1. Prospecting the attachment research field: a move to the level of engagement
- Author
-
M.L. Verhage, Robbie Duschinsky, Carlo Schuengel, Clinical Child and Family Studies, LEARN! - Child rearing, APH - Aging & Later Life, and APH - Mental Health
- Subjects
SDG 16 - Peace ,Field (Bourdieu) ,SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions ,05 social sciences ,Child Welfare ,050109 social psychology ,Bibliometrics ,Object Attachment ,Data science ,Justice and Strong Institutions ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Mental Health ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,Humans ,Prospecting ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Child ,Psychology ,050104 developmental & child psychology - Abstract
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.This paper prospected the evidence synthesized in meta-analyses on child–parent attachment to discuss its implications for the future of attachment research. Based on the 75 identified meta-analyses, effect size benchmarks may need to be adjusted to small (r = .10), medium (r = .20), and large (r = .30). Topics of attachment meta-analyses predominantly (53%) reflected interest in testing theory. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications (k = 7,595) that cited these meta-analyses reflect waxing uptake in work on interventions, mental health, and attachment anxiety/avoidance and waning uptake in work on attachment relationships and representations, except for the subtopics of sensitivity and fathers. Prospects for scientifically rigorous research are to be found in engagement with stakeholders working to address important societal challenges. Promoting nurturing care and reducing harm in child welfare contain “Goldilocks-problems” that are amenable to incremental progress while simultaneously advancing theory and methods.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF