Search

BackgroundHigher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis initiation, known as earlier start of dialysis, is often a surrogate of poor outcomes including higher mortality. We hypothesized that earlier dialysis initiation is associated with a faster decline in residual kidney function (RKF), which is also associated with higher mortality among incident hemodialysis (HD) patients.MethodsIn a cohort of 4911 incident HD patients who initiated HD over a 5-year period (July 2001 to June 2006), we examined the trajectories of RKF, ascertained by renal urea clearance (KRU), over 2 years after HD initiation across strata of eGFR at HD initiation using case-mix adjusted linear mixed-effect models. We then investigated the association between annual change in RKF and mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.ResultsThe median (interquartile range) baseline KRU was 2.20 (1.13-3.63)  mL/min/1.73 m2. The decline of KRU was faster in patients who initiated HD at higher eGFR. The relative changes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in KRU at 1 year after HD initiation were -1.29 (-1.28 to -1.30), -1.17 (-1.16 to -1.18), -1.11 (-1.10 to -1.12) and -0.78 (-0.78 to -0.79)  mL/min/1.73 m2 in the eGFR categories of ≥10, 8-

Purpose: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease' (MDRD) and 'Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration' (CKD-EPI) formulas are generally accepted and widely utilized tools to assess renal function. In this study, we aimed to investigate the power of the MDRD and CKDEPI formulas, which are the two most used formulas in the measurement of eGFR in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients, newly diagnosis with MM, were consecutively enrolled to the study and their records were analyzed in terms of demographic features and laboratory parameters of the patients, type of paraproteinemia and stage of disease. MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas were used to evaluate renal function. Results: The difference found between basal and thirdmonth estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using MDRD (61±15.4 mL/min/1.73 m², third month 75±18.2 mL/min/1.73 m²) and CKD-EPI formulas (62±15.7 mL/min/1.73 m², third month 76±18.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) were significant. There was no significant difference between two formulas regarding basal and third month eGFR mean values. According to CKD staging, 12.5% of all subjects changed and 80% of them moved to better stage. Conclusion: CKD-EPI tends to produce higher eGFR values with compared to MDRD, especially when they are used to evaluate mildly impaired renal function. Hence, prevalence of renal disease was determined lower when assessed with CKD-EPI. Therefore, we recommend that it is important to use the same eGFR estimation formula for a consistent outcomes analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Previous studies argued that leptin levels increase significantly with the progression of CKD. But the association between leptin and CKD has not been investigated in patients with NAFLD. Therefore, we conducted this study to establish whether increased leptin level is associated with CKD in NAFLD patients. In our prospective study with a follow up period of six months thirty-five teetotaller biopsy-proven NAFLD patients were divided as groups with mild, versus advanced, fibrosis. Liver fibrosis was also assessed with Fibroscan. Serum leptin levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. For insulin resistance we used the homeostasis model assessment method (HOMA-IR). For the kidney function, we used the abbreviated formula Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, which estimates GFR. For statistical analysis, Student's- t test, Mann-Whitney test, linear regression-binary logistic regression analyses and the ROC curve analysis were used. Advanced fibrosis and increased HOMA-IR were risk factors for decreased eGFR. Leptin correlated inversely with advanced fibrosis (p: 0.03) and low leptin was a risk factor for CKD (p: 0.02). In ROC curve analysis, advanced fibrosis and low leptin were risk factors for decreased eGFR (p: 0.007 and 0.004, respectively). Low leptin level was dependently associated with decreased eGFR. Advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients is a risk factor for CKD. Leptin correlated inversely with advanced fibrosis. Unlike the previous studies, which were not performed in NAFLD patients, we found decreased leptin in NAFLD patients with decreased eGFR. Low leptin level was found to be a dependent predictor for differentiating NAFLD patients with high risk for CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute kidney injury (AKI) can potentially lead to the accumulation of antimicrobial drugs with significant renal clearance. Drug dosing adjustments are commonly made using the Cockcroft-Gault estimate of creatinine clearance (CLcr). The Modified Jelliffe equation is significantly better at estimating kidney function than the Cockcroft-Gault equation in the setting of AKI. The objective of this study is to assess the degree of antimicrobial dosing discordance using different glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations. This is a retrospective evaluation of antimicrobial dosing using different estimating equations for kidney function in AKI and comparison to Cockcroft-Gault estimation as a reference. Considering the Cockcroft-Gault estimate as the criterion standard, antimicrobials were appropriately adjusted at most 80.7% of the time. On average, kidney function changed by 30 mL/min over the course of an AKI episode. The median clearance at the peak serum creatinine was 27.4 (9.3⁻66.3) mL/min for Cockcroft Gault, 19.8 (9.8⁻47.0) mL/min/1.73 m² for MDRD and 20.5 (4.9⁻49.6) mL/min for the Modified Jelliffe equations. The discordance rate for antimicrobial dosing ranged from a minimum of 8.6% to a maximum of 16.4%. In the event of discordance, the dose administered was supra-therapeutic 100% of the time using the Modified Jelliffe equation. Use of estimating equations other than the Cockcroft Gault equation may significantly alter dosing of antimicrobials in AKI.

Introduction: Age-related changes occurring in the kidney can lead to a reduction in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR); especially in older adults with multimorbidity and/or frailty, an accurate evaluation of kidney function is critical. For the estimation of GFR in patients over 70 years, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) is often used. However, validated equations exist for old-age populations like BIS1 (Berlin Initiative Study 1) and FAS (Full Age Spectrum). Here we aimed to compare the performance of CKD-EPI, MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), BIS1, and FAS in assessing eGFR in a population of patients over 70, to evaluate which equations show the most accurate performance in our setting., Materials and Methods: A total of 499 older adults were consecutively recruited in the Orthogeriatric ward and Oncogeriatrics clinic of IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino in Genoa Italy. eGFR was calculated using CKD-EPI, MDRD, BIS1, and FAS, calculating mean, median, standard deviation, and interquartile range. Bland-Altman graphs were used to evaluate how each equation performs with respect to the others and the concordance of the attribution of the KDIGO CKD stage was performed with Cohen's K constant and chi-squared test., Results: Patients' mean age was 82.6 years (± 7.44), and the mean creatinine value was 0.97 (± 0.71) mg/dl. The mean value of eGFR was 70 mL/min with CKD-EPI (± 20.6) and MDRD (± 25.7), 57 mL/min with BIS1 (± 16.7) and FAS (± 19.0), respectively. BIS1 and FAS estimated lower eGFR values than CKD-EPI and MDRD. As age increases, a steady decrease in filtrate value is observed with BIS1 and FAS. MDRD and CDK-EPI do not show the same trend. The performance of the equations at a fixed eGFR value of 30 mL/min is more linear for BIS1 and FAS compared with CKD-EPI and MDRD. Upon evaluation with chi-square, the attribution of KDIGO stage was statistically different among the various equations., Discussion: An appropriate assessment of renal function is of key clinical relevance to prevent adverse outcomes and risk of drug accumulation in older adults. Our study originally showed that in persons aged more than 70 years old BIS1 is the most accurate formula in calculating eGFR values when only serum creatinine is available., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Peruzzo, Ottaviani, Tagliafico, Muzyka, Ponzano, Marelli, Signori, Nencioni and Monacelli.)

