Search

BackgroundSkeletal metastases often occur in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) where bone biomarkers are prognostic for overall survival (OS). In those with highly elevated markers, there is preferential benefit from bone-targeted therapy. In the phase IIIS0421 docetaxel +/- atrasentan trial, clinical covariates and bone biomarkers were analyzed to identify CRPC subsets with differential outcomes.Subjects and methodsMarkers of bone resorption [N-telopeptide-NTx; pyridinoline-PYD] and formation [C-terminal collagen propeptide-CICP; bone alkaline phosphatase-BAP] were measured in pre-treatment sera. Bone biomarkers and clinical covariates were included in a Cox model for OS; bone markers were added in a stepwise selection process. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for risk factor models +/- bone markers. Significant variables were allowed to compete in a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Hazard ratios(HR) were calculated by comparing OS in each of the terminal nodes to a reference group in a Cox model.Results750 patients were included. Each bone marker significantly contributed to the risk factor-adjusted OS Cox model, with higher levels associated with worse OS. BAP (HR = 1.15, p = 0.008), CICP (HR = 1.27, p

Historically, notable variability has been observed in clinical trial outcomes between different regions and populations worldwide, even when employing the same cytotoxic regimen in lung cancer. These divergent results underscore the inherent challenges in interpreting trials conducted abroad and raise questions regarding the general applicability of transnational clinical trials. Various reasons have been postulated to account for these differences in efficacy and toxicity, including trial design, eligibility criteria, patient demographics and, perhaps most intriguingly, population-related pharmacogenomics. However, without methodology to control for such variables, these hypotheses remain largely untested. The authors previously developed the 'common arm' approach in order to directly compare efficacy and toxicity results of trials simultaneously performed in different countries. By standardizing clinical trial-associated variables such as treatment regimens (dose, schedule, and so on), eligibility, staging, response and toxicity criteria, this approach has the potential to determine the underlying reasons for divergences in trial outcomes across countries, and whether population-associated polymorphisms contribute to these differences. In the past decade, Japanese and US investigators have applied the common arm analytic method to trials in both extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and advanced nonSCLC. In the SCLC analysis, a comparison of the cisplatin/irinotecan arms from both trials revealed significant differences in response rates and overall survival. Significant differences were also observed in the distribution of gender and performance status. The common arm analysis in nonSCLC included two trials from Japan and one from the USA, each containing a 'common' carboplatin/paclitaxel arm. Clinical results were similar in the two Japanese trials, but were significantly different from the US trial with regard to survival, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and anemia. The underlying basis for these divergent outcomes is discussed. The common arm methodology provides a template for identifying and interpreting patient outcome differences across populations, and is an instructive lesson in the burgeoning era of clinical trials globalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may be spread by individuals unaware they are infected. Such dissemination has heightened ramifications in cancer patients, who may need to visit healthcare facilities frequently, be exposed to immune-compromising therapies, and face greater morbidity from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We determined characteristics of (1) asymptomatic, clinically diagnosed, and (2) serologically documented but clinically undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection among individuals with lung cancer., Patients and Methods: In a multicenter registry, individuals with lung cancer (regardless of prior SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or documented infection) underwent collection of clinical data and serial blood samples, which were tested for antinucleocapsid protein antibody (anti-N Ab) or IgG (N) levels. We used multivariable logistic regression models to investigate clinical characteristics associated with the presence or absence of symptoms and the presence or absence of a clinical diagnosis among patients with their first SARS-CoV-2 infection., Results: Among patients with serologic evidence or clinically documented SARS-CoV-2 infection, 80/142 (56%) had no reported symptoms at their first infection, and 61/149 (40%) were never diagnosed. Asymptomatic infection was more common among older individuals and earlier-stage lung cancer. In multivariable analysis, non-white individuals with SARS-CoV-2 serologic positivity were 70% less likely ever to be clinically diagnosed (P = .002)., Conclusions: In a multicenter lung cancer population, a substantial proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections had no associated symptoms or were never clinically diagnosed. Because such cases appear to occur more frequently in populations that may face greater COVID-19-associated morbidity, measures to limit disease spread and severity remain critical., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts directly relevant to the submitted work. Beyond this submission, the authors report the following disclosures: P.C.M. reports participation in advisory boards for Guardant Health, consulting for Vivace Therapeutics, and honoraria from Amgen. A.C.M. reports advisory board participation with Bayer, BMS, Exact Sciences, Gilead, and Novartis and board of directors of NTRKers. A.M.’s spouse, Dr. Martin Moore, is CSO and co-founder of Meissa Vaccines. J.C.K. reports consulting and advisory board participation for the following companies, all paid to GO2 for Lung Cancer: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and EQRX. C.R. reports speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, and MSD; advisory board honoraria from Inivata, Archer, Boston Pharmaceuticals, MD Serono and Novartis, Bayer, Invitae, Regeneron, and Bostongene; scientific advisory board member for Imagene; institutional research funding from LCRF-Pfizer and NCRF; non-re-numerated research support from Guardant Health and Foundation Medicine; nonrenumerated leadership roles at the International Society of Liquid Biopsy (ISLB), the International Association for Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), the European School of Oncology (ESO), and Oncology Latin American Association (OLA). J.D.M. reports licensing fees from the NIH and UTSW for distribution of human tumor cell lines. S.B. reports serving in consulting/advisory roles for Takeda, Mirati, and Merus. F.K. reports filed patents through The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai relating to SARS-CoV-2 serological assays, NDV-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, influenza virus vaccines, and influenza virus therapeutics, which list F.K. as co-inventor. Mount Sinai has spun out a company, Kantaro, to market serological tests for SARS- CoV-2, and another company, Castlevax, to develop SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. F.K. is co-founder and scientific advisory board member of Castle-vax. F.K. has consulted for Merck, Curevac, Seqirus, and Pfizer and is currently consulting for third Rock Ventures, GSK, Gritstone, and Avimex. He is also collaborating with Dynavax on influenza vaccine development. A.G.-S. has received research support from GSK, Pfizer, Senhwa Biosciences, Kenall Manufacturing, Blade Therapeutics, Avi-mex, Johnson & Johnson, Dynavax, 7Hills Pharma,Pharmamar, ImmunityBio, Accurius, Nanocompo-6, Hexamer, N-fold LLC, Model Medicines, Atea Pharma, Applied Biological Laboratories, and Merck, outside of the reported work; consulting agreements for the following companies involving cash and/or stock: Castlevax, Amovir, Vivaldi Biosciences, Contrafect, 7Hills Pharma, Avimex, Pagoda, Accurius, Esperovax, Farmak, Applied Biological Laboratories, Pharmamar, CureLab Oncology, CureLab Veterinary, Syn-airgen, Paratus, Pfizer, and Prosetta, outside of the reported work; has been an invited speaker in meeting events organized by Seqirus, Janssen, Abbott, and Astrazeneca; and is an inventor on patents and patent applications on the use of antivirals and vaccines for the treatment and prevention of virus infections and cancer, owned by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, outside of the reported work. K.L.R. has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bluprint, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Novocure, and Mirati A.A.M. holds a consultant or advisory role at Novartis, Amgen and MorphoSys and has research funding from Amgen and Pfizer. S.S.R. reports research funding (institutional) from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. F.R.H. reports advisory board participation with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Merck, Novo-cure, NextCure, Regeneron, Sanofi, Daiichi, G1 Therapeutics, Novartis, Merus Therapeutics, and ITeos Therapeutics. F.R.H. also reports a patent through University of Colorado on ‘‘EGFR Protein and Gene Copy Number as Predictive Biomarker for EGFR-directed Therapy. D.E.G. reports consulting fees from Catalyst Pharmaceuticals; U.S. patent 11,747,345; pending patents 17/045,482, 63/386,387, 63/382,972, and 63/382,257; participating in advisory boards for Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Elevation Oncology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi; stock shares in Gilead; and serving as co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer of OncoSeer Diagnostics, Inc. M.S., C.