Search

Introduction: The Smart Safety Surveillance (3S) concept is based on the understanding that, when faced with competing pharmacovigilance priorities, countries will have to invest judiciously, by focusing on new priority products, sharing work and resources with other countries when possible and building national competence for those activities that cannot be delegated., Method: The 3S principles were applied to Armenia, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Peru and Thailand using three priority products: bedaquiline, rotavirus vaccine and tafenoquine. A baseline assessment of pharmacovigilance preparedness was used to identify gaps and establish a work plan. The impact was measured by comparing pre and post 3S-intervention outcomes, which included the number and quality of reports (completeness scores) in the WHO global database of Individual Case Safety Reports, VigiBase, and number of structural indicators met. The implementation period was 9-18 months, ranging from March 2018 (earliest started) until May 2020 (latest)., Result: An increase in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting was demonstrated in Armenia (bedaquiline), Brazil (TB and malaria medicines), India (rotavirus vaccine) and Ethiopia (TB medicines). Completeness scores were above 0.5 at baseline in all countries, and reports improved in quality for Brazil (TB), Peru (malaria), Thailand (malaria) and India (immunization). The number of structural indicators met increased by more than double for Ethiopia. Ethiopia and India demonstrated an increased capacity for signal detection and signal evaluation. Armenia, Brazil, Peru and Thailand showed increased capacity to assess risk management plans following the implementation of 3S principles., Conclusion: The 3S concept has demonstrated success in different ways across the six countries. Activities focused on three products for a proof of concept of the 3S principles, with the expectation that the project impact will be sustained through strengthened systems, to guide pharmacovigilance activities of other products in the future. It is important to continue monitoring the countries to understand if the gains and successes of the current 3S project are sustainable., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: to characterise the adverse drugs reactions (ADRs) reported in the Lombard and Croatian paediatric population and to compare data to specific paediatric age groups, in terms of trend, pattern and severity of ADRs, increasing understanding of paediatric ADRs., Research Design and Methods: We selected and analysed all the spontaneous reports in which children were involved (0 < 18 years old) reported in the Lombardy and in Croatian pharmacovigilance databases from 1 th March 2005 to 31 th December 2013., Results: 9175 ADR reports were reported in the Lombardy, 2457 were included in the Croatian database. The age groups most involved were 2-11 for both countries. The 13.2% and 40.3% of reports retrieved in Lombardy and Croatia were classified as serious, respectively. Fatalities account for 0.09% and 0.12% in Lombardy and Croatia, respectively., Conclusion: Data on serious reports reflect a similar scenario in terms of age range; strikingly different therapeutic subgroups were involved in reporting activity likely due to greater self-medication practices with penicillins and anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretics drugs in Lombardy than in Croatia, highlighting the need to closely monitor this paediatric therapeutic area to ensure a safe use of these drugs.

Aim: To analyze potential and actual drug-drug interactions reported to the Spontaneous Reporting Database of the Croatian Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED) and determine their incidence., Methods: In this retrospective observational study performed from March 2005 to December 2008, we detected potential and actual drug-drug interactions using interaction programs and analyzed them., Results: HALMED received 1209 reports involving at least two drugs. There were 468 (38.7%) reports on potential drug-drug interactions, 94 of which (7.8% of total reports) were actual drug-drug interactions. Among actual drug-drug interaction reports, the proportion of serious adverse drug reactions (53 out of 94) and the number of drugs (n=4) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than among the remaining reports (580 out of 1982; n=2, respectively). Actual drug-drug interactions most frequently involved nervous system agents (34.0%), and interactions caused by antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were in most cases serious. In only 12 out of 94 reports, actual drug-drug interactions were recognized by the reporter., Conclusion: The study confirmed that the Spontaneous Reporting Database was a valuable resource for detecting actual drug-drug interactions. Also, it identified drugs leading to serious adverse drug reactions and deaths, thus indicating the areas which should be in the focus of health care education.

Objective: In recent years, studies investigated to what extend recommendations for co-prescribing gastroprotective agents in prevention of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications are followed in clinical practice. However, only a few studies have also taken into consideration the recommended dose of gastroprotectives prescribed in NSAID-induced ulcer prophylaxis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of concomitant use of gastroprotectives with NSAIDs in hospitalized patients, with emphasis on the recommended dose of gastroprotectives for ulcer prophylaxis., Method: This observational, cross-sectional, drug utilization study included all adult patients receiving NSAIDs hospitalized in the Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb on the day of the study. Data on age, sex, comorbidities, indications for NSAID use, type/dose of NSAIDs and gastroprotectives, history of gastrointestinal events, active gastrointestinal symptoms and risk factors were evaluated., Main Outcome Measure: Study outcomes were: (1) prevalence of prescription of gastroprotectives among NSAID-users at risk; (2) prevalence of prescription of gastroprotective in recommended dose; (3) association between risk factors and prescription of GPAs., Results: The rates of gastroprotectives prescription were significantly higher in NSAID-users with concomitant risk factors as compared to patients without risk factors [47/70 (67.1%) and 8/22 (36.4%), respectively; p=0.01072]. However, gastroprotection in recommended ulcer-preventive dose was low in both groups [8/70 (11.4%) and 9/92 (9.8%), respectively]. The number of concomitant risk factors did not increase the odds of receiving anti-ulcer therapy (odds ratio 0.7279). Thirty-three percent of patients with concomitant risk factors were not prescribed gastroprotectives. Ibuprofen, NSAID with the lowest risk of inducing gastrointestinal complications, was prescribed in only two patients., Conclusion: The results indicate high awareness among hospital physicians about possible NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications, but insufficient knowledge about risk factors related to NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity, recommended dose of gastroprotectives in NSAID-induced ulcer prophylaxis and gastrointestinal toxicity of different types of NSAIDs.