Background and Design: Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease believed to affect renal functions. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important indicator used to assess renal functions. The present study aims to measure the renal function of psoriasis patients via the technetium-99m diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (Tc-99m DTPA) method and compare the values obtained with those determined through indirect measurement methods, such as the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), considering the effects of systemic treatments and comorbidities. Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with chronic plaque-type psoriasis vulgaris were included in this study. The patients’ demographic characteristics, disease duration, psoriasis area and severity index score, drugs received for psoriasis treatment, comorbidities, and drugs received for comorbidity treatment were noted. Estimated GFRs were also calculated using the MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas. Results: Tc-99m DTPA values were affected only by age. As the patient age increased, a significant decrease in GFR measured with Tc-99m DTPA (r=0.289, p

Background: Carboplatin is the backbone cytotoxic agent for many chemotherapy regimens for lung cancer. Dosing of carboplatin is complicated due to its relationship to renal function and narrow therapeutic index. Overestimation of renal function may lead to supratherapeutic dosing and toxicity, while underestimation may lead to underdosing and therapeutic failure. Although the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations have higher accuracy in estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the Cockcroft Gault (CG) formula has been historically used for carboplatin dosing internationally.Methods: We compared these formulae to identify patient profiles that were associated with significant carboplatin dose variation by retrospectively analysing the carboplatin dosing of 96 patients with lung cancer. Carboplatin doses were calculated using eGFR generated by MDRD, CKD-EPI 2009 and CKD-EPI 2021 equations. These three hypothetical doses were compared to actual CG-based doses prescribed.Results: MDRD and CKD-EPI equations resulted in comparable carboplatin doses; however, CG doses diverged markedly with up to 17% of the patients receiving a carboplatin dose that was at least 20% higher than a non-CG formula would have predicted, and 20% received a dose that was at least 20% lower than a non-CG formula would have predicted. Our data suggest CG use overestimates kidney function in patients with a higher bodyweight and body surface area (BSA) while underestimating it in patients with a lower bodyweight and BSA. Importantly, we demonstrate potential real-world benefit as CKD-EPI predicted lower doses for patients whose (CG-derived) carboplatin dose was later reduced following clinical assessment prior to infusion.Conclusions: We have therefore confirmed significant differences in carboplatin dosing depending on the equation used in our modern patient population and suggest that use of CKD-EPI provides the most clinically appropriate carboplatin dosing and should be implemented as the new standard of care internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Race coefficients of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formulas may be partially responsible for racial inequality in preemptive listing for kidney transplantation. Methods We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database to evaluate differences in racial distribution of preemptive listing before and after application of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) race coefficients to all preemptively listed non-Black kidney transplant candidates (eGFR modulation). Odds of preemptive listing were calculated by race, with Black as the reference before and after eGFR modulation. Variables known to influence preemptive listing were included in the model. Results Among 385 087 kidney-alone transplant candidates from 1 January 2010 to 2 December 2020, 118 329 (30.7%) candidates were identified as preemptively listed (71.7% White, 19% Black, 7.8% Asian, 0.6% multi-racial, 0.6% Native American and 0.3% Pacific Islander). After eGFR modulation, non-Black patients with an eGFR ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m2 were removed. Compared with Black candidates, the adjusted odds of preemptive listing for White candidates decreased from 2.01 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.78–2.26] before eGFR modulation to 1.18 (95% CI 1.0–1.39; P = 0.046) with the MDRD and 1.37 (95% CI 1.18–1.58) with the CKD-EPI equations after adjusting for race coefficients. Conclusions Removing race coefficients in GFR estimation formulas may result in a more equitable distribution of Black candidates listed earlier on a preemptive basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background To determine the prevalence, distribution, concordance and associations of chronic kidney disease (CKD) determined by five glomerular filtration rate (GFR) formulae in urban black residents of Cape Town. Methods Data collection in this cross-sectional study included interviews, clinical measurements and biochemical analyses, including serum creatinine and cystatin C levels. GFR was based on the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations (CKD-EPI creatinine (CKD-EPIcr), CKD-EPI cystatin C (CKD-EPIcys), CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatins (CKD-EPIcr-cys)), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault formula (CGF). GFR

INTRODUCTION: Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) may arise after the use of contrast agents. Estimating of real glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is very important in order to prevent CIN. The most used GFR estimating equations are Cockroft-Gault (CG) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) but their superiority to each other is unknown in contrast media used patients. METHODS: : Total of 165 patients enrolled to our study. Serum urea, creatinine and cystatin C levels of all patients were measured just before and fifth day of coronary angiography/angioplasty procedure. Alteration in serum cystatin C level was accepted as reference and GFR changes according to both equations were compared with serum cystatin C level variations. RESULTS: Decreased GFR values according to both formulas were related with an increasing in serum cystatin C levels (p¬=0.042). However, there wasn't any superiority of formulas to each other in terms of GFR alterations (r¬= -.276 and r= -.275 for CG and MDRD equations respectively). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Both CG and MDRD equations are useful to detect the GFR changes in coronary angiography performed patients and there was not superiority of them to each other. To our knowledge, this is a first study about the comparison of MDRD and CG equations in coronary artery visualized patients.

ABSTRACT: Background: Standard equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) employ race multipliers, systematically inflating eGFR for Black patients. Such inflation is clinically significant because eGFR thresholds of 60, 30, and 20 ml/min/1.73m2 guide kidney disease management. Racialized adjustment of eGFR in Black Americans may thereby affect their clinical care. In this study, we analyze and extrapolate national data to assess potential impacts of the eGFR race adjustment on qualification for kidney disease diagnosis, nephrologist referral, and transplantation listing. Methods: Using population-representative cross-sectional data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2015-2018, eGFR values for Black Americans were calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation with and without the 1.21 race-specific coefficient using cohort data on age, sex, race, and serum creatinine. Findings: Without the MDRD eGFR race adjustment, 3.3 million (10.4%) more Black Americans would reach a diagnostic threshold for Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease, 300,000 (0.7%) more would qualify for beneficial nephrologist referral, and 31,000 (0.1%) more would become eligible for transplant evaluation and waitlist inclusion. Interpretation: These findings suggest eGFR race coefficients may contribute to racial differences in the management of kidney. We provide recommendations for addressing this issue at institutional and individual levels. Funding: No external funding was received for this study.

