1. Management of paraesophageal hiatus hernia
- Author
-
Gerdes, Stephan, Schoppmann, Sebastian F, Bonavina, Luigi, Boyle, Nicholas, Mueller-Stich, Beat P, Gutschow, Christian A, Gisbertz, Suzanne Sarah, Kockerling, Ferdinand, Lehmann, Thorsten G, Lorenz, Dietmar, Granderath, Frank Alexander, Rosati, Riccardo, Wullstein, Christoph, Lundell, Lars, Cheong, Edward, Nafteux, Philippe, Olmi, Stefano, Monig, Stefan, Biebl, Matthias, Leers, Jessica, Zehetner, Joerg, Kristo, Ivan, Berrisford, Richard George, Skrobic, Ognjan M, Simic, Aleksandar P, Pera, Manuel, Grimminger, Peter Philipp, Gockel, Ines, Zarras, Konstantinos, Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent Bernard, Gossage, James A, Henegouwen, Mark I van Berge, Stein, Hubert J, Markar, Sheraz R, Hueting, Willem Eduard, Targarona, Eduardo M, Johansson, Jan, Macaulay, Graeme D, Wijnhoven, Bas PL, Benedix, Frank, Attwood, Stephen E, Hoelscher, Arnulf Heinrich, Priego, Pablo, Fuchs, Karl-Hermann, Luyer, Misha DP, Griffiths, Ewen A, Sovik, Torgeir Thorson, Theodorou, Dimitrios, Sgromo, Bruno, Salo, Jarmo A, Singhal, Rishi, Thorell, Anders, Zaninotto, Giovanni, Itenc, Marko, D'journo, Xavier Benoit, Fullarton, Grant M, Horbach, Thomas, Surgery, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, CCA - Cancer biology and immunology, CCA - Imaging and biomarkers, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, and CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
- Subjects
REPAIR ,MESH ,Hiatus hernia ,Mesh ,Science & Technology ,Fundoplication ,Surgical technique ,GUIDELINES ,Paraesophageal hernia ,REFLUX ,Surgery ,Delphi survey ,RECURRENCE ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Abstract
Aims There is considerable controversy regarding optimal management of patients with paraesophageal hiatus hernia (pHH). This survey aims at identifying recommended strategies for work-up, surgical therapy, and postoperative follow-up using Delphi methodology. Methods We conducted a 2-round, 33-question, web-based Delphi survey on perioperative management (preoperative work-up, surgical procedure and follow-up) of non-revisional, elective pHH among European surgeons with expertise in upper-GI. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Items from the questionnaire were defined as “recommended” or “discouraged” if positive or negative concordance among participants was > 75%. Items with lower concordance levels were labelled “acceptable” (neither recommended nor discouraged). Results Seventy-two surgeons with a median (IQR) experience of 23 (14–30) years from 17 European countries participated (response rate 60%). The annual median (IQR) individual and institutional caseload was 25 (15–36) and 40 (28–60) pHH-surgeries, respectively. After Delphi round 2, “recommended” strategies were defined for preoperative work-up (endoscopy), indication for surgery (typical symptoms and/or chronic anemia), surgical dissection (hernia sac dissection and resection, preservation of the vagal nerves, crural fascia and pleura, resection of retrocardial lipoma) and reconstruction (posterior crurorrhaphy with single stitches, lower esophageal sphincter augmentation (Nissen or Toupet), and postoperative follow-up (contrast radiography). In addition, we identified “discouraged” strategies for preoperative work-up (endosonography), and surgical reconstruction (crurorrhaphy with running sutures, tension-free hiatus repair with mesh only). In contrast, many items from the questionnaire including most details of mesh augmentation (indication, material, shape, placement, and fixation technique) were “acceptable”. Conclusions This multinational European Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process to identify recommended strategies for the management of pHH. Our work may be useful in clinical practice to guide the diagnostic process, increase procedural consistency and standardization, and to foster collaborative research.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF