Search

Transcription must be properly regulated to ensure dynamic gene expression underlying growth, development, and response to environmental cues. Regulation is imposed throughout the transcription cycle, and while many efforts have detailed the regulation of transcription initiation and early elongation, the termination phase of transcription also plays critical roles in regulating gene expression. Transcription termination can be driven by only a few proteins in each domain of life. Detailing the mechanism(s) employed provides insight into the vulnerabilities of transcription elongation complexes (TECs) that permit regulated termination to control expression of many genes and operons. Here, we describe the biochemical activities and crystal structure of the superfamily 2 helicase Eta, one of two known factors capable of disrupting archaeal transcription elongation complexes. Eta retains a twin-translocase core domain common to all superfamily 2 helicases and a well-conserved C terminus wherein individual amino acid substitutions can critically abrogate termination activities. Eta variants that perturb ATPase, helicase, single-stranded DNA and double-stranded DNA translocase and termination activities identify key regions of the C terminus of Eta that, when combined with modeling Eta–TEC interactions, provide a structural model of Eta-mediated termination guided in part by structures of Mfd and the bacterial TEC. The susceptibility of TECs to disruption by termination factors that target the upstream surface of RNA polymerase and potentially drive termination through forward translocation and allosteric mechanisms that favor opening of the clamp to release the encapsulated nucleic acids emerges as a common feature of transcription termination mechanisms.

NusG is a transcription elongation factor that stimulates transcription pausing in Gram+ bacteria includingBacillus subtilisby sequence-specific interaction with a conserved pause-inducing-11TTNTTT-6motif found in the non-template DNA (ntDNA) strand within the transcription bubble. To reveal the structural basis of NusG-dependent pausing, we determined a cryo-EM structure of a paused transcription complex containing RNAP, NusG, and the TTNTTT motif in the ntDNA strand. Interaction of NusG with the ntDNA strand rearranges the transcription bubble by positioning three consecutive T residues in a cleft between NusG and the β-lobe domain of RNAP. We revealed that the RNAP swivel module rotation (swiveling), which widens (swiveled state) and narrows (non-swiveled state) a cleft between NusG and the β-lobe, is an intrinsic motion of RNAP and is directly linked to nucleotide binding at the active site and to trigger loop folding, an essential conformational change of all cellular RNAPs for the RNA synthesis reaction. We also determined cryo-EM structures of RNAP escaping from a paused transcription complex. These structures revealed the NusG-dependent pausing mechanism by which NusG-ntDNA interaction inhibits the transition from swiveled to non-swiveled states, thereby preventing trigger loop folding and RNA synthesis allosterically. This motion is also reduced by formation of an RNA hairpin within the RNA exit channel. Thus, the pause half-life can be modulated by the strength of the NusG-ntDNA interaction and/or the stability of the RNA hairpin. NusG residues that interact with the TTNTTT motif are widely conserved in bacteria, suggesting that NusG-dependent pausing of transcription is widespread.Significance statementTranscription pausing by RNA polymerase (RNAP) regulates gene expression where it controls co-transcriptional RNA folding, synchronizes transcription with translation, and provides time for binding of regulatory factors. Transcription elongation factor NusG stimulates pausing in Gram+ bacteria includingBacillus subtilisandMycobacterium tuberculosisby sequence-specific interaction with a conserved pause motif found in the non-template DNA (ntDNA) strand within the transcription bubble. Our structural and biochemical results revealed that part of the conserved TTNTTT motif in ntDNA is extruded and sandwiched between NusG and RNAP. Our results further demonstrate that an essential global conformational change in RNAP is directly linked to RNA synthesis, and that the NusG-ntDNA interaction pauses RNA synthesis by interfering with this conformational change.

