Search

Introduction: Obesity is a prevalent co-morbidity in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), causing metabolic disturbances that lead to changes in endocrinological homeostasis. Adipokines are proinflammatory molecules secreted by adipose tissues that affect metabolic and endocrinological mechanisms. Excess androgen secretion alters fat distribution and deposition, leading to increased visceral obesity in PCOS, which is a major concern for the development of cardiometabolic events. Aim: To assess the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) and levels of different adipokines in non obese and obese PCOS patients, and to establish the relationship between VAI and circulating adipokines in both non obese and obese phenotypes of PCOS patients. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India from November 2019 to August 2021. A total of 144 patients diagnosed with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria were divided into non obese and obese categories based on Body Mass Index (BMI). VAI was calculated using a sex-specific formula, and serum levels of adiponectin, resistin, and leptin were measured by Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA). Fasting glucose, insulin, and serum lipid profiles were evaluated. Data were statistically analysed using Student's t-tests and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Weighted linear regression was used to detect any relationships between adipokines, obesity indicators, and VAI. Results: A total of 144 female patients with a mean age of 27.47±0.33 years suffering from PCOS were included in this study. VAI was significantly higher (p-value=0.034) in non obese patients than in obese patients. There was a significant correlation between VAI and resistin (r-value=0.302, p-value=0.011) and leptin (r-value=0.308, p-value=0.009) in the non obese PCOS group. Additionally, there was a significant association between obesity indicators {BMI, Body Fat Percentage (BFP), Waist Circumference (WC), and Hip Circumference (HC)} and VAI; this association was absent in the obese subgroup. According to the regression model, leptin was the only statistically relevant predictor for VAI among the studied PCOS patients (t-value=2.278, p-value=0.024). Conclusion: VAI was higher in non obese PCOS patients. An imbalance in adipokines (leptin and resistin) may lead to the accumulation of visceral fat without significantly affecting BMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Digit ratio (2D:4D) has been associated with cardiovascular diseases using association with surrogate markers. Studies showing an association of digit ratio with cardiovascular parameters within normal limits are scarce. Aim: To explore the relation between different blood pressure components and digit ratio in normal young males within physiological range. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 25 apparently healthy male volunteers were included. Digit ratio (2D:4D) was measured. Body Mass Index (BMI) was estimated. Peripheral blood pressure, central aortic blood pressure and all four limb blood pressures were measured using periscope arterial health and cardiovascular analysis system. Blood pressure was measured using oscillometric method from all peripheral sites and estimated central aortic Pressure by a validated transfer function. Pearson's correlation studies were performed to assess any preliminary association. Two groups were formed of low and high digit ratio and Student's t-test was performed to assess any significant difference between the groups. Results: Digit ratio of both hands correlated best with peripheral Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) (Right- 2D:4D r=0.43, p<0.05/Left 2D:4D r=0.40, p<0.05). No significant association observed for peripheral systolic pressure (p>0.05) and digit ratio of both hands. Significant association observed for all four limb blood pressure components and digit ratio. Pulse pressure components did not show any association with digit ratio. Significant difference of blood pressure components was observed when low and high digit ratio groups were compared. It was observed that blood pressure components were on higher side within the normal limits among the subjects with high digit ratio. Conclusion: Preliminary observations from this pilot study suggests that in normal young adult males digit ratio associate positively with different blood pressure components in normotensive males and has the potential to be used as a potent marker for early changes in cardiovascular diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A normal physiology of a human being is not mere a series of functions occurring with specific intensities and timing. There are lot of factors that may change the normal physiological activity within normal limits. Finger length ratio is one of the markers of intrauterine androgen exposure and it is debated and contradicted by many authors. Digit ratio varies among the ethnicities. Many Indian studies show that there is considerable difference in finger length ratio in different population. Data regarding Central India was not found on extensive search., Aim: To find out the finger length ratio and explore the birth order effect on finger length ratio among the first two successive born in the said population., Materials and Methods: We conducted a survey on 1500 volunteer persons (800 male and 700 female) over two years of time. We measured the length of the index finger (2D) and ring finger (4D) of both the hands and asked about their birth order history to find out the digit ratio for Central India population and any existing correlation of the same with birth order. T Test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used for the measure of significance and difference among the groups. The p< 0.05 was considered to be significant., Results: Our study reports that, study population mean for right hand 2D:4D ratio was 0.976 (SD±0.031) and for left hand it was found to be 0.969 (SD±0.035). For males, mean finger length ratio for right hand was 0.967 (SD±0.033) and 0.963 (SD±0.037) for left hand. In females the mean Finger length ratio was 0.982 (SD±0.027) for right hand and 0.974 (SD±0.034) for the left hand respectively. Finger length ratio was found to be significantly less (p=0.03) in males for right hand. No significant (p=0.24) difference was observed for left hand. When assessed fraternal birth order effect among the eldest, second born with elder brother and second born with elder sister groups, no significant (p>0.05) variation for finger length ratio of right and left hands observed in both male and female population., Conclusion: Our study reports that the finger length ratio (2D:4D) for Central India population did not show significant association between finger length ratio and fraternal birth order among the first two successive born.