Search

Sociality in spiders has evolved independently multiple times, resulting in convergently evolved cooperative breeding and prey capture. In all social spiders, prey is captured by only a subset of group members and then shared with other, non-attacking group members. However, spiders' propensity to attack prey may differ among species due to species-specific trade-offs between risks, costs and benefits of prey capture involvement. We explored whether engagement in prey attack differs among three social Stegodyphus species, using orthopteran prey, and found substantial differences. Stegodyphus mimosarum Pavesi, 1883 had a low prey acceptance rate, was slow to attack prey, and engaged very few spiders in prey attack. In S. sarasinorum Karsch, 1892, prey acceptance was high, independently of prey size, but more spiders attacked when prey was small. While medium-sized prey had higher acceptance rate in S. dumicola Pocock, 1898, indicating a preference, the number of attackers was not affected by prey size. Our results suggest that the three species may have different cooperative prey capture strategies. In S. mimosarum and S. dumicola, whose geographical ranges overlap, these strategies may represent niche specialization, depending on whether their respective cautious and choosy approaches extend to other prey types than orthopterans, while S. sarasinorum may have a more opportunistic approach. We discuss factors that can affect social spiders' foraging strategy, such as prey availability, predation pressure, and efficiency of the communal web to ensnare prey. Future studies are required to investigate to which extent species-specific cooperative foraging strategies are shaped by ontogeny, group size, and plastic responses to environmental factors.

Organisms inhabiting extreme thermal environments, such as desert birds, have evolved spectacular adaptations to thermoregulate during hot and cold conditions. However, our knowledge if and how selection acts on thermoregulation and the potential for evolutionary responses is limited, particularly for large organisms experiencing extreme temperature fluctuations. Here we use thermal imaging to quantify selection and genetic variation in thermoregulation in ostriches (Struthio camelus), the world’s largest bird species that is regularly exposed to increasingly volatile temperatures. We found that females that are better at regulating their head temperatures had higher egg-laying rates under hotter conditions. Thermoregulatory capacity was both heritable and showed signatures of local adaptation. Females originating from populations exposed to more unpredictable climates were better at regulating their head temperatures in response to temperature fluctuations. Together these results reveal that past and present evolutionary processes have shaped genetic variation in thermoregulatory capacity, which appears to protect critical organs, such as the brain, from extreme temperatures during reproduction.Impact SummaryLarge animals inhabiting extreme thermal environments, such as deserts, are predicted to be particularly vulnerable to the sustained heat waves expected in their future climate. However, previous research on the evolution of thermoregulation has focused on the effect of increasing temperatures on survival in ectotherms. Here we study the ostrich (Struthio camelus), the world’s largest bird, that inhabits some of the hottest and driest regions on Earth. We show that the ability of females to reproduce during hot conditions is associated with their thermoregulatory capacity. Furthermore, variation in thermoregulation is heritable and related to past climatic conditions: Females from populations originating from parts of Africa with more extreme temperature fluctuations were better able to thermoregulate, indicating local adaptation to different climatic conditions. Together, these results suggest that thermoregulation in this large desert bird has evolved in response to past climatic conditions, remains genetically variable and is currently under selection due to its effect on reproduction.

Cooperative breeding societies allow the costs of reproduction to be shared. However, as groups become larger, such benefits often decrease and competition increases. This is predicted to select for an optimal group size, yet variation in groups is a ubiquitous feature of cooperative breeding animals. Here we experimentally established groups (ngroups=96) of cooperative breeding ostriches, Struthio camelus, with different numbers of males and females and manipulated the potential for cooperation over incubation. There was a clear optimal group size for males. Their reproductive success was maximized in groups with four or more females and no other males, irrespective of cooperation over incubation. Conversely, female reproductive success was strongly dependent on the benefits of cooperating over incubation, being maximized in groups with either many males or many females. In intermediate sized groups, both male and female reproductive success was reduced by sexual conflict over the timing of mating and incubation. Our experiments show that sex differences in the opposing forces of cooperation and competition can explain why variation in cooperative groups is widespread.

Rather than maximizing intake of available macronutrients, insects increase intake of some nutrients and restrict intake of others. This selective consumption influences, and potentially optimizes, developmental time, reproduction and lifespan of the organism. Studies so far have focused on discriminating between protein and carbohydrate uptake and the consequences on fitness components at different life stages. However, it is largely unknown whether and how the developmental diets, which may entail habitat-specific nutrient restrictions, affect selective consumption in adults. We show that adult female

Inbreeding depression is often intensified under environmental stress (i.e., inbreeding-stress interaction). Although the fitness consequences of this phenomenon are well-described, underlying mechanisms such as an increased expression of deleterious alleles under stress, or a lower capacity for adaptive responses to stress with inbreeding, have rarely been investigated. We investigated a fitness component (egg-to-adult viability) and gene-expression patterns using RNA-seq analyses in noninbred control lines and in inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster exposed to benign temperature or heat stress. We find little support for an increase in the cumulative expression of deleterious alleles under stress. Instead, inbred individuals had a reduced ability to induce an adaptive gene regulatory stress response compared to controls. The decrease in egg-to-adult viability due to stress was most pronounced in the lines with the largest deviation in the adaptive stress response (R

Mechanistic trade-offs between traits under selection can shape and constrain evolutionary adaptation to environmental stressors. However, our knowledge of the quantitative and qualitative overlap in the molecular machinery among stress tolerance traits is highly restricted by the challenges of comparing and interpreting data between separate studies and laboratories, as well as to extrapolating between different levels of biological organization. We investigated the expression of the constitutive proteome (833 proteins) of 35 Drosophila melanogaster replicate populations artificially selected for increased resistance to six different environmental stressors. The evolved proteomes were significantly differentiated from replicated control lines. A targeted analysis of the constitutive proteomes revealed a regime-specific selection response among heat-shock proteins, which provides evidence that selection also adjusts the constitutive expression of these molecular chaperones. Although the selection response in some proteins was regime specific, the results were dominated by evidence for a "common stress response." With the exception of high temperature survival, we found no evidence for negative correlations between environmental stress resistance traits, meaning that evolutionary adaptation is not constrained by mechanistic trade-offs in regulation of functional important proteins. Instead, standing genetic variation and genetic trade-offs outside regulatory domains likely constrain the evolutionary responses in natural populations.