Search

A panel of experts in urology, urogynecology, nursing, and behavioral therapy convened in 2010 to discuss the importance of a healthy bladder on overall health. They determined that a consensus statement was necessary to raise awareness among the general public, healthcare providers, payors, and policymakers, with the goals of minimizing the impact of poor bladder health and stimulating primary prevention of bladder conditions. In this statement, 'healthy' bladder function is described, as well as internal and external factors that influence bladder health. It is suggested that primary prevention strategies should be aimed at providing education regarding normal lower urinary tract structures and functioning to the public, including patients and healthcare providers. This education may promote the achievement of optimal bladder health by increasing healthy bladder habits and behaviors, awareness of risk factors, healthcare seeking, and clinician engagement and reducing stigma and other barriers to treatment. Promoting optimal bladder health may reduce the personal, societal and economic impact of bladder conditions, including anxiety and depression and costs associated with conditions or diseases and their treatment. While adopting healthy bladder habits and behaviors and behaviors may improve or maintain bladder health, it is important to recognize that certain symptoms may indicate the presence of conditions that require medical attention; many bladder conditions are treatable with a range of options for most bladder conditions. Lastly, the authors propose clinical directives based on persuasive and convergent research to improve and maintain bladder health. The authors hope that this statement will lead to promotion and achievement of optimal bladder health, which may improve overall health and help minimize the effects of bladder conditions on the public, healthcare professionals, educators, employers, and payors. The advisors are in consensus regarding the recommendations for improving and maintaining bladder health presented herein.

This study assessed the effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the bioavailability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine. Forty-four healthy volunteers received each of 4 treatments in a 4-period crossover design. The treatments consisted of osmotically controlled extended-release oxybutynin chloride tablets at 10 mg/d or extended-release tolterodine tartrate capsules at 4 mg/d, with and without preceding treatment with 20 mg omeprazole daily for 4 days. Blood samples collected predose and at scheduled time points for 36 hours postdose were analyzed for oxybutynin and its active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, or tolterodine and its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite, as appropriate. The AUCinfinity ratios for oxybutynin and its metabolite with and without prior omeprazole fell within the 80% to 125% range (accepted as the criterion for bioequivalence), as did those for tolterodine and its active moiety. The peak concentration ratios for oxybutynin and metabolite also conformed to this range; those for tolterodine did not. Increasing gastric pH with omeprazole does not substantially alter the pharmacokinetic properties of extended-release oxybutynin but may alter those of extended-release tolterodine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left untreated, this under-recognized condition places patients at increased risk for medical complications and adversely affects their quality of life. Medical therapy in conjunction with behavioral modification is a reasonable first-line option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the continued effectiveness and safety of the eCoin Implantable Tibial Nerve Stimulator system (ITNS) for urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). The 1-year pivotal study was extended through 2 years. The ITNS is a novel and recently FDA-approved therapy., Methods: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial was conducted on 137 subjects with refractory UUI to evaluate eCoin ITNS therapy. A 3-day voiding diary was collected along with the OAB questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and a custom Likert scale on subject satisfaction. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of subjects who achieved at least 50% reduction from baseline in number of UUI episodes. The primary safety measure was device-related adverse events (AEs)., Results: Seventy-two subjects completed the 96-week evaluation. Around 78% (95% CI: 67%-87%) experienced at least 50% reduction in UUI episodes; 48% (95% CI, 36%-60%) experienced at least 75% reduction, and 22% (95% CI, 13%-33%) were dry on a 3-day diary. Subjects reported a decrease from baseline in their UUI episodes/day of 2.61 (SD 2.97) and 2.97 (SD 2.64) at 48 weeks and 96 weeks, respectively. Around 91.3% did not require additional medications for OAB. No serious or unanticipated AEs were reported in this extension phase., Conclusion: The eCoin ITNS demonstrated consistent continuing effectiveness and safety in treating OAB patients with UUI. The findings support it as an excellent treatment option for refractory patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr Vincent Lucente, Paid consultant to Sponsor; Study Investigator Funded by Sponsor; Stock Holder for Valencia Technologies; Dr Laura Giusto, Financial Relationship to Competitors-Proctor for Bluewind; Primary Investigator of Medtronic TITAN trial; Dr Scott MacDiarmid: Paid consultant to Sponsor; Study Investigator Funded by Sponsor; Stock Holder for Valencia Technologies., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The tibial nerve is an established target for neuromodulation in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) and its