Search

AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) solution is a new ready-to-use formulation developed to reduce preparation time and improve reproducibility of injections.To further evaluate treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines (GLs) using pooled data from 2 Phase III studies.Following double-blind treatment with 50 U aboBoNT-A solution (n = 251) or placebo (n = 123), GL severity was assessed by investigators (ILA) and subjects (SSA). Other assessments included subject-reported time to onset, subject satisfaction, FACE-Q, and adverse events.One month after aboBoNT-A solution treatment, 88% had none-or-mild GLs at maximum frown and 93% had ≥1-grade improvement in ILA (similar for SSA), 24% to 27% remaining improved at Month 6. Glabellar lines responder rates remained higher than placebo throughout Month 6 ( p.001). Almost two-thirds of subjects reported onset within 3 days, nearly a quarter reporting effect by Day 1. Subject satisfaction with GL appearance, and FACE-Q satisfaction with facial appearance overall and psychological well-being were also improved over placebo throughout Month 6, p.05. Treatment-related adverse events were nonserious and mild or moderate.Pooled analysis confirmed a duration of effect on GLs of up to 6 months for aboBoNT-A solution, with onset starting within 24 hours, high subject satisfaction, and improved psychological well-being. The treatment was well tolerated.

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence (NDOI) is often inadequately managed with oral therapy.To assess efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A; Dysport®; Ipsen Ltd.) according to etiology of NDOI.Two phase III, randomized, double-blind studies (CONTENT1 [NCT02660138] conducted in Asia, Europe and North America; CONTENT2 [NCT02660359] conducted in the Americas, Asia, Europe and Oceania) both included patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis (MS), with inadequately managed NDOI, regularly performing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC).Patients in CONTENT1 and CONTENT2 received aboBoNT-A injections 600 U (n = 162)/800 U (n = 161), or placebo (n = 162) into the detrusor muscle.Primary endpoint: mean change from baseline in number of NDOI episodes/week at Week 6. Secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with no NDOI episodes; incontinence-related quality of life (I-QoL); urodynamic parameters; and time-to-retreatment. Safety was also assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted for pooled populations by etiology (aboBoNT-A doses vs. placebo).Of 485 randomized patients, 341 (70%) and 144 (30%) had SCI and MS etiologies, respectively. A significant reduction was observed in mean NDOI episodes/week at Week 6 with both aboBoNT-A doses versus placebo in the SCI (all p 0.001) and MS (all p 0.01) groups, as well as significant improvements in I-QoL and urodynamic parameters. Median time-to-retreatment was longer in patients with MS (48-62 weeks across doses) than those with SCI (39-44 weeks). Safety data were similar between etiologies. Urinary tract infection was the most frequent adverse event; similar numbers were reported across treatment groups.AboBoNT-A was well tolerated and significantly improved continence and bladder function, and QoL, in patients with SCI or MS with NDOI performing regular CIC.AboBoNT-A injections improved QoL, symptoms, and bladder function in patients with SCI or MS with bladder muscle overactivity that causes incontinence.

AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A, Dysport® [Ipsen, Paris, France]) inhibits acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction and may modulate pain signaling in hallux valgus (HV). This randomized study (NCT03569098) included a double-blind phase (aboBoNT-A 300U, 500U or placebo injections into forefoot muscles) and an open-label aboBoNT-A treatment period in participants with an HV diagnosis and no HV surgery. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score at week 8. Secondary endpoints included change in NPRS (other time points) and proportion of participants with ≥20% reduction from baseline NPRS (responders). Post-hoc analyses assessed number of days in a 7-day evaluation period that participants spent in a lower pain state than at baseline. Participants received aboBoNT-A 300U (n = 63), 500U (n = 60) or placebo (n = 63). Superiority to placebo was not observed with either aboBoNT-A dose at week 8, thus the primary endpoint was unmet. At week 12, a trend toward efficacy was observed with aboBoNT-A 500U versus placebo and the proportion of participants with ≥20% reduction from baseline NPRS was greater with aboBoNT-A 500U versus placebo (p = .006). Participants in the aboBoNT-A 500U group spent more days with lower NPRS than their lowest baseline score, and with NPRS ≥2 points lower than their mean baseline NPRS at weeks 8 and 12 versus placebo (all p.05; post-hoc). AboBoNT-A was well tolerated. Although the primary endpoint was unmet, other endpoints showed a nominal advantage for aboBoNT versus placebo for treatment of HV-related pain, particularly at week 12. Further clinical evaluation is needed to establish whether botulinum toxins represent a viable non-operative treatment option for HV-associated pain. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Hallux valgus is the medical name for a bunion, a foot deformity that can worsen over time. Patients with bunions experience pain and walking can become difficult, which can affect their quality of life. Foot support aids (e.g., braces, splints and inserts) are available, but surgery is the standard treatment. This study looked at how injections of a specific type of botulinum toxin, called abobotulinumtoxinA or "aboBoNT-A", into the foot may help to reduce pain in patients with bunions. The study included 186 patients aged 18 to 75 years who had not had surgery on their bunion. The researchers looked at how well the injections worked using scales that measure the pain levels the patient experienced. The main outcome was whether patients who had aboBoNT-A injections had less pain after 8 weeks than they did before treatment. The study included patients who were injected with saltwater (no treatment) to check that any treatment effect was real. Researchers also looked at the results after 12 weeks, as well as how many patients had less pain after treatment than before and how many days in a given week patients experienced less pain after treatment than they did before. There was no reduction in pain levels with aboBoNT-A injections after 8 weeks compared with no treatment. However, the other study outcomes suggested that aboBoNT-A resulted in a small benefit compared with no treatment, especially after 12 weeks. Further medical research is needed to establish whether botulinum toxins represent an alternative treatment to surgery for the pain associated with bunions.

Background The FACE-Q patient-reported outcome assesses patient experiences/outcomes with aesthetic facial procedure. A recent trial of abobotulinumtoxinA (ASI, liquid formulation) was the first to our knowledge to assess satisfaction with FACE-Q after glabellar line (GL) injection. Objectives The authors sought to evaluate patient satisfaction with ASI for GL treatment employing 3 FACE-Q scales: facial appearance, psychological well-being, and aging appearance. Methods This was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02353871) of ASI 50 units in adults with moderate-to-severe GL with 6-month follow-up. Results Significantly greater least squares mean changes from baseline were associated with ASI treatment (N = 125) vs placebo (N = 59) for satisfaction with facial appearance at all visits until day 148 (5 months; P < 0.0001-0.0037), psychological well-being at all visits (P < 0.0001-0.0279), and aging appearance at all visits except day 148 (P < 0.0001-0.0409). Significant differences (ASI vs placebo) were observed at all visits for individual items: “how rested your face looks” (P < 0.0001-0.0415), “I feel okay about myself” (P = 0.0011-0.0399), and “I feel attractive” (P < 0.0001-0.0102). Maximal least squares mean (standard error) changes in aging appearance score were −1.4 (0.3; ASI) and −0.3 (0.4; placebo). Investigators’ live assessment of GL at maximum frown significantly correlated with improvements in FACE-Q facial appearance and psychological scales (all patients: r = −0.41 and r = −0.36 [both P < 0.0001], respectively). Conclusions Significant improvements in patient satisfaction with aging, facial appearance, and, importantly, psychological well-being were demonstrated with ASI employing FACE-Q scales up to 5 to 6 months post-injection. Results support a long duration of efficacy with ASI and use of FACE-Q in future trials and clinical practice. Level of Evidence: 1

Background Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A for glabellar line (GL) treatment are well established. Currently approved formulations require reconstitution before injection. Objectives The authors sought to assess 6-month efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of new ready-to-use abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection (ASI) in patients with moderate-to-severe GL at maximum frown. Methods The authors conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02353871). Patients (N = 185) were randomized (2:1) to receive ASI 50 U or placebo. GL severity was evaluated at days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 148, and 183 employing a 4-point scale for investigator’s live assessment (ILA) and subject's self-assessment (SSA). Primary endpoint was ILA of GL at maximum frown at day 29, and secondary endpoints were ILA and SSA of GL at maximum frown (all time points), patient satisfaction with GL appearance, time to onset, and duration of action. Results Responder rates were significantly higher for ASI vs placebo (88.3% vs 1.4%; P < 0.0001) at day 29 by ILA and all time points by ILA (P < 0.0001-0.0441) and SSA (P < 0.0001-0.0036). Sixty percent of patients reported onset of treatment response on or before day 3 (P < 0.0001 vs placebo), and in 5% of patients, efficacy by ILA lasted 6 months (day 183; P = 0.0441 vs placebo). Patient satisfaction rates were significantly higher for ASI vs placebo at all visits (P < 0.0001). Safety was comparable with the known abobotulinumtoxinA profile. Conclusions ASI was significantly efficacious for improving moderate or severe GL vs placebo by investigator and patient assessment. ASI was associated with high patient satisfaction, a long duration of action, and comparable safety profile to abobotulinumtoxinA. Level of Evidence: 1