Between 1981 and 1994, 58 bioequivalence studies (b.s.) were performed in 885 healthy volunteers. 93.1 per cent were single-dose, mainly of two way cross-over design. According to ATC groups, 13 were of cardiovascular drugs(C), 11 musculoskeletal (M), nine alimentary (A), seven urogenital (G), seven antimicrobial (J), six haematological (B), three nervous (N) and two respiratory (R). 97.2 per cent of volunteers finished the studies. Out of 25 withdrawals, 14 did it by their own will, seven were excluded because of lack of compliance with the protocol, one because of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) (preputial oedema), one because of intercurrent illness, and two for other objective reasons. In 35 studies the probants have been males, in 23 both sexes. Subjects were between 18 and 40 years. 209 adverse events were reported in 18 studies (31 per cent). From 885 volunteers that came to first session at the time, 115 (13 per cent) had ADRs. The association of the drug and ADRs was defined as probable in 91 ADRs (45.9 per cent), definite in 66 (33.4 per cent) and possible in 41 (20.7 per cent). 73 (63.5 per cent) volunteers had one ADR, 22 (19.1 per cent) had two and 20 (17.4 per cent) more than two ADRs. The majority -117 (56 per cent)-of ADRs were mild, 78 (37.3 per cent) moderate and 14 (6.7 per cent) severe. The most frequent ADR was headache (22.9 per cent), followed by nasal congestion (12.9 per cent), sweating (12.4 per cent), nausea (6.7 per cent), restlessness (6.7 per cent), deafness and tinnitus (6.2 per cent), change of biochemical or haematological parameters (5.3 per cent) and other. An unusual and rare ADR was impotence and preputial oedema (two volunteers on frusemide). All studies of G group (7-100 per cent) had ADRs, followed by C group (5-38 per cent) and A (3-33 per cent). Glipizide (5 mg) had highest number of ADRs (64-30.6 per cent), bromocriptine (10 mg) had 31 (14.8 per cent) and frusemide (500 mg) 22 (10.6 per cent). The largest number of subjects with ADRs were on frusemide (13-72 per cent), glipizide (17-68 per cent) and bromocriptine (15-52 per cent). At a time when generic drugs are of increasing importance, the safety of b.s. is of considerable interest. Our data confirm their safety and indicate that the majority of ADRs are mild.

The pharmacokinetics of furosemide (frusemide) in patients with oedema have been relatively well studied, but in many studies it is unclear whether the disease or the oedema per se has the major effect. The rate of absorption of oral furosemide in patients with oedema was decreased, but total bioavailability was almost unchanged. The peak serum concentration (Cmax) and time taken to achieve Cmax were either decreased or unchanged. Binding of furosemide to plasma proteins is lower in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) and nephrotic syndrome, probably as a result of hypoalbuminaemia. The elimination half-life (t1/2) can be unchanged (CHF, DLC) or prolonged (chronic renal failure: CRF). Plasma and renal clearance are reduced in patients with CRF and nephrotic syndrome, but are almost unchanged in CHF and DLC. Disease-induced disorders are mainly responsible for the alterations of furosemide pharmacokinetics in oedematous conditions, while the influence of oedema per se is probably not clinically relevant. The pharmacokinetics of digoxin have been studied in a small number of studies only. In patients with CHF, considerable interindividual differences have been found. Because digoxin has a narrow therapeutic window, this drug should be administered cautiously to oedematous patients. Theophylline has higher bioavailability in patients with oedema, with a significantly higher Cmax in patients with hepatic cirrhosis and CHF than in healthy volunteers (29 and 22%, respectively). Furthermore, clearance decreases and t1/2 increases in these patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are often administered as prodrugs, and their pharmacokinetic profile could be influenced by the diseases that accompany oedematous states. However, the effect of oedema is difficult to discriminate from that of the disease. Individual ACE inhibitors are affected differently, but importantly the dosage of perindopril should be reduced in patients with CHF, while for most other ACE inhibitors the changes in pharmacokinetic parameters are clinically irrelevant. In conclusion, studies on pharmacokinetic changes in oedema are limited. Besides affecting absorption (after oral administration) and conversion of the prodrug to the active form, probably as a result of the associated disease, oedema has not been proven to cause any clinically relevant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters for individual drugs. However, further studies of this aspect of pharmacokinetics are needed.