Stalling of the transcription elongation complex formed by DNA, RNA polymerase (RNAP) and RNA presents a serious obstacle to concurrent processes due to the extremely high stability of the DNA-bound polymerase. RapA, known to remove RNAP from DNA in an ATP-dependent fashion, was identified over 50 years ago as an abundant binding partner of RNAP; however, its mechanism of action remains unknown. Here, we use single-molecule magnetic trapping assays to characterize RapA activity and begin to specify its mechanism of action. We first show that stalled RNAP resides on DNA for times on the order of 106 seconds and that increasing positive torque on the DNA reduces this lifetime. Using stalled RNAP as a substrate we show that the RapA protein stimulates dissociation of stalled RNAP from positively supercoiled DNA but not negatively supercoiled DNA. We observe that RapA-dependent RNAP dissociation is torque-sensitive, is inhibited by GreB and depends on RNA length. We propose that stalled RNAP is dislodged from DNA by RapA via backtracking in a supercoiling- and torque-dependent manner, suggesting that RapA’s activity on transcribing RNAP in vivo is responsible for resolving conflicts between converging polymerase molecular motors.

After transcription termination, cellular RNA polymerases (RNAPs) are occasionally trapped on DNA, impounded in an undefined Post-Termination Complex (PTC), limiting free RNAP pool and making transcription inefficient. In Escherichia coli, a Swi2/Snf2 ATPase RapA is involved in countering such inefficiency through RNAP recycling. To understand its mechanism of RNAP recycling, we have determined the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of two sets of E. coli RapA-RNAP complexes along with RNAP core enzyme and elongation complex (EC). The structures revealed the large conformational changes of RNAP and RapA upon their association implicated in the hindrance in PTC formation. Our study reveals that although RapA binds away from the DNA binding channel of RNAP, it can close the RNAP clamp allosterically thereby preventing its non-specific DNA binding. Together with DNA binding assays, we propose that RapA acts as a guardian of RNAP by which prevents non-specific DNA binding of RNAP without affecting the sigma factor binding to RNAP core enzyme, thereby enhancing RNAP recycling.

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is most highly expressed in rapidly growing bacteria and is drastically downregulated under stress conditions by the global transcriptional regulator DksA and the alarmone ppGpp. Here, we determined cryo-electron microscopy structures of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) σ70 holoenzyme during rRNA promoter recognition with and without DksA/ppGpp. RNAP contacts the UP element using dimerized α subunit carboxyl-terminal domains and scrunches the template DNA with the σ finger and β’ lid to select the transcription start site favorable for rapid promoter escape. Promoter binding induces conformational change of σ domain 2 that opens a gate for DNA loading and ejects σ1.1 from the RNAP cleft to facilitate open complex formation. DksA/ppGpp binding also opens the DNA loading gate, which is not coupled to σ1.1 ejection and impedes open complex formation. These results provide a molecular basis for the exceptionally active rRNA transcription and its vulnerability to DksA/ppGpp., Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) expression is regulated at the initiation stage of RNA synthesis. Here, the authors report cryo-EM structures of E. coli RNA polymerase and rRNA promoter complex with DksA/ppGpp on the way to open complex formation, identifying key steps in promoter recognition and opening.

The recent dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 from Wuhan city to all over the world has created a pandemic. COVID-19 has cost many human lives and created an enormous economic burden. Although many drugs/vaccines are in different stages of clinical trials, still none is clinically available. We have screened a marine seaweed database (1110 compounds) against 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2 using computational approaches. High throughput virtual screening was performed on compounds, and 86 of them with docking score −1 were subjected to standard-precision docking. Based on binding energies (−1), 9 compounds were further shortlisted and subjected to extra-precision docking. Free energy calculation by Prime-MM/GBSA suggested RC002, GA004, and GA006 as the most potent inhibitors of 3CLpro. An analysis of ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) properties of RC002, GA004, and GA006 indicated that only RC002 (callophysin A, from red alga Callophycus oppositifolius) passed Lipinski’s, Veber’s, PAINS and Brenk’s filters and displayed drug-like and lead-like properties. Analysis of 3CLpro-callophysin A complex revealed the involvement of salt bridge, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions. callophysin A interacted with the catalytic residues (His41 and Cys145) of 3CLpro; hence it may act as a mechanism-based competitive inhibitor. Docking energy and docking affinity of callophysin A towards 3CLpro was − 8.776 kcal mol−1 and 2.73 × 106 M−1, respectively. Molecular dynamics simulation confirmed the stability of the 3CLpro-callophysin A complex. The findings of this study may serve as the basis for further validation by in vitro and in vivo studies.