associated symptoms, including urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Technologies are currently available to deliver tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) through percutaneous devices or through implantable devices. The benefits and safety of percutaneous TNS have led to it as a guideline-recommended therapy. However, patient compliance is limited by the burden of weekly office visits and the need for maintenance treatments. Further, insurance often only covers a limited number of lifetime visits for percutaneous TNS. These factors and others have led to the development, study, and utilization of implantable TNS devices. Implantable TNS devices deliver the same therapeutic mechanism of action for nerve stimulation with a permanent implanted device that provides at-home stimulation rather than in-office therapy delivery. Additionally, there is an added potential for dynamic and patient-centered stimulation. There is a large body of high-quality evidence published for TNS, including numerous randomized controlled trials published on percutaneous TNS which have consistently demonstrated superior efficacy to sham and similar efficacy to that of anticholinergic medications. Percutaneous TNS also performs better than conservative therapy including pelvic floor muscle training. The percutaneous and implantable approaches deliver nerve stimulation to the same target nerve, using the same mechanism of action. Therefore, data from randomized trials of percutaneous TNS are informative for implantable TNS devices. At the time of this article's publication, at least two implantable TNS devices have received marketing authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The objective of this review is to discuss the mechanism of action for TNS and summarize the published literature from clinical trials of percutaneous TNS as a foundation of high-quality evidence for implantable devices targeting the tibial nerve., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Aims: In studies utilizing a 20-injection-site paradigm of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for overactive bladder (OAB), some patients performed clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). An alternative injection paradigm of fewer injections targeting the lower bladder may reduce the need for CIC by maintaining upper bladder function. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an unapproved alternative 10-injection-site paradigm targeting the lower bladder., Methods: In this phase 4, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with OAB and urinary incontinence (UI) for ≥6 months with ≥3 episodes of urinary urgency incontinence (no more than 1 UI-free day) and ≥8 micturitions per day over 3 days during screening were randomized 2:1 to onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U or placebo injected at 10 sites in the lower bladder., Results: Of 120 patients, 78 in the onabotulinumtoxinA group and 39 in the placebo group had efficacy assessments. In the double-blind phase, mean change from baseline at week 12 in daily frequency of UI episodes was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA (-2.9) versus placebo (-0.3) (least squares mean difference [LSMD]: -2.99, p < 0.0001). Achievement of 100% (odds ratio [OR]: 6.15 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.75-50.37]), ≥75% (OR: 7.25 [2.00-26.29]), and ≥50% improvement (OR: 4.79 [1.87-12.28]) from baseline in UI episodes was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo. Reductions from baseline in the daily average number of micturitions (LSMD: -2.24, p < 0.0001), nocturia (LSMD: -0.71, p = 0.0004), and urgency (LSMD: -2.56, p < 0.0001) were greater with onabotulinumtoxinA than with placebo. Treatment benefit was improved or greatly improved in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (74.0% of patients) versus placebo (17.6%) (OR: 13.03 [95% CI: 3.23-52.57]). Mean change from baseline in Incontinence Quality of Life score was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (LSMD: 24.2, p = 0.0012). Two of 78 (2.6%) patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA group used CIC during the double-blind period; no females used CIC during the double-blind period. Commonly reported adverse events (≥5%) were urinary tract infection (UTI), dysuria, and productive cough for both groups; rate of UTI was higher with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo., Conclusion: In patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA for OAB with UI, an unapproved alternative injection paradigm targeting the lower bladder demonstrated efficacy over placebo, with a low incidence of CIC., (© 2023 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: The eCoin (Valencia Technologies Corporation, Valencia, CA) is a battery-powered, nickel-sized and shaped neuromodulation device for the treatment of overactive bladder, and it is implanted in the lower leg in a short office or outpatient procedure under local anesthesia. A follow-on trial was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of eCoin reimplantation., Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, open-label study, including 23 participants with refractory urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) who were previously participants in the eCoin clinical feasibility trial. This follow-on study was conducted at 7 sites in the United States and New Zealand. Participants were reimplanted with a new eCoin device and activated after 4 weeks. Bladder diary data and validated quality-of-life instruments, collected at 12 weeks and 24 weeks postactivation, were compared with baseline., Results: Participants of the study were considered responders if they reported a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in episodes of UUI