Search

BackgroundResidents of nursing homes (NH) are at high risk of COVID-19 related morbidity and death and may respond poorly to vaccination because of old age and frequent comorbidities.MethodsForty residents and forty staff members either naïve or previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 were recruited in two NH in Belgium before immunization with two doses of 30µg BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine at day 0 and day 21. Binding antibodies (Ab) to SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD), spike domains S1 and S2, RBD Ab avidity, and neutralizing Ab against SARS-CoV-2 wild type and B.1.351 variant were assessed at days 0, 21, 28, and 49.ResultsSARS-CoV-2 naïve residents had lower Ab responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination than naïve staff. These poor responses involved lower levels of IgG to all domains of the vaccine antigen, lower avidity of RBD IgG, and lower levels of Ab neutralizing the vaccine strain. No naïve resident had detectable neutralizing Ab to the B.1.351 variant. High and comparable Ab responses were observed in residents and staff previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Clustering analysis revealed that poor vaccine responders not only included naïve residents but also naïve staff, emphasizing the heterogeneity of responses to mRNA vaccination in the general population.ConclusionsThe poor Ab responses to mRNA vaccination observed in infection naïve residents and in some naïve staff members of NH suggest suboptimal protection against breakthrough infection, especially with variants of concern. Adapted vaccination regimens may be needed to provide optimal protection against COVID-19 to vulnerable populations.SummaryPoor antibody responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination were observed in SARS-CoV-2 infection naïve residents and some naïve staff members of nursing homes. This suggests suboptimal protection against breakthrough infection, especially with variants of concern, and the need for adapted vaccination regimens.

Background Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Viruses (HTLV) type 1 and type 2 account for an estimated 5 to 10 million infections worldwide and are transmitted through breast feeding, sexual contacts and contaminated cellular blood components. HTLV-associated syndromes are considered as neglected diseases for which there are no vaccines or therapies available, making it particularly important to ensure the best possible diagnosis to enable proper counselling of infected persons and avoid secondary transmission. Although high quality antibody screening assays are available, currently available confirmatory tests are costly and have variable performance, with high rates of indeterminate and non-typable results reported in many regions of the world. The objective of this project was to develop and validate a new high-performance multiplex immunoassay for confirmation and discrimination of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 strains. Methodology/Principal findings The multiplex platform was used first as a tool to identify suitable antigens and in a second step for assay development. With data generated on over 400 HTLV-positive blood donors sourced from USA and French blood banks, we developed and validated a high-precision interpretation algorithm. The Multi-HTLV assay demonstrated very high performance for confirmation and strain discrimination with 100% sensitivity, 98.1% specificity and 100% of typing accuracy in validation samples. The assay can be interpreted either visually or automatically with a colorimetric image reader and custom algorithm, providing highly reliable results. Conclusions/Significance The newly developed Multi-HTLV is very competitive with currently used confirmatory assays and reduces considerably the number of indeterminate results. The multiparametric nature of the assay opens new avenues to study specific serological signatures of each patient, follow the evolution of infection, and explore utility for HTLV disease prognosis. Improving HTLV diagnostic testing will be critical to reduce transmission and to improve monitoring of seropositive patients., Author summary HTLV viruses are responsible for more than 10 million cases of infection worldwide. The infection is considered as a neglected disease due to lack of vaccines and treatments. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for counselling infected persons and prevention of secondary transmissions. In spite of the development of excellent serological screening assays, many cases of indeterminate and untyped results are still regularly reported and their infection status remain uncertain. To address the need of more precise diagnosis, we have developed a new cutting-edge in-vitro diagnostic confirmation test, named Multi-HTLV, which has been validated on a large panel of HTLV samples. The test is a multiplex immunoassay allowing powerful detection of antibodies against HTLV through combination of a set of selective and validated virus-specific antigens in a blood sample. The Multi-HTLV assay increases the reliability of HTLV diagnostics and strain typing thanks to a high precision mathematical algorithm.

Chagas disease, caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, affects more than 6 million people worldwide. Following a mostly asymptomatic acute phase, the disease progresses to a long-lasting chronic phase throughout which life-threatening disorders to the heart and/or gastrointestinal tract will manifest in about 30% of those chronically infected. During the chronic phase, the parasitemia is low and intermittent, while a high level of anti-T. cruzi antibodies persist for years. These two features hamper post-chemotherapeutic follow-up of patients with the tools available. The lack of biomarkers for timely assessment of therapeutic response discourages a greater use of the two available anti-parasitic drugs, and complicates the evaluation of new drugs in clinical trials. Herein, we investigated in a blinded case-control study the serological reactivity over time of a group of parasite-derived antigens to potentially address follow up of T. cruzi chronically infected subjects after treatment. We tested PFR2, KMP11, HSP70, 3973, F29 and the InfYnity multiplexed antigenic array, by means of serological assays on a multi-national retrospective collection of samples. Some of the antigens exhibited promising results, underscoring the need for further studies to determine their potential role as treatment response biomarkers.

Summary Background Assessment of therapeutic response with standard serological diagnostic assays in patients with chronic Chagas disease is a major challenge due to the long persistence of parasite-specific antibodies. The current consensus for parasitological cure is to monitor conversion from positive to negative Trypanosoma cruzi serology (seroreversion). However, because of robust humoral immune response, seroreversion by standard serological tests can take years to decades. Developing novel tests of parasitological cure or surrogates is thus a priority in the Chagas disease field. We aimed to evaluate the MultiCruzi assay as a predictive tool for parasitological cure in a cohort of treated infants and children with acute and chronic Chagas disease enrolled in a long-term retrospective longitudinal study with clinical, serological, and parasitological follow-up, and to explore whether MultiCruzi could predict parasitological cure more quickly than the current reference method. Methods Patients from two retrospective paediatric Chagas disease cohort studies with clinical, serological, and parasitological follow-up, diagnosed and treated at the parasitology service, Hospital de Ninos Ricardo Gutierrez (Buenos Aires, Argentina) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Serum samples were collected every 6 months to 12 months between Oct 22, 1990, and June 3, 2019, for cohort 1 and 1 month after birth for cohort 2 and then every 3 months for a year between July 23, 2012, and April 19, 2016. We evaluated serological follow-up with the Chagatest ELISA (Wiener Lab, Rosario, Argentina) and used this as a clinical reference method for the evaluation of seroreversion. We compared Chagatest ELISA results with results of MultiCruzi (InfYnity Biomarkers, Lyon, France), a novel antibody profiling multiplex assay, investigating seroreversion events with both of the assays and prediction of seroreversion with MultiCruzi using an interpretation formula. Findings Combining experimental data from discrete analysis of 15 T cruzi antigens efficiently predicted seroreversion at an early stage, which was later confirmed by conventional T cruzi serology. In cohort 1 (n=69), which included children of three different age groups, we observed differences 2 years after therapy. In the 27 individuals from cohort 1 who were treated within the first 12 months of age, MultiCruzi predicted early seroreversion in 21 (78%) patients whereas nine (33%) patients showed seroreversion with Chagatest ELISA (seroreversion difference 0·44, 95% CI 0·26–0·63; p=0·0005). In the 12 patients from cohort 1 treated between 1 year and 2 years of age, MultiCruzi predicted early seroreversion in six (50%) patients, whereas only one (8%) patient was confirmed to be seronegative with Chagatest ELISA (seroreversion difference 0·42, 95% CI 0·14–0·70; p=0·0253). In the 30 patients from cohort 1 who were treated between 2 years and 19 years of age, MultiCruzi predicted early seroreversion in five (6%) patients, whereas no patients were found to be seronegative with Chagatest ELISA (seroreversion difference 0·17, 0·03–0·30; p=0·0253). In cohort 2 (n=27), which included only children younger than 1 year of age and had a shorter follow up (between 5 months and 32 months), the proportion of reported events was significantly different 180 days after treatment for the T cruzi-positive group (early seroreversion predicted in nine [90%] of ten patients with MultiCruzi and confirmed seroreversion in four [40%] of ten patients with Chagatest ELISA; seroreversion difference 0·50, 95% CI 0·19–0·81; p=0·0253) and for the T cruzi-negative group 90 days (early seroreversion predicted in five [29%] of 17 patients with MultiCruzi and confirmed seroreversion in one [6%] of 17 patients with Chagatest ELISA; seroreversion difference 0·24, 0·03–0·44; p=0·0455) and 180 days (early seroreversion predicted in 17 [100%] of 17 patients with MultiCruzi and confirmed seroreversion only in seven [41%] of 17 patients with Chagatest ELISA; seroreversion difference 0·59, 0·35–0·82; p=0·0016) after treatment. Interpretation The MultiCruzi assay can be used as a predictive monitoring tool to assess parasitological cure in children. This approach might be a solution to forecast forthcoming seroreversion in treated adults infected with T cruzi, but this requires further investigation. Funding Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative. Translations For the Spanish, Portuguese and French translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

