Search

Background: Preventive anesthetic impact on the high rates of postoperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly patients is debated. The Prevention of postOperative Cognitive dysfunction by Ketamine (POCK) study aimed to assess the effect of ketamine on this condition., Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, interventional study. Patients ≥60 years undergoing major orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive preoperative ketamine 0.5 mg/kg as an intravenous bolus (n = 152) or placebo (n = 149) in random blocks stratified according to the study site, preoperative cognitive status and age. The primary outcome was the proportion of objective delayed neurocognitive recovery (dNR) defined as a decline of one or more neuropsychological assessment standard deviations on postoperative day 7. Secondary outcomes included a three-month incidence of objective postoperative neurocognitive disorder (POND), as well as delirium, anxiety, and symptoms of depression seven days and three months after surgery., Results: Among 301 patients included, 292 (97%) completed the trial. Objective dNR occurred in 50 (38.8%) patients in the ketamine group and 54 (40.9%) patients in the placebo group (OR [95% CI] 0.92 [0.56; 1.51], p = 0.73) on postoperative day 7. Incidence of objective POND three months after surgery did not differ significantly between the two groups nor did incidence of delirium, anxiety, apathy, and fatigue. Symptoms of depression were less frequent in the ketamine group three months after surgery (OR [95% CI] 0.34 [0.13-0.86])., Conclusions: A single preoperative bolus of intravenous ketamine does not prevent the occurrence of dNR or POND in elderly patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery. (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02892916)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to improve knowledge of what happens in the coagulation of orthopaedic patients under rivaroxaban and apixaban, in order to finalize and cross-validate effective measurement methods and to provide arguments for helping to reference one or the other drug in our central pharmacy. One hundred and two patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement were included. Half of them received rivaroxaban and the other half received apixaban. Blood samples (n = 244 with each drug) were taken at Cmax preoperatively and twice a week, apart from the day of the patient's discharge, when Ctrough concentration was targeted. Routine coagulation parameters, and functional and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assays for measurement of circulating concentrations were studied. The LC-MS/MS assay and the functional assays carried out in patients under routine conditions were highly correlated, apart from low concentrations (<30 ng/ml), which were affected by the variable individual potential to inhibit the exogenous bovine Xa used in the functional assays. After 1 week of treatment, the drugs differed: Cmax and Ctrough were closer when apixaban was taken twice daily (83 ± 39 and 58 ± 17 ng/ml) than with rivaroxaban taken once a day (113 ± 67 and 13 ± 20 ng/ml). Rivaroxaban had a greater influence on routine coagulation tests and reduced the maximum thrombin concentration more efficiently, as assessed by the thrombin generation test. Although rivaroxaban and apixaban present apparently similar constant rates, they exhibit significant differences in their concentrations and anticoagulant effects when studied ex vivo in orthopedic patients.

Introduction: Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have recently been added to the armamentarium for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Although this is their first licensed indication, others will soon follow. Owing to their claimed predictable anticoagulant response that dispenses with the need for monitoring coagulation, their effects are poorly described in routine cases. However, interpreting blood coagulation results and evaluating whether a treatment is properly targeted in the case of untoward incidents will become a common concern for clinicians., Methods: Eighty patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement were included in two studies. Forty of them received dabigatran (study 1) and 40 rivaroxaban (study 2). Blood samples (n = 176 and 166) were taken preoperatively and twice a week from the first postoperative day., Results: Dabigatran increased aPTTr about two-fold and PT about 1.2-fold, and it was mostly an initiation-phase modulator of thrombin generation. Mean circulating concentrations as measured by a diluted thrombin time were 105 ± 85 ng/mL at T(max) in samples from patients receiving the full dosing. They depended significantly on renal function, body weight and gender. Rivaroxaban increased aPTTr and PTr around 1.5 fold and modified the initiation and amplification phases of thrombin generation, with a lowered and prolonged thrombin burst. Mean circulating concentrations as measured by an antiXa test were 117 ± 78 ng/mL at T(max). With both drugs, routine coagulation tests, thrombin generation curves and functionally determined concentrations exhibited high interindividual variability., Conclusion: Routine coagulation tests are altered in patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban, but their alterations poorly reflect the circulating concentrations as determined by functional approaches., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine whether benzodiazepines are associated with an increased risk of hip fracture., Design: Case-control study., Participants: All incident cases of hip fracture not related to traffic accidents or cancer in patients over 65 years of age. 245 cases were matched to 817 controls., Setting: Emergency department of a university hospital., Main Outcome Measures: Exposure to benzodiazepines and other potential risk or protective factors or lifestyle items., Results: The use of benzodiazepines as determined from questionnaires, medical records, or plasma samples at admission to hospital was not associated with an increased risk of hip fracture (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.5). Hip fracture was, however, associated with the use of two or more benzodiazepines, as determined from questionnaires or medical records but not from plasma samples. Of the individual drugs, only lorazepam was significantly associated with an increased risk of hip fracture (1.8, 1.1 to 3.1)., Conclusion: Except for lorazepam, the presence of benzodiazepines in plasma was not associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. The method used to ascertain exposure could influence the results of case-control studies.

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of postanaesthetic recovery after anaesthesia with methohexitone (M) or with propofol (P). Thirty patients undergoing spinal surgery were randomly assigned to either group. The induction dose was 2 mg . kg-1 for both M and P. Anaesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion. The rate was 0.15 mg . kg-1 . min-1 for P and 0.07 mg . kg-1 . min-1 for M. Analgesia was obtained with fentanyl with the same doses in both groups. The maintenance doses were subsequently decreased by 50 and 75% of the initial values. This work compared the quality induction and the criteria of recovery (Aldrete score, Newman test). In two patients in each group, sensory evoked potentials (SEP) were recorded to monitor neurological integrity. The quality of induction was similar in both groups. Awakening was significantly more rapid in group P. The SEP were much decreased in group P, whilst there were few changes in group M. Monitoring of medullar integrity is mandatory in spinal surgery, requiring a rapid recovery. This objective was obtained with shorter delays in patients anaesthetized with propofol than in those who had received methohexitone. However, the former, at the doses used, seemed to depress the SEP.