Oral sulphate solution(OSS: sodium sulphate, potassium sulphate and magnesium sulphate) is a low-volume osmotic agent for cleansing the intestines.Aim:in a multicentre, prospective, randomized, 3rd phase study with two parallel groups, the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of OSS was evaluated in comparison with Macrogol 4000 with electrolytes (a reference preparation for bowel cleansing in Russia) in adult patients who were scheduled for routine diagnostic colonoscopy.Methods.This study was conducted in three Russian research centres during the March–December, 2015 period. Men and women over the age of 18 scheduled to undergo routine diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly assigned either to the OSS group or to the Macrogol group with a fractional use mode before the colonoscopy. The colonoscopy researchers were not aware of which preparation had been taken by the patients. Anonymized video records were centrally analysed by three experts. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a successful bowel preparation for colonoscopy ≥6 points, as determined by theBoston Bowel Preparation Scale of quality assessment(BBPS scale).Results.296 patients were randomized in the study (147 patients were treated with OSS, 149 patients received Macrogol); 294 participants were included in theIntention to Treat population(ITT-population), and 274 participants were included in thepopulation of patients who completed the study according to the protocol(Per-Protocol; PP-population) (139 patients received OSS, 135 patients received Macrogol). The proportion of patients with a successful bowel preparation (BBPS ≥6 scores) was high in both groups (OSS [PP-population]: 97.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 89.5–99.3), Macrogol [PP-population]: 97.7 % (95 % CI: 90.7–99.4)). The corrected difference between the groups was -0.5 % (95 % CI: -4.2–3.3), thereby demonstrating “no less effective” of OSS as compared to Macrogol. Compliance with the drug use regime was higher in the OSS group than in the Macrogol group (95.7 % versus 82.3 %, respectively, p-value = 0.0011, ITT-population).The most common symptom reported in patients was nausea (27.9 % in the OSS group and 12.9 % in the Macrogol group). The proportion of patients who developed nausea was significantly higher in the OSS group than in the Macrogol group (25.2 % compared with 10.2 % when taking the first dose of the preparation (p = 0.0008) and 19.7 % compared with 6.8 % when taking the second dose of the preparation (p = 0.0016)). Differences in other symptoms (bloating, abdominal pain or abdominal discomfort) between the groups were not significant, with the severity of symptoms being generally mild. The safety profile of the investigated preparations in patients withinflammatory bowel disease(IBD) in remission did not differ from that in the general patient population.The differences in terms of secondary endpoints were not identified, including BBPS assessment for different sections of the colon, the level of polyp detection, the duration and completeness of colonoscopy, and the investigator’s satisfaction with the procedure. The analysis by subgroups also did not reveal any significant differences.Conclusion.In this study, the “not less effectiveness” of the sulphate solution was demonstrated as compared to Macrogol in a fractional use mode. Both preparations were well tolerated. Despite the higher incidence of nausea in the OSS group, the patients showed significantly higher compliance with the OSS mode as compared to that of Macrogol.This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry of Clinical Trials, No. NCT02321462.

For patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence (NDOI), treatment with oral medications is often unsatisfactory.To assess the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) for NDOI.Two randomized, double-blind phase 3 studies (CONTENT1, NCT02660138; CONTENT2, NCT02660359) enrolled patients with NDOI who were regularly performing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and were inadequately managed with oral therapy. Pooled results from the first placebo-controlled treatment cycle are reported.Patients received injections of aboBoNT-A 600 U (n = 162) or 800 U (n = 161) or placebo (n = 162) into the detrusor muscle.The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in NDOI episodes per week at week 6. Secondary endpoints reported are the proportion of patients with no NDOI episodes, the volume per void, urodynamic parameters, and quality of life (QoL). Safety was also assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted for the pooled study populations (each aboBoNT-A dose vs placebo).At week 6, NDOI episodes per week were significantly reduced in each aboBoNT-A group versus placebo (both p0.001) and the volume per void had significantly increased. Approximately one-third of patients in each aboBoNT-A dose group reported no NDOI episodes versus 3% of patients in the placebo group. Reductions in urinary incontinence (UI) were reflected in significantly greater improvements in UI-related QoL in the aboBoNT-A groups versus placebo. Urodynamic parameters (bladder capacity and detrusor pressure) were significantly improved with each aboBoNT-A dose versus placebo. Each aboBoNT-A dose was well tolerated. Symptomatic urinary tract infection was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event, with incidence comparable across the aboBoNT-A and placebo groups. The studies were terminated prematurely owing to slow recruitment and were not designed for statistical comparison between the two aboBoNT-A doses.Intradetrusor aboBoNT-A is an effective treatment and alternative option for patients with NDOI who have an inadequate response to oral anticholinergics and are already performing CIC.In patients with bladder muscle overactivity caused by neurological conditions (multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury) and resulting in urinary incontinence, abobotulinumtoxinA injections improved their symptoms and bladder function, with no unexpected effects.

Background The effects of botulinum toxin are transient, and repeat injections are required in children with lower-limb spasticity. However, the efficacy of botulinum toxin in patients who have received previous injections has remained largely unexplored. Methods We present subgroup analyses of a phase III study conducted in ambulatory children (aged two to 17) with spastic equinus foot. Patients were randomized to single doses of abobotulinumtoxinA 10 U/kg/leg, 15 U/kg/leg, or placebo injected into the gastrocnemius-soleus complex (one or both legs). The first analysis was prespecified to review the effect of abobotulinumtoxinA in children previously treated with botulinum toxin versus those children new to the treatment; a second post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of abobotulinumtoxinA in children who changed botulinum toxin formulation. Results Of the 241 randomized patients, 113 had previously received botulinum toxin, including 86 who had been treated with another formulation. In both analyses, muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale) and the Physicians Global Assessment, at week 4, improved with abobotulinumtoxinA treatment versus placebo, regardless of baseline botulinum toxin status. Placebo responses in patients new to treatment were consistently higher than in the previously treated group. Conclusions These results demonstrate similar abobotulinumtoxinA efficacy and safety profiles in children with spasticity who are new to botulinum toxin treatment and those children who were previously treated. The efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA treatment in these previously treated patients were comparable with the overall trial population, indicating that doses of 10 and 15 U/kg/leg are suitable starting doses for children with spasticity regardless of the previous botulinum toxin preparation used.

Naturally occurring botulinum toxin (BoNT) serotypes have different pharmacological features of therapeutic and aesthetic interest. This phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EudraCT: 2016–002609-20) assessed safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the first recombinant BoNT serotype E (rBoNT-E) versus abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®), administered to extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) of healthy males. Subjects were randomised 3:1 (n = 28) to single ascending rBoNT-E (0.04–3.6 ng) doses or placebo. A further 24 subjects received abobotulinumtoxinA (20, 40, or 70 U) or placebo. PD were assessed using compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude. Demographics were similar between groups. All rBoNT-E doses were well tolerated (no severe treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs], serious adverse events, or treatment-related toxicities). Most TEAEs were mild/moderate and treatment-unrelated. rBoNT-E had a faster onset of action (days 1–2 post-injection), greater peak effect (>90% CMAP inhibition), and shorter duration of effect at highest tested doses versus abobotulinumtoxinA (onset of action ≤7 days post-injection; 70% maximal CMAP inhibition). rBoNT-E duration of effect was 2–7 weeks versus >26 weeks for abobotulinumtoxinA. Dose-dependent effects were observed for magnitude and duration of EDB CMAP inhibition, plateauing at 0.9 and 3.6 ng. rBoNT-E demonstrated a good safety profile and a PD profile that may address unmet therapeutic and aesthetic patient needs.

