Search

This study aims to measure the shielding effect of a novel tungsten rubber sheet (TRS) on the exposure of male gonads to ionizing radiation during upper abdominal and abdominal plus pelvic computed tomography (CT) examinations. The air kerma at the gonad with and without shielding was measured using an anthropomorphic body phantom. Gonads were shielded using: (1) 360° wrap with TRS (0.5-mm thick) and (2) 180° wrap with TRS. The air kerma at a position of male gonads in a pelvic scan was 21.8 mGy, even when the gonads were in the off-axis range. The TRS reduced the dose to the male gonads in abdominal plus pelvic CT examinations by 61% and 38% for the 360° and 180° TRS wrap, respectively.

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical performance and the effect on dose distribution and deliverability of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for prostate cancer created with the commercial knowledge-based planning (KBP) system (RapidPlan™). Materials and Methods: Three institutions, A, B, and C were enrolled in this study. Each institution established and trained a KBP model with their own cases. CT data and structures for 45 patients at institution B were utilized to validate the dose-volume parameters (D(2(%)), D(95(%),) and D(98(%)) for target, and V(50(%)), V(75(%),) and V(90(%)) for rectum and bladder), and the following mechanical performance parameters and gamma passing rates of each KBP model: leaf sequence variability (LSV), aperture area variability (AAV), total monitor unit (MU), modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv), MU/control point (CP), aperture area (AA)/CP, and MU×AA/CP. Results: Significant differences (p95% for all cases in each institution. Dose distribution and mechanical performance significantly differed between the three models. Conclusion: Each KBP model had different dose distributions and mechanical performance but could create an acceptable plan for deliverability regardless of mechanical performance.

In this study, we aim to clarify the dosimetric characteristics of a real time variable shape rubber containing tungsten (STR) as a thin bolus in 6-MV photon radiotherapy. The percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles (irradiation field = 10 × 10 cm2) in the water-equivalent phantom were measured and compared between no bolus, a commercial 5-mm gel bolus, and 0.5-, 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses. The characteristics of the PDDs were evaluated according to relative doses at 1 mm depth (D1mm) and depth of maximum dose (dmax). To determine the distance of the shift caused by the STR bolus, the PDD value at a depth of 100 mm without a bolus was obtained. For each STR thickness, the difference between the depth corresponding to this PDD value and 100 mm was calculated. The penumbra size and width of the 50% dose were evaluated using lateral dose profiles. The D1mm with no bolus, 5-mm gel bolus, and 0.5-, 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses were 47.6%, 91.5%, 78.2%, 86.6%, 89.3%, and 89.4%, respectively, and the respective dmax values were 15, 10, 13, 12, 11, and 10 mm. The shifting distance of the 0.5-, 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses were 2.7, 4.4, 4.8, and 4.9 mm, respectively. There were no differences for those in lateral dose profiles. The 1-mm-thick STR thin bolus shifted the depth dose profile by 4.4 mm and could be used as a customized bolus for photon radiotherapy.

Dosimetric potential of knowledge-based RapidPlan planning model trained with HyperArc plans (Model-HA) for brain metastases has not been reported. We developed a Model-HA and compared its performance with that of clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.From 67 clinical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) HyperArc plans for brain metastases, 47 plans were used to build and train a Model-HA. The other 20 clinical HyperArc plans were recalculated in RapidPlan system with Model-HA. The model performance was validated with the 20 plans by comparing dosimetric parameters for normal brain tissue between clinical plans and model-generated plans. The 20 clinical conventional VMAT-based SRS or stereotactic radiotherapy plans (CL-VMAT) were reoptimized with Model-HA (RP) and HyperArc system (HA), respectively. The dosimetric parameters were compared among three plans (CL-VMAT vs. RP vs. HA) in terms of planning target volume (PTV), normal brain excluding PTVs (Brain - PTV), brainstem, chiasm, and both optic nerves.In model validation, the optimization performance of Model-HA was comparable to that of HyperArc system. In comparison to CL-VMAT, there were no significant differences among three plans with respect to PTV coverage (p 0.17) and maximum dose for brainstem, chiasm, and optic nerves (p 0.40). RP provided significantly lower VThe Model-HA has the potential to significantly reduce the normal brain dose of the original VMAT plans for brain metastases.

To determine the thickness of a soft variable shape tungsten rubber (STR) as a lung compensating filter in total body irradiation.A tough water (TW) phantom and tough lung (TL) phantom were used as water and lung-equivalent phantoms. The TW with a thickness of 3 cm simulating the thoracic wall was used (upper layer). The TW or TL with a thickness from 1 to 15 cm (1 cm increments) was placed beneath the upper layer (middle layer). The TW with a thickness of 5 cm simulating the mediastinum was placed beneath the middle layer (lower layer), and a farmer ionization chamber was placed beneath this layer. The relative doses of a 10 MV X-rays were then measured. The TL was compensated in 1 mm increments from 1 to 11 mm of the STR, and the thickness of the STR at the same dose of TW (water equivalent) was obtained.The compensating ability of STR increased as the thickness of the TL increased, and an STR with a thickness of 1 mm reduced the dose by 2%-4%, depending on the thickness of lung. The STR thickness as an equivalent dose of TW per cm of TL was approximately linear, and the thickness was 0.62 mm/cm of TL.The STR can be used as a lung compensating filter for a water equivalent dose with 0.62 mm of STR per cm of lung.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the dose–volume parameters and regression scatter plots of the iteratively improved RapidPlan (RP) models, specific knowledge‐based planning (KBP) models, in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer over three periods. Methods A RP1 model was created from 47 clinical intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/VMAT plans. A RP2 model was created to exceed dosimetric goals which set as the mean values +1SD of the dose–volume parameters of RP1 (50 consecutive new clinical VMAT plans). A RP3 model was created with more strict dose constraints for organs at risks (OARs) than RP1 and RP2 models (50 consecutive anew clinical VMAT plans). Each RP model was validated against 30 validation plans (RP1, RP2, and RP3) that were not used for model configuration, and the dose–volume parameters were compared. The Cook's distances of regression scatterplots of each model were also evaluated. Results Significant differences (p

