Search

Objective To summarize the clinical reasons for failing to perform the second stage of operation after the first stage of operation of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and to explore the risk factors affecting the second stage of operation. Methods A sectional-cross study was conducted on 62 patients (54 males and 8 females, age: 49.1±10.4) with liver tumors who were continuously treated with ALPPS from October 2013 to December 2021. The patients were divided into the second stage of operation group and the non-second-stage operation group according to whether they accepted the second stage of operation or not. The clinical reasons why patients were failing to have the second stage of operation were collected. The data of patients, including the tumor diameter, clinical stages, Child-Pugh score, liver separation mode, liver function (levels of transaminase, bilirubin and albumin) in the preoperative and postoperative of first stage operation period, and complications were analyzed. Results Among the 62 patients, 45 patients successfully underwent the second stage of operation, and 17 patients failed to accept the second stage of operation, accounting for 27.4%. Among the patients who failed to accept the second stage of operation, there were 2 cases in the open ALPPS group, 11 cases in the radiofrequency assisted ALPPS (RALPS) group, and 4 cases in the laparoscopic ALPPS group. The difference of maximum tumor diameter and the formation of portal vein tumor thrombus was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of liver function, the differences in the level of albumin and total bilirubin tested before the first stage of operation and the level of aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin tested after the first stage of operation were statistically significant(P < 0.05). Pulmonary inflammation, pleural effusion and ascites were common complications of the first stage operation. There was significant difference between the 2 groups in complications of ascites of the first stage of operation(P < 0.05). There was significant difference in the incidence of complications(≥grade Ⅲ) between the 2 groups (P < 0.001). The clinical causes that patients failed to accepted the second stage of operation were no obvious liver hyperplasia, insufficient future liver remnant volume (FLRV), poor liver function and hepatic reserve function, complications and progression of tumor. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk factors affecting the second stage of operation were the maximum tumor diameter, the formation of tumor thrombus and the grade of complications of the first stage operation. Conclusion ALPPS should be selected carefully for patients with large tumor and portal vein thrombosis.

Background: The optimal occlusion and reperfusion time to balance blood loss and ischemia–reperfusion injury to the remnant liver remains unclear. The aim was to explore the clinical impact of prolonging the hepatic hilum occlusion time from 15 to 20 min using the intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) combined with controlled low central venous pressure (CLCVP). Methods: A total of 151 patients were included and divided into an experimental group (Group 20,75 cases) and a control group (Group 15,76 cases). In both groups, the hepatic hilum was blocked by the IPM combined with CLCVP to control intraoperative hepatic cross-sectional bleeding. The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters and safety were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative aminotransferase serum levels (p > 0.05). However, the operation time in Group 20 was significantly lower than that in Group 15 (222.4 ± 87.8 vs. 250.7 ± 94.5 min, p < 0.05). The procalcitonin at 1 day after operation in Group 20 was lower than that at 1 day after operation in Group 15 (0.78 ± 0.66 vs. 1.45 ± 1.33 ng/mL, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, postoperative bile leakage and postoperative infection between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis B cirrhosis, it is feasible and safe to prolong the hepatic hilum occlusion time from 15 to 20 min using the IPM combined with CLCVP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the long‐term efficacy of no‐touch radiofrequency ablation (NT‐RFA) for treating single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) less than 3 cm. Methods: A total of 331 patients with HCC less than 3 cm undergoing RFA in Southwest Hospital from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into NT‐RFA group (n = 113) and conventional RFA (C‐RFA) group (n = 218). The survival rate, local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) of the two groups were calculated and compared. Results: A significant difference was observed in ablation range (p = 0.000) and safety margin (p = 0.000) between the two groups. The 1‐, 2‐, 3‐, 4‐and 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates in NT‐RFA and C‐RFA group were 99.12%, 93.73%, 76.18%, 57.00%, 45.17% and 99.08%, 89.91%, 71.26%, 54.28%, 41.77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.281). The 1‐, 2‐, 3‐, 4‐and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) rates in NT‐RFA and C‐RFA group were 78.51%, 52.59%, 41.02%, 34.36%, 30.92% and 68.81%, 44.95%, 30.88%, 23.73%, 22.88%, respectively. The two groups differed significantly (p = 0.044). The 1‐, 3‐and 5‐year LTP‐free survival rates in NT‐RFA and C‐RFA group were 87.12%, 74.99%, 72.32% and 75.75%, 65.52%, 65.52%, respectively. The two groups also differed significantly (p = 0.024). Furthermore, the RFS rates of D ≤ 2 cm subgroups in NT‐RFA and C‐RFA groups differed significantly (p = 0.037), while the RFS rates of 2 cm < D ≤ 3 cm subgroups in two groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.578). Conclusions: The RFS rates of single HCC less than 3 cm treated by NT‐RFA was significantly higher than that of C‐RFA. Due to a larger ablation range and safety margin, NT‐RFA could significantly reduce LTP and improve RFS. Dual‐electrode NT‐RFA can significantly improve the RFS rate of patients with HCC less than 2 cm, but there is no obvious advantage compared with C‐RFA in the treatment of HCC over 2 cm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the short- and long-term treatment outcomes of open radiofrequency ablation combined with splenectomy and pericardial devascularization versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism. During the study period, the treatment outcomes of consecutive HCC patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism who underwent open radiofrequency ablation, splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (the study group) were compared with the treatment outcomes of a case-matched control group of HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation. The study group consisted of 32 patients, and the control group comprised 32 patients selected from 155 patients who were case-matched by tumor size, age, gender, MELD sore, tumor location, TNM classification, degree of splenomegaly and Child–Pugh staging. Baseline data on preoperative laboratory tests and tumor characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The mean follow-up was 43.2 ± 5.3 months and 44.9 ± 5.8 months for the study and control groups, respectively. Although the disease-free survival rates of the control group were better than those of the study group (P < 0.001), there was no significant difference in the cumulative overall survival time or the incidence of portal vein thrombosis between the two groups (P = 0.670, 0.083). Compared with the control group, the study group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, and lower incidences of postoperative pleural effusion and pneumonia (all P < 0.05). Open radiofrequency ablation, splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for small HCCs with portal hypertension and hypersplenism can be an alternative therapy for a subset of carefully selected patients under the shortage of liver donors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

No-touch combined directed perfusion radiofrequency ablation (NTDP-RFA) is a new technique for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of this new technique for the treatment of small HCC with cirrhosis. From January 2017 to March 2018, 56 consecutive patients treated with NTDP-RFA at our center were enrolled in this retrospective study. All NTDP-RFA procedures involved the use of internally cooled wet electrodes with a directional injection function, which can perform both intraelectrode cooling and extraelectrode saline perfusion. Survival curves were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess predictors of tumor progression and overall survival. Operative characteristics and complications were also assessed. No technical failure occurred, and the complete ablation rate after single NTDP-RFA treatment was 98.2%. The median tumor diameter and ablation time were 26 (18.0 − 28.0) mm and 8 (6 – 8) min, respectively. Mild complications occurred in five patients (8.9%) postoperatively, and the median hospital stay was 4 (4 − 5) days. In the 18 patients (32.1%) with poor liver function reserve (indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min > 15%, their liver function returned to normal on the third day after the postoperation. The 1- and 2-year local and distant progression rates were 1.7%, 7.1%, 3.5% and 10.7%, respectively. NTDP-RFA in the treatment of small HCC with cirrhosis has a low incidence of complications and provides a high survival rate without local tumor progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]