Search

Introduction: The phase 2 RAMONA study demonstrated that second-line nivolumab ± ipilimumab immunotherapy was feasible and effective in older patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Here, we presented results from functional status (FS) and quality-of-life (QoL) analyses., Materials and Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with advanced ESCC and disease progression following first-line therapy were enrolled for study treatment with nivolumab ± ipilimumab. Geriatric assessments (GA) consisting of G8 and GoGo/SlowGo evaluation, and quality of life (QoL) assessments with EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires were conducted at baseline and during the treatment. A post hoc analysis was performed to compare therapy efficacy, toxicity, and QoL between age groups (≥70 years vs. <70 years) and functionality groups (G8 > 14 vs. ≤14 and GoGo vs. SlowGo)., Results: In 66 treated patients with a median age of 70.5 years, older patients had non-inferior overall survival and tumor response compared to younger patients, with no increased treatment-related adverse events. Fitter patients (G8 > 14, GoGo) had a clinically, yet not statistically significant, survival advantage than less fit patients (G8 ≤ 14, SlowGo) patients. Moreover, FS by G8 and GoGo/SlowGo significantly correlated with QoL. Overall, QoL was impaired at baseline but remained stable in all scales over the course of immunotherapy., Discussion: The administration of nivolumab ± ipilimumab second-line immunotherapy in older patients with ESCC did not show age-dependent effects and maintained QoL. GA could identify functional deficits and limitations of QoL and should be implemented in the context of immunotherapy., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT03416244., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest NMB reports research funding and receipt of equipment from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. RDH reports advisory for Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Servier; honoraria for lectures and presentations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier; and consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier. AV reports consultancy and advisory role for AstraZeneca, Amgen, BeiGene, Böhringer Mannheim, BMS, BTG, Daichi-Sankyo, EISAI, Incyte, Ipsen, MSD, PierreFabre, Roche, Servier, Sirtex, Tahio and Terumo. MdW reports research funding from Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca and MorphoSys; speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca and Janssen; travel or accommodation expenses from Astellas and Janssen. RJ reports consulting fees from Roche and Bayer; payments for lectures and presentations from Dr. Falk Pharma and Bristol Myers Squibb; for writing of manuscripts from Boston Scientific and Springer Nature; advisory for Heidelberg University Hospital; and leading the Endoscopy section of the German Society of Gastroenterology. GS reports consulting fees from Servier, Pharmacosmos, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen and travel support from Daichi-Sankyo. PTP reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and MSD. TL is Scientific Head at CROLLL GmbH. HB is an employee of a commercial provider of clinical statistics and programming services (Staburo GmbH, Munich). MPE reports funding for conducting the trial from AIO-Studien-gGmbH which is the regulatory sponsor of the trial, and advisory for Bristol Myers Squibb. NH reports advisory for Bristol Myers Squibb. All remaining authors declare no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The overall survival of patients with advanced and refractory oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, mostly aged 65 years and older, is poor. Treatment with PD-1 antibodies showed improved progression-free survival and overall survival. We assessed the safety and efficacy of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy in this population., Methods: This multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 32 sites in Germany included patients aged 65 years and older with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and disease progression or recurrence following first-line therapy. Patients were treated with nivolumab (240 mg fixed dose once every 2 weeks, intravenously) in the safety run-in phase and continued with nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivolumab 240 mg fixed dose once every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks, intravenously). The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was compared with a historical cohort receiving standard chemotherapy in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03416244., Findings: Between March 2, 2018, and Aug 20, 2020, we screened 75 patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We enrolled 66 patients (50 [76%] men and 16 [24%] women; median age 70·5 years [IQR 67·0-76·0]), 44 (67%) of whom received combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy and 22 (33%) received nivolumab alone. Median overall survival time at the prespecified data cutoff was 7·2 months (95% CI 5·7-12·4) and significantly higher than in a historical cohort receiving standard chemotherapy (p=0·0063). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (12 [29%] of 42), nausea (11 [26%]), and diarrhoea (ten [24%]). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (20%) of 66 patients. Treatment-related death occurred in one patient with bronchiolitis obliterans while on nivolumab and ipilimumab treatment., Interpretation: Patients aged at least 65 years, with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma might benefit from combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy in second-line treatment., Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MPE reports receiving funding to conduct the trial from AIO Studien, the regulatory sponsor of the trial, and serving as an advisor with Bristol Myers Squibb. NMB reports receiving research funding and receipt of equipment from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. RH reports serving as an advisor with Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Servier; honoraria for lectures and presentations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier; and consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier. AV reports serving as an advisor with Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Eisai, AstraZeneca, IPSEN, MSD, Sirtex, BTG, Servier, Terumo, and Imaging Equipment; and consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Eisai, Astra Zeneca, IPSEN, MSD, Sirtex, BTG, Servier, Terumo, and Imaging Equipment. RJ reports receiving consulting fees from Roche and Bayer; payments for lectures and presentations from Dr Falk Pharma and Bristol Myers Squibb; for writing of manuscripts from Boston Scientific and Springer Nature; serving as an advisor with Heidelberg University Hospital; and leading the Endoscopy section of the German Society of Gastroenterology. PTP reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and MSD. TGa reports receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Roche for presentations and advisory functions. JNK reports receiving consulting fees from Owkin and Panakeia as well as honoraria for lectures from MSD and Eisai. MM reports employment with AIO Studien, who was the regulatory sponsor of the trial. NH reports serving as an advisor with Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer may suffer increased toxicity from intensive chemotherapy. Treatment individualization by geriatric assessment (GA) might improve functional outcome., Methods: We performed a multicenter, phase IV, open label trial in patients ≥70 years with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients underwent GA and were assigned to one of three categories based on their scores: Go-Go, Slow-Go, or Frail. These categories were intended to guide physician's treatment decisions when choosing to treat patients with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (arm A), gemcitabine (arm B), or best supportive care (arm C). Primary objective was a stable (loss of five points or less) Barthel's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score during chemotherapy; secondary endpoints included GA scores during therapy, safety, quality of life, response and survival rates., Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the trial in six centers in Germany (out of 135 planned), resulting in termination due to low recruitment. Fifteen patients were allocated to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, fifteen to gemcitabine, and two to best supportive care by their physicians, although according to their GA scores 29 patients (91%) were categorized as Slow-Go and three (9%) as Go-Go. Thus, fifteen of 32 (47%) patients were misclassified and given a course of treatment inconsistent with their GA scores. Median progression-free survival (PFS) were 3.3 months and 9.1 months and median time to quality-of-life deterioration 13 days and 29 days in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy arms, respectively. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 (78.6%) patients in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and 8 (53.3%) patients in the gemcitabine arm., Conclusions: Clinical evaluations by investigators differed markedly from geriatric assessments, leading to potential overtreatment. In our modest sample size study, those patients undergoing more intensive therapy had a less favorable course., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To determine a recommended Phase II dose of the oral fluoropyrimidine trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) combined with the multi-kinase inhibitor regorafenib (REG) in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Materials & methods: A conventional 3 + 3 dose finding design was used. FTD/TPI was administered on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28-day cycle, REG on days 2-22. Two dose levels were used: FTD/TPI 25 mg/m 2 b.i.d. + REG 120 mg/d, then escalated to FTD/TPI 35 mg/m 2 b.i.d. + REG 120 mg/d. Results: In total, 12 patients were treated at two dose levels. Three dose-limiting toxicities were observed; all were grade 3 hypertension causally attributed to REG. Recommended Phase II dose is FTD/TPI 25 mg/m 2 b.i.d. + REG 120 mg/d. Median progression-free survival was 3.81 months (95% CI: 1.51-5.29), median OS 11.1 months (95% CI: 2.3-18.2). Conclusion: The combination of REG and FTD/TPI is feasible and safe. Efficacy signals exceed that of the single agents at acceptable toxicity levels and are clinically meaningful.

