Search

IntroductionCyanide is a deadly poison, particularly with oral exposure where larger doses can occur before symptoms develop. Prior studies and multiple governmentagencies highlight oral cyanide as an agent with the potential for use in a terrorist attack. Currently, there are no FDA approved antidotes specific to oralcyanide. An oral countermeasure that can neutralize and prevent absorption of cyanide from the GI tract after oral exposure is needed. Our objective was toevaluate the efficacy of oral sodium thiosulfate on survival and clinical outcomes in a large, swine model of severe cyanide toxicity.MethodsSwine (45-55kg) were instrumented, sedated, and stabilized. Potassium cyanide (8 mg/kg KCN) in saline was delivered as a one-time bolus via an orogastric tube. Three minutes after cyanide, animals randomized to the treatment group received sodium thiosulfate (510 mg/kg, 3.25 M solution) via orogastric tube. Our primary outcome was survival at 60 minutes after exposure. We compared survival between groups by log-rank, Mantel-Cox analysis and trended labs and vital signs.ResultsAt baseline and time of treatment all animals had similar weights, vital signs, and laboratory values. Survival at 60 min was 100% in treated animals compared to 0% in the control group (p=0.0027). Animals in the control group became apneic and subsequently died by 35.0 min (20.2,48.5) after cyanide exposure. Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to controls (p=0.008). Blood lactate (p=0.02) and oxygen saturation (p=0.02) were also significantly different between treatment and control groups at study end.ConclusionOral administration of sodium thiosulfate improved survival, blood pressure, respirations, and blood lactate concentrations in a large animal model of acute oral cyanide toxicity.

BackgroundMethyl mercaptan occurs naturally in the environment and is found in a variety of occupational settings, including the oil, paper, plastics, and pesticides industries. It is a toxic gas and deaths from methyl mercaptan exposure have occurred. The Department of Homeland Security considers it a high threat chemical agent that could be used by terrorists. Unfortunately, no specific treatment exists for methyl mercaptan poisoning.MethodsWe conducted a randomized trial in 12 swine comparing no treatment to intramuscular injection of the vitamin B12 analog cobinamide (2.0 mL, 12.5 mg/kg) following acute inhalation of methyl mercaptan gas. Physiological and laboratory parameters were similar in the control and cobinamide-treated groups at baseline and at the time of treatment.ResultsAll six cobinamide-treated animals survived, whereas only one of six control animals lived (17% survival) (p = 0.0043). The cobinamide-treated animals returned to a normal breathing pattern by 3.8 ± 1.1 min after treatment (mean ± SD), while all but one animal in the control group had intermittent gasping, never regaining a normal breathing pattern. Blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation returned to baseline values within 15 minutes of cobinamide-treatment. Plasma lactate concentration increased progressively until death (10.93 ± 6.02 mmol [mean ± SD]) in control animals, and decreased toward baseline (3.79 ± 2.93 mmol [mean ± SD]) by the end of the experiment in cobinamide-treated animals.ConclusionWe conclude that intramuscular administration of cobinamide improves survival and clinical outcomes in a large animal model of acute, high dose methyl mercaptan poisoning.

IntroductionHydrogen sulfide (H2S) is found in petroleum, natural gas, and decaying organic matter. Terrorist groups have attempted to use it in enclosed spaces as a chemical weapon. Mass casualty scenarios have occurred from industrial accidents and release from oil field sites. There is no FDA approved antidote for sulfide poisoning. We have previously reported that intravenous cobinamide is effective for sulfide poisoning. A rapid-acting antidote that is easy to administer intramuscularly (IM) would be ideal for use in a prehospital setting. In this study, we assessed survival in sulfide-poisoned swine treated with IM cobinamide.MethodsEleven swine (45-55 kg) were anesthetized, intubated, and instrumented with continuous femoral and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. After stabilization, anesthesia was adjusted such that animals ventilated spontaneously with a FiO2 of 0.21. Sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS, 8 mg/mL) was infused intravenously at 0.9 mg/kg.min until apnea or severe hypotension. Animals were randomly assigned to receive cobinamide (4 mg/kg), or no treatment at the apnea/hypotension trigger. The NaHS infusion rate was sustained for 1.5 min post trigger, decreased to 0.2 mg/kg.min for 10 min, and then discontinued.ResultsThe amount of NaHS required to produce apnea or hypotension was not statistically different in both groups (cobinamide: 9.0 mg/kg ±6.1; saline: 5.9 mg/kg ±5.5; mean difference: -3.1, 95% CI: -11.3, 5.0). All of the cobinamide treated animals survived (5/5), none of the control (0/6) animals survived (p