BACKGROUND/AIM We investigated the plan complexity of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with knowledge-based plan (KBP) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) with a single optimization and whether it could be used clinically. MATERIALS AND METHODS KBP model was configured using 55 consecutive OPC and nasopharyngeal cancer plans. Plan complexity as a characteristic of multileaf collimator (MLC) motion and γ pass rate (2%/2 mm criterion) were compared between clinical manual plan (CMP) and KBP for other 10 plans. RESULTS Plan complexity metrics that had significant differences (p

Purpose Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on a patient’s skin. Methods Electron beam profiles were acquired with the STR placed on a water‐equivalent phantom and low melting‐point alloy (LMA) placed at the applicator according to commonly used procedures (field sizes: 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters). Depth and lateral dose profiles for 6‐ and 12‐MeV electron beams were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and were benchmarked against film measurements. The width of the off‐axis distance between 80% and 20% doses (P 80‐20) and the maximum dose were obtained from the lateral dose profiles. Bremsstrahlung emission was analyzed by MC simulations at the depth of maximum dose (R 100). Results The depth dose profiles calculated by the MC simulations were consistently within 2% of the measurements. The P 80‐20 at R 100 for 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters were 4.0 mm vs. 7.6 mm (STR vs. LMA) and 4.5 mm vs. 9.2 mm, respectively, for the 6‐MeV electron beam with 7.0‐mm‐thick STR, and 2.7 mm vs. 5.6 mm and 4.5 mm vs. 7.1 mm, respectively, for the 12‐MeV electron beam with 12.0‐mm‐thick STR. A hotspot was not observed on the lateral dose profiles obtained with the STR at R 100. The bremsstrahlung emission under the region shielded by the STR was comparable to that obtained with the LMA, even though the STR was placed on the surface of the phantom. Conclusions Skin collimator with STR provided superior dosimetric characteristics and comparable bremsstrahlung emission to LMA collimator at the applicator. STR could be a new tool for the safe and efficient delivery of electron radiotherapy.

PURPOSE Knowledge-based planning (KBP) has disadvantages of high monitor unit (MU) and complex multi-leaf collimator (MLC) motion. We investigated the optimal aperture shape controller (ASC) level for the KBP to reduce these factors in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer. METHODS The KBP model was created based on 51 clinical plans (CPs) of patients who underwent the VMAT for prostate cancer. Another 10 CPs were selected randomly, and the KBPs with/without ASC, changed stepwise from very low (KBP-VL) to very high (KBP-VH), were performed with a single auto-optimization. The parameters of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and MLC performance metrics were evaluated. We obtained the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv), closed leaf score (CLS), small aperture score (SAS), leaf travel (LT), and total MU. RESULTS The ASC did not affect the DVH parameters negatively. The following comparisons of MLC performance were obtained (KBP vs. KBP-VL vs. KBP-VH, respectively): 0.25 vs. 0.27 vs. 0.30 (MCSv), 0.19 vs. 0.18 vs. 0.16 (CLS), 0.50 vs. 0.45 vs. 0.40 (SAS10 mm), 0.73 vs. 0.68 vs. 0.63 (SAS20 mm), 768.35 mm vs. 671.50 mm vs. 551.32 mm (LT), and 672.87 vs. 642.36 vs. 607.59 (MU). There were significant differences between KBP and KBP-VH for MCSv and LT (p

Background An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (LINAC) with a 6-MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam that contains representative information such as the percent depth dose, profile and output factor for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide information about the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF). Methods After mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference data (RD) and the measured data (MD). For good agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10 and 20 cm). The field size results from the RD were compared with the results from the MD using the same condition. Results All fitting curves show goodness of fit, R2, values that are greater than 0.99. The differences in field size between the RD and the MD were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The smallest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion Application of the SCF method has been proven to accurately capture the field size of the preconfigured RD and the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a countercheck methodology to determine the field size from RD in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes for clinical use of the Halcyon system.

Dosimetric evaluation and variation assessment were performed with two knowledge-based planning (KBP) models created at different periods for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer at five institutes. The first and second models (F- and S-models) for KBP were created before April 2017 and April 2019, respectively. The S-model was created using feedback plans from the F-model. Dose evaluation was compared between the two models using the same two computed tomography (CT) datasets and structures. The evaluation metrics were the dose received by 95.0% and 2.0% of the planning target volume (PTV); dose-volume parameters to the rectum and bladder as V90, V80, and V50; and monitor unit (MU). Dosimetric variation was compared by exporting estimated dose-volume histograms for each model to the Model Analytics website and assessing the organ at risk volume. There were no dosimetric differences between the two models for PTV. The V50 of the rectum in the S-model had improved compared to that of the F-model (case I: 49.3 ± 15.6 and 43.5 ± 15.2 [p = 0.08]; case II: 42.5 ± 16.9 and 36.0 ± 15.6 [p = 0.138]). The differences in other parameters were within ± 1.8% between the rectum and the bladder. The MU was slightly higher in the S-model than in the F-model, and dosimetric variation was reduced to the rectum and bladder among all the institutes. The polished S-model for KBP could be used for standardization of the plan quality and sharing of KBP models in VMAT for prostate cancer.