First step of gene expression is transcribing the genetic information stored in DNA to RNA by the transcription machinery including RNA polymerase (RNAP). In Escherichia coli, a primary σ(70) factor forms the RNAP holoenzyme to express housekeeping genes. The σ(70) contains a large insertion between the conserved regions 1.2 and 2.1, the σ non-conserved region (σ(NCR)), but its function remains to be elucidated. In this study, we determined the cryo-EM structures of the E. coli RNAP σ(70) holoenzyme and its complex with promoter DNA (open complex, RPo) at 4.2 and 5.75 Å resolutions, respectively, to reveal native conformations of RNAP and DNA. The RPo structure presented here found an interaction between the σ(NCR) and promoter DNA just upstream of the −10 element, which was not observed in a previously determined E. coli RNAP transcription initiation complex (RPo plus short RNA) structure by X-ray crystallography because of restraint of crystal packing effects. Disruption of the σ(NCR) and DNA interaction by the amino acid substitutions (R157A/R157E) influences the DNA opening around the transcription start site and therefore decreases the transcription activity of RNAP. We propose that the σ(NCR) and DNA interaction is conserved in proteobacteria, and RNAP in other bacteria replaces its role with a transcription factor.

After transcription termination, cellular RNA polymerases (RNAPs) are occasionally trapped on DNA, impounded in an undefined Post-Termination Complex (PTC), limiting the free RNAP pool and subsequently leading to inefficient transcription. In Escherichia coli, a Swi2/Snf2 family of ATPase called RapA is known to be involved in countering such inefficiency through RNAP recycling; however, the precise mechanism of this recycling is unclear. To better understand its mechanism, here we determined the structures of two sets of E. coli RapA-RNAP complexes, along with the RNAP core enzyme and the elongation complex (EC), using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). These structures revealed the large conformational changes of RNAP and RapA upon their association that has been implicated in the hindrance of PTC formation. Our results along with DNA binding assays reveal that although RapA binds RNAP away from the DNA-binding main channel, its binding can allosterically close the RNAP clamp, thereby preventing its non-specific DNA binding and PTC formation. Taken together, we propose that RapA acts as a guardian of RNAP by which RapA prevents non-specific DNA binding of RNAP without affecting the binding of promoter DNA recognition σ factor, thereby enhancing RNAP recycling.

NusA is an essential protein that binds to RNA polymerase (RNAP) and also to the nascent RNA, and influences transcription by inducing pausing and facilitating the process of transcription termination / antitermination. Its participation in Rho-dependent transcription termination has been perceived, but the molecular nature of this involvement is not known. We hypothesized that as both Rho and NusA are RNA-binding proteins and have the potential to target the same RNA, the latter is likely to influence the global pattern of the Rho-dependent termination. Analyses of the nascent RNA-binding properties and consequent effects on the Rho-dependent termination functions of specific NusA-RNA binding domain mutants revealed an existence of Rho-NusA direct competition for the overlapping nut (NusA-binding site) and rut (Rho-binding site) sites on the RNA. This leads to delayed entry of Rho at the rut site that inhibits the RNA release process of the latter. High density tiling micro-array profiles of these NusA mutants revealed that a significant number of genes, together with transcripts from intergenic regions are up-regulated. Interestingly, majority of these genes were also up-regulated when the Rho function was compromised. These are strong evidences for the existence of NusA-binding sites in different operons which are also the targets of Rho-dependent terminations. Our data strongly argue in favor of a direct competition between NusA and Rho for the access of specific sites on the nascent transcripts in different parts of the genome. We propose that this competition enables NusA to function as a global antagonist of the Rho function, which is unlike its role as a facilitator of hairpin-dependent termination.