-Y.H., Y.H., J.E.G., A.M.R., J.C., S.C.T., J.M.C., R.B., N.C.R., P.A.B., J.C.F., E.K., M.N., and Y.S. report no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genomic fusions are potent oncogenic drivers across cancer types and many are targetable. We demonstrate the clinical performance of DNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for detecting targetable fusions., Materials and Methods: We analyzed targetable fusion genes in >450 000 tissue specimens profiled using DNA CGP (FoundationOne CDx, FoundationOne). Using a de-identified nationwide (US-based) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinico-genomic database, we assessed outcomes in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC (NonSqNSCLC) who received matched therapy based on a fusion identified using DNA CGP. Lastly, we modeled the added value of RNA CGP for fusion detection in NonSqNSCLC., Results: We observed a broad diversity of fusion partners detected with DNA CGP in conjunction with targetable fusion genes (ALK, BRAF, FGFR2, FGFR3, NTRK1/2/3, RET, and ROS1). In NonSqNSCLC with oncogenic ALK, NTRK, RET, and ROS1 fusions detected by DNA CGP, patients treated with a matched tyrosine kinase inhibitor had better real-world progression-free survival than those receiving alternative treatment regimens and benefit was observed regardless of the results of orthogonal fusion testing. An estimated 1.3% of patients with NonSqNSCLC were predicted to have an oncogenic driver fusion identified by RNA, but not DNA CGP, according to a model that accounts for multiple real-world factors., Conclusion: A well-designed DNA CGP assay is capable of robust fusion detection and these fusion calls are reliable for informing clinical decision-making. While DNA CGP detects most driver fusions, the clinical impact of fusion detection is substantial for individual patients and exhaustive efforts, inclusive of additional RNA-based testing, should be considered when an oncogenic driver is not clearly identified., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: Squamous cell cancer (SqCC) is a lung cancer subtype with few targeted therapy options. Molecular characterization, that is, by next-generation sequencing (NGS), is needed to identify potential targets. Lung Cancer Master Protocol Southwest Oncology Group S1400 enrolled patients with previously treated stage IV or recurrent SqCC to assess NGS biomarkers for therapeutic sub-studies., Methods: Tumors underwent NGS using Foundation Medicine's FoundationOne research platform, which sequenced the exons and/or introns of 313 cancer-related genes. Mutually exclusive gene set analysis and Selected Events Linked by Evolutionary Conditions across Human Tumors were performed to identify mutually exclusive and co-occurring gene alterations. Comparisons were performed with data on 495 lung SqCC downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between genetic variants and survival., Results: NGS data are reported for 1672 patients enrolled on S1400 between 2014 and 2019. Mutually exclusive gene set analysis identified two non-overlapping sets of mutually exclusive alterations with a false discovery rate of less than 15%: NFE2L2, KEAP1, and PARP4; and CDKN2A and RB1. PARP4, a relatively uncharacterized gene, showed three frequent mutations suggesting functional significance: 3116T>C (I1039T), 3176A>G (Q1059R), and 3509C>T (T1170I). When taken together, NFE2L2 and KEAP1 alterations were associated with poorer survival., Conclusions: As the largest dataset to date of lung SqCC profiled on a clinical trial, the S1400 NGS dataset establishes a rich resource for biomarker discovery. Mutual exclusivity of PARP4 and NFE2L2 or KEAP1 alterations suggests that PARP4 may have an uncharacterized role in a key pathway known to impact oxidative stress response and treatment resistance., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Kozono discloses consulting for Vertex and Roche/Genentech and honoraria from RefleXion outside the submitted work. Dr. Tolba discloses employment at Foundation Medicine. Dr. Waqar discloses holding positions on scientific advisory boards for AstraZeneca and Gilead Sciences. Dr. Dragnev discloses receiving institutional research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Merck, Molecular Templates, Novartis, Roche/Genentech. Dr. Cheng discloses receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Janssen, G1 Therapeutics, and research grants from AstraZeneca, and Genentech. Dr. Hirsch discloses holding positions on scientific advisory boards for BMS, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Novartis, AbbVie, Novocure, NextCure, Merus, G1 Therapeutics, Regeneron, none related to this work, and holding patent for EGFR protein and gene copy number as predictive biomarkers for EGFR-directed therapies (through University of Colorado), no royalties. Dr. Mack discloses being a consultant for Amgen, Guardant Health, and Vivance Therapeutics, and receiving honoraria from AbbVie (educational lecture). Dr. Gray discloses being a consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono – Merck, Gilead Sciences, IDEOlogy Health, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Merck and Company, Novartis, OncoCyte Biotechnology, Spectrum ODAC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Triptych Health Partners; research support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, G1 Therapeutics, Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, Merck and Company, Novartis, Pfizer. Dr. Borghaei discloses receiving research support for clinical trials from BMS, Lilly, Amgen and holding positions on advisory board/consultant for BMS, Lilly, Genentech, Pfizer, Merck, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Genmab, Regeneron, BioNTech, Amgen, Axiom, PharmaMar, Takeda, Mirati, Daiichi Sankyo, Guardant, Natera, Oncocyte, Beigene, iTEO, Jazz, Janssen, Puma, BerGenBio, Bayer, Iobiotech, Grid Therapeutics, holding position on data and safety monitoring board for University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program, Takeda, Incyte, Novartis, Springworks, holding position on the scientific advisory board for Sonnetbio (stock options), Inspirna (formerly Rgenix, stock options), Nucleai (stock options), and receiving honoraria from Amgen, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, travel support from Amgen, BMS, Merck, Lilly, EMD-Serono, Genentech, Regeneron, Mirati. Dr. Herbst discloses holding positions on the board of directors for Immunocore, Junshi Pharmaceuticals, being consultant for AbbVie Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Candel Therapeutics, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Cybrexa Therapeutics, DynamiCure Biotechnology, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, HiberCell, I-Mab Biopharma, Immune-Onc Therapeutics, Immunocore, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Loxo Oncology, Merck and Company, Mirati Therapeutics, NextCure, Normunity, Novartis, Ocean Biomedical, Oncocyte Corp, Oncternal Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Revelar Biotherapeutics, Ribbon Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Xencor, receiving research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech/Roche, Merck and Company, and holding leadership roles in American Association for Cancer Research, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, Southwest Oncology Group. Dr. Gandara discloses being a consultant for Adagene (institutional), AstraZeneca (institutional), Guardant Health (institutional), IO Biotech (institutional), Oncocyte (institutional), Oncohost (institutional), Merck (consultant), Roche-Genentech (institutional) and receiving institutional research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Merck. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In patients with lung cancer (LC), understanding factors that impact the dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti-spike antibody (SAb) titers over time is critical, but challenging, due to evolving treatments, infections, vaccinations, and health status. The objective was to develop a time-dependent regression model elucidating individual contributions of factors influencing SAb levels in LC patients using a prospective, longitudinal, multi-institutional cohort study initiated in January 2021. The study evaluated 296 LC patients-median age 69; 55% female; 50% stage IV. Blood samples were collected every three months to measure SAb levels using FDA-approved ELISA. Asymptomatic and unreported infections were documented through measurement of anti-nucleocapsid Ab levels (Meso Scale Discovery). Associations between clinical characteristics and titers were evaluated using a time-dependent linear regression model with a generalized estimating equation (GEE), considering time-independent variables (age, sex, ethnicity, smoking history, histology, and stage) and time-dependent variables (booster vaccinations, SARS-CoV-2 infections, cancer treatment, steroid use, and influenza vaccination). Significant time-dependent effects increasing titer levels were observed for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection ( p < 0.001) and vaccination/boosters ( p < 0.001). Steroid use ( p = 0.043) and chemotherapy ( p = 0.033) reduced titer levels. Influenza vaccination was associated with increased SAb levels ( p < 0.001), independent of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters. Prior smoking significantly decreased titers in females ( p = 0.001). Age showed no association with titers. This GEE-based linear regression model unveiled the nuanced impact of multiple variables on patient anti-spike Ab levels over time. After controlling for the major influences of vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 infections, chemotherapy and steroid use were found to have negatively affected titers. Smoking in females significantly decreased titers. Surprisingly, influenza vaccinations were also significantly associated, likely indirectly, with improved SARS-CoV-2 titers.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a new paradigm in optimizing treatment strategies for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its potential spans early-stage disease, influencing adjuvant therapy, to advanced disease, where it aids in identifying genomic markers and resistance mechanisms. This review explores the evolving landscape of utilizing liquid biopsies, specifically circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in the management of NSCLC with EGFR mutations. While tissue-based genomic testing remains the cornerstone for clinical decision-making, liquid biopsies offer a well-validated, guideline-recommended alternative approach. Ongoing trials integrating ctDNA for EGFR -mutant NSCLC management are also discussed, shedding light on the potential of ctDNA in early-stage disease, including its applications in prognostication, risk stratification, and minimal residual disease detection post-curative intent treatment. For advanced disease, the role of ctDNA in identifying resistance mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is explored, providing insights into disease progression and guiding treatment decisions. This review also addresses the challenges, including the limitations in sensitivity of current assays for disease recurrence detection, and calls for future studies to refine treatment approaches, standardize reporting, and explore alternative biofluids for enhanced sensitivity. A systematic approach is crucial to address barriers to ctDNA deployment, ensuring equitable access, and facilitating its integration into routine clinical practice.