This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of reducing the imaging dose for image‐guided radiotherapy by using planar kilovoltage orthogonal imaging and fiducial markers (kV‐FM). We tested kilovoltage planar images under clinical imaging conditions for the pelvis (75 kVp, 200 mA, 50 ms) at a decreasing tube current (from 200 to 10 mA). Imaging doses were measured with a semiconductor detector. The visibility of the kV‐FM, aspects of image quality (spatial resolution, low contrast resolution), and the resultant image registration reproducibility were evaluated using various shapes (folded, linear, tadpole‐like) of fiducial markers containing 0.5% iron [Gold Anchor™ (GA); Naslund Medical AB, Huddinge, Sweden]. The GA phantom was created by placing these variously shaped GAs in an agar phantom. The imaging doses with 200 and 10 mA were approximately 0.74 and 0.04 mGy and they were correlated to the tube current (R2 = 0.999). Regardless of the marker’s shape, the GA phantom ensured visibility even when the tube current was reduced to the minimum value (10 mA). The low contrast resolution was gradually decreased at less than 50 mA, but the spatial resolution did not change. Although the auto‐registration function could not be used, manual‐registration could be achieved with an accuracy of within 1 mm, even when the imaging dose was reduced to 1/20 of the clinical imaging condition for the pelvis. When using the GA as the fiducial marker, the imaging dose could be reduced to 1/20 of that used clinically while maintaining the accuracy of manual‐registration using the kV‐FM for image‐guided radiotherapy of the pelvis.

Purpose This study performed the accurate measurements of beam profiles with a new rigid board, which was consistent with the supplied reference beam profiles (RBPs) for clinical Halcyon model. Methods Percentage depth doses (PDDs), lateral and diagonal dose profiles were measured and compared with RBPs. A water tank was set on the rigid board bridged Halcyon bore without sagging and source-to-surface distance was 90.0 cm. Field sizes were from 2.0 to 28.0 cm squares and depths of lateral and diagonal dose profiles were 1.3, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 cm. For the PDD, the depth of maximum dose (dmax), PDD value at depth of 10.0 cm (PDD10), and absolute dose difference (DD) between RBP and measured beam profiles (MBP) were evaluated. For lateral and diagonal dose profiles, DDs for the whole and divided areas (central, shoulder, and extended areas) defined by third derivative, and distance-to-agreement (DTA) in the penumbra area were evaluated. Results For PDDs, the differences of dmax and PDD10 and DD beyond the dmax were within 1.0 mm, 0.3%, and 1.0%, respectively. For lateral and diagonal dose profiles, the DDs reached approximately 5.0% in the whole area because of penumbra area, while the DDs in the central, shoulder, and extended areas were within 1.0%, 2.0%, and 1.0%, respectively. The DTAs in the penumbra area were within 0.8 mm. Conclusions The supplied RBPs can be used clinically owing to the good agreement with the accurate MBPs with rigid board.

This study investigates whether a novel tungsten-containing rubber shield could be used as substitute shielding material in interventional radiology to reduce the occupational exposure of operators to scattered radiation from a patient. The tungsten-containing rubber is a lead-free radiation-shielding material that contains as much as 90% tungsten powder by weight. Air kerma rates of scattered radiation from solid-plate phantoms, simulating a patient, were measured with a semiconductor dosimeter at the height of the operator's eye (1,600 mm from the floor), chest (1,300 mm), waist (1,000 mm), and knee (600 mm) with and without tungsten-containing rubber shielding (1-5 mm thickness). The tungsten-containing rubber and a commercial shielding material (RADPAD) were affixed onto the phantom on the operator's side, and reductions in air kerma rates were compared. Reduction rates for tungsten-containing rubber shielding with thicknesses of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm at each height level were as follows: 70.37 ± 0.40%, 72.17 ± 0.29%, 72.95 ± 0.31%, 72.58 ± 0.35%, and 73.63 ± 0.63% at eye level; 76.36 ± 0.19%, 77.13 ± 0.10%, 77.36 ± 0.14%, 77.62 ± 0.25%, and 77.66 ± 0.14% at chest level; 67.78 ± 0.31%, 68.12 ± 0.19%, 68.88 ± 0.28%, 68.97 ± 0.14%, and 68.85 ± 0.45% at waist level; and 0.14 ± 0.94%, 0.72 ± 0.56%, 1.08 ± 0.74%, 1.77 ± 0.80%, and 1.79 ± 1.82% at knee level, respectively. Reduction rates with RADPAD were 61.80 ± 0.67%, 60.33 ± 0.61%, 64.70 ± 0.25%, and 0.14 ± 0.66% at eye, chest, waist, and knee levels, respectively. The shielding ability of the 1 mm tungsten-containing rubber was superior to that of RADPAD. The tungsten-containing rubber could be employed to minimize an operator's radiation exposure instead of the commercial shielding material in interventional radiology.

The present study aimed to evaluate whether knowledge-based plans (KBP) from a single optimization could be used clinically, and to compare dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters and plan quality between KBP with (KBPCONST) and without (KBPORIG) manual objective constraints and clinical manual optimized (CMO) plans for pharyngeal cancer. KBPs were produced from a system trained on clinical plans from 55 patients with pharyngeal cancer who had undergone intensity-modulated radiation therapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). For another 15 patients, DVH parameters of KBPCONST and KBPORIG from a single optimization were compared with CMO plans with respect to the planning target volume (D98%, D50%, D2%), brainstem maximum dose (Dmax), spinal cord Dmax, parotid gland median and mean dose (Dmed and Dmean), monitor units and modulation complexity score for VMAT. The Dmax of spinal cord and brainstem and the Dmed and Dmean of ipsilateral parotid glands were unacceptably high for KBPORIG, although the KBPCONST DVH parameters met our goal for most patients. KBPCONST and CMO plans produced comparable DVH parameters. The monitor units of KBPCONST were significantly lower than those of the CMO plans (P