descripción no proporcionada por scopus, ISGlobal work is supported by the Departament d’Universitats i Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain (AGAUR; 017SGR00924) and by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) RICET Network for Cooperative Research in Tropical Diseases (ISCIII; RD16/0027/0004 - PI1290) and FEDER. MJP research is supported by the Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia (PERIS 2016-2010 SLT008/18/00132). ICA, JG, and FT are supported by the grant number U01AI129783 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH). ICA is also partly supported by the grant number 5U54MD007592 from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), NIH. MCL and MCT were supported by ISCIII RICET grant RD16/0027/0005 - PI1290 and FEDER and by grants SAF2016-81003-R and SAF2016-80998-R from the Spanish “Programa Estatal I+D+i (MINECO)”. AA's work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health “Fondi Ricerca Corrente - Linea 3, progetto 9” to IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital. JR was supported by CONACyT Fossis grant #261006. The Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) is grateful to its donors, public and private, who have provided funding to DNDi since its inception in 2003. A full list of DNDi's donors can be found at http://www.dndi.org/donate/donors/. FIND is grateful to its donors, public and private, who have helped bring innovative new diagnostics for diseases of poverty. A full list of FIND’s donors can be found at: https://www.finddx.org/partners-donors/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Patients infected by Trypanosoma cruzi are typically diagnosed by detecting specific antibodies in serological assays. Persistence of the parasitic infection increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. There are indications that anti-parasitic therapies help to reduce these risks when comparing treated and untreated populations. However, at present, treatment efficacy cannot be properly evaluated on an individual patient basis by available laboratory methods. To monitor parasite clearance, it is essential to change the paradigm of serological methods: analyzing the broad spectrum of antibody diversity is more informative about clinical status than conventional serology tests designed merely for global detection of antibodies.

Background Trypanosoma cruzi parasite, the causative agent of Chagas disease, infects about six million individuals in more than 20 countries. Monitoring parasite persistence in infected individuals is of utmost importance to develop and evaluate treatments to control the disease. Routine screening for infected human individuals is achieved by serological assays; PCR testing to monitor spontaneous or therapy-induced parasitological cure has limitations due to the low and fluctuating parasitic load in circulating blood. The aim of the present study is to evaluate a newly developed antibody profiling assay as an indirect method to assess parasite persistence based on waning of antibodies following spontaneous or therapy-induced clearance of the infection. Methodology/Principal findings We designed a multiplex serology assay, an array of fifteen optimized T. cruzi antigens, to evaluate antibody diversity in 1654 serum samples from chronic Chagas patients. One specific antibody response (antibody 3, Ab3) showed a strong correlation with T. cruzi parasite persistence as determined by T. cruzi PCR positive results. High and sustained Ab3 signal was strongly associated with PCR positivity in untreated patients, whereas significant decline in Ab3 signals was observed in BZN-treated patients who cleared parasitemia based on blood PCR results. Conclusion/Significance Ab3 is a new surrogate biomarker that strongly correlates with parasite persistence in chronic and benznidazole-treated Chagas patients. We hypothesize that Ab3 is induced and maintained by incessant stimulation of the immune system by tissue-based and shed parasites that are not consistently detectable by blood based PCR techniques. Hence, a simple immunoassay measurement of Ab3 could be beneficial for monitoring the infectious status of seropositive patients., Author summary Chagas disease is a zoonosis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi infection. In this study, we sought to identify a simple serologic biomarker that can supersede PCR techniques in characterizing patients for parasite persistence, whether circulating or shielding in tissues. A multiparametric assay was designed to evaluate antibody diversity in untreated and benznidazole-treated chronic cardiomyopathy patients. Out of 15 different antigens we identified a distinct antibody specificity that strongly correlates with parasite persistence. This putative biomarker could be used to monitor active infection in T. cruzi seropositive patients and identify patients that responded to anti-parasitic therapy.

Antibodies named TcCRA "Trypanosoma cruzi Cross Reactive Antibodies" were detected in 47% of blood donors from French population unexposed to the parasite. In order to evaluate the passive or active transmissibility of TcCRA and further characterize its role and etiology, we have conducted a study in a cohort of 47 patients who underwent allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations (allo-HSCT). Donors and recipients were tested for TcCRA prior to transplantation. Recipients were further tested during follow-up after transplantation. Demographical, clinical and biological data were collected. Our primary end-point was to assess the risk of TcCRA acquisition after transplantation. During this initial analysis, we observed no seroconversion in patients receiving cells from TcCRA negative donors (n = 23) but detected seroconversion in 4 out of 24 patients who received hematopoietic stem cells from positive donors. Here, we are discussing possible scenarios to explain TcCRA-immune status in recipient after transplantation. ispartof: PLoS One vol:10 issue:9 ispartof: location:United States status: published

The commercially available diagnostic tests for syphilis are mostly based on the use of extracted antigens of Treponema pallidum . Pronounced cross-reactivities with other spirochete antigens are often reported. The aim of this study was to validate a novel multiparametric assay (the assay performed with the kit) INNO-LIA Syphilis for the confirmation of syphilis antibodies in a set of 840 documented human serum samples. All serum samples were previously tested at the French World Health Organization reference center for venereal diseases (Institute Alfred Fournier, Paris, France), with a consensus result provided for each sample. The study was conducted in two phases, with each phase involving a validation set (500 well-documented serum samples) and an exploratory set (340 serum samples) of serum samples, respectively. By measuring the sensitivity and specificity, we compared the result of the new assay with the consensus result on the basis of the results of a variable number of classical serological methods and clinical information when available. A sensitivity of 99.6% (95% confidence internal [CI], 98.5 to 99.9%) and a specificity of 99.5% (95% CI, 98.1 to 99.9%) were found for the new line immunoassay. Six of seven samples with indeterminate results by classical serology tested positive with the INNO-LIA Syphilis kit. This single multiparametric assay provides reliable confirmatory diagnostic information that must currently be obtained by the performance and interpretation of results of a combination of serological assays.

The present study evaluated a new confirmatory assay for antibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 and 2 (HTLV-1 and HTLV-2) proteins performed with serum samples from various commercial sources. The new test is a line immunoassay (LIA) with a nylon membrane sensitized with the most relevant antigens of HTLVs: the envelope gp46 and gp21 as well as the gag p24 and p19 antigens, represented by either recombinant proteins or synthetic peptides. A total of 176 serum or plasma samples were tested, of which 66 were HTLV-1 positive, 72 were HTLV-2 positive, and 38 were HTLV negative; of the 38 HTLV-negative samples 23 were indeterminate by Western blotting (WB). Serially diluted samples ( n = 33) from HTLV-1- and HTLV-2-infected patients were also analyzed to determine the sensitivity of the new assay. The new confirmatory assay (INNO-LIA HTLV) performed markedly better than WB assays for those samples reactive by screening. Accurate confirmation of the presence of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 antibodies and accurate discrimination of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 antibodies were obtained for all the HTLV-seropositive samples. Due to its enhanced specificity and sensitivity, the new assay not only improves the ability to confirm and discriminate HTLV infections but also eliminates the vast majority of WB-indeterminate and false-positive specimens.

International audience; Cross-reactive antibodies are characterized by their recognition of antigens that are different from the trigger immunogen. This happens when the similarity between two different antigenic determinants becomes adequate enough to enable a specific binding with such cross-reactive antibodies. In the present manuscript, we report the presence, at an "abnormal" high frequency, of antibodies in blood samples from French human subjects cross-reacting with a synthetic-peptide antigen derived from a Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) protein sequence. As the vector of T. cruzi is virtually confined to South America, the parasite is unlikely to be the trigger immunogen of the cross-reactive antibodies detected in France. At present, the cross-reactive antibodies are measured by using an in-house ELISA method that employs the T. cruzi -peptide antigen. However, to underline their cross-reactive characteristics, we called these antibodies "Trypanosoma cruzi Cross Reactive Antibodies" or TcCRA. To validate their cross-reactive nature, these antibodies were affinity-purified from plasma of healthy blood donor and were then shown to specifically react with the T. cruzi parasite by immunofluorescence. Seroprevalence of TcCRA was estimated at 45% in serum samples of French blood donors while the same peptide-antigen reacts with about 96% of T. cruzi -infected Brazilian individuals. In addition, we compared the serology of TcCRA to other serologies such as HSV 1/2, EBV, HHV-6, CMV, VZV, adenovirus, parvovirus B19, mumps virus, rubella virus, respiratory syncytial virus, measles and enterovirus. No association was identified to any of the tested viruses. Furthermore, we tested sera from different age groups for TcCRA and found a progressive acquisition starting from early childhood. Our findings show a large seroprevalence of cross-reactive antibodies to a well-defined T. cruzi antigen and suggest they are induced by a widely spread immunogen, acquired from childhood. The etiology of TcCRA and their clinical relevance still need to be investigated.

A CTL antigenic site located between residues 273 and 291 of the E1 envelope protein of RV was identified by 51 Cr-release assays employing SPs. Two E1-specific CTL clones were examined for immune recognition of RV wild-type and attenuated vaccine strains and recombinant E1 protein. The exact sequence (273–284) recognized by both clones was delineated by using truncated and overlapping SPs covering these residues. The defined T-cell site overlapped almost completely with a virus neutralizing antibody-binding site previously identified with mouse monoclonal and human antibodies. A series of single aa-substituted SP analogues of E1(273–284) was used to define residues critical for T-cell recognition. Using EBV-Bl displaying different HLA-DR haplotypes and -DR4 subtypes as targets to determine MHC class II restriction elements, immune recognition by both T-cell clones was shown to be associated with HLA-DR4. Three HLA-DR4 subtypes (DR4Dw 13A, DR4Dw13B, and DR4KT2) sharing a common residue, glutamic acid at position 74 in their β 1 chains, were able to present SP E1(273–284) to the T-cell clones.

