Search

Objectives: Recreational swimming/diving is among the most common physical activities in US children and a significant cause of morbidity across the United States. This study updates the national epidemiology of diving-related injuries., Methods: The Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was queried for patients aged 0 to 19 from 2008 to 2020 who presented to any of the 100 National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-participating emergency departments for a diving-related injury. Dive characteristics such as dive height, dive skill, dive direction, and dive sequence were determined from case narratives., Results: A total of 1202 cases were identified for analysis corresponding to a total national estimate of 37,387 diving related injuries during the period from 2008 to 2020 and a national incidence of 3.6 injuries per 100,000 population. Males accounted for 64% of injuries. The average yearly incidences of injury in the 10 to 14 and 15 to 19 age groups were identical at 5.8 per 100,000. Contact with the diving board or platform was the most common cause of injury (34%). Diving backwards or attempting a flip or handstand dive were associated with increased odds of sustaining an injury resulting from contact with the diving board or platform (odds ratio, 16.0 and 6.9, respectively). In 2020, the incidence of diving-related injury fell to 1.6 per 100,000 population., Conclusions: Diving injuries are common in children and adolescents, especially in boys aged 10 to 19. There was a significant reduction in diving-related injury corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Achilles tendon injuries are common in adults, and there is extensive literature describing the injury characteristics and treatment of these adult injuries. However, Achilles injuries are rare in the pediatric population and as a result, there is limited research reported on this age group. We therefore sought to characterize the injury presentation, treatment and outcomes for pediatric patients with partial and complete Achilles injuries., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients aged 0-18 treated for Achilles tendon injuries at 2 geographically distinct tertiary institutions between 2008 and 2021. Data collected included demographics, injury characteristics, and treatment course. Injury types were separated into 2 cohorts: traumatic Achilles injuries and ruptures due to muscular contraction. Traumatic injuries were further delineated into 2 injury mechanisms: open injuries related to penetrating trauma and closed injuries related to blunt trauma. Standard descriptive analyses were utilized to summarize findings., Results: Thirty-nine patients (43.6% female, median age 15 years) were identified, 29 (74.4%) of whom had complete tears. Twenty-five patients (64.1%) presented with traumatic injuries; among these, 48.0% (n=12/25) were ≤12 years. All patients ≤12 years sustained a traumatic injury. The most common traumatic mechanism was an open laceration due to penetrating trauma (68.0%), followed by closed ruptures associated with blunt trauma (32.0%). Fourteen patients (35.9%) presented with closed ruptures due to muscular contraction. Four patients (10.2%) had a prior history of clubfoot treated with Achilles tenotomy. Thirty-five patients (89.7%) were surgically treated with an open repair. The median immobilization period across all patients was 11 weeks (interquartile range: 10-12), starting most commonly with a posterior splint (46.2%) and concluding with a CAM boot (94.9%). Of patients with full follow-up data (n=22/39), all resumed normal activities, with a median clearance time of 6 months (interquartile range: 5-7.9)., Conclusions: We found that older adolescents (≥14 y) were more likely to rupture their Achilles tendon through a forceful muscular contraction, whereas younger patients (≤12 y) were more likely to injure their Achilles via a traumatic mechanism. Most patients were treated operatively and returned to sports at a median time of 6 months. A further prospective study is warranted to better characterize treatment protocols and patient outcomes in this population., Level of Evidence: Level-IV., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) has been increasingly used in the care of patients with geriatric hip fracture to reduce perioperative opiate use and the need for general anesthesia. However, the associated motor palsy may impair patients' ability to mobilize effectively after surgery and subsequently may increase latency to key mobility milestones postoperatively, as well as increase inpatient length of stay (LOS). The aim of this study was to investigate time-to-mobility milestones and length of hospital stay between peripheral, epidural, and general anesthesia., Methods: A retrospective review identified 1,351 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery for hip fracture between 2012 and 2018 at a single academic health system. Patients were excluded if baseline nonambulatory, restricted weight-bearing postoperatively, or sustained concomitant injuries precluding mobilization, with a final cohort of 1,013 patients. Time-to-event analyses for discharge and mobility milestones were assessed using univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses., Results: PNB was associated with delayed postoperative time to ambulation ( P < 0.001) and time to out-of-bed ( P = 0.029), along with increased LOS ( P < 0.001). Epidural anesthesia was associated with less delay to first out-of-bed ( P = 0.002), less delay to ambulation ( P = 0.001), and overall reduced length of stay ( P < 0.001)., Discussion: PNB was associated with slower mobilization and longer hospitalization while epidural anesthesia was associated with quicker mobilization