Background: While many molecular assays can detect mutations at low tumor purity and variant allele frequencies, complex biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) require higher tumor purity for accurate measurement. Scalable, quality-controlled, tissue-conserving methods to increase tumor nuclei percentage (TN%) from tumor specimens are needed for complex biomarkers and hence necessary to maximize patient matching to approved therapies or clinical trial enrollment. We evaluated the clinical utility and performance of precision needle-punch enrichment (NPE) compared with traditional razor blade macroenrichment of tumor specimens on molecular testing success., Methods: Pathologist-directed NPE was performed manually on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) blocks. Quality control of target capture region and quantity of residual tumor in each tissue block was determined via a post-enrichment histologic slide recut. Resultant tumor purity and biomarker status were determined by the computational analysis pipeline component of the FDA-approved next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, FoundationOne ® CDx. Following NPE implementation for real-world clinical samples, assay performance and biomarker (MSI, TMB, gLOH) detection were analyzed., Results: In real-world clinical samples, enrichment rate via NPE was increased to ~50% over a 2.5-year period, exceeding the prior use of razor blade macro-enrichment (<30% of cases) prior to NPE implementation due to proven efficacy in generating high quality molecular results from marginal samples and the ease of use for both pathologist and histotechnologists. NPE was associated with lower test failures, higher computational tumor purity, and higher rates of successful TMB, MSI and gLOH determination when stratified by pre-enriched (incipient) tumor nuclei percentage. In addition, challenging cases in which tumor content was initially insufficient for testing were salvaged for analysis of biomarker status, gene amplification/deletion, and confident mutant or wild-type gene status determination., Conclusions: Pathologist-directed precision enrichment from tissue blocks (aka NPE) increases tumor purity, and consequently, yields a greater number of successful tests and complex biomarker determinations. Moreover, this process is rapid, safe, inexpensive, scalable, and conserves patient surgical pathology material. NPE may constitute best practice with respect to enriching tumor cells from low-purity specimens for biomarker detection in molecular laboratories., Competing Interests: Authors DL, RH, IL, RK, NP, SL, BD, TJ, DM, JR, J-AV, JE, and JK are employed by Foundation Medicine, Inc. and stockholders of Roche. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Lin, Huang, Ladas, Keller, Patel, Lakis, Decker, Janovitz, Mata, Ross, Vergilio, Elvin, Herbst, Mack and Killian.)

Purpose: Efficacy of MEK inhibitors in KRAS+ NSCLC may differ based on specific KRAS mutations and comutations. Our hypothesis was that docetaxel and trametinib would improve activity in KRAS+ NSCLC and specifically in KRAS G12C NSCLC., Patients and Methods: S1507 is a single-arm phase II study assessing the response rate (RR) with docetaxel plus trametinib in recurrent KRAS+ NSCLC and secondarily in the G12C subset. The accrual goal was 45 eligible patients, with at least 25 with G12C mutation. The design was two-stage design to rule out a 17% RR, within the overall population at the one-sided 3% level and within the G12C subset at the 5% level., Results: Between July 18, 2016, and March 15, 2018, 60 patients were enrolled with 53 eligible and 18 eligible in the G12C cohort. The RR was 34% [95% confidence interval (CI), 22-48] overall and 28% (95% CI, 10-53) in G12C. Median PFS and OS were 4.1 and 3.3 months and 10.9 and 8.8 months, overall and in the subset, respectively. Common toxicities were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, rash, anemia, mucositis, and neutropenia. Among 26 patients with known status for TP53 (10+ve) and STK11 (5+ve), OS (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.16-7.01), and RR (0% vs. 56%, P = 0.004) were worse in patients with TP53 mutated versus wild-type cancers., Conclusions: RRs were significantly improved in the overall population. Contrary to preclinical studies, the combination showed no improvement in efficacy in G12C patients. Comutations may influence therapeutic efficacy of KRAS directed therapies and are worthy of further evaluation. See related commentary by Cantor and Aggarwal, p. 3563., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Lung cancer is responsible for 1.8 million annual deaths. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) represent 85% of lung cancer tumors. While surgery is an effective early-stage treatment, the majority of newly identified US lung cancer cases are stage III/IV. Immunotherapy, using programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor antibody therapeutics, has increased survival for patients with NSCLC. PD-L1 protein expression is widely used as a predictive biomarker informing treatment decisions. However, only a minority of patients (27%-39%) respond to PD-L1/PD-1 treatment. PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry assay has deficiencies in identifying responding and refractory patients. Given the different characteristics of squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, the predictability of PD-L1 levels in determining which patients would benefit from immunotherapy could vary between the 2 histologies. We analyzed 17 phase-III clinical studies and a retrospective study to determine if the predictive capability of PD-L1 expression varies between squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC. For patients with NSCLC treated with mono or dual-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), PD-L1 expression was more predictive of benefit for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC than squamous NSCLC. Patients with nonsquamous histology and PD-L1 high tumor proportion scores (TPS) survived 2.0x longer compared to those with low TPS, when treated with monotherapy ICI. Among patients with squamous NSCLC, that difference was 1.2 to 1.3x. For patients treated with ICIs and chemotherapy, there was no clear difference in the predictive value of PD-L1 levels between histologies. We encourage future researchers to analyze the predictability of PD-L1 biomarker expression separately for squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In comparison to the general population, lung cancer patients are more likely to suffer from severe Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated mortality. Considering this increased risk, and in order to prevent symptoms and severe disease, patients with lung cancer have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination primary and booster doses. Despite this, the pivotal clinical trials did not include these patients, which leaves open questions regarding vaccine efficacy and humoral immune response. This review outlines the findings of recent investigations into the humoral responses of lung cancer patients to COVID-19 vaccination, particularly the primary doses and first boost.