Background: Elderly patients represent a major fraction of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in routine clinical practice, but they are still underrepresented in clinical trials. In particular, data regarding efficacy and safety in frail or elderly patients with respect to immunotherapy are lacking. Importantly, immunosenescence in elderly patients might interfere with activities of immune-modulating drugs such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Thus, there is an urgent need to assess safety and efficacy of such inhibitors in this group., Methods/design: This prospective, open label, treatment stratified, randomized phase II study will enroll 200 patients with stage IV NSCLC amenable at least to single-agent chemotherapy (CT). Eligible patients must be aged 70 years or older and/or "frail" (Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1) or have a restricted performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG > 1). Patients are stratified according to modified Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) score: "fit" patients are allocated to combination CT (carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel) and "less fit" patients receive single-agent CT (gemcitabine or vinorelbine). After allocation to strata, patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either four cycles of CT or two cycles of CT followed by two cycles of durvalumab and subsequent maintenance treatment with durvalumab every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint is the rate of treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V4.03). As secondary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), descriptive subgroup analyses according to PD-L1 expression, and quality of life are addressed. Geriatric screening assessments and functional tests will be performed to complete the phenotyping of a potential "frail" and "elderly" patient cohort. The trial is accompanied by a biomaterial repository to explore potential biomarkers., Discussion: The DURATION trial will prospectively investigate the safety and tolerability of anti-PD-L1 treatment with durvalumab after chemotherapy in elderly and frail patients and thereby provide new insights into the effect of PD-L1 blockade and the impact of immunosenescence in this cohort of patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03345810; initially registered on 17 November 2017. Eudra-CT, 2016-003963-20; initially registered on 3 January 2017.