OBJECTIVES--Immune recognition of the major structural proteins of rubella virus by peripheral blood mononuclear cells and synovial inflammatory infiltrates of a patient with documented chronic rubella associated arthritis was compared with responses of normal healthy rubella virus immunoreactive subjects to establish if there were unusual response patterns associated with rubella associated arthritis in this subject. METHODS--Synthetic peptides (16-33 amino acids in length) representing selected amino acid sequences of the rubella virus envelope (E1 and E2) and capsid (C) proteins were used in lymphocyte stimulation assays with peripheral blood mononuclear cells or synovial inflammatory infiltrates to determine T lymphocyte recognition of antigenic sites within the synthetic peptides. A rubella virus specific polymerase chain reaction was used to determine the persistence of rubella virus in the patient's cells. RESULTS--The patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed abnormally increased lymphoproliferative responses to three E1 synthetic peptides encompassing residues 219-234, 389-411, and 462-481, and one E2 synthetic peptide containing the sequence 50-72, of which the last three were predicted to contain T cell antigenic sites. Although the patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed positive proliferative responses to C synthetic peptides, these were not unusual. The number of synthetic peptides within the E1, E2, and C panels recognised by the patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells was greater than was previously observed in normal healthy subjects. The recognition of synthetic peptides by synovial inflammatory infiltrates was similar to peripheral blood mononuclear cells but the responses measured were lower. The polymerase chain reaction was negative for rubella virus detection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and synovial inflammatory infiltrates. CONCLUSIONS--Abnormally increased T cell recognition of antigenic sites within rubella virus E1 and E2 proteins observed in this patient with rubella associated arthritis suggests chronic antigenaemia due to persistent rubella virus in tissue sites other than peripheral blood mononuclear cells or synovial inflammatory infiltrates.

Relatively large (16-33 aa) synthetic peptides (SPs) representing defined sequences of rubella virus (RV) E1 and E2 envelope proteins were used in lymphocyte stimulation and enzyme immunoassays to map immunoreactive regions recognized by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) and serum antibodies from healthy RV-seropositive, RV-seronegative, and RV-vaccinated adults. Five distinct immunoreactive regions were identified in RV E1 protein, spanning residues (11-39), (154-179), (199-239), (226-277), and (389-412), which stimulated cellular responses in 29-83% of the subjects tested. Two SPs, E1(213-239) and E1(258-277) containing previously-identified virus neutralizing antibody domains, reacted with serum antibodies and also stimulated lymphoproliferation suggesting that these E1 sequences contain linked or overlapping B-and T-cell antigenic sites. The frequency and magnitude of cellular responses to E2 SPs were somewhat lower. SPs encompassing E2 residues (50-72), (140-199), and (244-263) stimulated lymphocyte responses in 28-64% of the subjects tested, while to a lesser degree, SPs within residues (1-36) were also stimulatory. E2 SPs within the regions (1-36), (151-170), and (244-263) also showed low levels of antibody reactivity with sera from RV-seropositive subjects. E2(244-263) which induced the highest level of response among the E2 SPs tested, was of interest due to previous reports of sequence homology of this RV region with human myelin and its potential immunopathogenic role in demyelinating autoimmune diseases. Identification of these potentially immunodominant regions of RV envelope proteins is an important first step in the rational design of new RV vaccines.

A total of 250 human serum samples were tested for rubella virus immunoglobulin G antibodies by two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), one using whole rubella virus antigen and the other based on the use of synthetic peptide antigen. The samples were taken from 125 volunteers before and after their immunization with the RA 27/3 rubella vaccine. This study indicates that a synthetic peptide-based EIA can favorably replace current viral lysate-based EIAs to detect rubella virus antibodies following immunization. Because the synthetic peptide used in this newly developed EIA represents a putative neutralization epitope of the rubella virus, it could also be instrumental in determining rubella immune status and in assessing vaccine program efficiency.

This work reports a comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using two major Treponema pallidum recombinant antigens with a T. pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) assay and a nontreponemal Venereal Disease Reference Laboratory (VDRL) test. A total of 1,822 normal donor serum samples was tested for cardiolipin and T. pallidum antibodies, respectively, by the VDRL assay and EIA. Among these samples, 440 were further tested by TPHA technology. Four samples were found positive by EIA, while all were reported to be negative by both TPHA and VDRL routine assays. Subsequent testing of EIA-positive samples confirmed 100% (four of four samples) and 25% (one of four samples) positive results, respectively, by immunofluorescence assay and a Western blot (immunoblot) syphilis kit. The sensitivity of the recombinant EIA was estimated at virtually 100% with a reference panel of 50 syphilitic samples. According to this study, the newly developed EIA kit shows 100% sensitivity combined to a specificity greater than 99.8% for detecting treponemal immunoglobulin G antibodies in blood bank syphilis screening.

