Search

Copyright of Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation: Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Im vorliegenden Beitrag macht sich die Autorin Gedanken zu Kriegen und setzt sie in ein Verhältnis zu Frauen und Friedensbewegungen. Historische Fragmente feministischer Friedensinitiativen sollen dem von der Autorin attestierten Vergessen friedensbewegter Frauen entgegenwirken. In den 1970er und 1980er Jahren setzte sich z.B. die Bewegung „Frauen für den Frieden“ in Westdeutschland und Österreich gegen Militarisierung sowie gegen die Einbeziehung von Frauen in die Bundeswehr ein. Im Kontext aktueller Kriegsgeschehen lässt sich in Bezug auf feministische Bewegungen statt des Anknüpfens an Widerstandsbemühungen der Vergangenheit allerdings ein Richtungswechsel erkennen, der die Beteiligung an Militarismen als Emanzipation verkauft. In diesem Sinn wirbt auch das Bundesministerium für Landesverteidigung (Verteidigungsministerium) in Österreich mit dem „freiwilligen Grundwehrdienst“ für Frauen und die Nordatlantikpakt-Organisation (NATO) bemüht sich, Frauen an kriegstreibenden Militärplänen zu beteiligen. Die Autorin plädiert dafür, nicht mehr Frauen an Machtpositionen zu beteiligen, sondern die Machtpositionen an sich in Frage zu stellen. Bildlich nach Sheena Anderson gesprochen: Es gehe nicht darum, mehr Frauen an den Tisch zu bekommen, sondern vielmehr brauche es einen neuen Tisch. Dafür bedarf es kritischer und eben auch feministischer Friedensbildung, die an die Bemühungen historischer Friedensbewegungen anknüpft. (Red.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this article, the author explores the cooperative aspects of mound construction in Late Iron Age Scandinavia. Arguing against the outdated but widely held view that only centralized rule could organize monument construction, he investigates how participation in mound construction affected the people of Sør-Fron in south-eastern Norway. He contends, first, that repeated participation in mound construction helped create a sense of belonging and shared identity, which was maintained through centuries of major environmental and political turmoil. Second, mound construction was part of an active and conscious strategy to limit aggrandizement and prevent centralization and concentration of power. Rejection of Christianity arguably worked in similar ways. The author concludes with considerations of approaches to Iron Age monuments, emphasizing the importance of consensus and community-building and the role of communal opposition to centralized rule. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Discourse: Journal of Childhood & Adolescense Research / Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Discussion Papers is the property of Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Africa Spectrum is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Discussion Papers is the property of Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article "At first they are scared and afterwards they walk all over you" - Power dynamics in work relationships in the judicial coercive context" deals with the significance of power in the work relationship between social workers and delinquent youth. An empirical study from German-speaking Switzerland shows that power dynamics and interdependencies play an important role in collaboration. The article discusses how power phenomena in offender assistance could be addressed. The study examines power dynamics and dependencies between social workers and youth in the youth prosecution. Various aspects are critically questioned and possibilities for improving work relationships are highlighted. The author of the article is Prof. Dr. Patrick Zobrist from the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts - Social Work. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation: Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Emancipatie is goed, identiteitspolitiek is fout, zo luidt de strekking van het recente boek van politiek filosoof Gijs van Oenen, getiteld Culturele veldslagen: Filosofie van de culture wars. Kritiek op identiteitspolitiek - vooral die in de woke vorm – is vandaag de dag niks bijzonders. Ook de analyse van Van Oenen dat er net zo goed een identiteitspolitiek van rechts als van links bestaat is niet nieuw, evenmin als zijn ‘oplossing’ namelijk liberalisme en de rechtsstaat – beide treffen we bijvoorbeeld aan bij Anthony Appiah’s The Lies That Bind: Rethinking Identity (2019). Nieuw is wel dat Van Oenen - die zich als links intellectueel afficheert – hierbij etiketten gebruikt die momenteel gangbaar zijn in de hoek van alt right. De termen ‘cultuurmarxisme’ en ‘culture wars’ - zie de titel van zijn boek - worden door hem als neutraal gepresenteerd, maar het is de vraag wat hij daarmee binnen haalt.