on a 3-day voiding diary. At 12 weeks of treatment, 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52%-90%) of participants were considered responders. At 24 weeks of treatment, 82% (95% CI, 60%-95%) of participants were considered responders with 36% (95% CI, 20%-57%) of participants achieving complete continence. There were no device-related serious adverse events reported during the study., Conclusions: The reimplantation of eCoin was both safe and effective in treating UUI associated with overactive bladder syndrome. The demonstrated significant reduction or resolution of symptoms with no serious safety concern suggests that eCoin is a convenient and maintainable therapeutic device., Competing Interests: B.K. declares that he serves as a consultant for Valencia Technologies, was an investigator on this Valencia-sponsored clinical trial, and owns minor equity interest in the company. S.K.S. declares that he has been compensated as a consultant for Valencia Technologies, and owns stock options representing less than 0.01% of the company. The remaining authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest. The authors who own a minor equity interest in the company constitute a very small percentage; all authors constitute less than 0.1% of the company. Furthermore, this potential conflict of interest was addressed according to the recommendations of the local and central IRBs including: (i) Having a statement in the informed consent stating the PI own a minority stake, and disclosing the potential conflict of interest for which the participant has to sign. (ii) The data collected for this study come from a voiding diary and quality of life questionnaires, which are filled out by the participants. The PIs and Clinical Research Coordinators (CRCs) were not allowed to revise or write on these forms. If any formatting edits were made, the participants were asked to change and initial the change themselves. (iii) Clinical Research Coordinators had no conflict of interest and they were the individuals who scanned and sent the raw data., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the eCoin - a nickel-sized, primary battery-powered, neuromodulation device for the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence which is implanted in the lower leg in a 20-minute procedure under local anesthesia. A feasibility clinical trial was conducted and the results after 1 year of treatment with the eCoin are presented., Methods: A total of 46 participants with refractory urgency urinary incontinence were included in this prospective, single-arm, open-label study. This study was conducted at 7 sites in the United States and New Zealand. Participants in this study were implanted with the eCoin in the lower leg over the tibial nerve and activated after 4 weeks. Bladder diary data and validated quality-of-life instruments, collected at 3, 6, and 12 months' post-activation, were compared to baseline values., Results: Responders were defined as those who had a ≥50% reduction in reported episodes of urgency urinary incontinence. At 12 months', 65% of participants were considered responders with 26% of participants achieving complete continence. The median number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes per day decreased from 4.2 at baseline to 1.7 at 12 months'. Seventy percent of participants reported feeling "better", "much better", or "very much better" on the Likert 7-point maximum scale. One participant experienced a related serious adverse event., Conclusion: The eCoin is a safe and effective treatment for urgency urinary incontinence associated with overactive bladder syndrome, with significant reduction or complete resolution of symptoms and no significant safety concerns., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Many stroke survivors are eligible for sight impairment (SI) registration from a chronic visual impairment (VI). The literature and clinical experience show that some individuals who meet the criteria for registration either decline or are not offered registration. The aim of this Orthoptic stroke service review is to determine the reason for declining and whether the individuals feel supported without registration and to recommend service changes to improve the certification process. A service evaluation of stroke survivors who had declined SI registration was undertaken. All those with a diagnosis of stroke, a full Orthoptic assessment, a period of monitoring and were discharged between September 2017 and August 2019 were identified. . Fifty-four stroke survivors were eligible to be registered SI at their last appointment; 31 (57%) were not offered registration for reasons including end of life care. Of the remaining 23s, 14 proceeded with SI registration and nine declined. Four who declined were excluded (44%), as two were registered at a subsequent ophthalmology appointment, two were inappropriate to contact. A telephone interview was undertaken with the remaining five individuals. Of the five stroke survivors that were contacted, three (60%) recalled declining SI registration at their last appointment. All felt they were given enough information to aid their decision. Reasons given for declining registration included not accepting the VI, hoping for recovery and having enough support. The individuals felt they were still able to access services and were happy to remain unregistered. The remaining two stroke survivors could not recall being offered SI registration and subsequently requested to be registered following the telephone call. Of those individuals who initially declined registration, two (40%) decided to proceed with registration following the telephone interview. Although numbers are small it is worth considering a post discharge telephone consultation to stroke survivors who decline registration.