HCVs constitute a genus within the Flaviviridae, with closest homology to the hepatitis G and GB viruses, and Pestiviruses. The positive-stranded RNA genome encodes at least nine proteins. Core, El, and E2 constitute the structural proteins; NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B are nonstructural (NS) proteins. HCV isolates display high levels of sequence heterogeneity allowing classification into at least 11 types and 90 subtypes (1). HCV infection of the human liver is often clinically benign, with mild icterus in the acute phase, the disease may even go unnoticed in some cases of acute resolving hepatitis C. In the majority (>70%) of cases, however, HCV infection leads to chronic persistent or active infection, often with complications of liver cirrhosis and auto-immune disorders. Hepatocellular carcinoma may occur after about 20-35 yr (2); sometimes even without the intermediate phase of cirrhosis. No prophylaxis is available today and treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-α) only leads to long-term resolution in about 4-36% of treated cases, depending on the HCV genotype (1).

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a new confirmatory test for treponemal antibodies, INNO-LIA Syphilis (Innogenetics NV, Ghent, Belgium), on a large number of sera from a clinical laboratory. This multiparameter line immunoassay (LIA) uses recombinant and synthetic polypeptide antigens derived from Treponema pallidum proteins. In a single-blinded cross-sectional retrospective study, 289 seronegative sera, 219 seropositive sera, and 23 sera with an indeterminate serological status for syphilis were analyzed. All sera were tested by the T. pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA), the immunoglobulin (IgG)-fluorescent T. pallidum absorption assay (IgG-FTA-ABS), and the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test. In addition, some seropositive samples were analyzed by the 19S-IgM-FTA-ABS test, an enzyme immunoassay (IgM-EIA), and the MarDx immunoblotting assay. Based on a consensus diagnosis derived from conventional serology, all of the sera were classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate, and the results were compared with the findings of the INNO-LIA Syphilis assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the LIA were 100% (219 of 219) and 99.3% (286 of 288), respectively. Compared to TPHA and IgG-FTA-ABS, the new test gave a significantly higher number ( P = 0.021 and P < 0.0001, respectively) of correct results than either of the other two tests. The multiparameter INNO-LIA Syphilis assay is a useful confirmatory test for syphilis because it increases the reliability of syphilis diagnosis with respect to current conventional techniques.

BACKGROUND: The transfusion of contaminated blood has become the major route of transmission for Chagas' disease in Brazil. Current screening tests are insensitive and yield conflicting results, while confirmatory assays do not exist. A line immunoassay (INNO-LIA Chagas Ab [INNO-LIA]) combining relevant, immunodominant recombinant and synthetic antigens on a single nylon membrane strip was evaluated for the serologic confirmation of Chagas' disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera from 1062 patients and healthy residents of four Brazilian regions endemic for Chagas' disease were used for test optimization. The established confirmation algorithm was evaluated with an independent set of positive (n = 75) and negative (n = 148) samples. RESULTS: In the optimization phase, without an established comparative gold standard, the results with the INNO-LIA were compared with those obtained in four other screening assays. In the validation phase, the INNO-LIA showed a sensitivity of 100 percent (95% CI, 95.21-100) and a specificity of 99.32 percent (95% CI, 96.29-99.98) for well-characterized sera. Moreover, its specificity reached 100 percent with a set of 40 sera obtained from patients with documented leishmaniasis. The interpretation criteria defined in this study indicated that the INNO-LIA accurately detected the presence of antibodies to various specific antigens of Trypanosoma cruzi. CONCLUSION: The INNO-LIA Chagas Ab assay may become the first commercial assay to reliably confirm the presence of antibodies to T. cruzi.

