Author: "M. Rubino" - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"M. Rubino"' showing total 782 results

Start Over Author "M. Rubino"

782 results on '"M. Rubino"'

1. Revised records of atmospheric trace gases CO2, CH4, N2O, and δ13C-CO2 over the last 2000 years from Law Dome, Antarctica

Author: M. Rubino, D. M. Etheridge, D. P. Thornton, R. Howden, C. E. Allison, R. J. Francey, R. L. Langenfelds, L. P. Steele, C. M. Trudinger, D. A. Spencer, M. A. J. Curran, T. D. van Ommen, and A. M. Smith
Subjects: Environmental sciences, GE1-350, Geology, QE1-996.5
Abstract: Ice core records of the major atmospheric greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O) and their isotopologues covering recent centuries provide evidence of biogeochemical variations during the Late Holocene and pre-industrial periods and over the transition to the industrial period. These records come from a number of ice core and firn air sites and have been measured in several laboratories around the world and show common features but also unresolved differences. Here we present revised records, including new measurements, performed at the CSIRO Ice Core Extraction LABoratory (ICELAB) on air samples from ice obtained at the high-accumulation site of Law Dome (East Antarctica). We are motivated by the increasing use of the records by the scientific community and by recent data-handling developments at CSIRO ICELAB. A number of cores and firn air samples have been collected at Law Dome to provide high-resolution records overlapping recent, direct atmospheric observations. The records have been updated through a dynamic link to the calibration scales used in the Global Atmospheric Sampling LABoratory (GASLAB) at CSIRO, which are periodically revised with information from the latest calibration experiments. The gas-age scales have been revised based on new ice-age scales and the information derived from a new version of the CSIRO firn diffusion model. Additionally, the records have been revised with new, rule-based selection criteria and updated corrections for biases associated with the extraction procedure and the effects of gravity and diffusion in the firn. All measurements carried out in ICELAB–GASLAB over the last 25 years are now managed through a database (the ICElab dataBASE or ICEBASE), which provides consistent data management, automatic corrections and selection of measurements, and a web-based user interface for data extraction. We present the new records, discuss their strengths and limitations, and summarise their main features. The records reveal changes in the carbon cycle and atmospheric chemistry over the last 2 millennia, including the major changes of the anthropogenic era and the smaller, mainly natural variations beforehand. They provide the historical data to calibrate and test the next inter-comparison of models used to predict future climate change (Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project – phase 6, CMIP6). The datasets described in this paper, including spline fits, are available at https://doi.org/10.25919/5bfe29ff807fb (Rubino et al., 2019).
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

2. Compiled records of carbon isotopes in atmospheric CO2 for historical simulations in CMIP6

Author: H. Graven, C. E. Allison, D. M. Etheridge, S. Hammer, R. F. Keeling, I. Levin, H. A. J. Meijer, M. Rubino, P. P. Tans, C. M. Trudinger, B. H. Vaughn, and J. W. C. White
Subjects: Geology, QE1-996.5
Abstract: The isotopic composition of carbon (Δ14C and δ13C) in atmospheric CO2 and in oceanic and terrestrial carbon reservoirs is influenced by anthropogenic emissions and by natural carbon exchanges, which can respond to and drive changes in climate. Simulations of 14C and 13C in the ocean and terrestrial components of Earth system models (ESMs) present opportunities for model evaluation and for investigation of carbon cycling, including anthropogenic CO2 emissions and uptake. The use of carbon isotopes in novel evaluation of the ESMs' component ocean and terrestrial biosphere models and in new analyses of historical changes may improve predictions of future changes in the carbon cycle and climate system. We compile existing data to produce records of Δ14C and δ13C in atmospheric CO2 for the historical period 1850–2015. The primary motivation for this compilation is to provide the atmospheric boundary condition for historical simulations in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) for models simulating carbon isotopes in the ocean or terrestrial biosphere. The data may also be useful for other carbon cycle modelling activities.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

3. Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6)

Author: M. Meinshausen, E. Vogel, A. Nauels, K. Lorbacher, N. Meinshausen, D. M. Etheridge, P. J. Fraser, S. A. Montzka, P. J. Rayner, C. M. Trudinger, P. B. Krummel, U. Beyerle, J. G. Canadell, J. S. Daniel, I. G. Enting, R. M. Law, C. R. Lunder, S. O'Doherty, R. G. Prinn, S. Reimann, M. Rubino, G. J. M. Velders, M. K. Vollmer, R. H. J. Wang, and R. Weiss
Subjects: Geology, QE1-996.5
Abstract: Atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations are at unprecedented, record-high levels compared to the last 800 000 years. Those elevated GHG concentrations warm the planet and – partially offset by net cooling effects by aerosols – are largely responsible for the observed warming over the past 150 years. An accurate representation of GHG concentrations is hence important to understand and model recent climate change. So far, community efforts to create composite datasets of GHG concentrations with seasonal and latitudinal information have focused on marine boundary layer conditions and recent trends since the 1980s. Here, we provide consolidated datasets of historical atmospheric concentrations (mole fractions) of 43 GHGs to be used in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project – Phase 6 (CMIP6) experiments. The presented datasets are based on AGAGE and NOAA networks, firn and ice core data, and archived air data, and a large set of published studies. In contrast to previous intercomparisons, the new datasets are latitudinally resolved and include seasonality. We focus on the period 1850–2014 for historical CMIP6 runs, but data are also provided for the last 2000 years. We provide consolidated datasets in various spatiotemporal resolutions for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), as well as 40 other GHGs, namely 17 ozone-depleting substances, 11 hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), 9 perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) and sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2). In addition, we provide three equivalence species that aggregate concentrations of GHGs other than CO2, CH4 and N2O, weighted by their radiative forcing efficiencies. For the year 1850, which is used for pre-industrial control runs, we estimate annual global-mean surface concentrations of CO2 at 284.3 ppm, CH4 at 808.2 ppb and N2O at 273.0 ppb. The data are available at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/input4mips/ and http://www.climatecollege.unimelb.edu.au/cmip6. While the minimum CMIP6 recommendation is to use the global- and annual-mean time series, modelling groups can also choose our monthly and latitudinally resolved concentrations, which imply a stronger radiative forcing in the Northern Hemisphere winter (due to the latitudinal gradient and seasonality).
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

4. A new set-up for simultaneous high-precision measurements of CO2, δ13C-CO2 and δ18O-CO2 on small ice core samples

Author: T. M. Jenk, M. Rubino, D. Etheridge, V. G. Ciobanu, and T. Blunier
Subjects: Environmental engineering, TA170-171, Earthwork. Foundations, TA715-787
Abstract: Palaeoatmospheric records of carbon dioxide and its stable carbon isotope composition (δ13C) obtained from polar ice cores provide important constraints on the natural variability of the carbon cycle. However, the measurements are both analytically challenging and time-consuming; thus only data exist from a limited number of sampling sites and time periods. Additional analytical resources with high analytical precision and throughput are thus desirable to extend the existing datasets. Moreover, consistent measurements derived by independent laboratories and a variety of analytical systems help to further increase confidence in the global CO2 palaeo-reconstructions. Here, we describe our new set-up for simultaneous measurements of atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios and atmospheric δ13C and δ18O-CO2 in air extracted from ice core samples. The centrepiece of the system is a newly designed needle cracker for the mechanical release of air entrapped in ice core samples of 8–13 g operated at −45 °C. The small sample size allows for high resolution and replicate sampling schemes. In our method, CO2 is cryogenically and chromatographically separated from the bulk air and its isotopic composition subsequently determined by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). In combination with thermal conductivity measurement of the bulk air, the CO2 mixing ratio is calculated. The analytical precision determined from standard air sample measurements over ice is ±1.9 ppm for CO2 and ±0.09 ‰ for δ13C. In a laboratory intercomparison study with CSIRO (Aspendale, Australia), good agreement between CO2 and δ13C results is found for Law Dome ice core samples. Replicate analysis of these samples resulted in a pooled standard deviation of 2.0 ppm for CO2 and 0.11 ‰ for δ13C. These numbers are good, though they are rather conservative estimates of the overall analytical precision achieved for single ice sample measurements. Facilitated by the small sample requirement, replicate measurements are feasible, allowing the method precision to be improved potentially. Further, new analytical approaches are introduced for the accurate correction of the procedural blank and for a consistent detection of measurement outliers, which is based on δ18O-CO2 and the exchange of oxygen between CO2 and the surrounding ice (H2O).
Published: 2016
Full Text: View/download PDF

5. Reconstruction of Northern Hemisphere 1950–2010 atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbons

Author: D. Helmig, V. Petrenko, P. Martinerie, E. Witrant, T. Röckmann, A. Zuiderweg, R. Holzinger, J. Hueber, C. Thompson, J. W. C. White, W. Sturges, A. Baker, T. Blunier, D. Etheridge, M. Rubino, and P. Tans
Subjects: Physics, QC1-999, Chemistry, QD1-999
Abstract: The short-chain non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) are mostly emitted into the atmosphere by anthropogenic processes. Recent studies have pointed out a tight linkage between the atmospheric mole fractions of the NMHC ethane and the atmospheric growth rate of methane. Consequently, atmospheric NMHC are valuable indicators for tracking changes in anthropogenic emissions, photochemical ozone production, and greenhouse gases. This study investigates the 1950–2010 Northern Hemisphere atmospheric C2–C5 NMHC ethane, propane, i-butane, n-butane, i-pentane, and n-pentane by (a) reconstructing atmospheric mole fractions of these trace gases using firn air extracted from three boreholes in 2008 and 2009 at the North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling (NEEM) site and applying state-of-the-art models of trace gas transport in firn, and by (b) considering eight years of ambient NMHC monitoring data from five Arctic sites within the NOAA Global Monitoring Division (GMD) Cooperative Air Sampling Network. Results indicate that these NMHC increased by ~40–120% after 1950, peaked around 1980 (with the exception of ethane, which peaked approximately 10 yr earlier), and have since dramatically decreased to be now back close to 1950 levels. The earlier peak time of ethane vs. the C3–C5 NMHC suggests that different processes and emissions mitigation measures contributed to the decline in these NMHC. The 60 yr record also illustrates notable increases in the ratios of the isomeric iso-/n-butane and iso-/n-pentane ratios. Comparison of the reconstructed NMHC histories with 1950–2000 volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions data and with other recently published ethane trend analyses from ambient air Pacific transect data showed (a) better agreement with North America and Western Europe emissions than with total Northern Hemisphere emissions data, and (b) better agreement with other Greenland firn air data NMHC history reconstructions than with the Pacific region trends. These analyses emphasize that for NMHC, having atmospheric lifetimes on the order of < 2 months, the Greenland firn air records are primarily a representation of Western Europe and North America emission histories.
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