Background: Numerous equations are used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), based on serum creatinine (SCr), demographic and anthropometric data, none established in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study aimed to validate the available SCr-based eGFR equations in comparison with a measured (mGFR), stratified by chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage and age at the time of testing. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven pediatric kidney transplant recipients with 411 mGFR values (plasma clearance of iothalamate) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The bias, precision, and accuracy (percentage of estimates within 10% and 30% of mGFR) of five SCr eGFR equations (original Schwartz, CKiDSCr equation, Pottel, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)) were assessed. Results: Height-independent Pottel equation performed well across all the categories of age and CKD staging. CKiDSCr equation performed well in CKD stages II–V. The CKiDSCr equation had a lower bias in children < 15 years of age, while MDRD and CKD-EPI equations had less bias in children > 15 years. Overall, both the Pottel and CKiDSCr equations had high accuracy (80%) and low bias (< 5 ml/min/1.73 m2). In contrast, the original Schwartz, MDRD, and CKD-EPI equations displayed high bias and low precision/accuracy. Conclusions: Given their low bias and high accuracy across ages and CKD stages, the Pottel or the CKiDSCr equation is better to assess eGFR in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. The Pottel equation outperformed other eGFR equations in adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Global prevalence estimates for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) vary. This study assessed real-world prevalence estimates of renal impairment, based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), among commercially insured patients with RA in the United States (US). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used administrative claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) between January 2013 and December 2018. Adult patients with ≥ 2 claims for RA and ≥ 2 serum creatinine (SCr) measurements ≥ 90 days apart on or after the index date were included. eGFR was calculated per the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Prevalence of eGFR-based renal impairment was estimated for the overall RA population and for two subgroups: patients on advanced therapies (biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs/tofacitinib) and patients stratified based on health plan types. Results: Among 128,062 patients with ≥ 2 RA claims, 42,173 had qualifying SCr measurements, 16,197 were on advanced RA therapies, and 4911 had Medicare Advantage or Supplemental plus Part D coverage. For the overall population and the subgroup on advanced therapies, mild renal impairment was observed in 52% and 51%, moderate renal impairment in 9% and 7%, and severe renal impairment in 0.5% and 0.3% of patients, respectively. Moderate and severe renal impairment was more prevalent in the Medicare Advantage/Supplemental plus Part D population compared to the commercial coverage population. Conclusions: Approximately 7–10% of commercially insured adult patients in the US with RA had moderate or severe renal impairment. Assessment of renal function is an important consideration for safe treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We removed the race correction factor from eGFR while moving from MDRD to CKD-EPI. • Reclassification rates were determined for our patient population. • Distributions of eGFR without race were similar in Black and non-Black patients. Creatinine-based MDRD and CKD-EPI equations include a race correction factor, which results in higher eGFR in Black patients. We evaluated the impact on our patient population upon adoption of the CKD-EPI equation and the removal of the race correction factor from the equation. Retrospective analysis of blood creatinine results and respective eGFR values calculated by the MDRD or CKD-EPI equation without the race correction factor (CKD-EPI NoRace) in a large academic medical system over a 20.5-month period. In our population, when changing from MDRD to CKD-EPI NoRace , we observed that 3.5% of all patients were reclassified to categorically have worse kidney function. However, we also observed fewer patients overall with eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Around 60 and 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, 2.96% and 0.16% of all patients > 65 years of age were reclassified, as were 4.29% and 0.03% of all Black patients, respectively. When calculated with CKD-EPI NoRace , median eGFR was not meaningfully different between Black and non-Black patients (p = 0.02). Changing from MDRD to CKD-EPI NoRace could lead to a lower referral rate to nephrology. The distributions of creatinine and eGFR calculated with CKD-EPI NoRace were not meaningfully different in Black and non-Black patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives This study validates two popular predictive equations of renal function firstly, Modifications of Diet in Renal Disease and secondly, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations for Sri Lankan cohort. We used data of the patients referred to Renal Research lab of University of Colombo for creatinine clearance measurement. Results Predictive performances varied with the gender. Creatinine clearance and predicted renal functions were compared. Both fared unsatisfactorily with R2 ranging from 0.632 to 0.652, and overestimated renal function by 6–15%. The proportion chronic kidney disease staging 1 and 2 returned by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation showed significant difference, in females. Modifications of Diet in Renal Disease equation significantly under-estimated advanced chronic kidney disease in females. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation had better accuracy. The study sample had more females, Asian and lower body size and better renal functions than historic cohorts. Thai and Pakistani studies show both equations and their Asian adaptations fare poorly. Chronic kidney disease stages differ significantly with the equation used. Predictive equations have fared unsatisfactorily by overestimating renal functions. We recommend further studies using gold standards of measuring renal function.

Introduction: The estimation of renal function is an important component of hospital care. To do this, estimates are usually used, based on serum creatinine levels. The most widely used equations are MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault. Objective: To evaluate the correlation of the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations with the creatinine clearance value, based on 24-hour urine collection. Methods: In order to carry out this study, the records of the Clinical Pathology Service of Hospital Nacional Hipólito Unanue, a reference hospital in Lima (Peru), were used. Serum creatinine was measured using the Jaffe’s method. Creatinine clearance was performed by simultaneous determinations of serum creatinine and urinary creatinine, obtained through 24-hour urine collection. Correlations were calculated using Pearson coefficient, considering significant values of p