We have evaluated a new serological confirmatory test (INNO-LIA HTLV I/II Ab [INNO-LIA]) for human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) using a large collection of samples from Brazilian blood donors (São Paulo region) and compared the results with those obtained by Western blotting (WB) tests (WB2.3 and WB2.4). Blood donations were initially screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on viral lysates, and repeatedly reactive samples were further tested by WB2.3. When available, samples were also tested by PCR, two additional ELISAs based on recombinant antigens (recombinant ELISAs), a new-generation WB assay (WB2.4), and the INNO-LIA. Of the 18,169 samples tested, 292 (1.61%) were repeatedly reactive in the ELISAs (viral lysate based) and were further tested by WB2.3; 97 were positive (19 that were typed as HTLV type I [HTLV-I], 12 that were typed as HTLV type II [HTLV-II], and 66 that were nontypeable), 17 were negative, and 178 had indeterminate results. Of the samples with indeterminate results, 172 were tested by INNO-LIA, which could resolve 153 samples as negative. Regarding the positive samples, WB2.3 and INNO-LIA produced concordant results for all HTLV-I-positive samples, whereas for HTLV-II they agreed for 10 of 12 samples; the 2 samples with discordant results were considered to be positive for HTLV-II by WB with WB2.3 but negative for HTLV-II by INNO-LIA and the two recombinant ELISAs. Furthermore, of the 66 nontypeable samples, 60 underwent testing by INNO-LIA; 54 turned out to be negative by the latter test as well as by recombinant ELISAs. In conclusion, the new serological confirmatory assay for HTLV (INNO-LIA HTLV I/II Ab) resolved the results for the majority of the indeterminate and positive-untypeable samples frequently observed by WB assays.

The influence of single amino acid substitutions within a rubella E1 protein T-cell epitope, E1(273-284) on T-cell recognition was studied. Substitutions of an uncharged amino acid A for an E or for a T and substitution of a T for S were found to not significantly reduce the T-cell responses. However, substitution of a charged residue such as E for hydrophobic residues (I, V, or W); D for Q; or a relatively larger size amino acid for polar residues completely abolished the cytotoxicities mediated by E1(273-284)-specific T-cell clone. A set of single amino acid-substituted peptide analogs of E1(273-284) not eliciting cytotoxicity of the T-cell clone was used to test the influence of point mutation of the epitope on HLA DR restrictions. A panel of B-cell lines with different DR4 subtypes was used as targets in cytotoxicity assays to determine the restrictive HLA molecules. Results showed that modification of the T-cell epitope by point mutation could reverse the HLA DR restriction from one allele to other alleles. A model based on these results has been proposed to explain the mechanism balancing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) polymorphism in outbred populations.

The influence of glutamic acid (E)-alanine (A) dimorphism at position 74 of the DR4 beta chain on cytotoxic T cell recognition of an antigenic rubella virus peptide, E1(273-284), was studied using a panel of B cell lines and B cell transfectants expressing different HLA-DRB1 alleles as antigen-presenting cells and targets in 51Cr-release assays. Only B cell lines expressing the DRB1*0403, DRB1*0406 or DRB1*0407 subtypes which shared a residue, E, at position 74 in the DR4 beta chain when sensitized with E1(273-284) elicited strong cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. However, in direct binding and antibody inhibition assays, it was shown that biotinylated E1(272-285) could bind to DR molecules with residues other than E at position 74, including DRB1*0401, DRB1*0404 and DRB1*1101 expressed on transfectants. E1(272-285) bound with similar affinity to the transfectant with DRB1*0403, which has E at position 74, as well as the transfectant with DRB1*0404, which does not. When T-B cell engagement rates were compared in cell conjugate assays, the percentage of T-B conjugates was higher when peptide-pulsed transfectants with DRB1*0403 were used than with transfectants expressing DRB1*0404. Hence, the HLA DR beta 1 polymorphism at position 74, while not critical for the binding affinity of E1(272-285) to the HLA molecule, appears to be a primary determinant of restricted recognition and subsequent activation of the peptide-specific T cells.

Rubella virus (RV)-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies were studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques in sera from RV (RA 27/3)-vaccinated individuals, patients experiencing natural RV infection, congenital rubella syndrome patients, and individuals failing to respond to repeated RV immunization. Results obtained by using whole-RV ELISAs (detergent-solubilized M33 strain or intact Gilchrist strain) and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and neutralization (NT) assays were compared with results obtained with the same sera by using ELISAs employing a synthetic peptide, BCH-178, representing a putative neutralization domain on the RV E1 protein. Murine RV E1-specific monoclonal antibodies with HAI and NT activities exhibited strong reactivity in ELISAs with BCH-178 peptide. In sera from RA 27/3-vaccinated individuals collected at 0 (prevaccine), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, and 24 to 52 weeks postvaccine, the development of E1-peptide-reactive antibodies closely paralleled increases in RV-specific antibodies measured by whole-RV ELISAs and HAI and NT assays. Similarly, sequential serum samples obtained from patients during acute and convalescent phases of natural RV infection showed a coordinate increase in RV-specific antibodies as measured by whole-RV and peptide ELISAs. Conversely, congenital rubella syndrome patient sera, although exhibiting high levels of antibody in whole-RV ELISAs, had little or no antibody directed to the neutralization domain peptide. Sera from patients failing to respond to repeated RV immunization contained very low levels of RV-specific antibody in all ELISAs. Our results that the sequence represented by BCH-178 peptide may be a previously unidentified neutralization epitope for human antibodies on the RV E1 protein and may prove useful in determining effective RV immunity.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using biotinylated avian antibodies has been developed for the detection of rheumatoid factors (RF) of various isotypes in human sera. The avian antibodies were obtained from the egg yolks of hens immunized with human IgA, IgG and IgM and were purified by affinity chromatography. These reagents made it possible to detect each of the three isotypes of RF present in the same serum and avoided false positives since the Fc epitopes of avian immunoglobulins are not recognized by the antibody combining site of RF.