To clarify the dosimetric characteristics of a real-time variable shape rubber-containing tungsten (STR) bolus in a clinical plan and investigate the efficacy of the STR bolus in photon radiotherapy for keloids and other superficial tumors. A 5 mm gel bolus or 1 mm STR bolus was placed on a solid water phantom. Tangential irradiation was performed using a TomoTherapy Radixact-X9 and 6 MV X-ray flattening-filter-free beam, and the surface dose was measured with radiochromic film. Clinical-like plans (TomoDirect; TD and TomoHelical; TH) were applied with the same geometry and the dose distributions were measured. The increase in surface dose by the build-up effect and backscatter was 37.7% and 8.0% for the gel bolus, and 40.5% and 26.4% for the STR bolus, respectively. In the TD and TH plans, the increase in surface dose was 27.4% and 48.3% for the gel bolus, and 39.0% and 63.2% for the STR bolus. Similary, changes in the sagittal plane dose were - 3.9% and 6.1% for the gel bolus, and - 6.3% and 6.9% for the STR bolus. The STR bolus effectively increased the surface dose by the build-up effect and backscatter in photon radiotherapy for keloids and other superficial tumors.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of cleaned-up knowledge-based treatment planning (KBP) models on the plan quality for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Thirty prostate cancer VMAT plans were enrolled and evaluated according to four KBP modeling methods as follows: (1) model not cleaned – trained by fifty other clinical plans (KBPORIG); (2) cases cleaned by removing plans that did not meet all clinical goals of the dosimetric parameters, derived from dose–volume histogram (DVH) (KBPC-DVH); (3) cases cleaned outside the range of ±1 standard deviation through the principal component analysis regression plots (KBPC-REG); and (4) cases cleaned using both methods (2) and (3) (KBPC-ALL). Rectal and bladder structures in the training models numbered 34 and 48 for KBPC-DVH, 37 and 33 for KBPC-REG, and 26 and 33 for KBPC-ALL, respectively. The dosimetric parameters for each model with one-time auto-optimization were compared. Results: All KBP models improved target dose coverage and conformity and provided comparable sparing of organs at risks (rectal and bladder walls). There were no significant differences in plan quality among the KBP models. Nevertheless, only the KBPC-ALL model generated no cases of >1% V78 Gy (prescribed dose) to the rectal wall, whereas the KBPORIG, KBPC-DVH, and KBPC-REG models included two, four, and three cases, respectively, which were difficult to overcome with KBP because the planning target volume (PTV) and rectum regions overlapped. Conclusions: The cleaned-up KBP model based on DVH and regression plots improved plan quality in the PTV–rectum overlap region.

PURPOSE This study investigated the dosimetric characteristics of electron beams shaped with a real-time shapeable tungsten-containing rubber (STR) collimator. METHODS Circular irradiation fields of 40 mm diameter were shaped using STR or low melting-point alloy (LMA) placed on the electron applicator. The STR heated with approximately 70-degree warm water was molded into the template bottom of the applicator. Percent depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles of 6 and 12 MeV electron beams were measured and compared between STR and LMA. For the PDDs, the depths of maximum dose (dmax), 90% dose (d90), and 80% dose (d80) were evaluated. For the lateral dose profiles, penumbra as the width of the off-axis distance from 80% to 20% doses and treatment diameter covering over 90% dose were evaluated at the surface, dmax, d90, and d80. The transmission of the STR was also investigated at thicknesses fit to electron applicator for 6 and 12 MeV electron beams. RESULTS The STR was softened with 70-degree warm water. Therefore, it was easy to mold it and attach the applicator. The PDDs and penumbras at the surface, dmax, d90, and d80 for the STR were almost equal to those for the LMA with 6 and 12 MeV electron beams. The treatment diameters covering over 90% dose for the irradiation fields with 40 mm diameter at dmax (LMA vs. STR) were 20.9 vs. 21.1 mm and 19.2 vs. 18.4 mm for 6 and 12 MeV electron beams, respectively. The transmission of the STR was almost same as that of LMA. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric characteristics of the STR on the electron applicator were almost same as those of the LMA. The heated STR was shaped easily, flexibly, and immediately. The STR can be used as a substitute for LMA in electron radiotherapy.

This study aimed to clarify the inter-planner variation of plan quality in knowledge-based plans created by nine planners.Five hypofractionated prostate-only (HPO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans and five whole-pelvis (WP) VMAT plans were created by each planner using a knowledge-based planning (KBP) system. Nine planners were divided into three groups of three planners each: Senior, Junior, and Beginner. Single optimization with only priority modification for all objectives was performed to stay within the dose constraints. The coefficients of variation (CVs) for dosimetric parameters were evaluated, and a plan quality metric (PQM) was used to evaluate comprehensive plan quality.Lower CVs (0.05) were observed at dosimetric parameters in the planning target volume for both HPO and WP plans, while the CVs in the rectum and bladder for WP plans (0.91) were greater than those for HPO plans (0.17). The PQM values of HPO plans for Cases1-5 (average ± standard deviation) were 41.2 ± 7.1, 40.9 ± 5.6, and 39.9 ± 4.6 in the Senior, Junior, and Beginner groups, respectively. For the WP plans, the PQM values were 51.9 ± 6.3, 47.5 ± 4.3, and 40.0 ± 6.6, respectively. The number of clinically acceptable HPO and WP plans were 13/15 and 11/15 in the Senior group, 13/15 and 10/15 plans in the Junior group, and 8/15 and 2/15 plans in the Beginner group, respectively.Inter-planner variation in the plan quality with RapidPlan remains, especially for the complicated VMAT plans, due to planners' heuristics.

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate whether additional manual objectives are necessary for the RapidPlan (RP) with a single optimization. We conducted multi-institutional comparisons of plan quality for head and neck cancer (HNC) using the models created at each institute. Methods The ability of RP to produce acceptable plans for dose requirements was evaluated in two types of oropharynx cancers at five institutes in Japan. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans created without (RP plan) and with additional manual objectives (M-RP plan) were compared in terms of planning target volume (PTV), brainstem, spinal cord and parotid glands in dosimetric parameters. Results There were no major dosimetric PTV differences between RP and M-RP plans. For the brainstem and spinal cord in the RP plans, only 40% and 30% of the plans achieved the dose requirements, while the M-RP plans with upper objective added to volume 0% at all institutes achieved them for 90% of the plans. For the L-parotid gland, there was no difference in the RP and M-RP plans (both were 40%) in achieving the acceptable criteria. For the R-parotid gland, 60% and 80% of the RP and M-RP plans achieved the constraint criteria, and in terms of the achievement rate, the RP plans were relatively high. Conclusions M-RP plans did not require reoptimization; only an upper objective was needed for the brainstem and spinal cord, while the parotid gland dose was reduced in both RP plans with the auto generated line objectives alone.