Background and Design: Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease believed to affect renal functions. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important indicator used to assess renal functions. The present study aims to measure the renal function of psoriasis patients via the technetium-99m diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (Tc-99m DTPA) method and compare the values obtained with those determined through indirect measurement methods, such as the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), considering the effects of systemic treatments and comorbidities. Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with chronic plaque-type psoriasis vulgaris were included in this study. The patients' demographic characteristics, disease duration, psoriasis area and severity index score, drugs received for psoriasis treatment, comorbidities, and drugs received for comorbidity treatment were noted. Estimated GFRs were also calculated using the MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas. Results: Tc-99m DTPA values were affected only by age. As the patient age increased, a significant decrease in GFR measured with Tc-99m DTPA (r=0.289, p<0.001) was observed. Conclusion: Psoriasis, comorbidities, and nephrotoxic drugs used for treatment did not affect renal functions. GFR measurements were affected only by age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with the isotopic method is a gold standard. However, it is an elaborate and expensive procedure, so in everyday practice GFR is estimated with creatinine-based formulas. Despite the number of studies, it remains unclear which GFR estimating equation is the most accurate, especially in increasing elderly population. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the commonly used formulas to assess which one of them should be used in elderly female non-diabetic patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Material and methods : 336 non-diabetic females aged 70 and more were qualified to the study. On the basis of serum creatinine concentration, estimated GFR (eGFR) was estimated using various formulas. Results and discussions: The eGFR and CKD stages differ significantly depending on the used formula. The modification of diet in renal disease equation (MDRD) formula showed slightly, but still significantly, better correlation with creatinine concentration in serum than the CKD epidemiology collaboration equation. The Cockcroft-Gault equation formula was significantly inferior to above mentioned equations. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed that MDRD is the most sensitive equation and the differences between formulas compared in pairs were significant. Conclusions : Due to its highest correlation with creatinine and its highest sensitivity and specificity, the MDRD formula seems to be the most accurate equation to estimate GFR in elderly non-diabetic females. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Médica de Rosario is the property of Circulo Medico de Rosario and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely prescribed nowadays. Available DOACs are renally eliminated to some extent and need dose adjustment in patients with kidney dysfunction. Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula has been used to estimate creatinine clearance in DOACs trials. Nowadays, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) are preferred equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We reviewed studies that simulated DOACs dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation by MDRD, CKD-EPI, and CG. DOACs dose discordance varies from 28.8% underdosing to 59.2% overdosing when MDRD or CKD-EPI equations are substituted for CG. MDRD and CKD-EPI overestimate the GFR in lower thresholds of kidney function especially in elderly and females and result in overestimation of DOACs dosing or misclassifying the patients to be eligible for receiving DOACs when they are contraindicated. Compared with CG, MDRD and CKD-EPI underestimate the level of kidney function in higher GFR extremes and in these patients suggest DOACs when they are not recommended or suggest lower doses. Until running large clinical studies on efficacy/safety of DOACs dosing using MDRD or CKD-EPI equations, use of CG method for DOACs dosing is recommended in real practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is commonly used to monitor chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, but its validity for evaluating kidney function changes over time has not been comprehensively evaluated. We assessed the performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating GFR slope according to patient characteristics and specific CKD diagnosis. Methods In the NephroTest cohort study, we measured GFR 5324 times by chromium 51–labeled ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid renal clearance in 1955 adult patients with CKD Stages 1–4 referred to nephrologists (Stages 1–2, 19%) and simultaneously estimated GFR with both the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations for isotope dilution mass spectrometry traceable creatinine; absolute and relative GFR slopes were calculated using a linear mixed model. Results Over a median follow-up of 3.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.0–5.6] years, the decline in mean absolute and relative measured GFR (mGFR) and CKD-EPI and MDRD estimated GFR (eGFR) was 1.6 ± 1.2, 1.5 ± 1.4 and 1.3 ± 1.3 mL/min/1.73 m2/year and 5.9 ± 5.3, 5.3 ± 5.3 and 4.8 ± 5.2%/year, respectively; 52% and 55% of the patients had MDRD and CKD-EPI eGFR slopes within 30% of mGFR slopes. Both equations tended to overestimate the GFR slope in the youngest patients and underestimate it in the oldest, thus producing inverse associations between age and mGFR versus eGFR slope. Other patient characteristics and specific CKD diagnoses had little effect on the performance of the equations in estimating associations. Conclusions This study shows little bias, but poor precision in GFR slope estimation for both MDRD and CKD-EPI equations. Importantly, bias strongly varied with age, possibly due to variations in muscle mass over time, with implications for clinical care and research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The most commonly used glomerular filtration rate estimating equations for drug dosing are Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. However there is still a concern about whether to use MDRD and CKD-EPI interchangeably with CG for drug dosage adjustment. Methods The study was initiated to determine the concordance between MDRD, CKD-EPI and CG equations and associated factors in patients with chronic kidney disease at Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC). This was a cross sectional study which involved patient chart review and physicians self-administered questionnaire. Serum creatinine level ≥ 1.2 mg/dL was used as a cutoff point in pre-selection of patients. The correctness of the drug dose prescribed for the level of renal function were compared to the drug database (Lexi-Comp) available through Up-to-date version 21.2. Results Among the total of 422 patients, 249 (59%) were males. Mean age of patients was 46.09 years. The use of MDRD equation for drug dose adjustment by physicians working in the renal clinic of SPHMMC was six out of nine physicians. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the CG with MDRD and CKD-EPI equations was r = 0.94, P 70 years was associated with discordance between CG and MDRD equations for drug dosing recommendation whereas serum creatinine 1.2–3.5 mg/dL, weight 70 years were associated with discordance between the CG with MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for FDA assigned kidney function categories. However, none of the factors associated with discordance between CG and CKD-EPI for drug dosing. Conclusion MDRD equation can be used interchangeably with CG equation for drug dosing recommended in all adult patients between the age of 18 and 70 years. CKD-EPI can be used interchangeably with CG in all adult Ethiopian patients with CKD.

Abstract Background Accurate measurement of renal function is important: however, radiolabelled gold standard measurement of GFR is highly expensive and can only be used on a very limited scale. We aim to compare the performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in the multi-ethnic population attending University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). Methods This is a cross-sectional study recruiting patients, who attend UMMC Nephrology clinics on voluntary basis. 51-Chromium EDTA (51Cr-EDTA) plasma level was used to measure the reference GFR. The serum creatinine was determined by IDMS reference modified Jaffe kinetic assay (CrJaffe). The predictive capabilities of MDRD and CKD-EPI based equations were calculated. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20 and correlation, bias, precision and accuracy were determined. Results A total of 113 subjects with mean age of 58.12 ± 14.76 years and BMI of 25.99 ± 4.29 kg/m2 were recruited. The mean reference GFR was 66.98 ± 40.65 ml/min/1.73m2, while the estimated GFR based on MDRD and CKD-EPI formula were 62.17 ± 40.40, and 60.44 ± 34.59, respectively. Both MDRD and CKD-EPI were well-correlated with reference GFR (0.806 and 0.867 respectively) and statistically significant with p

Abstract Background Several equations have been developed to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The common equations used were derived from populations predominantly comprised of Caucasians with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Some of the equations provide a correction factor for African-Americans due to their relatively increased muscle mass and this has been extrapolated to black Africans. Studies carried out in Africa in patients with CKD suggest that using this correction factor for the black African race may not be appropriate. However, these studies were not carried out in healthy individuals and as such the extrapolation of the findings to an asymptomatic black African population is questionable. We sought to compare the proportion of asymptomatic black Africans reported as having reduced eGFR using various eGFR equations. We further compared the association between known risk factors for CKD with eGFR determined using the different equations. Methods We used participant and laboratory data collected as part of a global reference interval study conducted by the Committee of Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL) under the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Serum creatinine values were used to calculate eGFR using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), re-expressed 4 variable modified diet in renal disease (4v–MDRD), full age spectrum (FAS) and chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equations (CKD-EPI). CKD classification based on eGFR was determined for every participant. Results A total of 533 participants were included comprising 273 (51.2%) females. The 4v–MDRD equation without correction for race classified the least number of participants (61.7%) as having an eGFR equivalent to CKD stage G1 compared to 93.6% for CKD-EPI with correction for race. Only age had a statistically significant linear association with eGFR across all equations after performing multiple regression analysis. The multiple correlation coefficients for CKD risk factors were higher for CKD-EPI determined eGFRs. Conclusions This study found that eGFR determined using CKD-EPI equations better correlated with a prediction model that included risk factors for CKD and classified fewer asymptomatic black Africans as having a reduced eGFR compared to 4v–MDRD, FAS and CG corrected for body surface area.