Background: Hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy for metastatic lung cancer patients is frequently used in order to ease pain, to increase bone stability, to treat local mass effects, or to prolong progression-free survival at critical sites. Recently introduced, immunotherapy for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has significantly improved outcome in this cohort. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that the combination of photon radiation with programmed death-1 (PD-1) targeting immunotherapies may promote a strong and durable immune response against tumor manifestations both within and beyond radiation targets., Methods/design: In the present prospective, two-group, non-randomized, open-label phase II trial, 130 patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC in 2nd-line or 3rd-line treatment will be included. 65 patients with a clinical indication for palliative radiotherapy to non-cerebral/non-pulmonary metastatic sites will receive 240 mg nivolumab followed by palliative radiotherapy with 5 × 4 Gray (Gy) = 20 Gy photon radiation, which will be initiated within 72 h after first nivolumab administration (Group A). 65 patients without an indication for radiotherapy will only receive nivolumab (Group B). Nivolumab will be further administered every two weeks in both groups and will be continued until progression and loss of clinical benefit or until occurrence of limiting toxicities. The primary endpoint will be the objective response rate (ORR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary endpoints will be progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST 1.1, overall survival, descriptive subgroup analyses according to PD-L1 expression, toxicity and quality of life. Since response patterns following immunotherapies differ from those after conventional cytostatic agents, both objective response rate and progression-free survival will additionally be assessed according to immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) criteria., Discussion: The FORCE study will prospectively investigate response rates, progression-free and overall survival (OS), and toxicity of nivolumab with and without hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy in a group of 130 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (non-squamous histology) in 2nd-line or 3rd-line treatment. This trial will contribute prospective data to the repeatedly published observation that the combination of hypofractionated photon radiotherapy and medical immunotherapy is not only safe but will also promote antitumoral immune responses., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03044626 (Date of initial registration: 05 January 2017). Eudra-CT Number: 2015-005741-31 (Date of initial registration: 18 December 2015).

Background: Advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is frequently diagnosed in elderly patients. The impact of 2nd line chemotherapy is poorly defined. Recent data demonstrated effectiveness of checkpoint inhibitors in different squamous cell carcinomas. Therefore, we assess combined nivolumab/ipilimumab as 2nd line therapy in elderly ESCC patients., Methods: RAMONA is a multicenter open-label phase II trial. The primary objective is to demonstrate a significant survival benefit of nivolumab/ipilimumab in advanced ESCC compared to historical data of standard chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is therefore overall survival (OS). Major secondary objective is the evaluation of tolerability. Time to QoL deterioration will thus be determined as key secondary endpoint. Further secondary endpoints are tumor response, PFS and safety. We aim to recruit a total of n = 75 subjects that have to be > 65 years old. Eligibility is determined by the geriatric status (G8 screening and Deficit Accumulation Frailty Index (DAFI)). A safety assessment will be performed after a 3 cycle run-in phase of nivolumab (240 mg Q2W) to justify escalation for eligible patients to combined nivolumab (240 mg Q2W) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg Q6W), while the other patients will remain on nivolumab only. RAMONA also includes translational research sub-studies to identify predictive biomarkers, including PD-1 and PD-L1 evaluation at different time points, establishment of organoid cultures and microbiome analyses for response prediction., Discussion: The RAMONA trial aims to implement checkpoint inhibitors for elderly patients with advanced ESCC as second line therapy. Novel biomarkers for checkpoint-inhibitor response are analyzed in extensive translational sub-studies., Trial Registration: EudraCT Number: 2017-002056-86 ; NCT03416244 , registered: 31.1.2018.

Background: In the group of elderly patients (≥70 years) with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), it is not known who benefits from intensive 1st line nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-p/gem) combination chemotherapy or who would rather suffer from increased toxicity. We aim to determine whether treatment individualization by comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) improves functional outcome of the patients., Methods/design: GrantPax is a multicenter, open label phase 4 interventional trial. We use a CGA to stratify elderly patients into three parallel treatment groups (n = 45 per arm): 1) GOGO (nab-p/gem), 2) SLOWGO (gem mono) or 3) FRAIL (best supportive care). After the 1st cycle of chemotherapy (or 4 weeks in FRAIL group) another CGA and safety assessment is performed. CGA-stratified patients may not decline in their CGA performance in response to the first cycle of chemotherapy (primary objective), measured as a loss of 5 points or less in Barthels activities of daily living. Based on the second CGA, patients are re-assigned to their definite treatment arm and undergo further CGAs to monitor the course of treatment. Secondary endpoints include CGA scores during the course of therapy (CGA1-4), response rates, safety and survival rates., Discussion: GrantPax is the first trial implementing a CGA-driven treatment to personalize therapy for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. This may lead to standardization of therapy decisions for elderly patients and may optimize standard of care for this increasing group of patients., Trial Registration: NCT02812992 , registered 24.06.2016.