6. How well do different tracers constrain the firn diffusivity profile?

Author: C. M. Trudinger, I. G. Enting, P. J. Rayner, D. M. Etheridge, C. Buizert, M. Rubino, P. B. Krummel, and T. Blunier
Subjects: Physics, QC1-999, Chemistry, QD1-999
Abstract: Firn air transport models are used to interpret measurements of the composition of air in firn and bubbles trapped in ice in order to reconstruct past atmospheric composition. The diffusivity profile in the firn is usually calibrated by comparing modelled and measured concentrations for tracers with known atmospheric history. However, in most cases this is an under-determined inverse problem, often with multiple solutions giving an adequate fit to the data (this is known as equifinality). Here we describe a method to estimate the firn diffusivity profile that allows multiple solutions to be identified, in order to quantify the uncertainty in diffusivity due to equifinality. We then look at how well different combinations of tracers constrain the firn diffusivity profile. Tracers with rapid atmospheric variations like CH3CCl3, HFCs and 14CO2 are most useful for constraining molecular diffusivity, while &delta:15N2 is useful for constraining parameters related to convective mixing near the surface. When errors in the observations are small and Gaussian, three carefully selected tracers are able to constrain the molecular diffusivity profile well with minimal equifinality. However, with realistic data errors or additional processes to constrain, there is benefit to including as many tracers as possible to reduce the uncertainties. We calculate CO2 age distributions and their spectral widths with uncertainties for five firn sites (NEEM, DE08-2, DSSW20K, South Pole 1995 and South Pole 2001) with quite different characteristics and tracers available for calibration. We recommend moving away from the use of a firn model with one calibrated parameter set to infer atmospheric histories, and instead suggest using multiple parameter sets, preferably with multiple representations of uncertain processes, to assist in quantification of the uncertainties.
Published: 2013
Full Text: View/download PDF

7. Gas transport in firn: multiple-tracer characterisation and model intercomparison for NEEM, Northern Greenland

Author: C. Buizert, P. Martinerie, V. V. Petrenko, J. P. Severinghaus, C. M. Trudinger, E. Witrant, J. L. Rosen, A. J. Orsi, M. Rubino, D. M. Etheridge, L. P. Steele, C. Hogan, J. C. Laube, W. T. Sturges, V. A. Levchenko, A. M. Smith, I. Levin, T. J. Conway, E. J. Dlugokencky, P. M. Lang, K. Kawamura, T. M. Jenk, J. W. C. White, T. Sowers, J. Schwander, and T. Blunier
Subjects: Physics, QC1-999, Chemistry, QD1-999
Abstract: Air was sampled from the porous firn layer at the NEEM site in Northern Greenland. We use an ensemble of ten reference tracers of known atmospheric history to characterise the transport properties of the site. By analysing uncertainties in both data and the reference gas atmospheric histories, we can objectively assign weights to each of the gases used for the depth-diffusivity reconstruction. We define an objective root mean square criterion that is minimised in the model tuning procedure. Each tracer constrains the firn profile differently through its unique atmospheric history and free air diffusivity, making our multiple-tracer characterisation method a clear improvement over the commonly used single-tracer tuning. Six firn air transport models are tuned to the NEEM site; all models successfully reproduce the data within a 1σ Gaussian distribution. A comparison between two replicate boreholes drilled 64 m apart shows differences in measured mixing ratio profiles that exceed the experimental error. We find evidence that diffusivity does not vanish completely in the lock-in zone, as is commonly assumed. The ice age- gas age difference (Δage) at the firn-ice transition is calculated to be 182+3−9 yr. We further present the first intercomparison study of firn air models, where we introduce diagnostic scenarios designed to probe specific aspects of the model physics. Our results show that there are major differences in the way the models handle advective transport. Furthermore, diffusive fractionation of isotopes in the firn is poorly constrained by the models, which has consequences for attempts to reconstruct the isotopic composition of trace gases back in time using firn air and ice core records.
Published: 2012
Full Text: View/download PDF

8. Corrigendum to ``Gas transport in firn: multiple-tracer characterisation and model intercomparison for NEEM, Northern Greenland' published in Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4259–-4277, 2012

Author: C. Buizert, P. Martinerie, V. V. Petrenko, J. P. Severinghaus, C. M. Trudinger, E. Witrant, J. L. Rosen, A. J. Orsi, M. Rubino, D. M. Etheridge, L. P. Steele, C. Hogan, J. C. Laube, W. T. Sturges, V. A. Levchenko, A. M. Smith, I. Levin, T. J. Conway, E. J. Dlugokencky, P. M. Lang, K. Kawamura, T. M. Jenk, J. W. C. White, T. Sowers, J. Schwander, and T. Blunier
Subjects: Physics, QC1-999, Chemistry, QD1-999
Abstract: No abstract available.
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

9. Skeletal muscle overexpression of sAnk1.5 in transgenic mice does not predispose to type 2 diabetes

Author: E. Pierantozzi, L. Raucci, S. Buonocore, E. M. Rubino, Q. Ding, A. Laurino, F. Fiore, M. Soldaini, J. Chen, D. Rossi, P. Vangheluwe, H. Chen, and V. Sorrentino
Subjects: Medicine, Science
Abstract: Abstract Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and cis-expression quantitative trait locus (cis-eQTL) analyses indicated an association of the rs508419 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with type 2 diabetes (T2D). rs508419 is localized in the muscle-specific internal promoter (P2) of the ANK1 gene, which drives the expression of the sAnk1.5 isoform. Functional studies showed that the rs508419 C/C variant results in increased transcriptional activity of the P2 promoter, leading to higher levels of sAnk1.5 mRNA and protein in skeletal muscle biopsies of individuals carrying the C/C genotype. To investigate whether sAnk1.5 overexpression in skeletal muscle might predispose to T2D development, we generated transgenic mice (TgsAnk1.5/+) in which the sAnk1.5 coding sequence was selectively overexpressed in skeletal muscle tissue. TgsAnk1.5/+ mice expressed up to 50% as much sAnk1.5 protein as wild-type (WT) muscles, mirroring the difference reported between individuals with the C/C or T/T genotype at rs508419. However, fasting glucose levels, glucose tolerance, insulin levels and insulin response in TgsAnk1.5/+ mice did not differ from those of age-matched WT mice monitored over a 12-month period. Even when fed a high-fat diet, TgsAnk1.5/+ mice only presented increased caloric intake, but glucose disposal, insulin tolerance and weight gain were comparable to those of WT mice fed a similar diet. Altogether, these data indicate that sAnk1.5 overexpression in skeletal muscle does not predispose mice to T2D susceptibility.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

10. Effects of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg on C-reactive protein in adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 1, 2, and 3): Exploratory analyses of three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trialsResearch in context

Author: Subodh Verma, Meena Bhatta, Melanie Davies, John E. Deanfield, W. Timothy Garvey, Camilla Jensen, Kristian Kandler, Robert F. Kushner, Domenica M. Rubino, and Mikhail N. Kosiborod
Subjects: C-reactive protein, Cardiovascular risk factors, Semaglutide, Obesity, Type 2 diabetes, Weight loss, Medicine (General), R5-920
Abstract: Summary: Background: Inflammation is a key driver of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. C-reactive protein (CRP), an established biomarker of inflammation, is commonly elevated in people with overweight/obesity. Methods: STEP 1, 2, and 3 were 68-week, placebo-controlled trials of semaglutide for weight management in participants with overweight/obesity, with (STEP 2) or without (STEP 1 and 3) type 2 diabetes. Change in serum CRP from baseline to week 68 was assessed as a prespecified secondary endpoint for semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo (STEP 1, 2, and 3) and versus semaglutide 1.0 mg (STEP 2). Post hoc assessments included change in CRP by baseline characteristics (bodyweight, body mass index [BMI], glycaemic status, CRP concentration); change in CRP-defined cardiovascular risk category (3 mg/L [high]); and correlation between change in CRP and change in bodyweight, waist circumference, fasting serum insulin (STEP 1 and 3), fasting plasma glucose, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Findings: The trials took place from June through November 2018 (STEP 1 and 2) and from August 2018 to April 2020 (STEP 3). In all trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced CRP at week 68 versus placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD; 95% CI] −44% [–49 to −39] in STEP 1, –39% [–46 to −30] in STEP 2, and –48% [–55 to −39] in STEP 3; all p
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

11. Underwater Wireless Vision System Using Progressive Image Compression and Region of Interest

Author: Eduardo M Rubino, D. Centelles, Jorge Sales, José V. Martí, Raúl Marín, Alberto J. Alvares, and Pedro J. Sanz
Subjects: Compresión de Imagen, Transmisión de Datos, Sistemas de Comunicación, Teleoperación, Control engineering systems. Automatic machinery (General), TJ212-225
Abstract: The increasing demand for underwater robotic intervention systems around the world in several application domains requires more versatile and inexpensive systems. By using a wireless communication system, supervised semi-autonomous robots have freedom of movement and, at the same time, allows the operator to get camera feedback and supervise the intervention. On the other hand, the typical data rate of the wireless submarine channels is generally very limited, requiring the application of advanced compression techniques. In this paper we present the DEBT (Depth Embedded Block Tree) algorithm for the progressive compression of images with region of interest (ROI). The results demonstrate advantages with other compression algorithms, and the possibility of executing the algorithm in real time on ARM-based embedded low-power computers.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

12. Semaglutide improves cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with overweight or obesity: <scp>STEP</scp> 1 and 4 exploratory analyses

Author: Mikhail N. Kosiborod, Meena Bhatta, Melanie Davies, John E. Deanfield, W. Timothy Garvey, Usman Khalid, Robert Kushner, Domenica M. Rubino, Niels Zeuthen, and Subodh Verma
Subjects: Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Internal Medicine
Abstract: Evaluate the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg on cardiometabolic risk factors in people with overweight/obesity without diabetes in the STEP 1 and 4 trials.STEP 1 and 4 were phase III, 68-week, placebo-controlled trials of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg combined with lifestyle intervention; STEP 4 had a 20-week semaglutide run-in and 48-week randomized withdrawal period. Participants had a body mass index ≥30 kg/mOf the 1961 participants in STEP 1 and 803 in STEP 4, most had one or more complication/comorbidity at baseline, with dyslipidaemia and hypertension most prevalent. In STEP 1, reductions in waist circumference, SBP, DBP, FPG, fasting serum insulin, lipids and HOMA-IR were greater with semaglutide versus placebo (p ≤ .001). Reductions in SBP, non-HDL cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and FPG were generally greater with semaglutide than placebo within weight-loss categories. Non-significant ASCVD risk reductions were observed with semaglutide versus placebo (p .05). In STEP 4, improvements in waist circumference, SBP, FPG, fasting serum insulin and lipids during the semaglutide run-in (week 0-20) were maintained over week 20-68 with continued semaglutide, but deteriorated following the switch to placebo (p .001 [week 20-68]). Net reductions in antihypertensive/lipid-lowering medication use occurred with semaglutide versus placebo (both trials).Semaglutide may improve cardiometabolic risk factors and reduce antihypertensive/lipid-lowering medication use versus placebo in adults with overweight/obesity without diabetes. These potential benefits were not maintained after treatment discontinuation.STEP 1 NCT03548935, STEP 4 NCT03548987.
Published: 2022

13. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase 1 Inhibitor Brensocatib for Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Author: James D. Chalmers, Helen Usansky, Christopher M. Rubino, Ariel Teper, Carlos Fernandez, Jun Zou, and Kevin C. Mange
Subjects: Adult, Pharmacology, Benzoxazoles, Cathepsin G, Cystic Fibrosis, Myeloblastin, Fibrosis, Bronchiectasis, Oxazepines, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Serine Proteases, Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases, Leukocyte Elastase
Abstract: Brensocatib is an investigational, first-in-class, selective, and reversible dipeptidyl peptidase 1 inhibitor that blocks activation of neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs). The NSPs neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase 3 are believed to be central to the pathogenesis of several chronic inflammatory diseases, including bronchiectasis. In a phase II study, oral brensocatib 10 mg and 25 mg reduced sputum neutrophil elastase activity and prolonged the time to pulmonary exacerbation in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE). A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was developed to characterize brensocatib exposure, determine potential relationships between brensocatib exposure and efficacy and safety measures, and inform dose selection in clinical studies.Pharmacokinetic (PK) data pooled from a phase I study of once-daily brensocatib (10, 25, and 40 mg) in healthy adults and a phase II study of once-daily brensocatib (10 mg and 25 mg) in adults with NCFBE were used to develop a PPK model and to evaluate potential covariate effects on brensocatib pharmacokinetics. PK-efficacy relationships for sputum neutrophil elastase below the level of quantification (BLQ) and reduction in pulmonary exacerbation and PK-safety relationships for adverse events of special interest (AESIs; periodontal disease, hyperkeratosis, and infections other than pulmonary infections) were evaluated based on model-predicted brensocatib exposure. A total of 1284 steady-state brensocatib concentrations from 225 individuals were included in the PPK data set; 241 patients with NCFBE from the phase II study were included in the pharmacodynamic (PD) population for the PK/PD analyses.The PPK model that best described the observed data consisted of two distributional compartments and linear clearance. Two significant covariates were found: age on volume of distribution and renal function on apparent oral clearance. PK-efficacy analysis revealed a threshold brensocatib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) effect for attaining sputum neutrophil elastase BLQ and a strong relationship between sputum neutrophil elastase BLQ and reduction in pulmonary exacerbations. A PK-safety evaluation showed no noticeable trends between brensocatib exposure and the incidence of AESIs. Based on the predicted likelihood of clinical outcomes for sputum neutrophil elastase BLQ and pulmonary exacerbations, brensocatib doses of 10 mg and 25 mg once daily were selected for a phase III clinical trial in patients with NCFBE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04594369).PPK results revealed that age and renal function have a moderate effect on brensocatib exposure. However, this finding does not warrant dose adjustments based on age or in those with mild or moderate renal impairment. The PK/PD evaluation demonstrated the clinically meaningful relationship between suppression of neutrophil elastase activity and reduction in exacerbations in brensocatib-treated patients with NCFBE, supporting further development of brensocatib for bronchiectasis.
Published: 2022

14. Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses for Tebipenem after Oral Administration of Pro-Drug Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide

Author: H. Ganesan, V. K. Gupta, M. C. Safir, S. M. Bhavnani, A. K. Talley, D. Melnick, and C. M. Rubino
Subjects: Pharmacology, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology (medical)
Abstract: Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is an oral (PO) carbapenem pro-drug that is converted to the active moiety tebipenem in the enterocytes. Tebipenem has activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including extended-spectrum beta lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, and is being developed for the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (AP).
Published: 2023

15. Evaluation of the Impact of Comorbidities on Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics

Author: M. Trang, E. A. Lakota, M. C. Safir, S. M. Bhavnani, L. Friedrich, J. N. Steenbergen, P. C. McGovern, E. Tzanis, and C. M. Rubino
Subjects: Pharmacology, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology (medical)
Abstract: Omadacycline is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Analyses were undertaken to evaluate pharmacokinetic differences among subjects or patients stratified by comorbidities.
Published: 2023

16. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses Evaluating Omadacycline Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Arising from Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae

Author: Sujata M. Bhavnani, Jeffrey P. Hammel, Elizabeth A. Lakota, Michael Trang, Justin C. Bader, Catharine C. Bulik, Brian D. VanScoy, Christopher M. Rubino, Michael D. Huband, Lawrence Friedrich, Judith N. Steenbergen, and Paul G. Ambrose
Subjects: Pharmacology, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology (medical)
Abstract: Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline with in vitro activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae , is approved in the United States to treat patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Using nonclinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets for efficacy and in vitro surveillance data for omadacycline against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae , and a population pharmacokinetic model, PK-PD target attainment analyses were undertaken using total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma exposures to evaluate omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h or 200 mg i.v. every 24 h (q24h) on day 1, followed by 100 mg i.v. q24h on day 2 and 300 mg orally q24h on days 3 to 5 for patients with CABP.
Published: 2023

17. Antibody-mediated protection against symptomatic COVID-19 can be achieved at low serum neutralizing titers

Author: Pete Schmidt, Kristin Narayan, Yong Li, Chengzi I. Kaku, Michael E. Brown, Elizabeth Champney, James C. Geoghegan, Maximiliano Vásquez, Eric M. Krauland, Thomas Yockachonis, Shuangyi Bai, Bronwyn M. Gunn, Anthony Cammarata, Christopher M. Rubino, Paul Ambrose, and Laura M. Walker
Subjects: General Medicine
Abstract: Multiple studies of vaccinated and convalescent cohorts have demonstrated that serum neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers correlate with protection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the induction of multiple layers of immunity after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure has complicated the establishment of nAbs as a mechanistic correlate of protection (CoP) and hindered the definition of a protective nAb threshold. Here, we show that a half-life–extended monoclonal antibody (adintrevimab) provides about 50% protection against symptomatic COVID-19 in SARS-CoV-2–naïve adults at serum nAb titers on the order of 1:30. Vaccine modeling results support a similar 50% protective nAb threshold, suggesting that low titers of serum nAbs protect in both passive antibody prophylaxis and vaccination settings. Extrapolation of adintrevimab pharmacokinetic data suggests that protection against susceptible variants could be maintained for about 3 years. The results provide a benchmark for the selection of next-generation vaccine candidates and support the use of broad, long-acting monoclonal antibodies as alternatives or supplements to vaccination in high-risk populations.
Published: 2023

18. Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics: Influence of Mortality Risk Score among Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Author: M. Trang, J. P. Hammel, E. A. Lakota, M. C. Safir, S. M. Bhavnani, L. Friedrich, J. N. Steenbergen, P. C. McGovern, E. Tzanis, and C. M. Rubino
Subjects: Pharmacology, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology (medical)
Published: 2022

19. 1727. Phase 1b Dose-ranging Study Demonstrates Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Oral Epetraborole at the Predicted Therapeutic Dosage for Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease

Author: Paul B Eckburg, Dave Clarke, Jennifer Long, Sanjay Chanda, Kevin M Krause, Eric Easom, George Talbot, Christopher M Rubino, and Angela Molga
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background Epetraborole (EBO) — an orally available bacterial leucyl transfer RNA synthetase inhibitor with potent activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria — is under clinical development for treatment of MAC lung disease. We conducted a Phase 1b dose-ranging study of EBO tablets in healthy adult volunteers, to inform dose selection in the treatment of MAC lung disease. Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, EBO or placebo tablets were administered (n=8/cohort, 3:1 randomization) at dosages of 250-1000 mg q24h or 500 mg or 1000 mg q48h for up to 28 days. Standard Ph1 clinical and laboratory evaluations and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Based on prior human studies using significantly higher EBO daily doses, gastrointestinal (GI) events and anemia were predetermined AEs of special interest (AESIs). Plasma concentrations of EBO were measured by validated LC-MS/MS methods. Plasma PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods. Results A total of 43 subjects were enrolled; the 1000 mg q24h cohort was terminated early due to local COVID restrictions. Overall, 80.6% EBO subjects and 83.3% placebo subjects experienced ≥1 TEAE, none of which was serious or severe (Table). Most TEAEs were mild in severity (90%), and the remainder were moderate (10%). No TEAE leading to withdrawal from study was reported. The most frequent types of TEAEs were GI events (48.4% EBO, 41.7% placebo subjects), the most common being mild nausea. Two subjects had premature discontinuation of EBO due to a TEAE (asymptomatic liver enzyme elevations in a 250 mg q24h subject and mild nausea in a 1000 mg q48h subject). One 1000mg q24h subject had a TEAE of anemia. No clinically significant findings or TEAEs were observed for physical examinations, ECGs, or urine laboratory tests. Plasma Cmax and AUC0-∞ of EBO increased in a linear, dose-proportional manner across cohorts. Tmax was observed at ∼1 h post dose; mean t1/2 ranged from 7.63 to 11.1 h. Conclusion Oral EBO administered for 28-day dosing was generally well tolerated at the predicted therapeutic dose (500mg q24h) Predictable PK characteristics facilitate its use in MAC lung disease Further evaluation in a Phase 2/3 treatment-refractory MAC lung disease study is planned Disclosures Paul B. Eckburg, MD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Safety Review Board|Spero Therapeutics, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Sanjay Chanda, PhD, AN2 Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds George Talbot, MD, AN2 Therapeutics, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|AN2 Therapeutics, Inc.: Co-founder Christopher M. Rubino, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics,: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support.
Published: 2022

20. 591. Adintrevimab (ADI) Population Pharmacokinetics (PPK) in Phase 1 and Phase 2/3 COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment Study Participants

Author: Christopher M Rubino, Anthony P Cammarata, Paul Ambrose, Pete Schmidt, Myra Popejoy, Jean Gong, and Xia Pu
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background ADI is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered to have an extended half-life with high potency and broad neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 and other SARS-like coronaviruses with pandemic potential. Our objective was to develop a PPK model that describes the serum ADI concentration-time profile following intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) administration. Methods The ADI PPK model was developed on PK data from a Phase 1 single-ascending dose study (24 adults, IV and IM) and from Phase 2/3 COVID-19 prevention (EVADE; 659 adults, IM) and treatment (STAMP; 189 adults, IM) studies. 1,486 PK samples were included in the analysis. The impact of covariates (e.g. body weight, age, and baseline viral load) on ADI serum disposition were evaluated. Prediction-corrected visual predictive check (PC-VPC) plots were used to qualify the PPK model. Participant-specific ADI exposure estimates were generated using individual post hoc PK parameters. Results The PPK model is comprised of 2 systemic compartments, zero-order infusion for IV administration and first-order absorption for IM administration and provided a robust fit to the data based on the PC-VPC plots and goodness-of-fit plots (data not shown). Body weight influenced clearance, intercompartmental clearance, and central and peripheral volume compartments. The relationship between body weight and clearance was not suggestive of the need for dose adjustment over the population weight range studied (38.6 to 178.7 kg). There was no apparent impact of baseline viral load or age on ADI clearance. The median [range] half-lives in days by study; Phase 1 (α1.71 [1.18-2.46]; β 125 [117-149]), Phase 2/3 prevention (α 1.86 [0.640-3.13]; β 136 [105-209]), and Phase 2/3 treatment (α 1.89 [0.631-3.01]; β 136 [108-206]). The population mean IM bioavailability estimate was 90.5%. The figure shows the PPK model median (90% confidence interval) concentration-time profile following a single 300 mg IM ADI dose by study. Conclusion The PPK model provided a precise and unbiased fit to the observed ADI concentration-time data and will be useful for future PK-pharmacodynamic analyses. Moreover, ADI demonstrated high IM bioavailability and a median terminal elimination half-life of 125 to 136 days. Disclosures Christopher M. Rubino, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics,: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Anthony P. Cammarata, M.S., Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Paul Ambrose, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics: President Pete Schmidt, MD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Myra Popejoy, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Jean Gong, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Xia Pu, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds.
Published: 2022

21. 619. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Target Attainment Analyses to Support Epetraborole Dose Selection for the Treatment of Patients with Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease

Author: Sujata M Bhavnani, Jeffrey P Hammel, Harish Ganesan, M Courtney Safir, Christopher M Rubino, Paul G Ambrose, and Kevin M Krause
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background Epetraborole (EBO) is an orally available, bacterial leucyl transfer RNA synthetase inhibitor that concentrates in alveolar macrophages and exhibits potent activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria. PK-PD target attainment (PTA) analyses using plasma exposures were performed to support the selection of an EBO oral (PO) dosing regimen for clinical development in MAC lung disease. Methods Hill-type models were used to characterize the PK-PD relationships between EBO free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio and change in log10 CFU from baseline for 5 MAC isolates (EBO MIC range 2-8 mg/L) in a murine chronic MAC lung infection model. Change in log10 CFU was calculated by comparing lung CFUs after 56 days of EBO dosing (100 to 300 mg/kg/day) to CFUs of untreated controls prior to dosing. Data from PK studies were used to determine AUC by EBO dose. EBO PK parameters were calculated for 10,000 simulated MAC lung disease patients using an EBO population PK model with inflated PK variance to generate total-drug plasma concentration-time profiles at steady-state after administration of EBO 250 mg and 500 mg PO q24h for 21 days in a fasted state. Free-drug plasma AUC values were calculated using a human protein binding estimate of 0%. Percent probabilities of PTA were assessed using median, randomly assigned, and the highest of the free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio targets from the Hill models developed using the above-described in vivo efficacy study data. Results Table 1 summarizes the free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio targets for each MAC isolate. For EBO 250 mg q24h, percent probabilities of PTA were ≥ 90% for a 1-log10 CFU reduction (Figure 1) at an MIC of 4 mg/L (all PK-PD targets) or 8 mg/L (median target only) and for a 2-log10 CFU reduction (Figure 2) at an MIC of 2 mg/L (all PK-PD targets) or 4 mg/L (median target only). For EBO 500 mg q24h, percent probabilities of PTA were ≥ 90% for a 1-log10 CFU reduction at an MIC of 8 mg/L (all PK-PD targets) or 16 mg/L (median target only) and for a 2-log10 CFU reduction at an MIC of 4 mg/L (median and randomly assigned PK-PD targets) or 8 mg/L (median target only). Conclusion The high PTA associated with plasma exposures after oral EBO 500 mg q24h support advancing this dosing regimen into clinical studies in patients with MAC lung disease. Disclosures Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Jeffrey P. Hammel, MS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma,: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A,: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Harish Ganesan, MS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co.Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support M. Courtney Safir, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited,: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Christopher M. Rubino, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics,: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Paul G. Ambrose, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Kevin M. Krause, MBA, AN2 Therapeutics: Employee|AN2 Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds.
Published: 2022

22. 1132. Integrated Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) Characterizing Viral Dynamics After Intramuscular (IM) Adintrevimab (ADI) Administration in Participants with Mild to Moderate Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)

Author: Evan Tarbell, Scott A Van Wart, Myra Popejoy, Kristin Narayan, Ellie Hershberger, Xia Pu, Jean Gong, Christopher M Rubino, Andrew Santulli, and Paul Ambrose
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background ADI is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered to have an extended half-life with high potency and broad neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 and other SARS-like coronaviruses. The goal of our analysis was to develop a QSP model in which ADI concentrations in upper airway (UA) epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were linked to a viral dynamic model to describe the impact of ADI on SARS-CoV-2 viral load relative to placebo. Methods The QSP model was fit in NONMEM Version 7.4 using PK data from a Phase 1 study (N=24, IV and IM) and from Phase 2/3 COVID-19 prevention (EVADE; N=659, IM) and treatment (STAMP; N=189, IM) studies. Saliva and NP samples were collected from STAMP study participants (pts) infected with the delta or omicron variants. The viral dynamic model was based on a published model and was modified to include both active (V) and deactivated (DV) virus (Fig). The viral dynamic model was fit to the NP swab viral load data (2 samples/pt) standardized to time since infection based upon recorded symptom onset. Saliva data (7-8 samples/pt) was fit sequentially using a biophase compartment given the peak viral load was modestly lower and peaked later than Day 1. Viral dynamic model (A) and simulated median (90% PI) NP viral load reduction in ADI-treated or placebo participants for delta (B) and omicron (C) variants Results The QSP model provided an excellent fit to serum ADI concentration-time data after estimation of a transit rate to account for IM absorption, plasma volume, and the ADI-neonatal Fc receptor dissociation rate constant. The linked viral dynamic model captured the NP swab viral load data after estimating differences in within-host replication factor (R0) and viral production rate (p) by variant. Maximal ADI-induced effect (Smax) on stimulating viral clearance (c) was fixed to 0.43 based upon prior modeling. ADI concentration in UA ELF resulting in 50% of Smax (SC50) was estimated to be 0.086 for delta and 1.05 mg/L for omicron. Figure B and C show model-based simulated median (90% PI) viral load reduction in ADI-treated or placebo pts for delta and omicron variants. Conclusion This QSP model, in conjunction with information on new variants available early in outbreaks (IC50, infectivity (R0), viral production rate [each a model parameter]), allows for rapid dose identification in response to emerging variants. Disclosures Evan Tarbell, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support Scott A. Van Wart, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support Myra Popejoy, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Kristin Narayan, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Ellie Hershberger, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Xia Pu, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Jean Gong, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Christopher M. Rubino, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics,: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Andrew Santulli, BSE, Adagio Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support Paul Ambrose, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics: President.
Published: 2022

