Search

Your search keyword '"M.J. Koelemay"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "M.J. Koelemay"
4 results on '"M.J. Koelemay"'

1. The upper extremity postthrombotic syndrome score: an international Delphi consensus study to determine the score's functional disability component

Author

Ludo Schropp, Roos B. Cats, Robert J.C.M.F. de Kleijn, Eline S. van Hattum, Saskia Middeldorp, Mathilde Nijkeuter, Jan Westerink, Bart-Jeroen Petri, Gert J. de Borst, L. Schropp, R.B. Cats, R.J.C.M.F. de Kleijn, S. Black, D. Garcia, K. Meijer, M.R. Nijziel, E.M. Klappe, G. Geroulakos, C.H. van Ommen, M.J.E. van Rijn, J. Freischlag, M.J.H.A. Kruip, M.V. Huisman, M. Coppens, J.A.W. Teijink, S.K. Kakkos, G. Le Gal, P.E. Westerweel, M.L. Avila, L. Baumann Kreuziger, A.J. Ten Cate-Hoek, A.Y.Y. Lee, M.J. Koelemay, A. Srivastava, M.M.C. Hovens, Ç. Ünlü, F.A. Klok, J. Douketis, G. Stansby, K.A. Illig, R.W. Thompson, W.A. Bax, D. Poli, S.R. Kahn, E.S. van Hattum, S. Middeldorp, M. Nijkeuter, J. Westerink, B.J. Petri, G.J. de Borst, Epidemiology and Data Science, APH - Aging & Later Life, APH - Societal Participation & Health, Pediatrics, Surgery, Hematology, Vascular Medicine, ACS - Pulmonary hypertension & thrombosis, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, and ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes

Subjects
All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center, upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, diagnosis, Delphi technique, surveys and questionnaires, thoracic outlet syndrome, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], postthrombotic syndrome, Hematology, functional status
Abstract

Contains fulltext : 291124.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: In upper extremity thrombosis research, the occurrence of upper extremity postthrombotic syndrome (UE-PTS) is commonly used as the main outcome parameter. However, there is currently no reporting standard or a validated method to assess UE-PTS presence and severity. In a recent Delphi study, consensus was reached on a preliminary UE-PTS score, combining 5 symptoms, 3 signs, and the inclusion of a functional disability score. However, no consensus was reached on which functional disability score to be included. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current Delphi consensus study was to determine the specific type of functional disability score to finalize UE-PTS score. METHODS: This Delphi project was designed as a three-round study using open text questions, statements with 7-point Likert scales, and multiple-choice questions. The CREDES recommendations for Delphi studies were applied. In this context, a systematic review was conducted before the start of the Delphi rounds to identify the available functional disability scores as available in the literature and present these to the expert panel. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 47 initially invited international experts from multiple disciplines completed all the Delphi rounds. In the second round, consensus was reached on the incorporation of the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) in the UE-PTS score, rendering the third round obsolete. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached that the QuickDASH should be incorporated in the UE-PTS score. The UE-PTS score will need to be validated in a large cohort of patients with upper extremity thrombosis before it can be used in clinical practice and future research. 01 januari 2023

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Editor's Choice – Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands

Author

Hamid Jalalzadeh, Reza Indrakusuma, Mark J.W. Koelemay, Ron Balm, L.H. Van den Akker, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, J.G. Baal, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.H. Bockel, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos-van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, J.C. Breek, V. Brehm, M.J. Brinckman, T.H. van den Broek, H.L. Brom, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, G. den Butter, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, H.M. Coveliers, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, A.F. Derom, A.R. Dijkema, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, W.M. Fritschy, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, B. Knippenberg, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemay, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, J.H. Lardenoye, J.A. Lawson, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, F.L. Moll, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, T.F. Peterson, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, C.G. Rupert, B.R. Saleem, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van ’t Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, O. Schouten, M.H. Schreinemacher, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, M.P. Siroen, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P. de Smit, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, H. Stigter, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M.J. Testroote, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, J.H. Tordoir, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen - van Keulen, H.G. Voesten, R. Voorhoeve, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, G.A. Vos, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, I.C. Wolf-de Jonge, O. Yazar, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Pathology, VU University medical center, Pediatrics, Dermatology, ACS - Microcirculation, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, Graduate School, 02 Surgical specialisms, ​Robotics and image-guided minimally-invasive surgery (ROBOTICS), Neurology, Erasmus MC other, Molecular Genetics, Erasmus School of Economics, Socio-Medical Sciences (SMS), Cell biology, Gynecological Oncology, Research & Education, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry / Psychology, Cardiology, Urology, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus School of Law, Department of History, Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Finance, General Practice, Applied Economics, Pediatric Surgery, Department of Business-Society Management, Commercial Law and Financial Law, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Business Economics, Neurosurgery, Public Health, Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine, Hematology, Intensive Care, Psychiatry, WP ESPhil, and Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Subjects
Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Iliac Aneurysm/epidemiology, Patient characteristics, Netherlands/epidemiology, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, 030230 surgery, Iliac Artery/pathology, Endovascular aneurysm repair, Iliac Artery, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Aneurysm, Sex Factors, medicine, 80 and over, Humans, EVAR, Registries, Iliac artery aneurysm, Aged, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, Surgical repair, Aged, 80 and over, business.industry, Open repair, Endovascular Procedures, Retrospective cohort study, Guideline, Vascular surgery, medicine.disease, Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data, Surgery, Endovascular Procedures/methods, Aneurysm repair, Treatment Outcome, Iliac Aneurysm, Female, Guideline Adherence, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests.RESULTS: The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively).CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Randomised trial of excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease

Author

M.J Koelemay, E.W.J Montauban van Swijndregt, J. G. P. Tijssen, P. W. Serruys, Jacques J. Koolen, P. J. De Feyter, Sipke Strikwerda, Jan J. Piek, J.R Margolis, Yolande Appelman, George K. David, and Other departments

Subjects
Adult, Male, Angioplasty, Balloon, Laser-Assisted, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Coronary Disease, Coronary Angiography, Balloon, Coronary artery disease, Restenosis, Recurrence, Internal medicine, Angioplasty, medicine, Humans, Myocardial infarction, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, business.industry, Vascular disease, General Medicine, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Surgery, Stenosis, Treatment Outcome, Bypass surgery, Cardiology, Female, business, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract

Summary Background Excimer laser coronary angioplasty is reported to give excellent procedural results for treatment of complex coronary lesions, but this method has not been compared with balloon angioplasty in a randomised trial. Methods Patients (n=308) with stable angina and coronary lesions longer than 10 mm on visual assessment were included. 151 patients (158 lesions) were assigned randomly to laser angioplasty and 157 (167 lesions) to balloon angioplasty. The primary clinical endpoints were death, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or repeat coronary angioplasty of the randomised segment during 6 months of follow-up. The primary angiographic end-point was the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up in relation to the baseline value (net gain), as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Findings Laser angioplasty was followed by balloon angioplasty in 98% of procedures. The angiographic success rate was 80% in patients treated with laser angioplasty compared with 79% in patients treated with balloon angioplasty. There were no deaths. Myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty occurred in 4·6%, 10·6%, and 21·2%, respectively, of the patients in the laser angioplasty group compared with 5·7%, 10·8%, and 18·5% of the balloon angioplasty group. Net mean (SD) gain in minimal lumen diameter was 0·40 (0·69) mm in patients treated with laser angioplasty and 0·48 (0·66) mm in those treated with balloon angioplasty (p=0·34). The restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis) was 51·6% in the laser angioplasty group versus 41·3% in the balloon angioplasty group (p=0·13). Interpretation Excimer laser angioplasty followed by balloon angioplasty provides no benefit additional to balloon angioplasty alone with respect to the initial and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Published
1996
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Commentary Regarding Uptake of Carotid Artery Stenting in England and Subsequent Vascular Admissions: An Appropriate Response to Emerging Evidence?

Author

M.J. Koelemay, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, and Surgery

Subjects
Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Psychological intervention, Carotid endarterectomy, Patient Readmission, Asymptomatic, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, law, Carotid artery disease, medicine, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Stroke, Reimbursement, Medicine(all), Endarterectomy, Carotid, business.industry, Amaurosis fugax, medicine.disease, Surgery, Emergency medicine, Female, Stents, medicine.symptom, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business
Abstract

Several randomized controlled trials have shown the superiority of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over carotid artery stenting (CAS) to prevent stroke or death in the short term in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Since there is a gap between science and the real world, administrative data are frequently used to evaluate how evidence from trials is translated into daily clinical practice, to verify the external validity of trial results, and to identify opportunities to improve quality of care. In this issue of the journal, Lee et al. present an interesting study on the uptake of CAS in the UK between 2006 and 2012. 1 Whereas they found an absolute increase in CEA, the proportion of patients treated with CAS remained stable, being

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results