1. Consumption of rice, acceptability and sensory qualities of fortified rice amongst consumers of social safety net rice in Nepal
- Author
-
Rai, Anjana, Maharjan, Macha Raja, Harris Fry, Helen A., Chhetri, Parbati K., Wasti, Purna Chandra, and Saville, Naomi M.
- Subjects
Asia ,Livestock ,Physiology ,Science ,Crops ,Surveys ,Research and Analysis Methods ,Geographical Locations ,Nepal ,Plant and Algal Models ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Grasses ,Nutrition ,Survey Research ,Organisms ,Food Consumption ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Eukaryota ,food and beverages ,Agriculture ,Plants ,Diet ,Experimental Organism Systems ,Research Design ,Food ,People and Places ,Animal Studies ,Medicine ,Rice ,Physiological Processes ,Research Article ,Crop Science ,Cereal Crops - Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Micronutrient deficiencies are prevalent in Nepal where starchy foods constitute a large proportion of diets and consumption of micronutrient-rich foods is inadequate. We conducted a study to determine whether rice would be an appropriate vehicle for micronutrient fortification in Nepal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Bajura in remote rural Nepal, we conducted a household survey to characterize rice intakes in 195 households, and a double-blinded acceptability test with 177 social safety net rice consumers ≥18 years of age. Of these, 168 tasted fortified and unfortified rice to assess whether respondents could differentiate between fortified and non-fortified rice and their sensory properties. Rice was fortified by blending hot extruded kernels containing 6 micronutrients together with non-fortified rice at a 1:99 ratio. We used binomial tests to assess whether participants could correctly differentiate fortified rice, from non-fortified rice and paired t-tests to compare scores for sensory qualities of cooked fortified and non-fortified rice. We used multiple regression to test associations between per capita consumption and age, gender, wealth and food security. RESULTS: Per capita consumption of rice (median 216g/day, IQR 144.0, 288.0) did not vary by wealth but was +52.08g, (95% CI 10.43, 93.72) higher amongst moderately to severely food insecure households compared with food secure / mildly food insecure. Most respondents could not differentiate fortified rice from non-fortified rice: 37.5% identified uncooked fortified rice and 39.3% cooked rice, which was not different from the 33% expected by chance (p = 0.22 and p = 0.09 respectively). The sensory qualities of fortified rice were acceptable (scoring 3.9 out of 5) and did not differ from non-fortified rice (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: A rice fortification programme implemented through the Nepal Food Corporation's social safety nets has potential because purchase and consumption of rice is high and fortified rice is acceptable among consumers in remote food insecure areas of Nepal.
- Published
- 2019