Egg-yolk immunoglobulins extracted from the eggs of hens immunized with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have been used as a reagent in double sandwich ELISA for detecting RSV in nasal secretions. The sensitivity of virus detection was the same in indirect ELISA, using rabbit anti chicken globulin conjugate, as when biotinylated yolk globulin and labeled avidin were used for detection. The specificity of ELISA for detecting RSV using yolk antibody was similar to that achieved by indirect immunofluorescence using commercial reagents of mammalian origin. Purified immunoglobulin was easily extracted from egg yolk; the amount of globulin present in a single preparation obtained from a batch of ten eggs was sufficient to carry out 10(6) ELISA tests for RSV detection.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using biotinylated human IgG for the detection of rheumatoid factor (RF) in human sera has been developed. This assay avoids some of the problems encountered with earlier ELISA methods used for RF detection. Accurate RF titers of human sera were determined using a simple computer program developed for curve fitting of ELISA data.

Rubella virus (RV)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were studied in military recruits undergoing unselected immunization with live attenuated measles, mumps, and rubella virus (MMR) vaccine. Three different whole-RV enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and an epitope-specific EIA with a synthetic peptide (BCH-178c) representing a heutralization domain on the RV E1 envelope protein were used. Before vaccination, 84.2, 87.7, and 84.5% of the subjects tested (n = 399) were found to be seropositive (> 10 IU/ml or assay equivalent) by the three whole-RV EIAs, respectively, while only 82.5% were seropositive by the BCH-178c EIA. Although prevaccination seropositivity rates were similar for the whole-RV EIAs (sensitivity, 94 to 100%), many sera considered seropositive by the whole-RV EIAs had E1 peptide EIA antibody levels of < 10 IU/ml (sensitivity, 77.4 to 80.7%). One month after vaccination, 97.8, 97.2, and 93.5% of the subjects who were followed (n = 356) were seropositive by the three whole-RV EIAs, respectively, while 89% had BCH-178c peptide-specific IgG titers of > 10 IU/ml. After vaccination, depending on the assay used, up to 20.6% of initially seropositive individuals exhibited a greater than fourfold increase in RV-specific IgG, while up to 47.3% showed a greater than twofold increase. Increased antibody titers after vaccination (seroboosting) were most frequently associated with low levels of BCH-178c peptide-specific IgG before vaccination. RV protein-specific IgG was also studied by immunoblot assays in a subset (n = 56) of individuals receiving the MMR vaccine. Of these, 89.4 and 91.1% exhibited RV protein (E1, E2, and C protein)-specific IgG before and after vaccination, respectively. Seroboosting (two- to fourfold increase in EIA titers of individuals seropositive by the whole-RV EIA before vaccination) was usually accompanied by a shift in the IgG immunoblot pattern from a single (E1) to multiple (E1-E1, E1-C, or E1-E2-C) specificities, suggesting exposure of new epitopes as a result of viral replication.

Although screening for Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies is mandatory in most South American countries, current tests are insensitive and have poor specificity. A recently optimized line immunoassay (the INNO-LIA Chagas assay) for the serological confirmation of Chagas' disease was evaluated at a large blood bank in São Paulo, Brazil. Sera from blood donors who reacted in at least one of three serological screening assays ( n = 1,604) and who returned for a follow-up were retested, and the donors were interviewed to assess their epidemiological risk. The results obtained by the confirmatory assay evaluated in this study were compared to those obtained by the three different screening assays. Upon consideration of the consensus results obtained by the three different screening assays as a “gold standard,” the INNO-LIA Chagas assay showed a sensitivity of 99.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.3 to 99.9) and a specificity of 98.1% (95% CI, 96.6 to 99.0) for positive ( n = 503) and negative ( n = 577) sera. The INNO-LIA Chagas assay confirmed the results for significantly larger numbers of positive samples of at-risk individuals independent of the number of positive screening tests ( P = 0.017, Mantel-Haenszel test). In conclusion, the INNO-LIA Chagas assay reliably confirmed the presence of antibodies to T. cruzi and can be implemented as a confirmatory assay for Chagas' disease serology.