Purpose The influence of the offset distance from treatment target to gantry isocenter (GIC) on the dosimetric parameter and irradiation time was investigated using TomoTherapy Methods The reference position was defined as the centers of both the I’mRT phantom and planning target volume (PTV) with a spherical of 4 cm diameter aligned with the GIC. The dose calculations were performed in two offset methods with 2 and 12 Gy/fr, Method 1. The PTV was moved from 0.0 to 12.5 cm along the RL direction and −5.0 to 5.0 cm along the AP direction (PTV offset), Method 2. The phantom was moved from 0.0 to −7.5 cm along the RL direction and −5.0 to 5.0 cm along the AP direction (Phantom offset). The maximum, minimum and mean doses, homogeneity index, conformity index, irradiation time, and monitor unit were compared. Results The irradiation times increased with increasing PTV offset. The increases in the irradiation time were 54.4% and 40.8% at PTV offsets of 12.5 cm along the RL direction for 2 and 12 Gy/fr, while the increases were 20.1% and 15.0% at a PTV offset of 5.0 cm along the AP direction. An increased irradiation time was not observed for the phantom offset. The offset didn’t affect the other parameters. Conclusions The PTV location offset of ≥5 cm from the GIC along the RL and AP axes increased the irradiation time; therefore, the PTV should be aligned with the GIC as much as possible to reduce the irradiation time on TomoTherapy.

Background/aim Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (grid therapy) can control some bulky tumors which is challenging for conventional radiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether a novel tungsten contained rubber (TCR) grid collimator can be employed in electron grid therapy. Materials and methods The TCR grid collimator placed on a solid water phantom, and percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles were measured for 9 MeV electron beam with Gafchromic EBT3 films. At the lateral dose profile, the ratios of the dose in the areas with and without shielding (valley-to-peak ratios) were evaluated. Results The dmax values with the 1, 2 and 3 mm TCR grid collimators were 1.2, 1.1 and 0.7 cm, respectively, while the valley-to-peak ratios at each dmax were 0.566, 0.412 and 0.293, respectively. Conclusion Only the 2 mm TCR grid collimator had adequate dosimetric features compared to the conventional grid collimator and could be substituted.

BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of the study was to investigate the dosimetric characteristics of electron beams with a tungsten functional paper (TFP) surface collimator. MATERIALS AND METHODS The circular field of 6.0 cm diameter was created with the TFP collimator put on the phantom. Depth and lateral dose profiles for 4 and 6 MeV electron beams were obtained. The characteristics of lateral dose profile, treatment diameter as width over 90% of the dose, and penumbra as width of the off-axis positions from 80% to 20% dose levels were evaluated. RESULTS Compared to the lead collimator, the TFP collimator generated higher surface doses, the treatment diameters were increased from 42.8 to 48.6 mm and from 40.0 to 41.4 mm, and the penumbras were reduced from 15.0 to 9.6 mm and from 16.4 to 13.0 mm for 4 and 6 MeV electron beams, respectively. CONCLUSION The TFP surface collimator can provide an excellent dose distribution compared to the conventional lead collimator.

In this study, we aim to clarify the dosimetric characteristics of a real time variable shape rubber containing tungsten (STR) as a thin bolus in 6-MV photon radiotherapy. The percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles (irradiation field = 10 × 10 cm2) in the water-equivalent phantom were measured and compared between no bolus, a conventional 5-mm gel bolus, and 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses. The characteristics of the PDDs were evaluated according to relative doses at 1 mm depth (D1mm) and depth of maximum dose (dmax). The water-equivalent thicknesses of the STR boluses were determined by shifting the distance of the PDD’s build-up curve until it overlaid that with no bolus. The penumbra size and width of the 50% dose were evaluated using lateral dose profiles. The D1mm with no bolus, 5-mm gel bolus, and 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses were 47.6%, 91.5%, 86.6%, 89.3%, and 89.4%, respectively, and the respective dmax values were 15, 10, 12, 11, and 10 mm. The water-equivalent thicknesses of the 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses were 4.4, 4.9, and 5.1 mm, respectively. There were no differences for those in lateral dose profiles. The 1-mm-thick STR thin bolus shifted the depth dose profile by 4.4 mm and could be used as a customized bolus for photon radiotherapy.

Purpose This study investigated whether real-time variable shape tungsten rubber (STR) could be applied for nail radiation protection in total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy. Methods Simulated finger phantoms were made from syringes filled with physiological saline of volumes 5, 10, 20, and 30 ml (inner diameters of 14.1, 17.0, 21.7, and 25.3 mm, respectively). Gafchromic film was applied to the phantom, and lead (thickness 1-3 mm) or STR (thickness 1-4 mm) with an area of 4´1.5 cm was used to cover the film. A 6 MeV electron beam with an 8 mm acrylic board was then used to irradiate the phantom. The source-surface distance (SSD) was 444 cm, the field size was 36´36 cm at SSD of 100 cm without an electron applicator, and the monitor unit was 2000 MU. The shielding rates were obtained from the dose profiles. Results The mean values of the shielding rate values for all phantoms were 50.1, 97.6, and 98.7% for 1, 2, and 3 mm of lead, respectively, and -13.6, 53.9, 91.2, and 99.4% for 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm of STR, respectively. Conclusion STR with a thickness of 4 mm had the same shielding properties as lead with a thickness of 3 mm, which was an approximately 100% shielding rate. STR could therefore be used in TSEB therapy instead of lead.