and shorter hospital stays. Epidural anesthesia may be a preferable anesthesia choice in patients with geriatric hip fracture when possible., Level of Evidence: Level III., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Hypothesis: Regional anesthesia (RA) can be used to manage perioperative pain in the treatment of periarticular elbow fracture fixation. However, the opioid-sparing benefit is not well-characterized. The hypothesis of this study was that RA had reduced inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand in patients who had undergone periarticular elbow fracture surgery., Methods: This study retrospectively reviews inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand in all patients aged ≥18 years at a single Level I trauma center undergoing fixation of periarticular elbow (distal humerus and proximal forearm) fracture surgery (n=418 patients). In addition to RA vs. no RA, additional patient and operative characteristics were recorded. Unadjusted and adjusted models were constructed to evaluate the impact of RA and other factors on inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand., Results: Adjusted models demonstrated decreases in inpatient opioid consumption postoperation in patients with RA (13.7 estimated oxycodone 5-mg equivalents or OEs without RA vs. 10.4 OEs with RA from 0 to 24 hours postoperation, P = .003; 12.3 vs. 9.2 OEs from 24 to 48 hours postoperation, P = .045). Estimated cumulative outpatient opioid demand differed significantly in patients with RA (166.1 vs. 132.1 OEs to 6 weeks, P = .002; and 181 vs. 138.6 OEs to 90 days, P < .001)., Discussion: In proximal forearm and distal humerus fracture surgery, RA was associated with decreased inpatient and outpatient opioid demand after adjusting for baseline patient and treatment characteristics. These results encourage utilization of perioperative RA to reduce opioid use., (Copyright © 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Price transparency purports to help patients make high-value health care decisions, however, there is little data to support this. The pediatric distal radius buckle fracture (DRBF) has 2 equally efficacious but not equally priced treatment options (cast and splint), serving as an excellent potential model for studying price transparency. This study uses the DRBF model to assess the impact of up-front cost information on a family's treatment decisions when presented with clinically equivalent treatment options for a low-risk injury., Methods: Participants age 4 to 14 presenting with an acute DRBF to a hospital-based pediatric orthopaedic clinic were recruited for this randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into cost-informed or cost-blind cohorts. All families received standardized information about the injury and treatment options. Cost-informed families received additional cost information. Both groups were allowed to freely choose a treatment. Families were surveyed regarding their decision factors. Cost-blinded families were subsequently presented with the cost information and could change their decision. Independent samples t tests and χ2 tests were utilized to evaluate differences., Results: A total of 127 patients were enrolled (53% cost-informed, 47% cost-blind). The 2 groups did not significantly differ in demographics. Immobilization selection did not differ between groups, with 48% of the cost-informed families selecting the more expensive option (casting), compared with 47% of the cost-blind families. Cost was the least influential factor in the decision-making process according to participant survey, influencing only 9% of families. Only one family changed their decision after receiving cost information, from a splint to a cast., Conclusion: Families appear to be cost-insensitive when making medical treatment decisions for low-risk injuries for their child. Price transparency alone may not help families arrive at a decision to pursue high-value treatment in low-risk orthopaedic injuries., Level of Evidence: Level I., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are often treated with growth friendly devices such as vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib(VEPTR) and magnetically controlled growing rods(MCGR) to correct spinal deformity and improve pulmonary function. There is limited data on this topic, and the purpose of this study was to assess the effect of these constructs and the addition of chest wall support (CWS) on spinal deformity, thorax morphology and pulmonary outcomes., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included patients with chest wall deformity and scoliosis secondary to SMA who were treated with growth friendly interventions and had two-year follow-up. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were performed., Results: This study included 66 patients (25% MCGR, 73% VEPTR, 2% unknown). Approximately 23% of constructs included CWS. The average Cobb angle improved from 67° (SD: 27°) to 50° (SD: 26°) at 2 years in patients with CWS (p = 0.02), and from 59° (SD: 20°) to 46° (SD: 15°) at 2 years in patients without CWS (p < 0.01). Hemithorax height improved in patients treated with and without CWS (p = 0.01), but hemithorax width only improved in patients with CWS (p = 0.01). One patient with CWS and two patients without CWS required additional respiratory support at 2 years. The rates of postoperative complications were not significantly different in patients treated with and without CWS (p = 0.31)., Conclusions: Growth friendly constructs improve spinal deformity and may be effective in altering the progression toward respiratory failure in patients with SMA. Patients treated with CWS have significant improvements in thorax morphology compared to patients without CWS.