The given text is a compilation of case reports and studies related to toxicology and poisoning. It covers a range of topics, including medication overdoses, adverse effects of substances, and the management of toxic exposures. The document provides valuable insights into the complexities of toxicology and highlights the importance of prompt and individualized treatment approaches. It can be a useful resource for library patrons conducting research in this field. [Extracted from the article]

BackgroundHydrogen sulfide (H2 S) is a potentially deadly gas that naturally occurs in petroleum and natural gas. The Occupational Health and Safety Administration cites H2 S as a leading cause of workplace gas inhalation deaths. Mass casualties of H2 S toxicity may be caused by exposure from industrial accidents or release from oil field sites. H2 S is also an attractive terrorism tool because of its high toxicity and ease with which it can be produced. Several potential antidotes have been proposed for hydrogen sulfide poisoning but none have been completely successful.ObjectiveThe objective was to compare treatment response assessed by the time to spontaneous ventilation among groups of swine with acute H2 S-induced apnea treated with intravenous (IV) cobinamide (4 mg/kg in 0.8 mL of 225 mmol/L solution), IV hydroxocobalamin (4 mg/kg in 5 mL of saline), or saline alone.MethodsTwenty-four swine (45-55 kg) were anesthetized, intubated, and instrumented with continuous femoral and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. After stabilization, anesthesia was adjusted such that animals would spontaneously ventilate with an FiO2 of 0.21. Sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS; concentration of 8 mg/mL) was begun at 1 mg/kg/min until apnea was confirmed for 20 seconds by capnography. This infusion rate was sustained for 1.5 minutes postapnea and then decreased to a maintenance rate for the remainder of the study to replicate sustained clinical exposure. Animals were randomly assigned to receive cobinamide (4 mg/kg), hydroxocobalamin (4 mg/kg), or saline and monitored for 60 minutes beginning 1 minute postapnea. G* power analysis using the Z-test determined that equal group sizes of eight animals were needed to achieve a power of 80% in detecting a 50% difference in return to spontaneous ventilations at α = 0.05.ResultsThere were no significant differences in baseline variables. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the mg/kg dose of NaHS (5.6 mg/kg; p = 0.45) required to produce apnea. Whereas all of the cobinamide-treated animals survived (8/8), none of the control (0/8) or hydroxocobalamin (0/8)-treated animals survived. Mean (±SD) time to spontaneous ventilation in the cobinamide-treated animals was 3.2 (±1.1) minutes.ConclusionsCobinamide successfully rescued the severely NaHS-poisoned swine from apnea in the absence of assisted ventilation.