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an effective therapeutic strategy, improving the survival of patients with lung cancer compared with conventional treatments. However, novel predictive biomarkers are needed to stratify which patients derive clinical benefit because the currently used and highly heterogenic histological PD-L1 has shown low accuracy. Liquid biopsy is the analysis of biomarkers in body fluids and represents a minimally invasive tool that can be used to monitor tumor evolution and treatment effects, potentially reducing biases associated with tumor heterogeneity associated with tissue biopsies. In this context, cytokines, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), can be found free in circulation in the blood and packaged into extracellular vesicles (EVs), which have a specific delivery tropism and can affect in tumor/immune system interaction. TGF-β is an immunosuppressive cytokine that plays a crucial role in tumor immune escape, treatment resistance, and metastasis. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of circulating and EV TGF-β in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving ICIs., Methods: Plasma samples were collected in 33 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer before and during treatment with ICIs. EV were isolated from plasma by serial ultracentrifugation methods and circulating and EV TGF-β expression levels were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay., Results: Baseline high expression of TGF-β in EVs was associated with nonresponse to ICIs as well as shorter progression-free survival and overall survival, outperforming circulating TGF-β levels and tissue PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker., Conclusion: If validated, EV TGF-β could be used to improve patient stratification, increasing the effectiveness of treatment with ICIs and potentially informing combinatory treatments with TGF-β blockade., Plain Language Summary: Treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has improved the survival of some patients with lung cancer. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from this treatment, making it essential to develop more reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit. In this pilot study, the expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in blood circulation and in extracellular vesicles was analyzed. The levels of extracellular vesicle TGF-β before treatment were able to determine which patients would benefit from treatment with ICIs and have a longer survival with higher accuracy than circulating TGF-β and tissue PD-L1, which is the currently used biomarker in clinical practice., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are an effective preclinical in vivo platform for testing the efficacy of novel drugs and drug combinations for cancer therapeutics. Here we describe a repository of 79 genomically and clinically annotated lung cancer PDXs available from The Jackson Laboratory that have been extensively characterized for histopathologic features, mutational profiles, gene expression, and copy-number aberrations. Most of the PDXs are models of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including 37 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 33 lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) models. Other lung cancer models in the repository include four small cell carcinomas, two large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, two adenosquamous carcinomas, and one pleomorphic carcinoma. Models with both de novo and acquired resistance to targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors are available in the collection. The genomic profiles of the LUAD and LUSC PDX models are consistent with those observed in patient tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas and previously characterized gene expression-based molecular subtypes. Clinically relevant mutations identified in the original patient tumors were confirmed in engrafted PDX tumors. Treatment studies performed in a subset of the models recapitulated the responses expected on the basis of the observed genomic profiles. These models therefore serve as a valuable preclinical platform for translational cancer research., Significance: Patient-derived xenografts of lung cancer retain key features observed in the originating patient tumors and show expected responses to treatment with standard-of-care agents, providing experimentally tractable and reproducible models for preclinical investigations., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Liquid biopsy has revolutionized the management of cancer patients. In particular, liquid biopsy-based testing has proven to be highly beneficial for identifying actionable cancer markers, especially when solid tissue biopsies are insufficient or unattainable. Beyond the predictive role, liquid biopsy may be a useful tool for comprehensive tumor genotyping, identification of emergent resistance mechanisms, monitoring of minimal residual disease, early detection, and cancer interception. The application of next generation sequencing to liquid biopsy has led to the "quantum leap" of predictive molecular pathology. Here, we review the evolving role of liquid biopsy in lung cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Umberto Malapelle has received personal fees (as consultant and/or speaker bureau) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientifics, Eli Lilly, Diaceutics, GSK, Merck and AstraZeneca, Janssen, Diatech, Novartis and Hedera unrelated to the current work. Pasquale Pisapia has received personal fees as speaker bureau from Novartis, for work performed outside of the current study. Alessandro Russo reports advisory board role/consultancy for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer and MSD, unrelated to the current work. Christian Rolfo reports grants from Pfizer and MSD, consulting fees from Archer, Inivata, BMS, Novartis, Boston Pharmaceuticals, MD Serono; other from AstraZeneca, Roche, GuardantHealth, and MSD; safety monitoring board for MD Serono; leadership roles with ISLB, IASLC, ESO and ESMO; other support from GuardantHealth, unrelated to the current work. Giancarlo Troncone reports personal fees (as speaker bureau or advisor) from Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, BMS, GSK, Menarini, AstraZeneca, Amgen and Bayer, unrelated to the current work. The other Authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are under investigation as an early indicator of treatment outcome., Experimental Design: Serial plasma ctDNA (baseline, 8 weeks, and at progression) was prospectively incorporated into the SWOG S1403 clinical trial of afatinib ± cetuximab in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve, EGFR mutation tissue-positive non-small cell lung cancer., Results: EGFR mutations were detected in baseline ctDNA in 77% (82/106) of patients, associated with the presence of brain and/or liver metastases and M1B stage. Complete clearance of EGFR mutations in ctDNA by 8 weeks was associated with a significantly decreased risk of progression, compared with those with persistent ctDNA at Cycle 3 Day 1 [HR, 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.45; P < 0.0001], with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15.1 (95% CI, 10.6-17.5) months in the group with clearance of ctDNA versus 4.6 (1.7-7.5) months in the group with persistent ctDNA. Clearance was also associated with a decreased risk of death (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.90), P = 0.02; median overall survival (OS): 32.6 (23.5-not estimable) versus 15.6 (4.9-28.3) months., Conclusions: Plasma clearance of mutant EGFR ctDNA at 8 weeks was highly and significantly predictive of PFS and OS, outperforming RECIST response for predicting long-term benefit., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Aurora Kinase A (AKA) inhibition with gemcitabine represents a potentially synergistic cancer treatment strategy via mitotic catastrophe. The feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of alisertib (MLN8237), an oral AKA inhibitor, with gemcitabine was evaluated in this open-label phase I trial with dose escalation and expansion., Methods: Key inclusion criteria included advanced solid tumor with any number of prior chemotherapy regimens in the dose escalation phase, and advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with up to two prior chemotherapy regimens. Four dose levels (DLs 1-4) of alisertib (20, 30, 40, or 50 mg) were evaluated in 3 + 3 design with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles., Results: In total, 21 subjects were treated in dose escalation and 5 subjects were treated in dose expansion at DL4. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 1 of 6 subjects each in DL3 and DL4. All subjects experienced treatment-related adverse events. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 73% of subjects, with neutropenia observed in 54%. Out of 22 subjects evaluable for response, 2 subjects (9%) had partial response and 14 subjects (64%) had stable disease. Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.1-4.5). No significant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters for gemcitabine or its metabolite dFdU were observed with alisertib co-administration., Conclusions: This trial established the recommended phase 2 dose of alisertib 50 mg to be combined with gemcitabine. Gemcitabine and alisertib are a feasible strategy with potential for disease control in multiple heavily pre-treated tumors, though gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity was apparent., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Historically, high rates of actionable driver mutations have been reported in never-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). In the era of modern, comprehensive cancer mutation sequencing, this relationship necessitates a more detailed analysis., Methods: All Mount Sinai patients between January 1, 2015, and June 1, 2020, with a diagnosis of ADC of any stage with known smoking status who received genomic testing were included. Most patients were analyzed using the Sema4 hotspot panel or the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay version 3 next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel conducted at Sema4. Patients were considered fully genotyped if they were comprehensively analyzed for alterations in EGFR, KRAS, MET, ALK, RET, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK1-3, and ERBB2, otherwise they were considered partially genotyped., Results: Two hundred and thirty-six never-smokers and 671 smokers met the above criteria. Of the never-smokers, 201 (85%) had a driver mutation with 167 (71%) considered actionable (ie, those with US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents). Among smokers, 439 (65%) had an identified driver mutation with 258 (38%) actionable (P < .0001). When comprehensively sequenced, 95% (70/74) of never-smokers had a driver mutation with 78% (58/74) actionable; whereas, for smokers, 75% (135/180) had a driver with only 47% (74/180) actionable (P < .0001). Within mutations groups, EGFR G719X and KRAS G12Cs were more common to smokers. For stage IV patients harboring EGFR-mutant tumors treated with EGFR-directed therapies, never-smokers had significantly improved OS compared to smokers (hazard ratio = 2.71; P = .025). In multivariable analysis, Asian