23. 592. Impact of Elevated MIC Values on Echinocandin Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Candida glabrata Target Attainment (TA)

Author: Christopher M Rubino, Shawn Flanagan, Jeffrey B Locke, and Sujata M Bhavnani
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background Given the increasing prevalence of non-albicans Candida species, including C. glabrata and C. auris, which have higher predisposition to develop antifungal resistance (e.g., fks mutations conferring reduced susceptibility to echinocandins), disparities in PK-PD TA of currently approved echinocandins warrant further attention. Rezafungin (RZF) is a novel, next-generation echinocandin in development for treatment and prevention of invasive fungal disease. The completed Phase 3 treatment trial (ReSTORE; NCT03667690) demonstrated non-inferiority of RZF once weekly to caspofungin (CAS) once daily in patients with candidemia and invasive candidiasis. Here we revisit the challenge for echinocandins in achieving TA against C. glabrata with elevated MIC values and build on previous analyses using RZF patient data. Methods Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using published population PK models for anidulafungin (AFG), micafungin (MFG), CAS, and RZF (Bader et al 2018, Rubino and Flanagan 2021). Dosing regimens were as labeled for candidemia for once-daily echinocandins and as studied for RZF (400 mg Week 1, 200 mg once weekly thereafter). Individual free-drug plasma AUC values from time zero to the end of the dosing interval of 24 or 168 h (AUC0-tau) were calculated for each drug for 2 weeks. MIC values corresponding to observed C. glabrata MIC90 and MIC100 values for each drug were derived from 2018-2020 SENTRY surveillance data (Pfaller et al 2020, Carvalhaes et al 2022). Free-drug AUC0-tau:MIC targets associated with return to baseline colony-forming units (CFU) (stasis) of C. glabrata, derived from neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis models, were used (Table). Simulated echinocandin free-drug AUC0-tau:MIC ratio distributions relative to the MIC90 and MIC100 were generated. Results The FDA-approved dosing regimens for CAS, MFG and AFG failed to achieve adequate TA at higher C. glabrata MIC values associated with their respective MIC90 (AFG only) and/or MIC100 (all three). In contrast, the Phase 3 RZF dosing regimen achieved excellent TA at both the MIC90 and MIC100 (Figure). Conclusion Projected enhanced TA for RZF once weekly may result in clinical efficacy in patients infected with less susceptible C. glabrata isolates. Disclosures Christopher M. Rubino, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics,: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Shawn Flanagan, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics: Employee|Cidara Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Jeffrey B. Locke, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics: Employee|Cidara Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support.
Published: 2022

24. 593. Population Pharmacokinetic Model Development for Epetraborole and Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease Patients Using Data from Phase 1 and 2 Studies

Author: Harish Ganesan, M Courtney Safir, Sujata M Bhavnani, Kevin M Krause, and Christopher M Rubino
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background Epetraborole (EBO), an orally available bacterial leucyl transfer RNA synthetase inhibitor with potent activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria, is under clinical development for treatment of MAC lung disease. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model describing the disposition of EBO after oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) administration was developed to support EBO PK-PD analyses and dose selection for patients with MAC lung disease. Methods Model development was conducted using NONMEM (v.7.4.3). Models were attempted for oral absorption, systemic compartments, and linear vs. non-linear elimination. Model evaluation involved goodness-of-fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive plots, which describe the ability of model-based simulations to capture the observed data. Included were data from 5 Phase 1 (3 IV and 2 PO) and 2 Phase 2 studies (IV only) (Table 1). Results The pooled dataset included 2637 EBO PK samples from 138 subjects/patients. A robust fit to observed data across studies was obtained using a three-compartment model with linear elimination (Table 2). The impact of body weight on PK was included using an allometric scaling approach to accommodate observed lower body weight in MAC lung disease patients. PO dosing was modeled using an absolute bioavailability term (F) and transit compartments with separate absorption rates for fed and fasted administration. Interindividual variability (IIV) in systemic clearance was low (7.9%), but IIV in F (32.7%) contributed to slightly higher variability in PK for PO vs. IV administration. Moderate shrinkage was observed for the IIV in the model parameters. This was considered acceptable given inclusion of patients with limited PK data in the model and the objective to facilitate simulations designed to inform dose selection. The prediction-corrected visual predictive check plots for the data obtained from a recently completed Phase 1b study evaluating 28-day oral dosing regimens (NCT04892641) are provided in Figure 1. Conclusion This model is useful for describing expected PK in MAC lung disease patients and was used to conduct simulations for the advancement of the oral EBO 500 mg q24h dosing regimen into clinical studies in patients with MAC lung disease. Disclosures Harish Ganesan, MS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co.Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support M. Courtney Safir, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited,: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Kevin M. Krause, MBA, AN2 Therapeutics: Employee|AN2 Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Christopher M. Rubino, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics,: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support.
Published: 2022

25. LB2306. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic attainment (PTA), and Clinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) to Support Dose Selection for the Treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Infections

Author: Sujata M Bhavnani, Christopher M Rubino, Jeffrey P Hammel, Anthony P Cammarata, Kajal Larson, Kathryn Liolios, Sarah McLeod, Alita Miller, Paul G Ambrose, Ruben Tommasi, and John O'Donnell
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background SUL-DUR is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination in development for the treatment of ABC infections, which are often severe and associated with substantial mortality. PPK, PTA, and clinical PK/PD analyses were conducted using all available PK and efficacy data to support SUL-DUR dose selection. Methods PPK analyses were performed using PK data from 373 subjects, including 110 patients who received SUL-DUR and underwent PK sampling in the pivotal Phase 3 (ATTACK) trial. SUL-DUR concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) from healthy subjects were utilized to predict SUL-DUR ELF concentrations in Phase 3 patients. Covariate analyses evaluated the impact of demographic factors on PK exposures. The PPK model, non-clinical PK/PD data, and in vitro surveillance data were used to assess the PTA by MIC in simulated patients with ABC infections. Clinical PK/PD relationships were assessed using dichotomous and time-to-event efficacy endpoints from the ATTACK trial. Results Two-compartment models with linear kinetics best characterized SUL and DUR PK. Consistent with high renal clearance of SUL-DUR, dose adjustments are needed in patients with renal impairment or augmented renal function. Body weight, site of infection, and East Asian region (which grouped patients from mainland China, Taiwan, and South Korea vs others) were statistically significant covariates in the PPK analysis but were not clinically relevant. No other statistical or clinically relevant covariates were identified. As shown in Figures A and B for plasma and ELF, respectively, the PTA was ≥ 90% for pathogens with an MIC ≤ 4 µg/mL across renal function categories in simulated patients, using PK/PD targets associated with a 1-log kill10. No relationships were observed between PK/PD indices and efficacy endpoints, consistent with most patients achieving SUL and DUR exposures above nonclinical PK/PD targets for efficacy. Percent PTA by MIC on Day 1 based on the assessment of sulbactam %T>MIC ≥ 50% and durlobactam AUC:MIC ratio ≥ 10 targets and free-drug plasma (A) and total-drug ELF (B) exposures among simulated patients by CLcr group after administration of sulbactam 1 g/ durlobactam 1 g IV q6h and dosing regimens adjusted for renal impairment and augmented renal function Abbreviations: %T>MIC, percentage of time on Day 1 that concentration exceed minimum inhibitory concentration; AUC, area under the concentration-time curve; CLcr, creatinine clearance; ELF, epithelial lining fluid; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; q6h, every 6 hours; PK-PD, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic; PTA, probability of PK/PD target attainment Conclusion The simulated plasma and ELF exposures yielded a high PTA, which when combined with the favorable efficacy and safety findings from ATTACK (abstract #1266378), support a dose of 1.0 g sulbactam/1.0 g durlobactam via a 3-hour infusion, every 6 hours in patients with normal renal function and renal function-based dose adjustments. Disclosures Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|ICPD Holdings: Ownership Interest|ICPD Technologies: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|ICPD Holdings: Ownership Interest|ICPD Technologies: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sujata M. Bhavnani, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|ICPD Holdings: Ownership Interest|ICPD Technologies: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Christopher M. Rubino, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|ICPD Holdings: Ownership Interest|ICPD Technologies: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Jeffrey P. Hammel, MS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Anthony P. Cammarata, M.S., Adagio Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Kajal Larson, PhD, Entasis Therapeutics: Employee Kathryn Liolios, MA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|KBP Biosciences USA: Grant/Research Support|Lassen Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Sarah McLeod, PhD, Entasis Therapeutics: Employee Alita Miller, PhD, Entasis Therapeutics: Employee Paul G. Ambrose, PharmD; MS; FIDSA, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Antabio SAS: Grant/Research Support|Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|B. Braun Medical Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|Boston Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Bravos Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Celdara Medical LLC: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Cipla USA: Grant/Research Support|Crestone Inc.: Grant/Research Support|CXC: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm International SA: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Evopoint Biosciences Co.: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Hoffmann-La Roche: Grant/Research Support|ICPD: Ownership Interest|ICPD Biosciences, LLC.: Ownership Interest|ICPD Holdings: Ownership Interest|ICPD Technologies: Ownership Interest|Insmed Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Kaizen Bioscience, Co.: Grant/Research Support|Matinas Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|Melinta Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Menarini Ricerche S.p.A.: Grant/Research Support|Mutabilis: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics AG: Grant/Research Support|Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|PureTech Health: Grant/Research Support|Sfunga Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Suzhou Sinovent Pharmaceuticals Co.: Grant/Research Support|TauRx Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|tranScrip Partners: Grant/Research Support|Utility Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Valanbio Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|VenatoRx: Grant/Research Support|Wockhardt Bio AG: Grant/Research Support Ruben Tommasi, PhD, Entasis Therapeutics: Employee John O'Donnell, B.S, Entasis Therapeutics: Employee
Published: 2022

26. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftobiprole in Pediatric Patients

Author: Rima Snariene, Hans Georg Münch, Anne Smits, Christopher M. Rubino, Arunas Liubsys, Karine Litherland, Tomasz Tomasik, Kamal Hamed, Dace Gardovska, Chi D. Hornik, Mark J Polak, Przemko Kwinta, Veerle Cossey, Sebastian Schröpf, Christine Ruehle, and Miroslava Bosheva
Subjects: Data Analysis, Male, PNEUMONIA, cephalosporin, Cephalosporin, Phases of clinical research, Pediatrics, THERAPY, Gastroenterology, Medicine, noncompartmental analysis, Child, Cross Infection, pediatric patients, Half-life, SPECTRUM CEPHALOSPORIN BAL5788, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Community-Acquired Infections, Infectious Diseases, Child, Preschool, ComputingMethodologies_DOCUMENTANDTEXTPROCESSING, Administration, Intravenous, Female, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, pharmacokinetics, ceftobiprole, Microbiology (medical), medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, medicine.drug_class, Immunology, Ceftobiprole, DOSE PHARMACOKINETICS, Antimicrobial Reports, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Pharmacokinetics, Internal medicine, Humans, Dosing, Science & Technology, business.industry, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Pneumonia, PHARMACODYNAMICS, medicine.disease, Cephalosporins, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, business
Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Ceftobiprole, the active moiety of the prodrug ceftobiprole medocaril, is an advanced-generation, broad-spectrum, intravenous cephalosporin, which is currently approved for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired or community-acquired pneumonia. Methods: Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics and safety were analyzed from 2 recently completed pediatric studies, a single-dose, phase 1 study in neonates and infants up to 3 months of age (7.5 mg/kg) and a phase 3 study in patients 3 months to 17 years of age with pneumonia (10–20 mg/kg with a maximum of 500 mg per dose every 8 hours for up to 14 days). Results: Total ceftobiprole plasma concentrations peaked at the end of infusion. Half life (median ranging from 1.9 to 2.9 hours) and overall exposure (median AUC ranging from 66.6 to 173 μg•h/mL) were similar to those in adults (mean ± SD, 3.3 ± 0.3 hours and 102 ± 11.9 μg•h/mL, respectively). Calculated free-ceftobiprole concentrations in the single-dose study remained above a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 mg/L (fT > MIC of 4 mg/L) for a mean of 5.29 hours after dosing. In the pneumonia study, mean fT > MIC of 4 mg/L was ≥5.28 hours in all dose groups. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated in both studies. Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftobiprole characterized in the pediatric population were within the range of those observed in adults. In the pneumonia study, the lowest percentage of the dosing interval with fT > MIC of 4 mg/L was 50.8%, which suggests that pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment can be sufficient in pediatric patients. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated.
Published: 2021

27. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses as Support for Meropenem-Vaborbactam Dosing Regimens and Susceptibility Breakpoints

Author: S. M. Bhavnani, M. Trang, D. C. Griffith, O. Lomovskaya, J. P. Hammel, J. S. Loutit, S. K. Cammarata, M. N. Dudley, P. G. Ambrose, and C. M. Rubino
Subjects: Pharmacology, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Infectious Diseases, Urinary Tract Infections, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Administration, Intravenous, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, beta-Lactamase Inhibitors, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Abstract: Meropenem-vaborbactam is a fixed-dose beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor with potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales . Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target attainment analyses were undertaken using population pharmacokinetic models, nonclinical PK-PD targets for efficacy, in vitro surveillance data, and simulation to provide support for 2 g meropenem-2 g vaborbactam every 8 h (q8h) administered as a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, and dosing regimens adjusted for patients with renal impairment.
Published: 2022

28. Antibody-mediated protection against symptomatic COVID-19 can be achieved at low serum neutralizing titers

Author: Pete Schmidt, Kristin Narayan, Yong Li, Chengzi I. Kaku, Michael E. Brown, Elizabeth Champney, James C. Geoghegan, Maximiliano Vásquez, Eric M. Krauland, Thomas Yockachonis, Shuangyi Bai, Bronwyn M. Gunn, Anthony Cammarata, Christopher M. Rubino, and Laura M. Walker
Subjects: Article
Abstract: Multiple studies of vaccinated and convalescent cohorts have demonstrated that serum neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers correlate with protection against COVID-19. However, the induction of multiple layers of immunity following SARS-CoV-2 exposure has complicated the establishment of nAbs as a mechanistic correlate of protection (CoP) and hindered the definition of a protective nAb threshold. Here, we show that a half-life extended monoclonal antibody (adintrevimab) provides approximately 50% protection against symptomatic COVID-19 in SARS-CoV-2-naïve adults at low serum nAb titers on the order of 1:30. Vaccine modeling supports a similar 50% protective nAb threshold, suggesting low levels of serum nAb can protect in both monoclonal and polyclonal settings. Extrapolation of adintrevimab pharmacokinetic data suggests that protection against susceptible variants could be maintained for approximately 3 years. The results provide a benchmark for the selection of next-generation vaccine candidates and support the use of broad, long-acting monoclonal antibodies as an alternative or supplement to vaccination in high-risk populations.
Published: 2022

29. HCM-AF South Italy score for prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: data from a derivation and validation italian cohorts

Author: G Todde, E Monda, G Canciello, M Lioncino, R Lombardi, M Rubino, F Borrelli, M Caiazza, D Paoletta, G De Simone, G Pacileo, G Esposito, G Limongelli, and M A Losi
Subjects: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract: Background Only one score for prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been developed in North America (HCM-AF North America score). Purpose To develop a new score (HCM-AF South Italy score) in an Italian derivation cohort and to test the new score with that from North America, in an Italian validation cohort. Methods A cohort of 228 patients with HCM and without history of AF, followed at referral center 1 for HCM, was used for model development. A cohort of 226 patients without history of AF, followed at referral center 2, was used for external validation. During follow-up (IQR 3–13 years, median 8 years), 59 (26%) patients developed new-onset AF. Data in the development cohort generated the HCM-AF South Italy score, a point score to predict AF probability: left atrial dimension >49 mm (+5 points), age at clinical evaluation 25 mmHg (+2 points), NYHA class >1 (+1 point). Results Patients from the validation cohort were older, had lower prevalence of HCM family history, lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, taken fewer drugs like beta-blockers, ACE or ARB, calcium-channel blockers, and antiarrhythmic drugs and had lower LVOTO than patients from the derivation cohort, (overall p4 identified patients at risk of AF with a sensitivity of 48%, specificity of 76%, PPV of 20% and NPV of 92%. Conclusion Although derived and tested in little and quite different populations, the performance of the HCM-AF South Italy score was superior to that of the score developed in North America. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Published: 2022

30. Author response for 'Semaglutide improves cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with overweight or obesity: <scp>STEP</scp> 1 and 4 exploratory analyses'

Author: null Mikhail N. Kosiborod, null Meena Bhatta, null Melanie Davies, null John E. Deanfield, null W. Timothy Garvey, null Usman Khalid, null Robert Kushner, null Domenica M. Rubino, null Niels Zeuthen, and null Subodh Verma
Published: 2022

31. Effects of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg on C-reactive protein in adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 1, 2, and 3): Exploratory analyses of three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials

Author: Subodh Verma, Meena Bhatta, Melanie Davies, John E. Deanfield, W. Timothy Garvey, Camilla Jensen, Kristian Kandler, Robert F. Kushner, Domenica M. Rubino, and Mikhail N. Kosiborod
Subjects: General Medicine
Abstract: Inflammation is a key driver of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. C-reactive protein (CRP), an established biomarker of inflammation, is commonly elevated in people with overweight/obesity.STEP 1, 2, and 3 were 68-week, placebo-controlled trials of semaglutide for weight management in participants with overweight/obesity, with (STEP 2) or without (STEP 1 and 3) type 2 diabetes. Change in serum CRP from baseline to week 68 was assessed as a prespecified secondary endpoint for semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo (STEP 1, 2, and 3) and versus semaglutide 1.0 mg (STEP 2).The trials took place from June through November 2018 (STEP 1 and 2) and from August 2018 to April 2020 (STEP 3). In all trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced CRP at week 68 versus placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD; 95% CI] -44% [-49 to -39] in STEP 1, -39% [-46 to -30] in STEP 2, and -48% [-55 to -39] in STEP 3; all p 0.05). In STEP 2, CRP reductions were greater with semaglutide 2.4 mg (-49%) than with 1.0 mg (-42%) but the difference did not reach statistical significance (ETD [95% CI] -12% [-23 to 1]; p = 0.06). Reductions in CRP occurred in parallel with bodyweight loss and were consistent regardless of baseline BMI/bodyweight/glycaemic status. More semaglutide-treated participants had reductions in CRP-defined cardiovascular risk versus those on placebo. Reductions in CRP were positively correlated with reductions in bodyweight, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, and HOMA-IR (data not shown).In people with overweight/obesity, once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg and 1.0 mg reduced CRP concentration irrespective of baseline BMI/bodyweight/glycaemic status compared with placebo. These data suggest a potential anti-inflammatory role of semaglutide in obesity.Novo Nordisk.
Published: 2022

32. P335 TEMPORAL TRENDS (2003–2018) OF IN–HOSPITAL AND 30–DAY MORTALITY IN PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED WITH ACUTE HEART FAILURE IN LOMBARDY