Background Preclinical research indicates that BN82451B has potential to interfere with excitotoxicity, and possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and mitochondrial protection properties. In-vivo studies in tgHD mice suggested neuroprotective and antidyskinetic effects. Aims The safety and tolerability of BN82451B was tested in Huntington’s Disease (HD) alongside exploratory efficacy with a focus on motor symptoms. Methods This 4-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, in-patient, proof-of-concept study explored escalating doses (40 – 80 mg BID) of BN82451B in symptomatic HD subjects. Primary objective was safety and tolerability, secondary objectives were motor symptoms assessed by Q-Motor and the UHDRS-TMS. Results A total of 30 subjects were planned to be included, but the study was terminated after inclusion of 17 subjects (14 BN82451B/3 placebo). Recruitment in this study was complicated by an obligatory in-patient setting at a phase-1 research-unit for four weeks. There were no severe safety issues, but 6 of the 14 treated subjects (43%) developed cutaneous adverse events (rash) which led to discontinuation of treatment in 3 cases and resolved after discontinuation of treatment in all 6 cases. Another 2 subjects were withdrawn due to nausea and vomiting. BN82451B treatment did not differentiate from placebo in the exploratory outcome variables. While placebo subjects showed a mean improvement in the UHDRS-TMS, Q-Motor measures indicated no change in the placebo group. However, mean Q-Motor changes of BN82451B treated patients suggested a none-significant deterioration of motor performance while on drug, which reverted after drug discontinuation. Conclusions BN82451B induced skin rash in 43% of exposed patients and increased nausea/vomiting. Exploratory analysis did suggest a potential for deterioration of motor symptoms in HD subjects under treatment. Q-Motor measures showed much less variance and no placebo response in repeated assessments compared to the UHDRS-TMS. It was decided to discontinue the study.

Background AbobotulinumtoxinA has beneficial effects on spasticity and active movements in hemiparetic adults with upper limb spasticity (ULS). However, evidence-based information on optimal dosing for clinical use is limited. Objective To describe joint-specific dose effects of abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with ULS. Design Secondary analysis of a phase 3 study (NCT01313299). Setting Multicenter, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants A total of 243 adults with ULS >6 months after stroke or traumatic brain injury, aged 52.8 (13.5) years and 64.3% male, randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single-injection cycle of placebo or abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U or 1000 U (total dose). Methods The overall effects of injected doses were assessed in the primary analysis, which showed improvement of angles of catch in finger, wrist, and elbow flexors and of active range of motion against these muscle groups. This secondary analysis was performed at each of the possible doses received by finger, wrist, and elbow flexors to establish possible dose effects. Main Outcome Measures Angle of arrest (X V1 ) and angle of catch (X V3 ) were assessed with the Tardieu Scale, and active range of motion (X A ). Results At each muscle group level (finger, wrist, and elbow flexors) improvements in all outcome measures assessed (X V1 , X V3 , X A ) were observed. In each muscle group, increases in abobotulinumtoxinA dose were associated with greater improvements in X V3 and X A , suggesting a dose-dependent effect. Conclusions Previous clinical trials have established the clinical efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA by total dose only. The wide range of abobotulinumtoxinA doses per muscle groups used in this study allowed observation of dose-dependent improvements in spasticity and active movement. This information provides a basis for future abobotulinumtoxinA dosing recommendations for health care professionals based on treatment objectives and quantitative assessment of spasticity and active range of motion at individual joints. Level of Evidence I

Psychometric tests obtained from 6564 young men were studied as a function of the parents' ages at conception and of some characteristics of the subject's postnatal environment. Individual scores, from 0 to 20, were divided into two groups: n(1)11 and n(2)

To evaluate the relation between apathy and development of dementia in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Two hundred and fifty-one French-speaking outpatients fulfilling the criteria of amnestic MCI were enrolled. Apathy was assessed with the Apathy Inventory (IA). Neuropsychiatric evaluation also included the Goldberg anxiety scale and the Montgomery and Asberg Depressive Rating Scale (MADRS). The main end point considered after a 1-year follow-up was the development of dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT).At baseline there were 86 (39.8%) subjects presenting at least one symptom of apathy among the 216 included in analysis. After a 1-year follow-up, 22 patients developed DAT. Of the patients with apathy at baseline 13 (15.1%) developed DAT in comparison with 9 (6.9%) of the non-apathetic patients. At the 1-year follow-up, patients developing DAT had a significantly higher frequency of apathetic symptoms (91.7%) than patients without DAT (26.9%).Taking into account that apathy is one of the most frequently observed neuropsychiatric symptoms in MCI and in DAT the present study suggests that patients with MCI and apathy should be more closely observed.