Copyright of Nefrologia is the property of Revista Nefrologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Although environmental exposure to multiple metals is common, epidemiological studies on the associations of exposure to 23 metals with kidney function have not been analyzed. We aimed to investigate the associations of 23 metals levels with renal function. We conducted a cross-sectional study in four rural regions of Hunan province. Plasma and urine metals levels were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). Two-level logistic regression was used to investigate the associations of metals levels with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with adjustment for confounding factors. We conducted a sensitivity analysis of the results using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. A total of 3553 participants completed the investigation. Five metals (plasma arsenic and molybdenum; urine copper, rubidium, and strontium) were identified to be significantly associated with renal function. Participants in the highest quartile of plasma arsenic and molybdenum were at 17.95 (95% CI: 6.35–50.76) and 24.23 (95% CI: 7.42–79.19) fold risk of abnormal eGFR, respectively, compared with the lowest quartile. The highest quartiles of urine copper, rubidium, and strontium were associated with 3.70 (95% CI:1.92–7.14), 0.16 (95% CI:0.07–0.37) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.03–0.21) fold risk of abnormal eGFR. The sensitivity analysis revealed that plasma arsenic, molybdenum and urine copper, rubidium and strontium levels retained similar associations with abnormal eGFR. Plasma arsenic and molybdenum, and urine copper are risk factors for abnormal renal function, while urine rubidium and strontium are protective factors for renal function. • A cross-sectional study was conducted in four rural regions of Hunan province. • The associations of multiple metal levels with renal function was investigated. • Multiple metals in plasma and urine are associated with abnormal eGFR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Résumé: La prise en charge de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) au cours de la cirrhose s'est simplifiée et est indépendante de sa cause. Elle repose sur les mesures générales suivantes : la recherche et le traitement d'un facteur précipitant (en particulier une infection bactérienne), l'arrêt des médicaments potentiellement aggravants et une expansion volémique. Le diagnostic de syndrome hépatorénal (SHR), une forme particulière d'IRA, nécessite notamment l'absence de réponse au remplissage par albumine pendant deux jours consécutifs. Le traitement du SHR repose sur l'association d'un vasoconstricteur et de l'albumine. La terlipressine est le vasoconstricteur de référence, mais la noradrénaline peut également être utilisée dans les unités de soins intensifs en cas d'indisponibilité ou d'intolérance à la terlipressine. La transplantation hépatique représente, en théorie, le meilleur traitement du SHR, à condition de ne pas méconnaître une maladie rénale chronique sous-jacente avancée qui pourrait justifier une transplantation combinée hépatique et rénale. La prévention de l'IRA repose sur les mesures suivantes : la compensation des paracentèses de grand volume par des perfusions d'albumine, l'administration d'une antibiothérapie pour prévenir le risque de récidive d'une infection du liquide d'ascite et lors d'une hémorragie digestive, et le respect des contre-indications médicamenteuses pouvant précipiter l'IRA. Management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cirrhosis has been simplified and is independent of its cause. This medical management relies on screening and treatment of triggering events (especially bacterial infection), withdrawal of all nephrotoxic drugs, and plasma volume expansion whenever required. The diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is based on the absence of response after two consecutive days of plasma volume expansion with albumin. When HRS is diagnosed, patients should promptly receive vasoconstrictive drugs in association with albumin. Terlipressin is the most investigated vasoconstrictor, but noradrenaline may also be used in intensive care units whenever terlipressin is not available or poorly tolerated. Liver transplantation (LT) represents, theoretically, the definitive treatment of HRS. However, the non-recovery of renal function after LT is frequent and favored by unexpected advanced chronic kidney disease or by a prolonged AKI which may lead to a simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Prevention of AKI is crucial and includes plasma volume expansion when large volume paracentesis is required, antibioprophylaxis after a first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding, and discontinuation of drugs susceptible to precipitate AKI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Renal function is the most commonly applied patient‐specific quantitative variable used to determine drug doses. Measurement of renal function is not practical in most clinical settings; therefore, clinicians often rely on estimates when making dosing decisions. Similarly, renal function estimates are used to assign subjects in phase 1 pharmacokinetic studies, which inform dosing in late‐phase clinical trials and ultimately the product label. The Cockcroft‐Gault estimate of creatinine clearance has been the standard renal function metric; however, this paradigm is shifting toward the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD) estimate of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The proportion of approved new drug labels with dosing recommendations based on the MDRD equation was 16.7% in 2015, 70.0% in 2016, and 46.7% in 2017. Disharmonious recommendations from the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency will continue to increase this heterogeneity in the assessment of renal function in drug development and negatively impact industry, health systems, and clinicians. In this review, we discuss the current regulatory guidance for the conduct of renal impairment pharmacokinetic studies and review the implications of this guidance across the medication use system with 3 recently approved antibiotics: ceftazidime/avibactam, delafloxacin, and meropenem/vaborbactam. Finally, we suggest measuring GFR in phase 1 studies and employing the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD‐EPI) equation to integrate data across clinical trials. This will help to harmonize CKD staging, population pharmacokinetic analyses, and dosing by estimated renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reporting of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in every creatinine test is suggested, despite the fact that every laboratory reports it in their result. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) is a formula that is used to estimate the GFR using serum creatinine. Serum cystatin C is a relatively new test and superior for assessing kidney functions. The purpose of this study was to show the correlation between MDRD and serum cystatin C. A cross-sectional study was conducted using secondary data from 260 subjects, aged 40–70 years old to assess serum creatinine and serum cystatin C at a private laboratory in West Jakarta, during the period of January 2013–September 2014. The result of the study showed that the mean age of subjects was 55.7+7.8 years old, the mean serum cystatin C level was 0.99 + 0.6 mg/L, and the mean MDRD was 80.24±28.1 mL/min/1.73 m2. Pearson correlation analysis showed a negative correlation between MDRD and serum cystatin C with r = -0.767 and p =0.001. In conclusion, higher MDRD presents lower cystatin C serum; hence, MDRD can be used as an alternative renal function test when serum cystatin C is not available. [

