92 to −1.93%), and one AD‐cluster (724 voxels; mean change: −1.28%). The resulting pattern implies the presence of strain‐induced injuries in central and brainstem regions, with comparatively milder physical exercise‐induced effects across frontal and superior regions of the left hemisphere, which need further investigation. This article highlights key considerations that need to be addressed in future work to enhance our understanding of the nature of observed white matter changes, improve the comparability of findings across studies, and promote data pooling initiatives to allow more detailed investigations (e.g., exploring sex‐ and sport‐specific effects). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Language and culture endow humans with access to conceptual information that far exceeds any which could be accessed by a non-human animal. Yet, it is possible that, even without language or specific experiences, non-human animals represent and infer some aspects of similarity relations between objects in the same way as humans. Here, we show that monkeys' discrimination sensitivity when identifying images of animals is predicted by established measures of semantic similarity derived from human conceptual judgments. We used metrics from computer vision and computational neuroscience to show that monkeys' and humans' performance cannot be explained by low-level visual similarity alone. The results demonstrate that at least some of the underlying structure of object representations in humans is shared with non-human primates, at an abstract level that extends beyond low-level visual similarity. Because the monkeys had no experience with the objects we tested, the results suggest that monkeys and humans share a primitive representation of object similarity that is independent of formal knowledge and cultural experience, and likely derived from common evolutionary constraints on object representation.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Poststroke homonymous hemianopia is disabling, and complete spontaneous recovery is rare. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot clinical trial, we tested whether fluoxetine enhances vision recovery after stroke. Methods: We randomized 17 consecutive adults 1:1 to 90 days of fluoxetine 20 mg daily vs placebo within 10 days of an ischemic stroke causing isolated homonymous hemianopia. The primary end point was percent improvement in 24-2 automated perimetry at 6 months. Twelve participants completed the study. Clinical trial registration NCT02737930. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis of the primary end point, percent improvement in perimetric mean deviation, showed a nonsignificant benefit of fluoxetine (64.4%, n = 5) compared with placebo (26.0%, n = 7, one-tailed 95% confidence interval (CI) = (−2.13, ∞), P = 0.06). The original blind field completely recovered in 60% receiving fluoxetine and 14% receiving placebo (odds ratio = 7.22, one-tailed 95% CI = (0.50, ∞)). Conclusion: These results suggest a trend in favor of fluoxetine for vision recovery after stroke and have the potential to inform the design of a larger multicenter trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2 experiments participants named pictures of common objects with superimposed distractor words. In one naming condition, the pictures and words were presented simultaneously on every trial, and participants produced the target response immediately. In the other naming condition, the presentation of the picture preceded the presentation of the distractor by 1,000 ms, and participants delayed production of their naming response until distractor word presentation. Within each naming condition, the distractor words were either semantic category coordinates of the target pictures or unrelated. Orthogonal to this manipulation of semantic relatedness, the frequency of the pictures' names was manipulated. The authors observed semantic interference effects in both the immediate and delayed naming conditions but a frequency effect only in the immediate naming condition. These data indicate that semantic interference can be observed when target picture naming latencies do not reflect the bottleneck at the level of lexical selection. In the context of other findings from the picture-word interference paradigm, the authors interpret these data as supporting the view that the semantic interference effect arises at a postlexical level of processing.

In 2 experiments participants named pictures of common objects with superimposed distractor words. In one naming condition, the pictures and words were presented simultaneously on every trial, and participants produced the target response immediately. In the other naming condition, the presentation of the picture preceded the presentation of the distractor by 1,000 ms, and participants delayed production of their naming response until distractor word presentation. Within each naming condition, the distractor words were either semantic category coordinates of the target pictures or unrelated. Orthogonal to this manipulation of semantic relatedness, the frequency of the pictures' names was manipulated. The authors observed semantic interference effects in both the immediate and delayed naming conditions but a frequency effect only in the immediate naming condition. These data indicate that semantic interference can be observed when target picture naming latencies do not reflect the bottleneck at the level of lexical selection. In the context of other findings from the picture--word interference paradigm, the authors interpret these data as supporting the view that the semantic interference effect arises at a postlexical level of processing. Keywords: semantic interference effect, lexical selection by competition, picture--word interference, delayed naming, response exclusion hypothesis

The dominant view in the field of lexical access in speech production maintains that selection of a word becomes more difficult as the levels of activation of nontarget words increase--selection by competition. The authors tested this prediction in two sets of experiments. First, the authors show that participants are faster to name pictures of objects (e.g., 'bed') in the context of semantically related verb distractors (e.g., sleep) compared with unrelated verb distractors (e.g., shoot). In the second set of experiments, the authors show that target naming latencies (e.g., 'horse') are, if anything, faster for within-category semantically close distractor words (e.g., zebra) than for within- category semantically far distractor words (e.g., whale). In the context of previous research, these data ground a new empirical generalization: As distractor words become semantically closer to the target concepts--all else being equal--target naming is facilitated. This fact means that lexical selection does not involve competition, and consequently, that the semantic interference effect does not reflect a lexical level process. This conclusion has important implications for models of lexical access and interpretations of Stroop-like interference effects. Keywords: lexical access, competition, semantic interference, semantic facilitation, semantic distance Supplemental material: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33-3.503-supp