ancestry and female sex remained significant predictors of (1) OS in stage IV patients and (2) likelihood of harboring a receptor of fusion-based driver., Conclusion: Comprehensive NGS revealed driver alterations in 95% of never-smokers, with the majority having an associated therapy available. All efforts should be exhausted to identify or rule out the presence of an actionable driver mutation in all metastatic lung ADC., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) changed the therapeutic landscape of patients with lung cancer. However, only a subset of them derived clinical benefit and evidenced the need to identify reliable predictive biomarkers. Liquid biopsy is the non-invasive and repeatable analysis of biological material in body fluids and a promising tool for cancer biomarkers discovery. In particular, there is growing evidence that extracellular vesicles (EVs) play an important role in tumor progression and in tumor-immune interactions. Thus, we evaluated whether extracellular vesicle PD-L1 expression could be used as a biomarker for prediction of durable treatment response and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing treatment with ICIs., Methods: Dynamic changes in EV PD-L1 were analyzed in plasma samples collected before and at 9 ± 1 weeks during treatment in a retrospective and a prospective independent cohorts of 33 and 39 patients, respectively., Results: As a result, an increase in EV PD-L1 was observed in non-responders in comparison to responders and was an independent biomarker for shorter progression-free survival and overall survival. To the contrary, tissue PD-L1 expression, the commonly used biomarker, was not predictive neither for durable response nor survival., Conclusion: These findings indicate that EV PD-L1 dynamics could be used to stratify patients with advanced NSCLC who would experience durable benefit from ICIs., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a transmembrane glycoprotein receptor with intracellular tyrosine kinase activity. Its alterations, including mutation, amplification and overexpression, could result in oncogenic potential and have been detected in many cancers such as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Such alterations are, in general, considered markers of poor prognosis. Anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, e.g. trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) and disitamab vedotin (RC48), were recently approved for HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. Meanwhile, several HER2-targeted drugs, such as T-DXd, neratinib, afatinib, poziotinib and pyrotinib, have been evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC, with several of them demonstrating clinical benefit. Therefore, identifying HER2 alterations is pivotal for NSCLC patients to benefit from these targeted therapies. Recent guidelines on HER2 testing were developed for breast and gastric cancer, however, and have not been fully established for NSCLC. The expert group here reached a consensus on HER2 alteration testing in NSCLC with the focus on clinicopathologic characteristics, therapies, detection methods and diagnostic criteria for HER2-altered NSCLC patients. We hope this consensus could improve the clinical management of NSCLC patients with HER2 alterations., Competing Interests: Disclosure JZ served as a scientific advisor/consultant for AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Novocure, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Mirati, Novartis, Cardinal Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nexus Health and Sanofi, is on the speakers’ bureau for AstraZeneca and MJH Life Sciences and has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, Mirati, AbbVie and Hengrui Therapeutics. FRH participated in scientific advisory boards for: Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Sanofi/Regeneron, OncoCyte. CZ reported honoraria as a speaker from Roche, Lily China, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Hengrui, Qilu, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Innovent Biologics, C-Stone, Luye Pharma, TopAlliance Biosciences, and Amoy Diagnositics; and advisor fees for Innovent Biologics, Hengrui, Qilu, and TopAlliance Biosciences. SR reported honoraria as a speaker from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Hengrui, and Junshi, advisor fees for Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Boehringer Ingelheim and research funding from Hengrui. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The phase III S0819 trial investigated addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy (CT) in NSCLC. Subgroup analyses suggested an OS benefit among patients with EGFR copy number gain in squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), (HR = 0.58 [0.39-0.86], P = .0071). A more detailed model based on EGFR FISH, EGFR IHC and KRAS mutation status was evaluated to yield a more precise predictive paradigm of cetuximab-based therapy in advanced NSCLC., Methods: FISH was performed using the Colorado Scoring Criteria; H-Score was used to quantify EGFR IHC expression (cut-off ≥ 200). A Cox model was used to assess treatment effects for OS and PFS within biomarker and clinical subgroups. KRAS mutation was analyzed using Therascreen. The false discovery rate controlled for multiple comparisons. S0819 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00946712., Results: Of 1,313 eligible patients, assay results were obtained for FISH on 976 patients (41% positive), for IHC on 945 patients (31% positive), and KRAS mutation status on 627 patients (26% positive). In SCC patients, OS was significantly improved with addition of cetuximab when both EGFR FISH and EGFR IHC were positive (N = 58), (OS HR: 0.32 [95% CI 0.18-0.59]; P = .0002, q = 0.08), median 12.6 versus 4.6 months. The results were independent of KRAS mutation status. In Non-SCC, no predictive value of EGFR IHC, EGFR FISH status and/or KRAS status was seen., Conclusions: In NSCLC SCC, a combination index of EGFR FISH plus EGFR IHC results was associated with improved OS when cetuximab was added to CT, representing a potential predictive molecular paradigm for patients suitable for EGFR-antibody therapy., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Onalespib is a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor (HSP90i). Previous preclinical and clinical studies with HSP90i have demonstrated activity in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of onalespib plus erlotinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of the combination in epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFRex20ins) NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Standard 3+3 dose escalation was followed by a phase II expansion in EGFRex20ins. The phase II component targeted a response rate of 25% versus a background rate of 5%. Prospective next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 70 cancer-related genes, including EGFR, via plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was performed. Toxicity was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4, and response was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1., Results: Eleven patients were treated (nine dose escalation, two dose expansion). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in dose level (DL) 0 and zero in DL -1 (minus). In 10 EGFRex20ins patients, no responses were observed, median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.9-5.7), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40% (median, 3.5 months). EGFRex20ins was detected in nine of 10 ctDNA samples at baseline; on-treatment ctDNA clearance was not observed. Grade 3 diarrhea was the predominant toxicity in 45% of patients. The recommended phase II dose is DL -1 (minus): erlotinib 150 mg orally every morning and onalespib 120 mg/m 2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days., Conclusion: Overlapping toxicities of erlotinib and onalespib, mainly diarrhea, limited the tolerability of this combination, and limited clinical activity was observed, so the trial was closed early. Plasma EGFRex20ins ctDNA was detected in the majority of patients; failure to clear ctDNA was consistent with lack of tumor response (NCT02535338)., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is superior to platinum-based chemotherapy in treatment-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab is superior to docetaxel in advanced pretreated NSCLC., Objective: To determine whether the addition of ipilimumab to nivolumab improves survival in patients with advanced, pretreated, immunotherapy-naive squamous (Sq) NSCLC., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP) S1400I phase 3, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 18, 2015, to April 23, 2018, randomizing patients in a 1:1 ratio to nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab. The median follow-up in surviving patients was 29.5 months. The trial was conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network and included patients with advanced immunotherapy-naive SqNSCLC and a Zubrod score of 0 (asymptomatic) to 1 (symptomatic but completely ambulatory) with disease progression after standard platinum-based chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified by sex and number of prior therapies (1 vs 2 or more). Data were analyzed from May 3, 2018, to February 1, 2021., Interventions: Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks, with or without ipilimumab, 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks, until disease progression or intolerable toxic effects., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (IA-PFS) and response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1., Results: Of 275 enrolled patients, 252 (mean age, 67.5 years [range 41.8-90.3 years]; 169 men [67%]; 206 White patients [82%]) were deemed eligible (125 randomized to nivolumab/ipilimumab and 127 to nivolumab). The study was closed for futility at a planned interim analysis. Overall survival was not significantly different between the groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.16; P = .34). Median survival was 10 months (95% CI, 8.0-14.4 months) in the nivolumab/ipilimumab group and 11 months (95% CI, 8.6-13.7 months) in the nivolumab group. The IA-PFS HR was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61-1.03; P = .09); median IA-PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.4 months) in the nivolumab/ipilimumab group and 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-4.0 months) in the nivolumab alone group. Response rates were 18% (95% CI, 12%-25%) with nivolumab/ipilimumab and 17% (95% CI, 10%-23%) with nivolumab. Median response duration was 28.4 months (95% CI, 4.9 months to not reached) with nivolumab/ipilimumab and 9.7 months with nivolumab (95% CI, 4.2-23.1 months). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 49 of 124 patients (39.5%) who received nivolumab/ipilimumab and in 41 of 123 (33.3%) who received nivolumab alone. Toxic effects led to discontinuation in 31 of 124 patients (25%) on nivolumab/ipilimumab and in 19 of 123 (15%) on nivolumab., Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, ipilimumab added to nivolumab did not improve outcomes in patients with advanced, pretreated, immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive SqNSCLC., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02785952.