Background/aim We investigated the dosimetric characteristics of electron radiotherapy for auricular keloid using real-time variable-shape tungsten rubber (STR). Patients and methods For the first evaluation, STR was shaped into a rectangular irradiation field (3.0×5.0 cm2). In the next step, the STR was reshaped to fit the target (3.5×6.5 cm2) for the second evaluation. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles were obtained with 6-MeV electron beams and compared with those of low-melting-point lead (LML). Results Compared to the LML on electron applicator, PDD differences were within 0.4 mm, while the penumbras as width of 20-80% dose levels were smaller (maximum reductions: 75.8% and 82.9% at first and second evaluations, respectively). The treatment process of shaping the STR, decision on output, and irradiation was completed within 45 min. Conclusion Electron radiotherapy using STR for keloid can be performed with excellent dose distribution in a short time. First clinical experience found the STR is suitable for use in individualized and immediate electron radiotherapy.

Background : An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (Linac) with a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam containing the representative information regarding the percent depth dose, profile, output factor, etc. for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide the information of the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF). Methods : After a mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference and measured data. For a high agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm 2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10, 20 cm). The results of the field size from the reference data were compared with the results in the measured data using the same condition. Results : All fitting curves show values of goodness of fit, R 2 , better than 0.99. The differences in the field size between the reference data and the measured data were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The lowest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion : The application of the SCF has been proven to accurately obtain the field size of the preconfigured reference and of the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a counte-rcheck methodology to determine the field size from the reference data in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for the routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes clinically used with the Halcyon system.

Background: An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (Linac) with a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam containing the representative information regarding the percent depth dose, profile, output factor, etc. for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide the information of the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF).Methods: After a mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference and measured data. For a high agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10, 20 cm). The results of the field size from the reference data were compared with the results in the measured data using the same condition.Results: All fitting curves show values of goodness of fit, R2, better than 0.99. The differences in the field size between the reference data and the measured data were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The lowest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion: The application of the SCF has been proven to accurately obtain the field size of the preconfigured reference and of the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a countercheck methodology to determine the field size from the reference data in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for the routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes clinically used with the Halcyon system.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify factors predicting the performance of knowledge-based planning (KBP) models in volume modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer in terms of sparing the organ at risk (OAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In three institutions, each KBP model was trained by more than 20 library plans (LP) per model. To validate the characterization of each KBP model, 45 validation plans (VP) were calculated by the KBP system. The ratios of overlap between the OAR volume and the planning target volume (PTV) to the whole organ volume (V(overlap)/V(whole)) were analyzed for each LP and VP. Regression lines between dose–volume parameters (V(90), V(75), and V(50)) and V(overlap)/V(whole) were evaluated. The mean OAR dose, V(90), V(75), and V(50) of LP did not necessarily match those of VP. RESULTS: In both the rectum and bladder, the dose–volume parameters for VP were strongly correlated with V(overlap)/V(whole) at institutes A, B, and C (R > 0.74, 0.85, and 0.56, respectively). Except in the rectum at institute B, the slopes of the regression lines for LP corresponded to those for VP. For dose–volume parameters for the rectum, the ratios of slopes of the regression lines in VP to those in LP ranged 0.51–1.26. In the bladder, most ratios were less than 1.0 (mean: 0.77). CONCLUSION: For each OAR, each model made distinct dosimetric characterizations in terms of V(overlap)/V(whole). The relationship between dose–volume parameters and V(overlap)/V(whole) of OARs in LP predicts the KBP models’ performance sparing OARs.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the RapidPlan knowledge-based treatment planning system using models including registered pseudo-structures, and to determine how many structures are required for automatic optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for postoperative uterine cervical cancer. Methods: Pseudo-structures were retrospectively contoured for patients who had completed treatment at one of five institutions. For 22 patients, RPs were generated with a single optimization for models with two (RP_2), four (RP_4), or five (RP_5) registered structures, and the dosimetric parameters of these models were compared with a clinical plan with several optimizations. The total times for pseudo-structure creation and optimization were also measured.Results: Most dosimetric parameters showed no major differences between each RP. In particular, the rectum Dmax, V50Gy, and V40Gy with RP_2, RP_4, and RP_5 were not significantly different, and were lower than those of the clinical plan. In addition, the average proportions of plans achieving acceptable criteria for all dosimetric parameters were 98%, 99%, 98%, and 98% for the clinical plan, RP_2, RP_4, and RP_5, respectively. The average times for the creation and optimization of pseudo-structures were 105, 17, 21, and 29 minutes, for the clinical plan, RP_2, RP_4, and RP_5, respectively. Conclusions: The RapidPlan model with two registered pseudo-structures could generate clinically acceptable plans while saving time. This modeling approach using pseudo-structures could possibility be used for the VMAT planning process.

Purpose Novel linac improvements in speed of gantry, collimator, leaf and dose rate may increase the time-efficiency of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery, however remains to be investigated. In this study, a fast-rotating O-ring linac (Halcyon) with fast moving leaves is compared with a general linac (TrueBeam: TB) in terms of plan quality for VMAT of C-shape, prostate, multi target and, head and neck (H&N) cases from AAPM TG-119. Materials and methods For the four test cases, VMAT planning was performed using single to four-arc VMAT on a Halcyon and using single to three-arc VMAT on a TrueBeam. Same conditions for optimization were used in each test case. Target coverage metrics and organ at risks (OAR) dose were compared. Monitor unit (MU) and irradiation time in each plan were also compared. Results In all cases, single-arc plans of Halcyon were inferior to TB plans on dose objectives. Conformity index (CI) to outer target of C-shape case was better for Halcyon (1-arc: 1.242, 2-arc: 1.202, 3-arc: 1.198, 4-arc: 1.181) than for TB (1-arc: 1.247, 2-arc: 1.211, 3-arc: 1.211) except to single arc. D5 (Gy) of core for C-shape case was better for halcyon (1-arc: 23.29, 2-arc: 21.01, 3-arc: 20.64, 4-arc: 20.47) than for TB (1-arc: 24.04, 2-arc: 22.94, 3-arc: 23.04). Calculated MU was smaller for Halcyon than for TB. In addition, Halcyon is more faster than TB because mechanical movements were improved. Conclusion For VMAT plan in each case, Halcyon as well or better at the plan quality of two or three arcs on TB while reducing the delivery time.