Background: The evaluation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in cancer patients seems to rely mostly on the Cockcroft‐Gault (CG) formula or the creatinine levels to adjust treatment dosages which is a practice refuted by internists. Aims: We evaluate the overall agreement of the CG, modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and CKD–epidemiology collaboration equations (CKD‐EPI) equation with the newly devised Janowitz and Williams' (JW) equation. Methods: The renal function was estimated in 235 cancer patients according to the CG, MDRD, body surface area (BSA)‐adjusted MDRD, CKD‐EPI, BSA‐adjusted CKD‐EPI and JW formulae. Results: JW equation was more in agreement with CG and CKD‐EPI estimations than the other equations. Taking JW equation as reference, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that CG eGFR had the higher area under the curve when compared with other equations. Hierarchical cluster analysis showed more proximity between CG and JW equations than the other equations. Conclusion: The newly proposed JW eGFR estimation was more in agreement with CG equation than the other equations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) plays a vital role in assessment of the renal function. This study evaluated the performance of the CKD-EPI creat and MDRD equations in the South African Kwa-Zulu Natal population. Objectives The objectives if the study were to compare the of CKD-EPI creat and MDRD equations in the selected population to the measured GFR using Sodium Technetium-99 m-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate clearance derived GFR. Method Records of adult patients with measured GFR performed at the Nuclear Medicine Department at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2016 were reviewed. eGFR for all included patients was calculated using the MDRD equation without African American correction factor and the CKD-EPI creat equation with and without the African American correction factor for the Black African patients. Statistical comparison of the eGFR with measured GFR was performed with Bland Altman bias plots, Wilcoxon match pairs signed ranks test and accuracy within 10% and 30%.ROC curve analysis assessed the sensitivity and specificity at eGFR <90 and < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 . Results After exclusion, 287 patients were included for analysis with sufficient numbers for only the Black African and Indian patients. None of the equations showed accuracy of eGFR within 30% of measured GFR for 90% of patients. In the Black African population, the CKD-EPI creat equation without the correction factor performed best. 17% and 14.4% of the Black African participants would be reclassified with the CKD-EPI creat equation without and with the African American correction factor respectively compared to mGFR at a cut-off of 60 mls/min/1.73m 2 . Conclusion None of the evaluated equations attained the 2002 KDOQI benchmark of P 30 >90%. 11.1–17% of individuals would have been incorrectly classified using the CKD-EPI creat equation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR). The eGFR is calculated from serum creatinine levels using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) or Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations.Aim: To compare the performance of one versus two eGFR/ACR measurements, and the impact of equation choice, on CKD diagnosis and classification.Design and Setting: Cohort study in primary care in the Thames Valley region of the UK.Method: Data were from 485 participants aged >60 years in the Oxford Renal Cohort Study with at least two eGFR tests. The proportion of study participants diagnosed and classified into different CKD stages using one and two positive tests were compared. Prevalence of CKD diagnosis and classification by CKD stage were compared when eGFR was calculated using MDRD and CKD-EPI equations.Results: Participants included in the analysis had a mean age of 72.1 (±6.8) years and 57.0% were female. Use of a single screening test overestimated the proportion of people with CKD by around 25% no matter which equation was used, compared with the use of two tests. The mean eGFR was 1.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI = 1.1 to 1.6) higher using the CKD-EPI equation compared with the MDRD equation. More patients were diagnosed with CKD when using the MDRD equation, compared with the CKD-EPI equation, once (64% versus 63%, respectively) and twice (39% versus 38%, respectively), and 16 individuals, all of who had CKD stages 2 or 3A with MDRD, were reclassified as having a normal urinary ACR when using the CKD-EPI equation.Conclusion: Current guidance to use two eGFR measures to diagnose CKD remains appropriate in an older primary care population to avoid overdiagnosis. A change from MDRD to CKD-EPI equation could result in one in 12 patients with a CKD diagnosis with MDRD no longer having a diagnosis of CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introducción: la artritis reumatoidea (AR) es uno de los síndromes clínicos con mayor frecuencia dentro de las afecciones reumatológicas y su asociación con las enfermedades glomerulares es poco frecuente. Objetivo: describir los hallazgos histopatológicos en las biopsias renales en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea y correlacionarlos con las manifestaciones clínicas y de laboratorio al inicio, a los 6 meses y al año de seguimiento. Pacientes y métodos: es un estudio observacional retrospectivo realizado en un hospital Universitario en Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se incluyeron 41 pacientes con diagnóstico de artritis reumatoidea de acuerdo a los criterios establecidos por el Colegio Americano de Reumatología publicados en 1987; en un período de 20 años. Se incluyeron diagnósticos histopatológicos de nefropatía membranosa (NM), enfermedad de cambios mínimos (ECM), amiloidosis secundaria (AA), gloméruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria (GEFS); glomerulopatía mesangial (GPM) y glomerulonefritis con proliferación extracapilar (GNEC). Las características clínicas, de laboratorios, la descripción histopatológica, los años de evolución de la artritis reumatoidea y los diferentes tratamientos fueron analizados durante los primeros 6 meses y al año del seguimiento. Con esto, se buscó determinar la progresión de la insuficiencia renal, calculada a través de la fórmula de MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) de 4 variables y el aumento de la proteinuria. Resultados: El hallazgo histológico más frecuente fue la amiloidosis, con un 34.1 % (n=14), seguido de la glomerulopatía mesangial (21,9 %, n=9), la nefropatía membranosa (19,5 %, n=8), la glomerulonefritis con proliferación extracapilar (12,1 %, n=5), la glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria (7,3 %, n=3) y enfermedad de cambios mínimos (8,2 %, n=2). El síndrome nefrótico fue la forma de presentación más frecuente en los pacientes con amiloidosis (en un 85,7 % de los casos), la microhematuria se presentó en el 100 % de los pacientes con GPM y en el 80 % de los pacientes con GNEC. En el 85,7 % de los pacientes con AA, se presentó fibrosis intersticial moderada a severa, mientras que en la GNEC y la NM la fibrosis se observó en un 80 % y 40 % respectivamente. Se evaluó la proteinuria de 24 horas, la creatinina y la filtración glomerular estimada por MDRD a los 6 y a los 12 meses. Se concluyó que los pacientes con AA, GEFS y GNEC presentaron mayor progresión de la insuficiencia renal a los 12 meses. Lo contrario sucedió en los pacientes con enfermedad de cambios mínimos (ECM) y glomerulopatía mesangial (GPM), los cuales tenían una menor progresión de la insuficiencia renal al año de seguimiento. Hubo una correlación entre las glomerulopatías que tenían mayor deterioro de la función renal en las cuales se observó a su vez, mayor compromiso tubulointersticial, (este fue el caso de la amiloidosis). Las glomerulopatías que presentaban mayor proteinuria al inicio eran la nefropatía membranosa, la amiloidosis y la enfermedad de cambios mínimos. Tanto la nefropatía membranosa como la enfermedad de cambios mínimos, tenía remisión parcial tras un año, a diferencia de la amiloidosis, la cual presentaba progresión de la proteinuria a los 12 meses de seguimiento. Conclusión: las glomerulopatías que presentaron mayor progresión de la insuficiencia renal al año, con base en la estimación por MDRD4, tenían en la biopsia renal mayor compromiso tubulointersticial. Estas fueron la amiloidosis secundaria, la glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria, y glomerulonefritis con proliferación extracapilar. Por el contrario, las de mejor evolución respecto al grado de proteinuria y tasa de filtrado glomerular determinado por MDRD4, fueron la glomerulopatía mesangial, la enfermedad de cambios mínimos y la nefropatía membranosa.