Author: F Trombara, G Marenzi, N Cosentino, O Leoni, P Poggio, M De Metrio, M Rubino, A Bonomi, F Oliva, and P Agostoni
Subjects: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract: Introduction Limited and controversial temporal trend of in–hospital mortality of patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) have been reported. We evaluated whether, in AHF hospitalized patients, the rate of in–hospital and 30–day mortality, and 30–day re–hospitalization for AHF changed in the last 15 years. Methods We examined administrative data from Lombardy (∼10.000.000 inhabitants), Italy. We analyzed data of all adults hospitalized for AHF from 2003 to 2018 in Lombardy. Patients were stratified according to hospitalization period: 2003–2006; 2007–2010; 2011–2014; 2015–2018. The primary study endpoint was the comparison among periods of in–hospital mortality, while secondary endpoints were 30–day mortality and re–hospitalization for AHF temporal trends. Results During the study period, 414,164 patients were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of AHF. The in–hospital and 30–day mortality in the entire cohort showed a progressive increase over time (from 6.7% to 8.5% and from 12.4% to 14.5%, respectively). Thirty–day re–hospitalization for AHF was 2% showing a progressive decrease across years. However, patient’ complexity, as inferable from number of comorbidities, increased in most recently hospitalized patients. After matching for age, gender, and admission ward, the study population included 78,884 patients in each study period. In the matched population, after further adjustment for major comorbidities, the risk of in–hospital and 30–day mortality and of the 30–day risk of AHF re–hospitalization progressively decreased from one period to the following one by 1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%–2%), 2% (1%–3%) and 10% (8%–12%), respectively. Conclusions In our study, the greater patients’ complexity largely accounted for the continuing rise in early mortality observed in patients hospitalized with AHF. This work was partly financed by the Italian Ministry of Health and the Lombardia Region (Grant NET–2016–02364191; EASY–NET).
Published: 2023

33. C63 PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF RIGHT VENTRICULAR PULMONARY ARTERIAL UNCOUPLING IN CARDIAC AMYLOIDOSIS

Author: G Palmiero, E Monda, F Verrillo, F Dongiglio, M Caiazza, M Rubino, M Lioncino, G Diana, E Vetrano, A Fusco, A Cirillo, A Mauriello, G Ciccarelli, M De Rimini, M D’Alto, G Cerciello, A D‘Andrea, P Golino, P Calabrò, E Bossone, and G Limongelli
Subjects: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract: Background This study aims to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of the right ventricular pulmonary arterial (RV–PA) uncoupling in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Methods The study population consisted in 92 consecutive patients with CA (age 71.1±12.2 years, 71% males; 47% with immunoglobulin light chain (AL), 53% with transthyretin [ATTR]). All patients underwent a comprehensive evaluation. A pre–specified tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion on pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) value Results Thirty–two patients (35%) showed RV–PA uncoupling at baseline evaluation (15/44 [34%] AL and 17/48 [35%] ATTR). Patients with RV–PA uncoupling in both AL and ATTR showed worse NYHA functional class, lower systemic blood pressure, and more pronounced left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction than those with RV–PA coupling. During a median follow–up of 8 months (IQR 4–13), 26 patients (28%) experienced cardiovascular death. Patients with RV–PA uncoupling showed lower survival at 12 months follow–up than those with RV–PA coupling (42.7% [95%CI 21.7–63.7%] vs. 87.3% [95%CI 78.3–96.3%], p–value Conclusions RV–PA uncoupling is common among patients with CA, and it is a marker of advanced disease and worse outcomes. This study suggest that TAPSE/PASP ratio has the potential to improve risk stratification and guide management strategies in patients with CA.
Published: 2023

34. 1078. Optimization of a 96-well Plate Format Assay to Evaluate Concentration-Dependent Activity of a Monoclonal Antibody Against the O Antigen O25b from ST131-H30 Escherichia coli

Author: Jill Lindley, Timothy B Doyle, Brian D VanScoy, Christopher M Rubino, Sujata M Bhavnani, Paul G Ambrose, and Mariana Castanheira
Subjects: Infectious Diseases, Oncology
Abstract: Background Escherichia coli ST131 is a major challenge for global human health. Among ST131 isolates, the H30 type is prevalent and displays multiple drug resistance to classes. A monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific for the O antigen, O25b, which is conserved in ST131-H30 clonal lineage, was developed for diagnostic and prophylactic therapy. We optimized a 96-well plate assay to test different concentrations of the mAb against E. coli clinical isolates. Methods Initial growth curves were performed against 69 ST131-O25b, 9 ST131-O25a, 32 ST131 non-O25, and 29 non-ST131 E. coli isolates in 40% active human serum (HS). Additional conditions evaluated for growth inhibition by the mAb included 3 media types, 3 HS sources, pH variations, addition of polysorbate 80 (P80), inoculum concentration, length of incubation, and varying calcium and magnesium concentrations. Once optimal parameters were established, the assay was miniaturized into a 96-well format and 12 ST131-O25b and 5 non-ST131 were tested. Fluorescence and visual reading using alamarBlue (AB), a cell metabolism indicator, were performed at 8 and 10h in addition to plating for viable colonies. Results After 10h incubation, only 36/69 (52.2%) ST131-O25b isolates exhibited visible growth in BHI plus 40% HS. A 2-part growth inhibition assay using BHI plus 50% HS and BHI with 25% HS without the addition of P80, calcium, or magnesium was considered the optimal growth condition for EC strains to test the effect of the mAb. By 10 hours, all ST131-O25b strains displayed a visual inhibition of growth between 0.3-5 mg/L of α-ST131 mAb and zero non-ST131 strains were inhibited (Figure). While reading AB on a fluorometer was more sensitive and less subjective than visual interpretation, both reading methods allow for endpoint determinations. Additionally, panels were able to go through one freeze-thaw cycle and still retain α-ST131:O25b mAb activity. Conclusion Concentration-dependent activity of a α-ST131:O25b mAb can be measured in vitro in a microtiter format; however, the growth inhibition by HS, while still providing enough complement for complement-mediated mAb killing, might be an obstacle. Additionally, assay reproducibility may be difficult without a consistent source of active HS. Figure Disclosures Jill Lindley, Bravos Biosciences (Research Grant or Support)ContraFect Corporation (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Qpex Biopharma (Research Grant or Support) Timothy B. Doyle, AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Research Grant or Support)Bravos Biosciences (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Spero Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support) Brian D. VanScoy, B.S., 3-V Biosciences (Grant/Research Support)Achogen (Grant/Research Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Arixa Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Arsanis Inc. (Grant/Research Support)B. Braun Medical Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)BLC USA (Grant/Research Support)Boston Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Bravos Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support)Cidara Therapeutics Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Cipla, USA (Grant/Research Support)Corcept Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Cumberland Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Debiopharm International SA (Grant/Research Support)Discuva Limited (Grant/Research Support)Emerald Lake Technologies (Grant/Research Support)Enhanced Pharmacodynamics (Grant/Research Support)Entasis Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)E-Scape Bio (Grant/Research Support)Genentech (Grant/Research Support)Geom Therapeutics, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support)Hoffmann-La Roche (Grant/Research Support)Horizon Orphan LLC (Grant/Research Support)ICPD Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support)Indalo Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Insmed Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics (Employee)Iterum (Grant/Research Support)KBP Biosciences USA (Grant/Research Support)Kyoto Biopharma, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Grant/Research Support)Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. (Grant/Research Support)Merck & Co., Inc (Grant/Research Support)Mutabilis (Grant/Research Support)Nabriva Therapeutics AG (Grant/Research Support)Naeja-RGM Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Nosopharm SAS (Grant/Research Support)Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Grant/Research Support)NuCana Biomed (Grant/Research Support)Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Polyphor, Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Prothena Corporation (Grant/Research Support)PTC Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Rempex Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Roche TCRC (Grant/Research Support)Sagimet (Grant/Research Support)scPharmaceuticals Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support)Spero Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)TauRx Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Theravance Biopharma Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)USCAST (Grant/Research Support)VenatoRx (Grant/Research Support)Vical Incorporated (Grant/Research Support)Wockhardt Bio AG (Grant/Research Support)Zavante Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Zogenix International (Grant/Research Support) Christopher M. Rubino, Pharm.D., 3-V Biosciences (Grant/Research Support)Achogen (Grant/Research Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Arixa Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Arsanis Inc. (Grant/Research Support)B. Braun Medical Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)BLC USA (Research Grant or Support)Boston Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Bravos Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, member/owner)Cidara Therapeutics Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Cipla, USA (Grant/Research Support)Corcept Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Cumberland Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Debiopharm International SA (Grant/Research Support)Discuva Limited (Grant/Research Support)Emerald Lake Technologies (Grant/Research Support)Enhanced Pharmacodynamics (Grant/Research Support)Entasis Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)E-Scape Bio (Grant/Research Support)Genentech (Grant/Research Support)Geom Therapeutics, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support)Hoffmann-La Roche (Grant/Research Support)Horizon Orphan LLC (Grant/Research Support)ICPD Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, member/owner)Indalo Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Insmed Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics (Employee)Iterum (Grant/Research Support)KBP Biosciences USA (Grant/Research Support)Kyoto Biopharma, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Grant/Research Support)Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. (Grant/Research Support)Merck & Co., Inc (Grant/Research Support)Mutabilis (Grant/Research Support)Nabriva Therapeutics AG (Grant/Research Support)Naeja-RGM Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Nosopharm SAS (Grant/Research Support)Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Grant/Research Support)NuCana Biomed (Grant/Research Support)Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Polyphor, Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Prothena Corporation (Grant/Research Support)PTC Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Rempex Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Roche TCRC (Grant/Research Support)Sagimet (Grant/Research Support)scPharmaceuticals Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support)Spero Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)TauRx Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Theravance Biopharma Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)USCAST (Grant/Research Support)VenatoRx (Grant/Research Support)Vical Incorporated (Grant/Research Support)Wockhardt Bio AG (Grant/Research Support)Zavante Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Zogenix International (Grant/Research Support) Sujata M. Bhavnani, Pharm.D., M.S., FIDSA, 3-V Biosciences (Grant/Research Support)Achogen (Grant/Research Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Arixa Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Arsanis Inc. (Grant/Research Support)B. Braun Medical Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)BLC USA (Grant/Research Support)Boston Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Bravos Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, member/owner)Cidara Therapeutics Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Cipla, USA (Grant/Research Support)Corcept Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Cumberland Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Debiopharm International SA (Grant/Research Support)Discuva Limited (Grant/Research Support)Emerald Lake Technologies (Grant/Research Support)Enhanced Pharmacodynamics (Grant/Research Support)Entasis Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)E-Scape Bio (Grant/Research Support)Genentech (Grant/Research Support)Geom Therapeutics, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support)Hoffmann-La Roche (Grant/Research Support)Horizon Orphan LLC (Grant/Research Support)ICPD Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, member/owner)Indalo Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Insmed Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics (Employee)Iterum (Grant/Research Support)KBP Biosciences USA (Grant/Research Support)Kyoto Biopharma, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Grant/Research Support)Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. (Grant/Research Support)Merck & Co., Inc (Grant/Research Support)Mutabilis (Grant/Research Support)Nabriva Therapeutics AG (Grant/Research Support)Naeja-RGM Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Nosopharm SAS (Grant/Research Support)Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Grant/Research Support)NuCana Biomed (Grant/Research Support)Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Polyphor, Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Prothena Corporation (Grant/Research Support)PTC Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Rempex Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Roche TCRC (Grant/Research Support)Sagimet (Grant/Research Support)scPharmaceuticals Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support)Spero Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)TauRx Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Theravance Biopharma Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)USCAST (Grant/Research Support)VenatoRx (Grant/Research Support)Vical Incorporated (Grant/Research Support)Wockhardt Bio AG (Grant/Research Support)Zavante Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Zogenix International (Grant/Research Support) Paul G. Ambrose, Pharm.D., FIDSA, 3-V Biosciences (Grant/Research Support)Achogen (Grant/Research Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Arixa Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Arsanis Inc. (Grant/Research Support)B. Braun Medical Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)BLC USA (Grant/Research Support)Boston Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Bravos Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, member/owner)Cidara Therapeutics Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Cipla, USA (Grant/Research Support)Corcept Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Cumberland Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Debiopharm International SA (Grant/Research Support)Discuva Limited (Research Grant or Support)Emerald Lake Technologies (Grant/Research Support)Enhanced Pharmacodynamics (Grant/Research Support)Entasis Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)E-Scape Bio (Grant/Research Support)Genentech (Grant/Research Support)Geom Therapeutics, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support)Hoffmann-La Roche (Grant/Research Support)Horizon Orphan LLC (Grant/Research Support)ICPD Biosciences, LLC (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, member/owner)Indalo Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Insmed Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics (Employee)Iterum (Grant/Research Support)KBP Biosciences USA (Grant/Research Support)Kyoto Biopharma, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Grant/Research Support)Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. (Grant/Research Support)Merck & Co., Inc (Grant/Research Support)Mutabilis (Grant/Research Support)Nabriva Therapeutics AG (Grant/Research Support)Naeja-RGM Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Nosopharm SAS (Grant/Research Support)Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Grant/Research Support)NuCana Biomed (Grant/Research Support)Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Polyphor, Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)Prothena Corporation (Grant/Research Support)PTC Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Rempex Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Roche TCRC (Grant/Research Support)Sagimet (Grant/Research Support)scPharmaceuticals Inc. (Grant/Research Support)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support)Spero Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)TauRx Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Theravance Biopharma Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support)USCAST (Grant/Research Support)VenatoRx (Grant/Research Support)Vical Incorporated (Grant/Research Support)Wockhardt Bio AG (Grant/Research Support)Zavante Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Zogenix International (Grant/Research Support) Mariana Castanheira, PhD, AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Research Grant or Support)Bravos Biosciences (Research Grant or Support)Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Cipla USA Inc. (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Qpex Biopharma (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Spero Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support) Mariana Castanheira, PhD, Affinity Biosensors (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Allergan (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Amicrobe, Inc (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Amplyx Pharma (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Artugen Therapeutics USA, Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Basilea (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; BIDMC (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; bioMerieux Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; BioVersys Ag (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Bugworks (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Cidara (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Cipla (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Contrafect (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Cormedix (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Crestone, Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Curza (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; CXC7 (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Entasis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Fedora Pharmaceutical (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Fimbrion Therapeutics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Fox Chase (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; GlaxoSmithKline (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Guardian Therapeutics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Hardy Diagnostics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; IHMA (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Janssen Research & Development (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Johnson & Johnson (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Kaleido Biosceinces (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; KBP Biosciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Luminex (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Matrivax (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Mayo Clinic (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Medpace (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Melinta (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Menarini (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Meridian Bioscience Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Micromyx (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; MicuRx (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; N8 Medical (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Nabriva (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; National Institutes of Health (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; National University of Singapore (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; North Bristol NHS Trust (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Novome Biotechnologies (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Paratek (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Prokaryotics Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; QPEX Biopharma (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Rhode Island Hospital (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; RIHML (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Roche (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Roivant (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Salvat (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Scynexis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; SeLux Diagnostics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Shionogi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Specific Diagnostics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Spero (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; SuperTrans Medical LT (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; T2 Biosystems (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; The University of Queensland (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Thermo Fisher Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Tufts Medical Center (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Universite de Sherbrooke (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; University of Iowa (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; University of Wisconsin (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; UNT System College of Pharmacy (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; URMC (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; UT Southwestern (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; VenatoRx (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Viosera Therapeutics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Wayne State University (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support
Published: 2021