Purpose: We performed a clinical feasibility trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fully implanted, primary battery powered, nickel sized and shaped neuromodulation device called the eCoin® for tibial nerve stimulation to treat refractory urgency urinary incontinence., Materials and Methods: This prospective, single arm, open label study included 46 participants with refractory urgency urinary incontinence. It was performed at multiple sites in the United States and New Zealand. The device was implanted in the lower leg over the tibial nerve and activated after 4 weeks. Bladder diary data and validated quality of life instruments were collected 3 and 6 months after activation and compared to baseline values., Results: The mean ± SD age of participants was 63.4 ± 11.5 years and 45 (98%) were female. Episodes of urgency urinary incontinence were reduced a relative median of 71% after 3 months of treatment (4.2 vs 1.7 daily episodes at 3 months, p = 0.001). A 50% or greater decrease in reported episodes of urgency urinary incontinence was observed in 32 of 46 participants (69.6%) at 3 months with more than 20% dry at 3 and 6 months. I-QOL (Incontinence Quality of Life) scores improved an average of 25.9 points and 33 of 46 patients (72%) indicated improvement in symptoms. A single serious adverse event secondary to wound care resolved with intravenous antibiotics., Conclusions: The implantable neuromodulation device was a safe and effective treatment of urgency urinary incontinence associated with overactive bladder syndrome with a significant reduction or resolution of symptoms and no significant safety concerns.

Objective: Previous randomized controlled trials have reported a 6.1-6.9% incidence of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA in non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB) patients who were inadequately managed by ≥1 anticholinergic. A multi-center retrospective chart review assessed the real-world rate of voiding dysfunction requiring catheterization., Methods: Patients received onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (approved dose) administered by experienced injectors between January 2013 and June 2015. Patients using CIC or an indwelling catheter for ≥24 hours for voiding dysfunction prior to onabotulinumtoxinA injections were excluded. The primary outcome was post-treatment CIC (lasting >24 hours; per individual physician's clinical judgment considering patient's voiding symptoms, post-void residual [PVR] urine volumes and patient bother). Potential baseline predictors of CIC (history of pelvic prolapse, cystocele, diabetes, PVR urine volume and age) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression., Results: Overall, 299 patients received their first treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U. Mean age was 66.4 years; 98.3% were female. The incidence of CIC was 2.7% in the total study population after the first treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA. The de novo CIC rate in treatments 2 and 3 combined was similarly low (3.2%). None of the evaluated baseline characteristics were significant predictors of CIC initiation due to the low CIC incidence., Conclusions: This real-world study of non-neurogenic OAB patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA suggests that the CIC rate is lower than the rates reported in previous studies. There were no significant correlations between baseline predictors and CIC initiation, although statistical significance may not have been reached because of the low incidence of CIC.