First step of gene expression is transcribing the genetic information stored in DNA to RNA by the transcription machinery including RNA polymerase (RNAP). In Escherichia coli, a primary σ70 factor form the RNAP holoenzyme to express housekeeping genes. The σ70 contains a large insertion at between the conserved regions 1.2 and 2.1, the σ non-conserved region (σNCR), but its function remains to be elucidated. In this study, we determined the cryo-EM structures of the E. coli RNAP σ70 holoenzyme and its complex with promoter DNA (open complex, RPo) at 4.2 and 5.75 Å resolutions, respectively, to reveal native conformations of RNAP and DNA. The RPo structure presented here found an interaction between R157 residue in the σNCR and promoter DNA just upstream of the −10 element, which was not observed in a previously determined E. coli RNAP transcription initiation complex (RPo plus short RNA) structure by X-ray crystallography due to restraint of crystal packing effect. Disruption of the σNCR and DNA interaction by the amino acid substitution (R157E) influences the DNA opening around the transcription start site and therefore decreases the transcription activity of RNAP. We propose that the σNCR and DNA interaction is conserved in proteobacteria and RNAP in other bacteria replace its role with a transcription factor.

The bacterial transcription terminator, Rho, terminates transcription at half of the operons. According to the classical model derived from in vitro assays on a few terminators, Rho is recruited to the transcription elongation complex (EC) by recognizing specific sites (rut) on the nascent RNA. Here, we explored the mode of in vivo recruitment process of Rho. We show that sequence specific recognition of the rut site, in majority of the Rho-dependent terminators, can be compromised to a great extent without seriously affecting the genome-wide termination function as well as the viability of Escherichia coli. These terminators function optimally only through a NusG-assisted recruitment and activation of Rho. Our data also indicate that at these terminators, Rho-EC-bound NusG interaction facilitates the isomerization of Rho into a translocase-competent form by stabilizing the interactions of mRNA with the secondary RNA binding site, thereby overcoming the defects of the primary RNA binding functions.

In the conventional model of the Rho-dependent transcription termination, the terminator Rho binds to the rut (Rho utilization) site and translocates along the nascent RNA prior to making possible interactions with the elongating RNA polymerase (RNAP). Even though the interaction between Rho and isolated RNAs was studied in great detail, the same has never been shown with the nascent RNA emerging from the transcription elongation complex (EC). Direct demonstration and requirement of the Rho-nascent RNA binding become even more important because of the recently proposed alternative model where Rho loads onto the RNAP prior to the formation of the nascent RNA. Here, we have measured the direct association of Rho in vitro with the free RNAP, RNAP-promoter binary complex and stalled ECs with varied length of RNA. We observed the association of Rho only with the ECs having the rut-site-containing long nascent RNA. This association was significantly reduced when either a Rho mutant, Y80C, defective for RNA binding or an antisense oligo to the rut site was used or when the rut site was eliminated by RNase digestion or replacement with a random RNA sequence. The presence of EC-bound NusG, the binding partner of Rho, did not facilitate this association. RNase footprinting of the Rho-EC complex revealed a clear Rho-mediated protection of the rut sites on the nascent RNA. We concluded that the nascent RNA loading of Rho and its interaction with the rut site are mandatory and prerequisites for its recruitment to the EC under in vitro experimental conditions.

The highly conserved Nus factors of bacteria were discovered as essential host proteins for the growth of temperate phage λ in Escherichia coli . Later, their essentiality and functions in transcription, translation, and, more recently, in DNA repair have been elucidated. Close involvement of these factors in various gene networks and circuits is also emerging from recent genomic studies. We have described a detailed overview of their biochemistry, structures, and various cellular functions, as well as their interactions with other macromolecules. Towards the end, we have envisaged different uncharted areas of studies with these factors, including their participation in pathogenicity.