Background Delivery of a single energy 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) photon beam is a main characteristic of an O-ring gantry type linear accelerator (linac) Halcyon. The purpose of this study is to determine the field size of the beam through an application of the simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF) to the beam profiles obtained from the preconfigured reference data of Halcyon, and then to compare its parametrization with the measured beam data from Halcyon. Methods After a mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference and measured data. When a high agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles as 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm 2 as a function of depths (at 1.3, 5, 10, 20 cm). The results of the field size from the reference data were compared with the results in the measured data using same condition. Results All fitting curves show an average agreement ratio higher than 97% and the values of goodness of fit, R 2 , as better than 0.99. The differences of the field size between the reference data and the measured data were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The least difference of the field sizes at depth 10 cm which is a surface to axis distance was reported. Conclusion The application of the SCF has been proved to accurately obtain the field size of the preconfigured reference and of measured FFF photon beam data for Halcyon. The current work can be useful to the beam commissioning as a countercheck methodology to the field size from the reference data in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon and to the routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes clinically used with the Halcyon.

Positron emission tomography (PET–CT) is an essential imaging modality for the management of various diseases. Increasing numbers of PET–CT examinations are carried out across the world and deliver benefits to patients; however, there are concerns about the cumulative radiation doses from these examinations in patients. Compared to the radiation exposure delivered by CT, there have been few reports on the frequency of patients with a cumulative effective radiation dose of ≥100 mSv from repeated PET–CT examinations. The emerging dose tracking system facilitates surveys on patient cumulative doses by PET–CT because it can easily wrap up exposure doses of PET radiopharmaceuticals and CT. Regardless of the use of a dose tracking system, implementation of justification for PET–CT examinations and utilisation of dose reduction measures are key issues in coping with the cumulative dose in patients. Despite all the advantages of PET/MRI such as eliminating radiation exposure from CT and providing good tissue contrast in MRI, it is expensive and cannot be introduced at every facility; thus, it is still necessary to utilise PET–CT with radiation reduction measures in most clinical situations.

We have developed soft rubber (SR) bolus that can be shaped in real-time by heating flexibly and repeatedly. This study investigated whether the SR bolus could be used as an ideal bolus, such as not changing of the beam characteristics and homogeneity through the bolus and high plasticity to adhere a patient in addition to real-time shapeable and reusability, in electron radiotherapy. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles (LDPs) were obtained for 4, 6, and 9 MeV electron beams and were compared between the SR and conventional gel boluses. For the LDP at depth of 90% dose, the penumbra as lateral distance between the 80% and 20% isodose lines (P80-20) and the width of 90% dose level (r90) were compared. To evaluate adhesion, the air gap volume between the boluses and nose of a head phantom was evaluated on CT image. The dose profiles along the center axis for the 6 MeV electron beam with SR, gel, and virtual boluses (thickness = 5 mm) on the head phantom were also calculated for the irradiation of 200 monitor unit with a treatment planning system and the depth of the maximum dose (dmax) and maximum dose (Dmax) were compared. The PDDs,P80-20, andr90between the SR and gel boluses corresponded well (within 2%, 0.4 mm, and 0.7 mm, respectively). The air gap volumes of the SR and gel boluses were 3.14 and 50.35 cm3, respectively. Thedmaxwith SR, gel and virtual boluses were 8.0, 6.0, and 7.0 mm (no bolus: 12.0 mm), and theDmaxvalues were 186.4, 170.6, and 186.8 cGy, respectively. The SR bolus had the equivalent electron beam characteristics and homogeneity to the gel bolus and achieved excellent adhesion to a body surface, which can be used in electron radiotherapy as an ideal bolus.

We developed a novel low‐radiation‐absorbent lok‐bar (HM‐bar) that is used to secure the immobilizers to the couch. The aim of this study was to investigate the X‐ray scattering and absorption properties of the HM‐bar in computed tomography (CT) simulation and radiotherapy dose delivery using the Varian Exact™ lok‐bar (VL‐bar) as a benchmark. CT images were obtained with or without lok‐bar, and then each image was visually evaluated for artifacts. The attenuation rates for each lok‐bar were measured using a farmer‐type ionization chamber (PTW30013) and the I'mRT phantom (IBA Dosimetry GmbH). Measurement points were between gantry angles of 110 and 180°. The treatment apparatus was a NovalisTx (Brainlab AG); X‐ray energies were set at 6 MV and 10 MV. In the presence of each lok‐bar, the radiation dose was measured in accordance with 10 volumetric modulated arc therapy–stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT‐SBRT) plans for lung cancer. Artifacts were seldom observed in the CT scans of the HM‐bar. The attenuation rate of each lok‐bar was higher when the X‐ray energy was set at 6 MV than at 10 MV. The highest attenuation rate in the VL‐bar was observed at a gantry angle of 112°; the rates were 22.4% at 6 MV and 19.3% at 10 MV. Similarly, the highest attenuation rate for the HM‐bar was also observed at a gantry angle of 112°; the rates were 12.2% and 10.1% at 6 MV and 10 MV, respectively. When the VL‐bar was evaluated, the isocenter dose of the VMAT‐SBRT plans was attenuated by 2.6% as a maximum case. In the case of the HM‐bar, the maximum attenuation was 1.4%. In the measurements of each VMAT‐SBRT plan, the difference of the dose attenuation rate between the VL‐bar and HM‐bar was approximately 1%. The HM‐bar could be used to minimize the occurrence of artifacts and provide good images in CT scans regarding radiotherapy planning and dose calculation. It can be used for patient therapy at hospitals to provide accurate dose delivery because of its low X‐ray scattering and absorption characteristics.

