Search

Purpose: The possibility of using a passive Robot Arm (3D method) in model surgery and comparing with manual technique model surgery. Patients and methods: Seventeen patients undergoing orthognathic surgery gave consent for this study. Model surgery was performed by using a manual technique and using the Robot Arm. The model surgery that was performed by using the manual technique named group A and the one performed by the Robot Arm named group B. Patients’ maxillary casts were measured before and after model surgery, and results were compared with those for the original treatment plan in the horizontal (X-axis), vertical (Y-axis), and transverse (Z-axis) planes. Results: Statistical analysis using Mann–Whitney U test for X- and Y-axis and independent sample t test for Z-axis have shown significant differences between both groups in X-axis (P = .026) and Y-axis (P = .021) but not in Z-axis (P = .762). Conclusions: Model surgery performed with a Robot Arm is more accurate in all dimensions X, Y, and Z than the manual model surgery. Keywords: Orthognathic

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the head position for a three-dimensional soft tissue laser scan (lasergraph) using thin-plate splines, for orthognathic surgery planning and follow-up. 60 laser scans of five subjects (12 scans per subject) were obtained at specified intervals. The head was positioned in the lateral view using a spirit level, an engineering device for setting horizontal surfaces, to adjust the Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the ground. The projection of a narrow beam of longitudinal laser light was used to adjust the axial plane for the frontal view. These scanned images (lasergraphs) were digitised and the co-ordinates of the landmarks recorded. The digitised laser scans were compared using thin-plate splines analysis. The mean difference between the scans due to variations in head position was 0.0135 +/- 0.0109 g x cm2/ sec2 in the lateral view and 0.0090 +/- 0.0054 g x cm2/sec2 in the frontal view. This represents an overall distortion error of less than 2% when following up the surgical change of a typical bimaxillary osteotomy case with 6 mm maxillary advancement and 3 mm mandibular set-back. It is concluded that facial laser scans (lasergraphs) with the Frankfort horizontal plane set using a head rest and spirit level, and the axial plane set using projection of a vertical laser light on the facial midline, are highly reproducible.

The use of a facial midline indicator (FMI) to transfer the midline and long axis of the face from the patient to the articulator for orthognathic planning is described.