Search

We aimed to identify socioeconomic gaps in the administration of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for patients with atypical meningioma (AM) and secondarily to determine differences in survival between patients receiving radiation and those not receiving radiation at 12 and 60 months. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients receiving AM surgery between 2004 and 2019. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the association between receipt of adjuvant radiation and social determinants. Secondarily, Kaplan-Meir curves were used to compare overall patient survival between those that received radiation and those that did not. Adjuvant radiation was less likely to be administered to patients over 65 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53–22 0.77) and more likely to be administered to males (95% CI = 1.07–1.38). Compared to the Southern USA, patients were more likely to receive RT in the Northeastern (95% CI 24 = 1.40–2.05), Midwestern (95% CI = 1.06–1.54), and Western parts of the USA (95% 25 CI = 1.31–2.00). Patients residing furthest from their facility were less likely to receive radiation (95% CI = 0.65–0.98). Insured patients were more likely to receive radiation (P = 0.048) than uninsured patients. On multivariate analysis, no differences were found between racial groups regarding adjuvant radiation. For patients unstratified, radiation was shown to improve survival at 12 and 60 months. Disparities exist in the administration of adjuvant RT for AM. Patients over 65, women, those residing in the Southern USA, those living further from their facilities and uninsured patients are less likely to receive radiation than their counterparts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Over 25% of the 27 million uninsured individuals in the United States are eligible for Medicaid. Many hospitals have insurance linkage programs that assist eligible patients with enrollment, but little is known about the impact of these programs on care utilization. This research assessed health care utilization and health outcomes among patients enrolled in Medicaid via a hospital-based insurance linkage program. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults aged 18–64 admitted to the hospital from 2016 to 2021. Those who obtained insurance retroactively via insurance linkage (RI) were compared with those who presented with Medicaid (MI) or remained uninsured (UI). The primary outcome was the presence of at least one visit with a primary care provider (PCP) in the 12 months following index admission. Secondary outcomes included having an assigned PCP, ED revisits, and hospital readmissions. For patients with diabetes and hypertension, 12-month hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP) readings were tracked. Results: Of 3882 patients admitted with no insurance, 2905 (74.8%) were enrolled in insurance (RI). In multivariable analysis, RI patients were 14% more likely (OR 1.14, p = 0.020) to have completed at least one PCP visit by 12 months after index admission compared to those with preexisting Medicaid (MI), and uninsured patients were 29% less likely (OR 0.71, p = 0.003). MI and RI patients also had more ED revisits (p < 0.001) and greater 12-month reductions in blood pressure (p < 0.001) compared with uninsured patients. Conclusion: Hospital-based insurance linkage reached three-quarters of uninsured patients and was associated with increased utilization of acute and outpatient health care services. An acute care encounter represents an opportunity to connect patients to insurance, a key step toward improving their health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Insurance status (IS) is known to be associated with length of stay (LOS). The impact of IS on excess LOS (ELOS), days between medical readiness and discharge date, has not been explored. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with pelvic fractures at a level I trauma center. Outcomes included ELOS (primary), discharge disposition (secondary), and ELOS-associated complications (secondary). Results: 185 patients were included. Uninsured patients were the youngest and had the least baseline comorbidities (31.3 years (median), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).1) while publicly insured patients were the oldest and had the most baseline comorbidities (58.4 years (median), CCI 2.32). Excess LOS and associated complications did not differ among groups. After regression analysis, UIPs had longer LOS than PRPs (2.07 days, 95% CI.28-3.85). UIPs were recommended to go to inpatient rehabilitation 51.6% of the time but were discharged home 93.6% of the time; 81.0% of these changes were attributed to insufficient financial resources. Conclusions: Excess LOS and complications associated with ELOS were not associated with IS. Although UIPs were younger and had fewer baseline comorbidities, they had longer LOS after regression analysis. While discharge recommendations differed based on insurance status, UIPs had limited access to rehabilitation due to financial disparities. Despite initial treatment team recommendations, UIPs had to be sent home as their lack of insurance precluded inpatient rehabilitation placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decentralized government is hypothesized to lead public service investments to better align with political preferences across geographical regions, yet there has been limited rigorous testing of this hypothesis. We examine how local public provision of hospital services varied according to political preferences between 2006 and 2016. We use state Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as a source of exogenous variation. Consistent with the motivation for federalism, we find that areas less supportive of the ACA tended to convert the state expansion into lower property taxes with lower public hospital expenditures, whereas, in states that expanded Medicaid, local governments tended to increase public provision of