Search

Objectives: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) can affect nearly any organ and is often treated with glucocorticoids, which contribute to organ damage and toxicity. Comorbidities and healthcare utilization in IgG4-RD are poorly understood., Methods: We conducted a cohort study using claims data from a US managed care organization. Incident IgG4-RD cases were identified using a validated algorithm; general population comparators were matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity and index date. The frequency of 21 expert-defined clinical outcomes associated with IgG4-RD or its treatment and healthcare-associated visits and costs were assessed 12 months before and 36 months after the index date (date of earliest IgG4-RD-related claim)., Results: There were 524 cases and 5240 comparators. Most cases received glucocorticoids prior to (64.0%) and after (85.1%) the index date. Nearly all outcomes, many being common glucocorticoid toxicities, occurred more frequently in cases vs comparators. During follow-up, the largest differences between cases and comparators were seen for gastroesophageal reflux disease (prevalence difference: +31.2%, P < 0.001), infections (+17.3%, P < 0.001), hypertension (+15.5%, P < 0.01) and diabetes mellitus (+15.0%, P < 0.001). The difference in malignancy increased during follow-up from +8.8% to +12.5% (P < 0.001). Some 17.4% of cases used pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy during follow-up. Over follow-up, cases were more often hospitalized (57.3% vs 17.2%, P < 0.01) and/or had an emergency room visit (72.0% vs 36.7%, P < 0.01); all costs were greater in cases than comparators., Conclusions: Patients with IgG4-RD are disproportionately affected by adverse outcomes, some of which may be preventable or modifiable with vigilant clinician monitoring. Glucocorticoid-sparing treatments may improve these outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an immune-mediated condition that can affect nearly any organ or anatomic site. We sought to describe the epidemiology of IgG4-RD in the USA., Methods: We used Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2021 to identify IgG4-RD cases using a validated algorithm. We estimated the incidence rate and prevalence between 2015 and 2019 (when rates stabilised), standardised to the US population by age and sex. We compared mortality rates among patients with IgG4-RD to the non-IgG4-RD population matched in a 1:10 ratio on age, sex, race/ethnicity and encounter date. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate HRs and 95% CIs., Results: We identified 524 IgG4-RD cases. The mean age was 56.5 years with 57.6% female and 66% White. The incidence of IgG4-RD increased during the study period from 0.78 to 1.39 per 100 000 person-years in 2015 and 2019, respectively. The point prevalence on 1 Janury 2019 was 5.3/100 000 persons. During follow-up, there were 39 and 164 deaths among 515 IgG4-RD cases and 5160 comparators, resulting in a mortality rate of 3.42 and 1.46/100 person-years, respectively, and adjusted HR of 2.51 (95% CI 1.76 to 3.56)., Conclusions: The incidence of IgG4-RD is similar to that of systemic rheumatic diseases such as ANCA-associated vasculitis and systemic sclerosis but may be increasing as familiarity with this diagnosis grows. Clinicians should be aware of this condition, especially given the excess risk of death. Identification of effective therapies is an important research agenda., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ZSW is funded by NIH/NIAMS (K23AR073334 and R03AR078938) and the RRF (K Supplement). ZSW reports research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Principia/Sanofi and consulting fees from Zenas Biopharma, Horizon, Sanofi, Shionogi, Viela Bio and MedPace. GM, ES, NP-I and DM are employees of Sanofi and may hold stock in Sanofi., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Roche COBAS Amplicor monitor version 1.5 assay is considered gold standard for viral load monitoring in Botswana. Due to its demand for elaborate infrastructure, viral load testing has been confined to the national HIV reference laboratories. Cavidi ExaVir Load version 2 assay was considered as a potential alternative to decentralize viral load testing to the rural/remote hospital laboratories and thus increase access to therapy. This study compared the performance of ExaVir Load v2 assay at a district hospital laboratory in Serowe and COBAS Amplicor monitor v1.5 assay at the Botswana Harvard HIV Reference Laboratory using quality assessment samples and plasma from HIV-positive individuals. ExaVir Load v2 and COBAS Amplicor monitor v1.5 assays had very good agreement; Kappa statistic 0.951. The COBAS Amplicor monitor v1.5 and ExaVir Load v2 assays detected HIV-1 RNA in 84 and 86 samples but did not detect HIV-1 RNA in 221 and 219 samples, respectively. The two assays detected HIV-1 RNA concordantly in 82 samples and were strongly correlated (r=0.8554, P<0.0001). ExaVir Load v2 assay provided a simple and reliable alternative viral load system that is adaptable to district hospital laboratories. The cost per test is less than RT-PCR. The ExaVir Load v2 systems have since been placed in four more district and primary hospital laboratories.