Introduction: S1400F is a non-match substudy of Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP) evaluating the immunotherapy combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab to overcome resistance to anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) therapy in patients with advanced squamous lung carcinoma (sq non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC))., Methods: Patients with previously treated sqNSCLC with disease progression after anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy, who did not qualify for any active molecularly targeted Lung-MAP substudies, were eligible. Patients received tremelimumab 75 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg once every 28 days for four cycles then durvalumab alone every 28 days until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (RECIST V.1.1). Primary and acquired resistance cohorts, defined as disease progression within 24 weeks versus ≥24 weeks of starting prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, were analyzed separately and an interim analysis for futility was planned after 20 patients in each cohort were evaluable for response., Results: A total of 58 eligible patients received drug, 28 with primary resistance and 30 with acquired resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events at least possibly related to treatment were seen in 20 (34%) patients. The response rate in the primary resistance cohort was 7% (95% CI 0% to 17%), with one complete and one partial response. No responses were seen in the acquired resistance cohort. In the primary and resistance cohorts the median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (95% CI 1.6 to 3.0) and 2.1 months (95% CI 1.6 to 3.2), respectively, and overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI 4.0 to 12.0) and 7.6 months (95% CI 5.3 to 10.2), respectively., Conclusion: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab had minimal activity in patients with advanced sqNSCLC progressing on prior anti-PD-1 therapy. Trial registration number NCT03373760., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors’ financial disclosures include: NBL received travel support and institutional research funding from Astra Zeneca and personal fees (CME lectures) from MSD and BMS, unrelated to the study. MR salary support from Hope Foundation, participation on DMSB for AstraZeneca, unrelated to study. NR received personal fees from Abbvie, Apricity, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Calithera, Dracen, Editas, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmith Kline, Illumina, Merck, Neogenomics, Novartis and Takeda, and personal fees and stock options from Arcus, Belicum, Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, and Gritstone; royalties for patent filed by MSKCC identifying determinants of cancer response to immunotherapy (PCT/US2015/062208 licensed to Personal Genome Diagnostics; PM reports personal fees from Guardant Health. LHS research support from Merck, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, and Boehringer, participating in DSMB for Regeneron, patent with Varian. SCR fees for expert testimony. JC reports consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Coherus, Merck, NCCN, Pfizer and travel support from AstraZeneca, GI Therapeutics, participating on DSMB or Ad Board for Beyond Spring, Celegene, G1 Therapeutics, Janssen, Merrimack, Mylan, Roche. JDB is principal investigator of AstraZeneca sponsored trial (PACIFIC 2), research support and consulting fees from Varian. TS institutional grants from Genentech/Roche, Blueprint Medicines, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Advaxis, Regeneron, participation on DSMB or ad board for Takeda, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Foundation Medicine, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Puma Biotechnology, Janssen Oncology, Regeneron. SR grants from Tesaro, Merck, AstraZeneca, Advaxis, BMS, Amgen, Takeda, Genmab, GSK, consult fees from Amgen, BMS, Genentech/Roche, Merck, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, GSK, Lilly. RSH reports membership in board of directors for Immunocore Holdings Ltd, Junshi Pharmaceuticals, consulting including travel support from AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Merck, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., consulting with ARMO Biosciences, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Candel Therapeutics, Cybrexa Therapeutics, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Foundation Medicine, Genmab, Gilead, Halozyme Therapeutics, Heat Biologics, I-Mab Biopharma, Immunocore, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Mirati Therapeutics, Nektar, Neon Therapeutics, NextCure, Novartis, Ocean Biomedical, Oncternal Therapeutics, Pfizer, Ribbon Therapeutics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Shire PLC, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, STCube Pharmaceuticals, Symphogen, Takeda, Tesaro, Tocagen, Ventana Medical Systems, WindMIL Therapeutics, Xencor. Research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech/Roche, Merck. VP research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Merck, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Nektar Therapeutics, Janssen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Checkmate, Incyte, consulting fees from AbbVie, Araxes, Arrys Therapeutics, Bolt Therapeutics, Clovis Oncology, Exelixis, G2 Innovation, Gritstone, Ideaya, Leeds Biolabs, Loxo Oncology, Takeda, Tesaro, TRM Oncology, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Merck, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Nektar Therapeutics, Janssen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, personal fees from F. Hoffman-La Roche, employee of Pfizer. KK travel and consultant fees from AstraZeneca.DRG consultant and participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca (institutional), Roche-Genentech (institutional), Guardant Health (institutional), IO Biotech (institutional) and Oncocyte (institutional) fees paid to institution, research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genentech and Merck, personal fees from Inivata, Lilly, Merck and Novartis.The following investigators have no financial disclosures to report: FH, JW, WjI, KM, JM., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Lung-MAP S1400K was designed to evaluate the response to telisotuzumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-MET, in patients with c-MET-positive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)., Patients and Methods: Patients with previously treated SCC with c-MET-positive tumors (H score ≥ 150, Ventana SP44 assay) were enrolled into 2 cohorts: Cohort 1 (immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive) and Cohort 2 (immune checkpoint inhibitor refractory). Telisotuzumab vedotin 2.7 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response assessments were performed every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, response within cohort, duration of response, and toxicities. Interim analysis was planned after 20 evaluable patients, with ≥ 3 responses needed to continue enrollment., Results: Forty-nine patients (14% of screened patients) were assigned to S1400K, 28 patients enrolled (15 in Cohort 1 and 13 in Cohort 2), and 23 were eligible. S1400K closed on December 21, 2018 owing to lack of efficacy. Two responses (response rate of 9%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-20%) were reported in cohort 1 (1 complete and 1 unconfirmed partial response), whereas 10 patients had stable disease, with a disease control rate of 52%. The median overall and progression-free survival was 5.6 and 2.4 months, respectively. There were 3 grade 5 events (2 pneumonitis, in Cohort 2, and 1 bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, in Cohort 1)., Conclusion: Telisotuzumab vedotin failed to meet the pre-specified response needed to justify continuing enrollment to S1400K. Pneumonitis was an unanticipated toxicity observed in patients with SCC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This signal finding study (S1400G) was designed to evaluate the efficacy of talazoparib in advanced stage squamous cell lung cancer harboring homologous recombination repair deficiency., Patients and Methods: The full eligible population (FEP) had tumors with a deleterious mutation in any of the study-defined homologous recombination repair genes and without prior exposure to a PARP inhibitor. The primary analysis population (PAP) is a subset of FEP with alteration in ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2. Treatment consisted of talazoparib 1 mg daily continuously in 21-day cycles. A 2-stage design with exact 93% power and 1-sided 0.07 type I error required enrollment of 40 patients in the PAP in order to rule out an overall response rate (ORR) of 15% or less if the true ORR is ≥ 35%., Results: The study enrolled 47 patients in the FEP, of whom 24 were in the PAP. The median age for the FEP was 66.7 years; 83% were male and 85% white. ORR in the PAP was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0, 21) with disease control rate of 54% (95% CI, 33, 74). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.5-2.8) and 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.0-10), respectively. In the FEP, ORR was 11% (95% CI, 3.6, 23), the disease control rate was 51% (95% CI, 36, 66), and the median duration of response was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.3, 4.2). Median progression-free and overall survival were 2.5 months and 5.7 months, respectively., Conclusions: S1400G failed to show sufficient level of efficacy for single agent talazoparib in a biomarker defined subset of squamous lung cancer with homologous recombination repair deficiency., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mutation in the gene that encodes Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most common oncogenic driver in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, occurring in approximately 30% of lung adenocarcinomas. Over 80% of oncogenic KRAS mutations occur at codon 12, where the glycine residue is substituted by different amino acids, leading to genomic heterogeneity of KRas-mutant tumors. The KRAS glycine-to-cysteine mutation (G12C) composes approximately 44% of KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer, with mutant KRas G12C present in approximately 13% of all patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Mutant KRas has been an oncogenic target for decades, but no viable therapeutic agents were developed until recently. However, advances in KRas molecular modeling have led to the development and clinical testing of agents that directly inhibit mutant KRas G12C . These agents include sotorasib (AMG-510), adagrasib (MRTX-849), and JNJ-74699157. In addition to testing for known actionable oncogenic driver alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET exon 14 skipping, RET, and NTRK and for the expression of programmed cell-death protein ligand 1, pathologists, medical oncologists, and community practitioners will need to incorporate routine testing for emerging biomarkers such as MET amplification, ERBB2 (alias HER2), and KRAS mutations, particularly KRAS G12C, considering the promising development of direct inhibitors of KRas G12C protein., (Copyright © 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been incorporated into various clinical oncology guidelines for systemic treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancers (aNSCLC). However, less than 50% (and 20%) of the patients responded to the therapy as a first (or second) line of therapy. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an extensively studied biomarker of response to ICI, but results from this test have equivocal predictive power. In order to identify other biomarkers that support clinical decision-making around whether to treat with ICIs or not, we performed a retrospective study of patients with aNSCLC who underwent ICI-based therapy in the Mount Sinai Health System between 2014 and 2019., Methods: We analyzed data from standard laboratory tests performed in patients as a part of the routine clinical workup during treatment, including complete blood counts (CBC) and a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), to correlate test results with clinical response and survival., Results: Of 11,138 NSCLC patients identified, 249 had been treated with ICIs. We found associations between high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR ≥ 5) and poor survival in ICI-treated NSCLC. We further observed that sustained high NLR after initiation of treatment had a more profound impact on survival than baseline NLR, regardless of PD-L1 status. Hazard ratios when comparing patients with NLR ≥ 5 vs. NLR < 5 are 1.7 (p = 0.02), 3.4 (p = 4.2 × 10 - 8 ), and 3.9 (p = 1.4 × 10 - 6 ) at baseline, 2-8 weeks, and 8-14 weeks after treatment start, respectively. Mild anemia, defined as hemoglobin (HGB) less than 12 g/dL was correlated with survival independently of NLR. Finally, we developed a composite NLR and HGB biomarker. Patients with pretreatment NLR ≥ 5 and HGB < 12 g/dL had a median overall survival (OS) of 8.0 months (95% CI 4.5-11.5) compared to the rest of the cohort with a median OS not reached (95% CI 15.9-NE, p = 1.8 × 10 - 5 ), and a hazard ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.7-4.1, p = 3.5 × 10 - 5 )., Conclusions: We developed a novel composite biomarker for ICI-based therapy in NSCLC based on routine CBC tests, which may provide meaningful clinical utility to guide treatment decision. The results suggest that treatment of anemia to elevate HGB before initiation of ICI therapy may improve patient outcomes or the use of alternative non-chemotherapy containing regimens.

Purpose: MET dysregulation is an oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as well as a mechanism of TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) resistance in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-mutated disease. This study was conducted to determine safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination EGFR and MET inhibitors as a strategy to overcome and/or delay EGFR-TKI resistance., Methods: A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial of capmatinib in combination with erlotinib in patients with MET-positive NSCLC was used. Eighteen patients in the dose-escalation cohort received 100-600 mg twice daily of capmatinib with 100-150 mg daily of erlotinib. There were two dose-expansion cohorts. Cohort A included 12 patients with EGFR -mutant tumors resistant to TKIs. Cohort B included five patients with EGFR wild-type tumors. The primary outcome was to assess safety and determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination., Results: The most common adverse events of any grade were rash (62.9%), fatigue (51%), and nausea (45.7%). Capmatinib exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics combined with erlotinib, while showing no significant drug interactions. The RP2D was 400 mg twice daily capmatinib tablets with 150 mg daily erlotinib. The overall response rate (ORR) and DCR in dose-expansion cohort A was 50% and 50%, respectively. In cohort B, the ORR and disease control rate were 75% and 75%., Conclusion: Capmatinib in combination with erlotinib demonstrated safety profiles consistent with prior studies. We observed efficacy in specific patient populations. Continued evaluation of capmatinib plus EGFR-TKIs is warranted in patients with EGFR activating mutations., Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments). Caroline E. McCoachHonoraria: Novartis, Genentech, Guardant Health Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Speaker’s Bureau: Novartis Research Funding: Novartis, Revolution Medicine Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Loxo, Eli Lilly, Takeda PharmaceuticalsAiming YuStock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson & Johnson Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patents: (1) Yu AM, Wang WP, Chen QX, Li MM. Hybrid tRNA/pre-miRNA molecules and methods of use. US Patent No. 10619156, Issue date: April 14, 2020. European Patent No. 3150980, Grant date: May 20, 2020. (2) Yu AM. Method for detection of RNase activity. US Patent No. 10422003. Issue date: September 24, 2019. (3) Yu AM, Jilek JL, Zhang QY, Ho PY, Tu MJ. tRNA/pre-miRNA compositions and methods for treating hepatocellular carcinoma. US Patent Application No. 62/660919, filed on April 20, 2018. (4) Yu AM, Ho PY, Tu MJ, Jilek JL, Zhang QY, Petrek HE. tRNA/pre-miRNA compositions and use in treating cancer. US Patent Application No. 62/674939, filed on May 22, 2018.David R. GandaraHonoraria: AstraZeneca Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca (I), Guardant Health (I), OncoCyte (I), Amgen, IO Biotech (I), Merck, Roche/Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inivata, Novartis Research Funding: Roche/Genentech (I), Merck (I), Amgen (I) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer IngelheimJonathan W. RiessConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Medtronic, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Loxo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech Research Funding: Merck (I), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (I), Spectrum Pharmaceuticals (I), Boehringer Ingelheim (I), Novartis (I)Tiahong LiConsulting or Advisory Role: Foundation Medicine, Archer Diagnostics, Eisai Research Funding: Pfizer (I), Hengrui Therapeutics (I), Eureka (I), Merck (I), OncoImmune (I)Primo N. LaraConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen Research Funding: Aragon Pharmaceuticals (I), Janssen Biotech (I), Tracon Pharma (I), Merck (I), Pharmacyclics (I), Incyte (I), Taiho Pharmaceutical (I)Matthew GubensConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Heron, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inivata Research Funding: Celgene (I), Merck (I), Novartis (I), Roche/Genentech (I), OncoMed (I)Philip C. MackHonoraria: Guardant Health Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Guardant Health, Amgen Research Funding: Boehringer IngelheimKaren KellyHonoraria: Merck Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Regeneron, AbbVie, EMD Serono, Merck, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Symphogen, Inivata, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Genmab, Targeted Oncology, Genentech Research Funding: EMD Serono (I), Genentech (I), AbbVie (I), Five Prime Therapeutics (I), Regeneron (I), Astellas Pharma (I), Tizona Therapeutics, (I) Eli Lilly (I), Novartis (I), Amgen (I) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Author royalties for UpToDate, an evidence-based, peer-reviewed information resource, available via the web, desktop, and PDA Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Merck, Regeneron, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, EMD Serono No potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: The Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP; S1400) is a completed biomarker-driven master protocol designed to address an unmet need for better therapies for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung-MAP (S1400) was created to establish an infrastructure for biomarker screening and rapid regulatory intent evaluation of targeted therapies and was the first biomarker-driven master protocol initiated with the US National Cancer Institute (NCI)., Methods: Lung-MAP (S1400) was done within the National Clinical Trials Network of the NCI using a public-private partnership. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had stage IV or recurrent squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. The study included a screening component using the FoundationOne assay (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA) for next-generation sequencing, and a clinical trial component with biomarker-driven substudies and non-match substudies for patients who were ineligible for biomarker-driven substudies. Patients were pre-screened and received their substudy assignment upon progression, or they were screened at progression and received their substudy assignment upon completion of testing. Patients could enrol onto additional substudies after progression on a substudy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02154490, and all research related to Lung-MAP (S1400) is completed., Findings: Between June 16, 2014, and Jan 28, 2019, 1864 patients enrolled and 1841 (98·9%) submitted tissue. 1674 (90·9%) of 1841 patients had biomarker results, and 1404 (83·9%) of 1674 patients received a substudy assignment. Of the assigned patients, 655 (46·7%) registered to a substudy. The biomarker-driven substudies evaluated taselisib (targeting PIK3CA alterations), palbociclib (cell cycle gene alterations), AZD4547 (FGFR alteration), rilotumumab plus erlotinib (MET), talazoparib (homologous recombination repair deficiency), and telisotuzumab vedotin (MET). The non-match substudies evaluated durvalumab, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab for anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1-naive disease, and durvalumab plus tremelimumab for anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 relapsed disease. Combining data from the substudies, ten (7·0%) of 143 patients responded to targeted therapy, 53 (16·8%) of 315 patients responded to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy for immunotherapy-naive disease, and three (5·4%) of 56 responded to docetaxel in the second line of therapy. Median overall survival was 5·9 months (95% CI 4·8-7·8) for the targeted therapy groups, 7·7 months (6·7-9·2) for the docetaxel groups, and 10·8 months (9·4-12·3) for the anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1-containing groups. Median progression-free survival was 2·5 months (95% CI 1·7-2·8) for the targeted therapy groups, 2·7 months (1·9-2·9) for the docetaxel groups, and 3·0 months (2·7-3·9) for the anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1-containing groups., Interpretation: Lung-MAP (S1400) met its goal to quickly address biomarker-driven therapy questions in squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. In early 2019, a new screening protocol was implemented expanding to all histological types of non-small-cell lung cancer and to add focus on immunotherapy combinations for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapy-relapsed disease. With these changes, Lung-MAP continues to meet its goal to focus on unmet needs in the treatment of advanced lung cancers., Funding: US National Institutes of Health, and AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, and Pfizer through the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based mutation profiling, if sufficiently sensitive and comprehensive, can efficiently identify genomic targets in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Therefore, the authors investigated the accuracy and clinical utility of a commercially available digital next-generation sequencing platform in a large series of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling results from 8388 consecutively tested patients with advanced NSCLC were analyzed. Driver and resistance mutations were examined with regard to their distribution, frequency, co-occurrence, and mutual exclusivity., Results: Somatic alterations were detected in 86% of samples. The median variant allele fraction was 0.43% (range, 0.03%-97.62%). Activating alterations in actionable oncogenes were identified in 48% of patients, including EGFR (26.4%), MET (6.1%), and BRAF (2.8%) alterations and fusions (ALK, RET, and ROS1) in 2.3%. Treatment-induced resistance mutations were common in this cohort, including driver-dependent and driver-independent alterations. In the subset of patients who had progressive disease during EGFR therapy, 64% had known or putative resistance alterations detected in plasma. Subset analysis revealed that ctDNA increased the identification of driver mutations by 65% over standard-of-care, tissue-based testing at diagnosis. A pooled data analysis on this plasma-based assay demonstrated that targeted therapy response rates were equivalent to those reported from tissue analysis., Conclusions: Comprehensive ctDNA analysis detected the presence of therapeutically targetable driver and resistance mutations at the frequencies and distributions predicted for the study population. These findings add support for comprehensive ctDNA testing in patients who are incompletely tested at the time of diagnosis and as a primary option at the time of progression on targeted therapies., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Background: S1400D is a biomarker-driven therapeutic substudy of Lung-MAP evaluating the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR) inhibitor AZD4547 in patients with FGF pathway-activated squamous cell. This is the first phase II trial to evaluate AZD4547 as a targeted approach in patients with previously treated FGFR-altered squamous cell NSCLC and is the first demonstration of successful implementation and conduct of a national umbrella protocol in this disease setting., Methods: Eligible patients had tumoral FGFR alteration or mutation and had progressive disease after at least one line of platinum-based systemic therapy. Patients received AZD4547 80 mg twice daily orally. Primary endpoint was response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and duration of response (DoR)., Results: Ninety-two patients were assigned to S1400D, 43 were enrolled, and 27 AZD4547-treated patients were evaluable. Evaluable patients were predominantly white (n = 24, 89%), median age 66 years (range, 49-88 years old), and female (n = 7, 26%). FGFR alterations included FGFR1 amplification (n = 23; 85%), FGFR3 amplification (n = 2; 7%), FGFR3 S249C (n = 2; 7%), and FGFR3 fusion (n = 1; 4%). Treatment with ADZ4547 was well tolerated; grade 3 adverse events occurred in six patients, and one patient had grade 4 sepsis. Of 27 response-evaluable patients, 1 patient with FGFR3 S249C had unconfirmed partial response with a DoR of 1.5 months and 1 patient with FGFR1 amplification had a confirmed partial response with a DoR of 2.9 months (7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0%-17%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival for the AZD4547-treated cohort were 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.4- 4.5 months) and 7.5 months (95% CI: 3.7-9.3 months)., Conclusions: AZD4547 had an acceptable safety profile but minimal activity in this predominantly FGFR1/FGFR3-amplified cohort. Evaluation of other targeted agents in Lung-MAP is ongoing., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients randomized to receive everolimus (EVE) versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. Due to a higher than expected dropout rate, we assessed EVE trough levels in the adjuvant setting to evaluate the relationship between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity., Methods: Patients received 10 mg daily EVE for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples were collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 and analyzed for EVE. Patients with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. Patients were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the most common adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status., Results: A total of 467 patients were included in this analysis. Quartiles normalized to an EVE dose of 10 mg/day were < 9.0, 9.0-12.9, 12.9-22.8, and > 22.8 ng/mL, respectively. EVE trough levels increased with increasing age ( p  < 0.001). Furthermore, EVE trough levels were higher in men than women (19.4 versus 15.4 ng/mL, p  = 0.01). Risk of grade 2 + triglycerides was increased in Q2 and Q3 vs Q1 (OR = 2.08; p  = 0.02 and OR = 2.63; p  = 0.002). Risk of grade 2 + rash was increased in Q2 and Q4 vs Q1 (OR = 2.99; p  = 0.01 and OR = 2.90; p  = 0.02). There was also an increased risk of any grade 3 + tox in Q2 vs Q1 (OR = 1.71; p  = 0.05)., Conclusions: We identified significant gender and age-related differences in EVE trough levels in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for RCC. Furthermore, our analysis identified significant associations between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity., Competing Interests: TWS reports a grant from The Hope Foundation through the SWOG Trial Support (STrS) program, during the conduct of this study. EIH reports clinical trial funding support from Genentech/Roche, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. PCM reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Guardant Health, and personal fees from Apton Biosystems, all outside the submitted work. MNS reports grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, grants from Janssen Oncology, grants from Advaxis, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and grants from Nektar, all outside the submitted work. PL reports consultant fees from Novartis, during the conduct of this study. NJV reports personal fees from Novartis, during the conduct of this study; personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Exelixis, personal fees from BMS, all outside the submitted work. CWR reports non-financial support from Novartis, during the conduct of this study; personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Exelixis, personal fees from Genentech/Roche, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Argos, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants from CytRx Corporation, grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, grants from Eisai, grants from Exelixis, grants from Genentech, grants from Novartis, grants from Glaxo Smith Kline, grants from Janssen, grants from Karyopharm, grants from MabVax, grants from Merck, grants from Morophotek, grants from Threshold Pharmaceuticals, grants from TRACON, and non-financial support from Bayer, all outside the submitted work. MP, CMT, GSP, MVM, and IMT have nothing to disclose., (© 2019 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.)