Introduction Emergent clinical care and patient movements through the military evacuation system improves survival. Patient management differs when transporting from the point-of-injury (POI) to the first medical treatment facility (MTF) versus transporting from the Role 2 to the Role 3 MTF secondary to care rendered within the MTF, including surgery and advanced resuscitation. The objective of this study was to describe care provided to patients during theater inter-facility transports and compare with pre-hospital transports (POI to first MTF). Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with the Role 2 to the Role 3 transports in Afghanistan and Iraq from 2007 to 2016. Data collected included procedures and events at the MTF and during transport. We compared the intra-theater transport data (Role 2 to Role 3) to data from a previous study evaluating pre-hospiital transports (POI to first MTF). Results We reviewed the records of 869 Role 2 to Role 3 transport patients. Role 2 to Role 3 transports were longer in duration compared to POI transports (39 minutes vs. 23 minutes) and were more likely to be staffed by advanced personnel (nurses, physician assistants, and physicians) (57% vs. 3%). The sample primarily consisted of military-aged males (mean age 27 years) who suffered from explosive or blunt force injuries. Procedures performed during each phase of care reflected the capabilities of the teams and locations. Pain and cardiac events were more common in POI evacuations compared to the Role 2 to Role 3 transports, but documentation of respiratory events, hemodynamic events, neurologic events, and equipment failure was more common during the Role 2 to Role 3 transports. Survival rates were slightly higher among the Role 2 to Role 3 cohort (98% vs. 95%, difference 3% [95% confidence interval of the difference 1-5%]). Conclusions Inter-facility transports (Role 2 to Role 3) are longer in duration, transport more complex patients, and are staffed by more advanced level provider types compared to transports from POI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Video laryngoscope (VL) technology improves first‐pass success. The novel i‐view VL device is inexpensive and disposable. We sought to determine the first‐pass intubation success with the i‐view VL device versus the standard reusable VL systems in routine use at each site. Methods: We performed a prospective, pragmatic study at two major emergency departments (EDs) when VL was used. We rotated i‐view versus reusable VL as the preferred device of the month based on an a priori schedule. An investigator‐initiated interim analysis was performed. Our primary outcome was a first‐pass success with a non‐inferiority margin of 10% based on the per‐protocol analysis. Results: There were 93 intubations using the reusable VL devices and 81 intubations using the i‐view. Our study was stopped early due to futility in reaching our predetermined non‐inferiority margin. Operator and patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The first‐pass success rate for the i‐view group was 69.1% compared to 84.3% for the reusable VL group. A non‐inferiority analysis indicated that the difference (−15.1%) and corresponding 90% confidence limits (−25.3% to −5.0%) did not fall within the predetermined 10% non‐inferiority margin. Conclusions: The i‐view device failed to meet our predetermined non‐inferiority margin when compared to the reusable VL systems with the study stopping early due to futility. Significant crossover occurred at the discretion of the intubating operator during the i‐view month. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The ability of military clinicians to conduct military medical research is often limited because of competing priorities and a lack of research mentorship. The Clinician-Scientist Investigator Opportunity Network (CSION) was developed with the intent of training clinicians how to engage in requirements-driven research within the DoD. Materials and Methods Three to five academic medical faculties were selected from a pool of applicants each year to participate in a 2-year research fellowship. To be eligible for the CSION program, applicants had to meet the following criteria: (1) Completed residency graduate medical education training, (2) not be currently enrolled as a graduate medical education trainee, and (3) obtained permission from their department leadership to focus 25% of their duty hours on CSION participation to include didactic and research efforts. The remaining 75% of fellows' time was dedicated to clinical duties. Monthly didactics, intensive mentorship, and consistent support were offered to each fellow by the CSION leadership team. Metrics were recorded to include both research and clinical productivity. Results Between January 2019 and December 2022, 12 CSION fellows graduated from the program (four in the class of 2020, three in 2021, and five in 2022). From 2019 to 2021, the 12 CSION fellows initiated 204 research protocols, generated 489 publications/presentations, and secured 33 research grants. All graduates of the program remain active in clinical research with multiple graduates currently assigned to research positions. Conclusions The CSION research education program is a 2-year additional duty research fellowship producing clinician-scientists conducting military-relevant medical research and publications and may be considered a low-cost/highly efficient alternative to achieve the reported benefits of the MD–PhD tract. The expansion of the CSION program may improve the quality of military medical research and health care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The MARCH (Massive hemorrhage, Airway, Respirations, Circulation, and Hypothermia/Head injuries) algorithm taught to military medics includes interventions to prevent hypothermia. As possible sequelae from major trauma, hypothermia is associated with coagulopathy and lower survival. This paper sought to define hypothermia within our combat trauma population using an outcomes-based method, and determine clinical variables associated with hypothermia. This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry focused on casualties who received prehospital care. A receiver operating curve was constructed and Youden's index was used to define hypothermia within the predetermined population based on mortality risk. A multivariable regression model was used to identify associations. There were 23,243 encounters that met the inclusion criteria for this study with patients having received prehospital care and documentation of at least one emergency department temperature. An optimal threshold of 36.2° C was found to predict mortality; 3,159 casualties had temperatures below this threshold (14%). Survival to discharge was lower among casualties with hypothermia (91% versus 98%). Hypothermic casualties were less likely to undergo blanket application (38% versus 40%). However, they had higher proportions with Hypothermia Prevention and Management Kit application (11% versus 7%) and radiant warming (2% versus 1%). On multivariable regression modeling, none of the hypothermia interventions were associated with a decreased likelihood of hypothermia. Non-hypothermia interventions associated with hypothermia included prehospital intubation (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.45–1.69) and blood product administration. Hypothermia, including a single recorded low temperature in the patient care record, was associated with worse outcomes in this combat trauma population. Prehospital intubation was most strongly associated with developing hypothermia. Prehospital warming interventions were not associated with a reduction in hypothermia risk. Our dataset suggests that current methods for prehospital warming are inadequate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]