Background/Aim: We evaluated the dosimetric profiles of manually generated volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans and performance of a commercial knowledge-based planning system (KBP) in treating breast cancer. Materials and Methods: We defined the manually generated VMAT plan as the manual plan (MP). Twenty MPs were generated for left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and used to develop a KBP training set. The other five patients were used for validation. The dosimetric parameters among MPs, tangential irradiation plans (TPs), and KBP-VMAT plans (KBP-Ps) were compared. Results: D(95) and homogeneity of the planning target volume (PTV) were significantly higher and greater in MPs and KBP-Ps than in TPs. Lung V(20), V(40). The Dmean for the left anterior descending artery was lower in MPs and KBP-Ps than in TPs. KBP could save time in generating VMAT plans. Conclusion: MPs and KBP-Ps could ensure higher dose uniformity of PTV than TPs. KBP could faster generate comparable MPs for breast cancer.

This study characterized the plan complexity of the dual-layer multi-leaf collimator (MLC) performance for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in Halcyon. Plan complexity metrics were computed independently for each MLC layer (proximal and distal): modulation complexity score (MCS), plan averaged beam area, irregularity, and modulation (PA, PI, and PM) were obtained. These were investigated when weighted by proportions of the effective proximal MLC and distal MLC (MCSw, PAw, PIw, and PMw). Conventional plan complexity metrics for the effective 5.0 mm resolution MLC (MCS5, PA5, PI5, PM5), small aperture score (SAS), effective distal MLC score (EDS), and MU were also evaluated. Forty-five consecutive VMAT plans were analyzed retrospectively for treatment sites of the prostate, head and neck (HN), and other parts. The mean values of the metrics for proximal MLC and distal MLC were 0.310 and 0.245 (MCS), 71.09 cm2 and 55.92 cm2 (PA), 6.24 and 10.19 (PI), and 0.593 and 0.645 (PM), respectively. The degree of plan complexity in the distal MLC was larger than in the proximal MLC. The percentage of the effective distal MLC was higher than that of the proximal MLC (mean EDS = 0.555). The MCSw, PAw, PIw, and PMw showed significant differences between the prostate and HN groups like the PA5, PI5, and PM5; however, the MCS5 did not. Additionally, the MCS5 correlated with MU and PM5, while the MCSw correlated with SAS and PA5. The plan complexity for each MLC layer and subsequently combining these complexities might be useful to better understand the dual-layer MLC performance.

Containing 80% tungsten by weight, tungsten functional paper (TFP) is a radiation-shielding material that is lightweight, flexible, disposable, and easy to cut. Through experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations, we investigated the feasibility of using TFP as a bolus in electron beam radiotherapy. Commercial boluses of thickness 5 and 10 mm and from one to nine layers of TFPs (0.3–2.7 mm) were positioned on the surface of water-equivalent phantoms. The percentage depth dose curves and transverse dose profiles were measured using a 9-MeV electron beam from a clinical linear accelerator. Normalized to the value at the depth of maximum dose without bolus, the relative doses at the phantom surface for no bolus, 5-mm bolus, 10-mm bolus, 1 TFP, 3 TFPs, 6 TFPs, and 9 TFPs were 78%, 88%, 92%, 84%, 92%, 102%, and 112%, respectively; the therapeutic depths corresponding to a 90% dose level were 29.1 mm, 22.7 mm, 17.7 mm, 26.6 mm, 23.2 mm, 19.3 mm, and 15.8 mm, respectively. The TFP contributed to increased skin dose and provided dose uniformity within the target volume. However, it also resulted in increased lateral constriction and penumbra width. The results of Monte Carlo simulation produced similar trends as the experimental measurements. Our findings suggest that using TFP as a novel thin and flexible skin bolus for electron beam radiotherapy is feasible.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate knowledge-based volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for oesophageal cancers using a model trained with plans optimised with a different treatment plan...

Background Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) ventilation is an emerging imaging modality. Functional avoidance of regions according to 4D-CT ventilation may reduce lung toxicity after radiation therapy. This study evaluated associations between 4D-CT ventilation-based dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes. Methods Pre-treatment 4D-CT data were used to retrospectively construct ventilation images for 40 thoracic cancer patients retrospectively. Fifteen patients were treated with conventional radiation therapy, 6 patients with hyperfractionated radiation therapy and 19 patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Ventilation images were calculated from 4D-CT data using a deformable image registration and Jacobian-based algorithm. Each ventilation map was normalized by converting it to percentile images. Ventilation-based dosimetric parameters (Mean Dose, V5 [percent lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy], and V20 [percent lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy]) were calculated for highly and poorly ventilated regions. To test whether the ventilation-based dosimetric parameters could be used predict radiation pneumonitis of ≥Grade 2, the area under the curve (AUC) was determined from the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results For Mean Dose, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–30% range showed the highest AUC value (0.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.663–0.955). For V20, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–20% range had the highest AUC value (0.774; 95% [CI], 0.598–0.915), and for V5, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–30% range had the highest AUC value (0.843; 95% [CI], 0.732–0.954). The highest AUC values for Mean Dose, V20, and V5 were obtained in poorly ventilated regions. There were significant differences in all dosimetric parameters between radiation pneumonitis of Grade 1 and Grade ≥2. Conclusions Poorly ventilated lung regions identified on 4D-CT had higher AUC values than highly ventilated regions, suggesting that functional planning based on poorly ventilated regions may reduce the risk of lung toxicity in radiation therapy.