Search

Background: In literature, there are several studies about the effects of nutraceutical combinations at fasting, but data in post-prandial phase are lacking.Purpose: We planned a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a nutraceutical agent containing fermented red rice, phytosterols and olive polyphenols compared to placebo in a sample of Caucasian patients with low cardiovascular risk, both at fasting and after an oral fat load.Study Design: Eighty patients were randomized to receive, as addition to diet and physical activity, a nutraceutical combination containing fermented red rice, sterol esters and stanols, curcumin, and olive polyphenols or placebo (control group), once a day.Methods: We evaluated at baseline, and after 3 months: body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and soluble endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule-1. We evaluated these parameters both at fasting, and after an oral fat load.Results: Nutraceutical combination gave a reduction of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, both compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all), and to placebo (p < 0.05 for all). We recorded a reduction of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and sE-selectin in the group treated with nutraceutical combination, both compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all), and to placebo (p < 0.05 for all). Parameters recorded during oral fat load improved compared to the oral fat load performed at baseline with the nutraceutical combination.Conclusions: The nutraceutical combination of fermented red rice, sterol esters and stanols, curcumin, and olive polyphenols seems to be effective in improving lipid profile and markers of endothelial damage in dyslipidemic patients in primary prevention at low risk for developing cardiovascular disease. The true novelty of this study, however, is the improvement of endothelial damage after an oral fat load compared to placebo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To evaluate if the positive effects recorded on glycaemic control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) were maintained on the long-term compared with multiple daily injection (MDI). The secondary objective was to evaluate if there is a reduction of type and number of cardiovascular events (CV).Methods: This retrospective, observational study evaluated glycaemic control and the number of CV in 104 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes previously treated with MDI and initiating CSII therapy with tubed insulin pumps compared with 109 patients previously treated with MDI continuing MDI.Results: After 8 years, the glycaemic control including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and prandial plasma glucose (PPG) improved with both CSII and MDI compared with baseline; however, HbA1c , FPG, and PPG recorded with CSII were lower than data recorded with MDI. During the 8 years, there were fewer CV events with CSII, compared with MDI, and in particular, there were fewer cases of atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular contractions, acute coronary infarction, angina pectoris, heart failure, and peripheral vascular ischemia. We did not record any reduction of ischemic stroke events.Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that CSII treatment seems to reduce the rates of CV compared with MDI therapy. Moreover, CSII also improved glycaemic control, without increasing the number of hypoglycaemia. However, given the observational design of this trial, our data should be validated in a randomized clinical trial; if they will be confirmed, CSII could be chosen for fully informed and motivated patients at higher risk of developing CV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For some years now, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is uncertainty on DOAC use in some clinical scenarios not fully explored by clinical trials, but commonly encountered in the real world. We report a Delphi Consensus on DOAC use in NVAF and VTE patients. The consensus dealt with 16 main topics: (1) clinical superiority of DOACs compared to VKAs; (2) DOACs as a first-line treatment in patients with AF; (3) therapeutic options for patients undergoing electrical cardioversion; (4) selection of patients suitable for switching from VKAs to DOACs; (5) and (7) role of general practitioners in the follow-up of patients receiving a DOAC; (6) duties of Italian oral anticoagulation therapy centers; (8) role of therapy with DOACs in oncological patients with NVAF; (9) role of DOACs in oncological patients with VTE; (10) methods for administration and therapy compliance for DOACs; (11) drug interactions; (12) safety of low doses of DOACs; (13) therapeutic management of frail patients with NVAF; (14) therapeutic management of NVAF patients with glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min (15); advantages of DOACs for the treatment of frail patients; (16) limitations on therapeutic use of DOACs. Sixty-two cardiologists from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: somewhat agree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). Namely, votes 1-2 were considered as disagreement while votes 3-5 as agreement. Agreement among the respondents of =66% for each statement was considered consensus. A brief discussion about the results for each topic is also reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increasing rate of cardiovascular diseases, the improved survival after the acute phase, the aging of the population and the implementation of primary prevention caused an exponential increase in outpatient cardiac performance, thereby making it difficult to maintain a balance between the citizen-patient request and the economic sustainability of the healthcare system. On the other side, the prescription of many diagnostic tests with a view to defensive medicine and the related growth of patients' expectations, has led several scientific societies to educational campaigns highlighting the concept that "less is more".The present document is aimed at providing the general practitioner with practical information about a prompt diagnosis of signs/symptoms (angina, dyspnea, palpitations, syncope) of the major cardiovascular diseases. It will also provide an overview about appropriate use of diagnostic exams (echocardiogram, stress test), about the appropriate timing of their execution, in order to ensure effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of the health system.

The introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) into clinical practice has revolutionized the prevention and the therapeutic approaches to thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and represents with no doubts one of the most remarkable advances in the history of cardiovascular medicine over the last years. NOACs beyond a comparable efficacy with vitamin K antagonists allow to overcome the limitations of this last category of drugs owing to their less drug to drug interactions and a predictable anticoagulant effect that allows a fixed dose administration without the need for continuous monitoring. However, the penetration of NOACs into the Italian market is still lower than predicted with respect to their use in other European countries.The aim of this review is to critically analyze the reasons behind this attitude through the adoption of the nominal group technique, a methodology that permits to reach an official consensus.

The number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is increasing worldwide. Follow-up strategies after PCI are extremely heterogeneous and can greatly affect the cost of medical care. In the present paper, practical advises are provided with respect to a tailored follow-up strategy on the basis of patients' risk profile. Clinical and interventional cardiologists, cardiac rehabilitators, and general practitioners equally contributed to the creation of the present document and defined three follow-up strategies and types and timing of clinical and instrumental evaluations in post-PCI patients.