Search

Simple Summary: The short-term benefits of pair housing pre-weaning calves have been successfully demonstrated, but the longer-term implications are still relatively unknown, especially for heifers enter the milking herd. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pairs compared to the individual housing of pre-weaning calves on longer-term heifer production. We found that pair-housed calves were less likely to exit the herd, which resulted in pair-housed calves producing more total milk per calf recruited into the original study. However, pair-housed calves also suffered from higher risks of developing udder health issues. The season of birth had an impact on growth rates, with heifers born in the colder winter months having reduced growth, but seasonality did not impact any other variables. Pair housing of pre-weaning dairy calves has previously demonstrated positive impacts on their growth, health and behaviour, but longer-term effects on production are still relatively unknown. This study followed a cohort of 431 Holstein heifers, recruited from a single UK commercial dairy farm, from weaning until either culling or the end of their first lactation. All animals were allocated to either individual or pair housing as a pre-weaning calf. Following weaning, all heifers were similarly managed through group housing, feeding with total mixed rations, the use of automatic heat detection for artificial insemination and weighing every two months until conception. Farm staff identified disease occurrences, which were treated following standard operating procedures. First-lactation monthly milk recording was used to measure milk yields and somatic cell counts. Overall mortality (voluntary and involuntary) was 26.6%, with a decreased hazard of exiting the herd if the heifer was pair housed as a calf (HR 0.70; p = 0.067). The voluntary cull rate was highest in the post-insemination period (13.0%) due to poor fertility. Heifers that were pair housed as calves had significantly increased odds of developing udder health issues as a primiparous cow (OR = 1.93, p = 0.022). Despite this, the 305-day milk yields were not associated with the housing group. However, the total milk produced per calf recruited into the original study was greater for pair-housed compared with individually housed calves (8088 kg vs. 7115 kg; p = 0.071), which is likely due to the significantly higher hazard of individually housed calves exiting the herd prematurely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Body condition scoring of dairy cows estimates their body reserves. Automation allows increased data availability and reduced labour costs. The aim of this study was to compare an automated (AUT) body condition score (BCS) system to manual observers on a single commercial dairy farm in south‐west England. Methods: Three practising veterinary surgeons performed body condition scoring of 315 dairy cows using the agriculture and horticulture development board (AHDB) Body Condition Scorecard. AUT BCSs were obtained from two 3D cameras and compared to the BCSs recorded by the three operators. Results: The AUT system only agreed with manual scorers at a BCS of 3. The system failed to detect cows classified as underconditioned (BCS ≤ 2.25) by any of the operators (sensitivity 0%). It also systematically underestimated the BCS of cows classified as overconditioned (BCS ≥ 3.5) by the operators. For overconditioned cows, the sensitivity of the AUT system ranged from 30.7% to 48.8% when compared with the manual operators. The AUT system also had weaker agreement with operators for Jersey cows, with Cohen's weighted kappa values of 0.28 for Jersey animals and 0.40 for Holsteins. Limitations: This study used a convenience sample of animals on a single farm at a single time point, so the extent to which the findings can be more widely generalised is unclear. Conclusions: The AUT system failed to detect animals classified as underconditioned by the operators and underestimated the condition of cows classified as overconditioned by the operators. Currently, without improvements to the algorithm, the clinical usefulness of such an AUT system for body condition scoring is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Dutch Five Step trimming method (Toussaint Raven, 1985) has been an internationally recognised standard for cattle foot trimming for over 30 years. However, with the increasing size and productivity of UK dairy cattle, modifications have been proposed. Research evidence suggests that some modifications may be beneficial, particularly a deeper concavity of the sole of the lateral hind claw to reduce peak force and compression of the corium which can lead to injury during standing and locomotion. There remains considerable debate over optimal toe length and lack of clarity about from where the initial measurement is made. Furthermore, there is limited evidence on what is the optimal frequency of routine trimming. Current research supports the view that routine trimming using best practice standards is beneficial in terms of reducing lameness and promoting welfare, but this may not always be cost beneficial in herds with a low lameness incidence. It should also not be prioritised over lameness treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pair housing of pre-weaning dairy calves has previously demonstrated positive impacts on their growth, health and behaviour, but longer-term effects on production are still relatively unknown. This study followed a cohort of 431 Holstein heifers, recruited from a single UK commercial dairy farm, from weaning until either culling or the end of their first lactation. All animals were allocated to either individual or pair housing as a pre-weaning calf. Following weaning, all heifers were similarly managed through group housing, feeding with total mixed rations, the use of automatic heat detection for artificial insemination and weighing every two months until conception. Farm staff identified disease occurrences, which were treated following standard operating procedures. First-lactation monthly milk recording was used to measure milk yields and somatic cell counts. Overall mortality (voluntary and involuntary) was 26.6%, with a decreased hazard of exiting the herd if the heifer was pair housed as a calf (HR 0.70; p = 0.067). The voluntary cull rate was highest in the post-insemination period (13.0%) due to poor fertility. Heifers that were pair housed as calves had significantly increased odds of developing udder health issues as a primiparous cow (OR = 1.93, p = 0.022). Despite this, the 305-day milk yields were not associated with the housing group. However, the total milk produced per calf recruited into the original study was greater for pair-housed compared with individually housed calves (8088 kg vs. 7115 kg; p = 0.071), which is likely due to the significantly higher hazard of individually housed calves exiting the herd prematurely.