Background/Aims: Accurate staging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is very important. We tried to identify difference in GFR evaluation between CKD-EPI and Gates method with renal scintigraphy and which variables are associated with these differences. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 341 patients who underwent dynamic renal scintigraphy in the last 5 years. Patients were categorized according to KDIGO staging I to V, using the eGFR calculated with the CKD-EPI equation. Secondarily, we stratified patients according to treatment with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors. Results: Gates method tends to underestimate GFR especially in CKD stage I (mean -22.2 ml/min) and II (mean -12.5 ml/min). The division in quartiles of ages showed an underestimation of GFR only in the first quartile of age (Conclusion: The assessment of GFR by the Gates method must be carefully considered in the early stages of CKD, especially in younger patients. Moreover, the difference is more pronounced in patients treated with RAS inhibitors. Longitudinal studies will prove which method better predicts cardiovascular or renal events.

Background: The most commonly used glomerular filtration rate estimating equations for drug dosing are Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. However there is still a concern about whether to use MDRD and CKD-EPI interchangeably with CG for drug dosage adjustment.Methods: The study was initiated to determine the concordance between MDRD, CKD-EPI and CG equations and associated factors in patients with chronic kidney disease at Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC). This was a cross sectional study which involved patient chart review and physicians self-administered questionnaire. Serum creatinine level ≥ 1.2 mg/dL was used as a cutoff point in pre-selection of patients. The correctness of the drug dose prescribed for the level of renal function were compared to the drug database (Lexi-Comp) available through Up-to-date version 21.2.Results: Among the total of 422 patients, 249 (59%) were males. Mean age of patients was 46.09 years. The use of MDRD equation for drug dose adjustment by physicians working in the renal clinic of SPHMMC was six out of nine physicians. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the CG with MDRD and CKD-EPI equations was r = 0.94, P < 0.001 and r = 0.95, P < 0.001, respectively. The concordance between the CG with MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for FDA assigned kidney function categories was 73.7%, Kappa = 0.644 and 74.9%, Kappa = 0.659, respectively. Concordance between the CG with MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for the drug dosing recommendation was 89.6%, kappa = 0.782 and 92%, kappa = 0.834, respectively. Age > 70 years was associated with discordance between CG and MDRD equations for drug dosing recommendation whereas serum creatinine 1.2-3.5 mg/dL, weight < 61 Kg and age > 70 years were associated with discordance between the CG with MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for FDA assigned kidney function categories. However, none of the factors associated with discordance between CG and CKD-EPI for drug dosing.Conclusion: MDRD equation can be used interchangeably with CG equation for drug dosing recommended in all adult patients between the age of 18 and 70 years. CKD-EPI can be used interchangeably with CG in all adult Ethiopian patients with CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several equations have been developed to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The common equations used were derived from populations predominantly comprised of Caucasians with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Some of the equations provide a correction factor for African-Americans due to their relatively increased muscle mass and this has been extrapolated to black Africans. Studies carried out in Africa in patients with CKD suggest that using this correction factor for the black African race may not be appropriate. However, these studies were not carried out in healthy individuals and as such the extrapolation of the findings to an asymptomatic black African population is questionable. We sought to compare the proportion of asymptomatic black Africans reported as having reduced eGFR using various eGFR equations. We further compared the association between known risk factors for CKD with eGFR determined using the different equations.Methods: We used participant and laboratory data collected as part of a global reference interval study conducted by the Committee of Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL) under the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Serum creatinine values were used to calculate eGFR using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), re-expressed 4 variable modified diet in renal disease (4v-MDRD), full age spectrum (FAS) and chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equations (CKD-EPI). CKD classification based on eGFR was determined for every participant.Results: A total of 533 participants were included comprising 273 (51.2%) females. The 4v-MDRD equation without correction for race classified the least number of participants (61.7%) as having an eGFR equivalent to CKD stage G1 compared to 93.6% for CKD-EPI with correction for race. Only age had a statistically significant linear association with eGFR across all equations after performing multiple regression analysis. The multiple correlation coefficients for CKD risk factors were higher for CKD-EPI determined eGFRs.Conclusions: This study found that eGFR determined using CKD-EPI equations better correlated with a prediction model that included risk factors for CKD and classified fewer asymptomatic black Africans as having a reduced eGFR compared to 4v-MDRD, FAS and CG corrected for body surface area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Accurate measurement of renal function is important: however, radiolabelled gold standard measurement of GFR is highly expensive and can only be used on a very limited scale. We aim to compare the performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in the multi-ethnic population attending University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC).Methods: This is a cross-sectional study recruiting patients, who attend UMMC Nephrology clinics on voluntary basis. 51-Chromium EDTA (51Cr-EDTA) plasma level was used to measure the reference GFR. The serum creatinine was determined by IDMS reference modified Jaffe kinetic assay (CrJaffe). The predictive capabilities of MDRD and CKD-EPI based equations were calculated. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20 and correlation, bias, precision and accuracy were determined.Results: A total of 113 subjects with mean age of 58.12 ± 14.76 years and BMI of 25.99 ± 4.29 kg/m2 were recruited. The mean reference GFR was 66.98 ± 40.65 ml/min/1.73m2, while the estimated GFR based on MDRD and CKD-EPI formula were 62.17 ± 40.40, and 60.44 ± 34.59, respectively. Both MDRD and CKD-EPI were well-correlated with reference GFR (0.806 and 0.867 respectively) and statistically significant with p < 0.001. In the overall cohort, although MDRD had smaller bias than CKD-EPI (4.81 vs. 6.54), CKD-EPI was more precise (25.22 vs. 20.29) with higher accuracy within 30% of measured GFR (79.65 vs. 86.73%).Conclusion: The CKD-EPI equation appeared to be more precise and accurate than the MDRD equation in estimating GFR in our cohort of multi-ethnic populations in Malaysia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Résumé Le débit de filtration glomérulaire est le meilleur marqueur quantitatif de fonction rénale. Il permet le diagnostic et la classification en cinq stades de gravité de la maladie rénale chronique. La mesure du débit de filtration glomérulaire repose en théorie sur le calcul de la clairance urinaire de substances exogènes telles l’inuline ou l’éthylène-diamine-tétra-acétique acide marqué au chrome 51. En pratique, le débit de filtration glomérulaire est le plus souvent estimé à partir d’équations dérivées de la créatinine plasmatique. Ce travail passe en revue l’ensemble des méthodes destinées à mesurer ou approcher le débit de filtration glomérulaire, et s’attache à décrire les évolutions récentes dans ce domaine, incluant celles concernant les méthodes de dosage de la créatinine plasmatique, les estimateurs dérivés de la concentration de créatinine et de la cystatine. La place de la mesure du débit de filtration glomérulaire par clairance de traceurs exogènes est également discutée. Glomerular filtration rate is the best quantitative marker of renal function. It allows diagnosis and classification of severe chronic kidney disease into five stages. Theoretically, the measurement of glomerular filtration rate is based on the calculation of urinary clearance of exogenous substances such as chromium 51-labeled inulin or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ([ 51 Cr]-EDTA). In practice, glomerular filtration rate is most often estimated from equations derived from plasma creatinine. This article reviews the range of methods used to measure or approximate glomerular filtration rate and attempts to describe recent developments in this area, including those related to plasma creatinine assay methods, creatinine and cystatin C concentration-derived estimations. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by the clearance of exogenous tracers is also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Renal function impairment is common in geriatric palliative care patients. Accurate assessment of renal function is necessary for appropriate drug dosage. Several equations are used to estimate kidney function. Aims: 1) To investigate the differences (_) in kidney function assessed with simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Berlin Initiative Study (BIS1), and Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) formulas in geriatric palliative care patients, and 2) to assess factors that may influence these differences. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data of patients aged ≥70 years admitted to a palliative care in-patient unit. The agreement between C-G, MDRD, and BIS1 equations was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis. Partial correlation analysis was used to analyze factors influencing the discordance. Results: A total of 174 patients (67 men; mean age 77.9±5.8 years) were enrolled. The mean Δ MDRD and C-G was 18.6 (95% limits of agreement 55.3 and -18.2). The mean Δ BIS1 and C-G was 6.1 (25.7 and -13.5), and the mean Δ MDRD and BIS1 was 12.5 (40.6 and -15.6). According to the National Kidney Foundation classification, 61 (35.1%) patients were differently staged using MDRD and C-G, while ~20% of patients were differently staged with BIS1 and C-G and MDRD and BIS1. Serum creatinine (SCr) and body mass index (BMI) had the most important influence on variability of Δ MDRD and C-G (partial R2 37.7% and 28.4%). Variability of Δ BIS1 and C-G was mostly influenced by BMI (34.8%) and variability of Δ MDRD and BIS1 by SCr (42.2%). Age had relatively low influence on differences between equations (3.1%-9.5%). Conclusion: There is a considerable disagreement between renal function estimation formulas, especially MDRD and C-G in geriatric palliative care patients, which may lead to errors in drug dosage adjustment. The magnitude of discrepancy increases with lower SCr, lower BMI, and higher age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In acutely unwell patients with rapidly changing renal function, estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and predicting adverse renal outcomes are challenging and often inaccurate. Kinetic GFR (kGFR) is an estimate of immediate biomarker clearance derived from two discreet measurements that may better represent acute function. Our objective is to assess the clinical utility of kGFR as a predictive tool and examine the association of kGFR to adverse renal outcomes compared with measurements to traditional estimates. Methods: We compared the association of kGFR and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) with acute kidney injury (AKI), renal replacement therapy (RRT), cardiovascular morbidity, 30-day mortality and new chronic kidney disease development. A total of 107 acute admissions to a medical high dependency and intensive care unit were assessed retrospectively. Creatinine measurements and outcomes were recorded and kGFR was calculated at the earliest possible time point. This was then compared with simultaneous MDRD estimated GFR. Results: Mean age was 60 years old, AKI occurred in 25% of patients, acute cardiovascular events occurred in 13%, RRT was initiated in 15% and 30-day mortality was 30%. kGFR predicted the AKI more accurately than MDRD [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.86 versus AUC = 0.64]. kGFR predicted the need for RRT more accurately than MDRD (AUC = 0.901 versus AUC = 0.79). Neither kGFR nor admission MDRD was associated with 30-day mortality or cardiovascular morbidity. Conclusions: Measuring kGFR in the acute setting could help clinicians better predict adverse renal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements are critical in patients with hepatic cirrhosis but potentially erroneous when based on serum creatinine. New equations for estimated GFR (eGFR) have shown variable performance in cirrhotics, possibly because of inaccuracies in reference methods for measured GFR (mGFR). The primary objective was to compare the performance of 4 improved eGFR equations with a 1-compartment, 2-sample plasma slope intercept 99mTc-DTPA mGFR method to determine whether any of the eGFR calculations could replace plasma 99mTc-DTPA mGFR in patients with cirrhosis. The secondary objective was to test the hypothesis that mGFR using voluntary voided urine collections introduces error compared with plasma-only methods. Methods: Fifty-four patients with hepatic cirrhosis underwent mGFR determinations from 2 plasma samples at 1 and 3 h after intravenous administration of 185 MBq of 99mTc-DTPA. GFR was also generated by a UV/P calculation derived from blood and urine samples. These mGFRs were compared with the eGFRs generated by 4 estimating equations: MDRD (Modified Diet in Renal Disease), CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration) (serum creatinine [SCr]), CKD-EPI (cystatin [CysC]), and CKD-EPI (CysC+SCr). eGFRs were compared with mGFRs by Pearson correlation, precision, bias, percentage bias, and accuracy (eGFRs varying by <10% [p10], <20% [p20] or <30% [p30] from the corresponding mGFR). Results: All eGFRs showed poorer performance when the UV/P 99mTc-DTPA mGFR was used as the reference than when the plasma 99mTc-DTPA mGFR was used. When compared with the plasma 99mTc-DTPA mGFR method, the performance of all eGFR equations was superior to most published reports. There was a moderately good positive correlation between eGFRs and mGFRs. When compared with plasma 99mTc-DTPA mGFR, precision of eGFRs was in the range of 14-20 mL/min and showed a negligible bias. Compared with the plasma 99mTc-DTPA mGFR, CKD-EPI (CysC+SCr) showed the best overall performance and accuracy, at 85.19% (p30), 75.93% (p20), and 42.59% (p10). Conclusion: Estimating equations for measuring eGFR performed better than in most published reports, attributable to use of the plasma 99mTc-DTPA mGFR method as a reference. CKD-EPI (CysC+SCr) eGFR showed the best overall performance. However, more discriminating methods may be required when accurate GFR measurements are necessary. mGFR measurements using urine collections may introduce error compared with plasma-only methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. A systematic bias against women, resulting from the use of creatinine as a measure of renal function, has been identified in Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based liver allocation. Correction of this bias by calculation of female creatinine levels using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula has been suggested.Material and methods. A cohort of 639 cirrhotic candidates for first-time liver transplantation was studied. Creatinine levels were corrected for gender using the MDRD formula. The accuracy of MELD, with or without creatinine correction, to predict 3- and 6-month mortality after inclusion in a transplant waiting list was estimated.Results. Women exhibited significantly lower creatinine levels, glomerular filtration rate, and MELD scores than men. After creatinine correction, female MELD scores had a mean increase of 1.1 points. Creatinine correction yielded an increase of 3 points in the MELD score in 15.2% of patients, 2 points in 22.4%, and 1 point in 17.6% of patients. The likelihood of death at 3 and 6 months after enrollment in the transplant waiting list was similar in males and females and the likelihood of receiving a transplant, as assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves, was also similar in males and females.Conclusion. The survival or the likelihood of receiving a transplant while on the waiting list were similar in men and women in both pre- and post-MELD eras and creatinine correction did not increase the accuracy of the MELD score in estimating 3- and 6-month mortality in female candidates for liver transplantation.