Purpose: To establish a cornea transplant model in a pigmented rat strain and to define the immunologic reaction toward corneal allografts, by studying the cellular and humoral immune response after keratoplasty., Methods: Full thickness penetrating keratoplasty was performed on Brown Norway (RT1n) recipients using fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched Piebald-Viral-Glaxo (PVG; RT1c) donors. Using multicolor flow cytometry (FACS) we quantified and compared the cellular composition of draining versus non-draining lymph nodes (LN). Furthermore, we developed an isolation method to release viable graft infiltrating lymphocytes (GIL) and subjected them to phenotypic analysis and screened serum from transplanted animals for allo-antibodies., Results: Assessing ipsi-lateral submandibular LN we find ample evidence for post surgical inflammation such as elevated absolute numbers of cluster of differentiation (CD)4+, CD8+, B-cells, and differential expression of CD134. However, we could not unequivocally identify an allo-antigen-specific immune response. FACS analysis of lymphocytes isolated from collagenase digested rejected corneas revealed the following six distinct subpopulations: MHC-2+ cells, CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, CD161(dull) large granular lymphocytes, CD3+ CD8+ CD161(dull) natural killer (NK)-T-cells and CD161(high) CD3⁻ NK cells. At post-operation day (POD)-07 only CD161(dull) MHC-2(neg) large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) were detected in syngeneic and allo-grafts. In concordance with an increase in B-cell numbers we often detected copious amounts of allo-antibodies in serum of rejecting animals, in particular immunoglobulin (Ig) M (IgM), immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 (IgG1), and IgG2a., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that despite its immune privileged status and low-responder characteristics of the strain combination, allogeneic corneal grafts mount a full fledged T helper1 (Th1) and Th2 response. The presence of NK-T-cells and NK-cells in rejecting corneas shows the synergy between innate and adaptive immunity during allograft destruction.

Background/aims: The ability of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) to home to sites of neoangiogenesis makes them attractive candidates for use in the field of gene therapy. The efficacy of this approach depends on the efficiency of the vector used for transgene delivery., Methods/results: In this study, we have compared the efficiency of adenovirus, five serotypes of AAV2, VSVG-pseudotyped lentivirus, and nonviral plasmid/liposome DNA vectors to deliver the green fluorescence protein reporter gene to human early EPCs to determine efficacy and vector-related cell toxicity. Adenovirus proved most effective with efficiencies of up to 80% with low levels of cell death. Lower levels of expression were seen with other vectors. Electroporation proved unsuitable at the parameters tested. We have also identified at least two distinct subpopulations that exist in the heterogeneous parent EPC culture, one of which is amenable to transduction with adenovirus and one that is not. In addition, adenoviral transduction did not disrupt the ability of the cells to incorporate into endothelial structures in vitro., Conclusion: We have found adenovirus to be the most efficient of the vector systems tested for gene delivery to EPCs, an effect that is mediated almost entirely by one of two identified subpopulations.

Delivery of cellular and/or trophic factors to the site of injury may promote neural repair or regeneration and return of function after peripheral nerve or spinal cord injury. Engineered scaffolds provide a platform to deliver therapeutic cells and neurotrophic molecules. We have genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from the green rat (CZ-004 [SD TgN(act-EGFP)OsbCZ-004]) to express nerve growth factor (NGF) using an adenoviral vector. Cells maintained their stem cell phenotype as judged by expression of CD71 and CD172 markers, and absence of the hematopoietic marker CD45. Cells continued to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) on a long-term basis. Morphology, viability, and growth kinetics were maintained when cells were grown on a poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) polymer scaffold. Under appropriate growth conditions, they differentiated into chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic phenotypes, demonstrating that they retained their characteristics as MSCs. NGF was secreted from transduced MSCs at physiologically relevant levels ( approximately 25 ng/mL) measured by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA). Secreted NGF was functionally active in a neurite growth assay with PC12 cells. We conclude that MSCs are a good candidate for delivery of therapeutic factors into the injured nervous system. They are autologous, may be genetically modified to express neurotrophins, and are compatible with polymer surfaces that may be used as a potential delivery system.