In The Lancet, fi ndings from Nita Bhandari and colleagues’ phase 3 clinical trial show the safety and effi cacy of the 116E rotavirus vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in Indian infants. The vaccine has an effi cacy similar to that of two licensed oral rotavirus vaccines—RotaTeq (Merck) and Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline) — when tested in low-income settings. However, the timeline of development has been unique and unconventional. The vaccine was not the product of a major multinational manufacturer, but rather, the result of work by team science, based in India. Team science called on the combined expertise and interests of highly diverse multinational groups of clinical and translational investigators from 13 institutions, all with the shared goal of development of a rotavirus vaccine in India that was not only safe and eff ective, but also aff ordable for use in India and other low-income countries (table). By working directly as a team and recruiting members with new skills as the vaccine development process evolved, many of the risks and expenses for research and development that would have been almost insurmountable for a local manufacturer were buff eted with fi nancial help from the public–private partnership between the Indian Government, the manufacturer (Bharat Biotech International), PATH (a non-profi t organisation supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), and other academic institutions at diff erent phases of the development programme, and with technical support from various members of the team. The outcome is a vaccine that is so far safe and eff ective, and that will be accessible to the public sector in India for a maximum of US$1·00 per dose. As is frequently the case, development of this vaccine began when a pediatrician at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, funded by a grant from India’s Department of Science and Technology, astutely noted that newborn babies were becoming infected with rotavirus in the hospital, but were not becoming sick; an observation made previously by Bishop and colleagues in Australia. The neonatal strain from India, 116E, turned out to be a naturally attenuated human–bovine reassortant virus that induced robust humoral and local immune responses and protected infants against severe diarrhoeal disease upon subsequent reinfection with rotavirus; properties that suggested its potential as a candidate vaccine. The 116E isolate was initially developed into a vaccine candidate by a team of Indian and American investigators supported through a bilateral collaborative initiative, the Indo-US Vaccine Action Program, hosted by the Government of India’s Department of Biotechnology, the Indian Council of Medical Research, and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In 1998, the Vaccine Action Program hosted a meeting to identify a manufacturing partner in India willing to develop the 116E candidate as a vaccine. The owner of Bharat Biotech International (a young biotech company with no licensed products at the time) came forward and committed his company to pursue this endeavour. The ability to prepare the manufacturer to develop the vaccine was made possible with generous support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Government of India’s Department of Biotechnology through a series of grants to PATH and to several partner Indian institutions. Scientists from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Indian Institute of Science, and Stanford University provided the company with crucial technical assistance in specialties such as viral cultivation, and assay development and validation. The Bharat Biotech International team were a central part of the eff ort to develop a regulatory strategy, a commercial scale manufacturing process, and project management for product development, with strong support from PATH and the Department of Biotechnology, and with guidance from other partners. Bhandari and colleagues’ pivotal phase 3 fi eld trial was coordinated by the Society for Applied Studies, a community and child health research organisation experienced in undertaking complex community-based fi eld studies, and by PATH. The trial was done at three sites: the Society for Applied Studies in Delhi, KEM Hospital Research Centre in Pune, and the Christian Medical College in Vellore. The clinical assays were done at Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, with quality assurance aided by PATH. The Department of Biotechnology and PATH, together with site principal investigators and the clinical operations management unit, provided oversight through the project management committee. The outcome of this team eff ort was the development of a novel rotavirus vaccine. This vaccine is the fi rst totally new vaccine in recent memory to be developed entirely in India via a process that began with a key clinical observation, followed by basic virology, immunology, and epidemiology research, and progressing through product development to a licensed product. This process opposes the often cited bias from big pharma that local manufacturers cannot pursue independent research, develop good manufacturing practices, and produce a novel product. Cost is one of the most important determinants of a country’s ability and willingness to introduce a new vaccine and is a key motivation of the development programme. The two licensed vaccines have been Lancet 2014; 383: 2180–83