Study Design: It is a retrospective cohort study., Objectives: To compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of serial body casting for infantile idiopathic scoliosis (IIS) with versus without the use of general anesthesia (GA). Serial body casting for IIS has traditionally been performed under GA. However, reports of neurotoxic effects of anesthetics in young children have prompted physicians to consider instead performing these procedures while patients are awake and distracted by electronic devices., Methods: Patients from a multicenter registry who underwent serial casting for IIS were included. The patients were divided into asleep (GA) and awake (no GA) cohorts. Comparisons were made between pre-casting, first in-cast, and post-casting radiographic measures in each cohort. The rates of successful casting (≥ 10° major CA improvement), curve progression, and incidence of casting abandonment for surgical intervention were also compared., Results: One-hundred and twenty-one patients who underwent serial casting for IIS were included. Ninety-two (76%) patients were asleep during casting procedures, while 29 (24%) were awake. Patients in the awake cohort were older (p < 0.01), had a lower BMI (p = 0.03), and more severe curve magnitudes (p < 0.01) at baseline. Patients in the awake cohort experienced greater first-in-cast correction of the major curve (p = 0.01) and improvement in thoracic spine height (p < 0.01). The rate of casting success was higher in the awake cohort (72%) as compared to the asleep cohort (48%) (p = 0.02), although the rate of curve progression (worsening) was similar (p = 0.880). Lastly, there was a lower rate of conversion to surgery at 2 years post-initiation of casting, although this was not statistically significant (0% vs. 8%; p = 0.126)., Conclusions: Patients who underwent awake serial casting had similar radiographic outcomes as compared to those who were under general anesthesia during the procedures. Thus, awake casting may provide a safe and effective alternative to the use of general anesthesia in patients with idiopathic infantile scoliosis., Level of Evidence: III.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine risk factors for infection among EOS patients treated by rib-based distraction instrumentation, and to further assess the incidence of infection among C-EOS categories and sub-types. Despite the heterogonous nature of early onset scoliosis, the classification of early onset scoliosis (C-EOS) has proven to have excellent reliability across its major categories. C-EOS's reliability has been verified; however, little data exist on the utility of this categorization in clinical decision-making and risk assessment., Methods: After institutional review board approval, data for EOS patients treated by rib-based distraction instrumentation were collected between 2013 and 2017 in a single institution. Data collection included: major categories of early onset scoliosis classification (etiology, major curve and kyphosis), BMI, height, weight, procedure type, site of procedure, presence of tracheostomy, and bowel/urinary incontinence., Results: 156 EOS patients underwent 843 rib-based distraction instrumentation procedures. 22.4% of patients (35/156 patients, 42 procedures) developed infections, 30/35 requiring irrigation and debridement. Type of procedure was significantly associated with infection rate, with rib-based distraction instrumentation insertion corresponding with the highest incidence of infection, as compared to instrumentation revisions or expansions (p = 0.006). Infection rates were also more common in shorter and lighter weight children (p = 0.001 and 0.03; respectively). Patients with a neuromuscular etiology had the highest rate of infection in comparison to congenital, syndromic, and idiopathic (5.7% vs, 4.9%, 4.7%, and 2.6%; respectively). Notably, high infection rates occurred neuromuscular hyper-kyphotic subjects (M+), occurring in all major curve C-EOS subgroups and at a rate of 8.3% for all procedures., Conclusion: Neuromuscular, larger magnitude major curve, and larger magnitude kyphotic angle C-EOS categories appear to be at a higher risk of infection. Such information potentiates the usefulness of C-EOS in surgical decision-making and in the informed consent process., Level of Evidence: Level III therapeutic.

Background: Adolescent athletes who sustain an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear have significantly reduced activity levels during recovery. Activity level is linked to body mass index (BMI); however, it is unclear how recovery from an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) affects relative BMI and whether these changes persist after return to activity., Hypothesis: Patients' BMI percentile will significantly increase after ACLR, but will trend toward baseline after return to activity., Study Design: Cross-sectional study., Level of Evidence: Level 3., Methods: A retrospective review of 666 pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent ACLR was performed. Body mass was assessed by evaluating change in BMI percentile at 8 standard-of-care time windows relative to BMI percentile at time of surgery. Linear regression and bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the effect of time window and other demographic factors on the change in BMI percentile. These analyses were rerun after dividing patients by clinical obesity categorization (underweight, normal, overweight, or obese) at time of surgery to assess the effect of preinjury body mass levels., Results: BMI percentile of all BMI categories tended to increase postoperatively, peaking 6 to 9 months after surgery, with a median increase of 1.83 percentile points. After this peak, BMI approached baseline but remained elevated at 0.95 percentile points 2 years postoperatively. Beginning 3 months after surgery, the normal-weight group had significantly larger changes in BMI percentile at each time window, peaking at 4.15 points above baseline at 9 months. This BMI increase among normal-weight patients persisted in the second postoperative year, with a median percentile increase of 2.63 points., Conclusion: Pediatric and adolescent patients, especially those with a normal BMI, undergo significant changes to their BMI during recovery from ACLR., Clinical Relevance: Patients' failure to return to their presurgical BMI percentile 2 years postoperatively suggests that ACLR may have long-reaching and often unappreciated effects on body mass.