healthcare. Key Takeaways: Local governments participate in the healthcare system as both patient‐care providers and third‐party payers, and account for over 50% of subnational US government expenditures on hospitals and public health services.The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) represented a federal intervention that supplemented existing public health services while also making public health services less expensive to provide.States that expanded Medicaid under the 2010 ACA are treated as exogenous variation to local governments by providing healthcare reimbursements to previously uninsured pools of patients.Differences‐in‐differences demonstrate that local governments treated state Medicaid expansion heterogeneously, with local governments in areas that supported President Obama in the 2008 election increasing hospital expenditures, whereas those in Mitt Romney voting areas tended to maintain expenditures and reduce property tax levies.Findings are consistent with the view that local governments are responsive to the preferences of its voters, even in complex policy environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate patients' knowledge regarding HPV vaccination and vaccine uptake in a diverse patient population. The secondary objective was to evaluate factors influencing the decision to vaccinate, potential barriers to vaccination, and to assess whether HPV vaccines were offered to or discussed with eligible patients in a safety net Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clinic. Methods: A 28-item survey was developed using Likert scale survey questions to assess patient agreement with statements regarding HPV and the vaccine. The surveys were administered to patients in the Ob/Gyn outpatient clinics from May 2021 through September 2022. Additionally, pharmacy data were reviewed and chart review was performed as a quality improvement initiative to assess the impact of expanded HPV vaccine eligibility to patients with private insurance on vaccine uptake. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: 304 patients completed surveys from May 2021 through September 2022. The median age of respondents was 32 (range 18-80). 16 (5%) were Non-Hispanic White, 124 (41%) were Hispanic White, 58 (19%) were Non-Hispanic Black, 6 (2%) were Hispanic Black, 29 (9.5%) were Haitian, 44 (14%) were Hispanic Other, 7 (2%) were Non-Hispanic Other, 20 (6.6%) did not respond. 45 (14%) patients were uninsured. Many patients (62%) reported that a physician had never discussed HPV vaccination with them. Seventy nine percent of patients reported they had never received the HPV vaccine, and 69% of patients reported that lack of a medical provider recommendation was a major barrier. Among patients to whom HPV vaccination had been recommended, 57% reported that the vaccine was not available the same day in clinic. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that many patients never had a provider discuss HPV vaccination with them and never received the HPV vaccine. Additionally, amongst those who did initiate HPV vaccination, completion of the series remains a key barrier. Ensuring that providers discuss HPV vaccination and that patients receive HPV vaccines, along with expanding access to and convenience of HPV vaccination are critical aspects of preventing cervical cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chargemaster prices are the list prices that providers and health systems assign to each of their medical services in the US. These charges are often several factors of magnitude higher than those extended to individuals with either private or public insurance, however, these list prices are billed in full to uninsured patients, putting them at increased risk of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). The objective of this study was to examine the risk of CHE across insurance status, diabetes diagnosis and to examine disparity gaps across race/ethnicity. Methods: We perform a retrospective observational study on a nationally representative cohort of adult patients from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the years 2002–2017. Using logistic regression models we estimate the risk of CHE across insurance status, diabetes diagnosis and explore disparity gaps across race/ethnicity. Results: Our fully adjusted results show that the relative odds of having CHE if uninsured is 5.9 (p < 0.01) compared to if insured, and 1.1 (p < 0.01) for patients with a diabetes diagnosis (compared to those without one). We note significant interactions between insurance status and diabetes diagnosis, with uninsured patients with a diabetes diagnosis being 9.5 times (p < 0.01) more likely to experience CHE than insured patients without a diabetes diagnosis. In terms of racial/ethnic disparities, we find that among the uninsured, non-Hispanic blacks are 13% (p < 0.05), and Hispanics 14.2% (p < 0.05), more likely to experience CHE than non-Hispanic whites. Among uninsured patients with diabetes, we further find that Hispanic patients are 39.3% (p < 0.05) more likely to have CHE than non-Hispanic white patients. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that uninsured patients with diabetes are at significantly elevated risks for CHE. These risks are further found to be disproportionately higher among uninsured racial/ethnic minorities, suggesting that CHE may present a channel through which structural economic and health disparities are perpetuated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An integrated practice unit (IPU) that provides a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, typically involving a primary care provider, registered nurse, social worker, and pharmacist has been shown to reduce healthcare utilization among high-cost super-utilizer (SU) patients or multi-visit patients (MVP). However, less is known about differences in the impact of these interventions on insured vs. uninsured SU patients and super high frequency SUs ( 8 ED visits per 6 months) vs. high frequency SUs (4–7 ED visits per 6 months). Methods: We assessed the percent reduction in ED visits, ED cost, hospitalizations, hospital days, and hospitalization costs following implementation of an IPU for SUs located in an academic tertiary care facility. We compared outcomes for publicly insured with uninsured patients, and super high frequency SUs with high frequency SUs 6 months before vs. 6 months after enrollment in the IPU. Results: There was an overall 25% reduction in hospitalizations (p < 0.001), and 23% reduction in hospital days (p = 0.0045), when comparing 6 months before vs. 6 months after enrollment in the program. There was a 26% reduction in average total direct hospitalization costs per patient (p = 0.002). Further analysis revealed a greater reduction in health care utilization for uninsured SU patients compared with publicly insured patients. The program reduced hospitalizations for super high frequency SUs. However, there was no statistically significant impact on overall health care utilization of super high frequency SUs when compared with high frequency SUs. Conclusions: Our study supports existing evidence that dedicated IPUs for SUs can achieve significant reductions in acute care utilization, particularly for uninsured and high frequency SU patients. Trial Registration: IRB201500212. Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hysterectomy is a common surgery among reproductive-aged U.S. patients, with rates highest among Black patients in the South. There is limited insight on causes of these racial differences. In the U.S., electronic medical records (EMR) data can offer richer detail on factors driving surgical decision-making among reproductive-aged populations than insurance claims-based data. Our objective in this cohort profile paper is to describe the Carolina Hysterectomy Cohort (CHC), a large EMR-based case-series of premenopausal hysterectomy patients in the U.S. South, supplemented with census and surgeon licensing data. To demonstrate one strength of the data, we evaluate whether patient and surgeon characteristics differ by insurance payor type. Methods: We used structured and abstracted EMR data to identify and characterize patients aged 18–44 years who received hysterectomies for non-cancerous conditions between 10/02/2014–12/31/2017 in a large health care system comprised of 10 hospitals in North Carolina. We used Chi-squared and Kruskal Wallis tests to compare whether patients' socio-demographic and relevant clinical characteristics, and surgeon characteristics differed by patient insurance payor (public, private, uninsured). Results: Of 1857 patients (including 55% non-Hispanic White, 30% non-Hispanic Black, 9% Hispanic), 75% were privately-insured, 17% were publicly-insured, and 7% were uninsured. Menorrhagia was more prevalent among the publicly-insured (74% vs 68% overall). Fibroids were more prevalent among the privately-insured (62%) and the uninsured (68%). Most privately insured patients were treated at non-academic hospitals (65%) whereas most publicly insured and uninsured patients were treated at academic centers (66 and 86%, respectively). Publicly insured and uninsured patients had higher median bleeding (public: 7.0, uninsured: 9.0, private: 5.0) and pain (public: 6.0, uninsured: 6.0, private: 3.0) symptom scores than the privately insured. There were no statistical differences in surgeon characteristics by payor groups. Conclusion: This novel study design, a large EMR-based case series of hysterectomies linked to physician licensing data and manually abstracted data from unstructured clinical notes, enabled identification and characterization of a diverse reproductive-aged patient population more comprehensively than claims data would allow. In subsequent phases of this research, the CHC will leverage these rich clinical data to investigate multilevel drivers of hysterectomy in an ethnoracially, economically, and clinically diverse series of hysterectomy patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophagectomy is a complex operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have shown that sub-specialization is associated with improved esophagectomy outcomes. We hypothesized that disparities would exist among esophagectomy patients regarding access to thoracic surgeons based on demographic, geographic, and hospital factors. The Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify adult inpatients receiving esophagectomy for esophageal and gastric cardia cancer, Barrett's esophagus, and achalasia from 2015 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes. Patients were categorized as receiving their esophagectomy from a thoracic versus non-thoracic provider. Survey methodology was used to correct for sampling error. Backwards selection from bivariable analysis was used in a survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression to determine predictors of esophagectomy provider specialization. During the study period, 960 patients met inclusion criteria representing an estimated population size of 3894 patients. Among them, 1696 (43.5%) were performed by a thoracic surgeon and 2199 (56.5%) were performed by non-thoracic providers. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with decreased likelihood of receiving care from a thoracic provider included Black (OR 0.41, p  < 0.001), Other (OR 0.21, p  < 0.001), and Unknown race (OR 0.22, p  = 0.04), and uninsured patients (OR 0.53, p  = 0.03). Urban hospital setting was associated with an increased likelihood of care by a thoracic provider (OR 4.43, p  = 0.001). In this nationally representative study, Nonwhite race, rural hospital setting, and lower socioeconomic status were factors associated with decreased likelihood of esophagectomy patients receiving care from a thoracic surgeon. Efforts to address these disparities and provide appropriate access to thoracic surgeons is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Racial and ethnic disparities in the management of adult patients with blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) have been previously demonstrated. It is unknown if similar disparities exist in pediatric patients with BSIs. Management of BSIs can include operative management, but nonoperative management (NOM) is preferred. This study assesses the association of race and insurance status on use of NOM among pediatric (aged < 18 y) patients following BSI. Data were abstracted from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files for calendar years 2013-2017. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between race or insurance status and NOM while controlling for injury severity, age, and facility type. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion within 24 h and hospital length of stay. We analyzed 1436 pediatric BSI patients. Black, non-Hispanic patients were less likely (odds ratio: 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-1.02, P = 0.043) to undergo NOM and stayed 0.6 d longer (P = 0.010) than White, non-Hispanic patients. Uninsured patients were less likely (odds ratio: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.25-1.11, P = 0.080) to undergo NOM and publicly insured patients stayed 0.24 d (P = 0.048) longer than privately insured patients. We found disparities in use of NOM for Black patients and uninsured patients as well as differences in length of stay. These results extend the literature on racial and socioeconomic disparities in care of trauma patients to pediatric BSI patients. Addressing these disparities requires additional studies aimed at identifying the underlying causes. • Among pediatric patients with isolated severe blunt splenic injury, Black, non-Hispanic patients were more than 50% less likely to undergo nonoperative management than White, non-Hispanic patients. • Black, non-Hispanic patients' hospital stays were 0.6 d longer than White, non-Hispanic patients. • Publicly insured patients were less likely to undergo nonoperative management and had longer hospital stays than privately insured patients. • The results above control for patients' age, injury severity, and treating facility type. Patients treated at pediatric trauma centers were much more likely to undergo nonoperative management. • Establishing the existence of race and socioeconomic disparities is crucial for future studies aiming at identifying the underlying causes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Q: You grew up in a small rural village in Kenya, the child of farmers. How did that upbringing inform your world view and career choices? A: It made me [...]

Background: Uninsured and underinsured patients face specialty care access disparities that prevent them from obtaining the care they need and negatively impact their health and well-being. We aimed to understand how making specialty care electronic consultations (eConsults) available at a multi-site Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in central Texas affected uninsured patients' care-seeking experiences and impacted their ability to receive the needed care. Methods: We used concepts from Ecological Systems Theory to examine individual, interpersonal, organization-level, social, and health policy environment factors that impacted patients' access to specialty care and the use of eConsults. We conducted thematic analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with patients about seeking specialty care while uninsured and with uninsured patients and FQHC PCPs about their experience using eConsults to obtain specialists' recommendations. Results: Patients and PCPs identified out-of-pocket cost, stigma, a paucity of local specialists willing to see uninsured patients, time and difficulty associated with travel and transportation to specialty visits, and health policy limitations as barriers to obtaining specialty care. Benefits of using eConsults for uninsured patients included minimizing/avoiding financial stress, expanding access to care, expanding scope of primary care, and expediting access to specialists. Concerns about the model included patients' limited understanding of eConsults, concern about cost, and worry whether eConsults could appropriately meet their specialty needs. Conclusions: Findings suggest that eConsults delivered in a primary care FQHC addressed uninsured patients' specialty care access concerns. They helped to address financial and geographic barriers, provided time and cost savings to patients, expanded FQHC PCPs' knowledge and care provision options, and allowed patients to receive more care in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the prevalence and predictors of screening for violence against persons and victim service utilization within an integrated safety‐net health system. Study Setting: Emergency Department (ED) at Parkland Hospital—Dallas County's largest safety‐net provider of services for minority and underinsured and uninsured patients. Study Design: Prospective, longitudinal study during the first 6 months of a universal violence against persons screener. Data Collection: Health records were extracted for all patients with a visit to the ED between January and July, 2021. Modeling described the patient population across screening (screened vs. not screened) and, among those screened, the results (positive vs. negative), average time spent in the ED, and referral patterns for victim services. Principal Findings: During the study period, 65,563 unique patients with 95,555 encounters occurred. Seventy‐one percent (n = 67,535) were screened for violence against persons and, of those, 2% screened positive (n = 1349). Of the patients who screened positive, 1178 (87%) were referred to and 806 (60%) received care at victim services. Implementing screening did not increase the length of stay at ED. Conclusions: Systematic implementation of comprehensive violence screening at a safety‐net system can result in robust identification and timely referrals to victim services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]