35. Return to the Operating Room after Vitrectomy for Vitreous Opacities

Author: Shaina M. Rubino, Flora Lum, and D. Wilkin Parke
Subjects: medicine.medical_specialty, genetic structures, business.industry, medicine.medical_treatment, Retinal detachment, Vitrectomy, Cataract surgery, medicine.disease, eye diseases, Vitreous Floater, Ophthalmology, Medicine, Current Procedural Terminology, sense organs, Eye surgery, Epiretinal membrane, business, Macular hole
Abstract: Purpose To investigate the rate of return to the operating room after vitrectomy surgery for vitreous opacities. Design Retrospective registry cohort. Participants Individuals receiving care in ophthalmology practices participating in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. Methods Data from the IRIS Registry were analyzed for patients who underwent vitrectomy for vitreous opacities. Cases were identified by the combination of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), codes (379.21, 379.22, 379.24, and 379.25), and a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for vitrectomy surgery. Main Outcome Measures The number and percentage of eyes that underwent additional eye surgery within 1 year after vitrectomy for vitreous opacities were identified, as was the nature of the additional procedures per CPT code. Results Fifty thousand eight hundred thirty-six eyes that underwent vitrectomy surgery linked to one of the ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM codes for vitreous opacities were identified. In 17 615 eyes, the surgery was linked to the vitreous opacities code exclusively, and not to epiretinal membrane or macular hole codes. Of these, 2187 eyes (12.4%) returned to the operating room for cataract surgery, and 643 eyes (3.7%) returned to the operating room for a noncataract procedure. Four hundred fifty-seven eyes (2.6%) returned to the operating room for retinal detachment repair. Conclusions In the IRIS Registry, eyes undergoing vitrectomy for vitreous opacities returned to the operating room for an ophthalmic surgery other than cataract extraction 3.7% of the time, and retinal detachment repair was performed 2.6% of the time.
Published: 2021

36. Population Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension in Patients with Treatment-Refractory Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease

Author: Dayton W. Yuen, Nikolas J. Onufrak, Christopher M. Rubino, Jakko van Ingen, David E. Griffith, Kevin C. Mange, Kevin L. Winthrop, and Sujata M. Bhavnani
Subjects: medicine.medical_specialty, Population, Cmax, Urine, 030226 pharmacology & pharmacy, Gastroenterology, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Pharmacokinetics, Internal medicine, Medicine, Pharmacology (medical), Dosing, Original Research Article, education, Pharmacology, education.field_of_study, Inhalation, business.industry, lnfectious Diseases and Global Health Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 4], Amikacin, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Sputum, medicine.symptom, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: Background and Objectives Use of parenteral amikacin to treat refractory nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung disease is limited by systemic toxicity. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data pooled from two randomized trials to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of once-daily amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) in patients with treatment-refractory NTM lung disease. Methods In phase 2 (TR02-112) and phase 3 (CONVERT) studies, patients with sputum cultures positive for Mycobacterium avium complex (both studies) or M. abscessus (TR02-112) despite ≥ 6 months of guideline-based therapy were treated with once-daily ALIS 590 mg. Results Fifty-three patients (28 Japanese; 25 White) were assessed. At baseline and ≈ 6 months after daily dosing, median maximum concentration (Cmax) was < 2 mg/L and median area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0–24) was
Published: 2021

37. Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dose Selection of Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis of Pediatric Patients

Author: Christopher M. Rubino, Wes Cetnarowski, Angela Karpf, Nikolas J. Onufrak, Diane Licursi, Diana Valencia Martinez, and Michael L. Schmitz
Subjects: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, Metabolic Clearance Rate, medicine.drug_class, Antibiotics, Population, Cefazolin, Models, Biological, 030226 pharmacology & pharmacy, model‐based simulations, Young Adult, 03 medical and health sciences, Surgical prophylaxis, 0302 clinical medicine, Pharmacokinetics, Pediatric surgery, medicine, Humans, Cutoff, Pharmacology (medical), surgical prophylaxis, Child, education, Aged, Pharmacology, education.field_of_study, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, business.industry, Body Weight, Pediatric Pharmacology, Perioperative, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Middle Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Area Under Curve, Child, Preschool, Surgical Procedures, Operative, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Anesthesia, Female, business, pharmacokinetics, Monte Carlo Method, Half-Life, medicine.drug
Abstract: Cefazolin is an antibiotic frequently used for perioperative prophylaxis. Data from healthy adults and pediatric surgery patients were pooled to refine a previously developed population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and to determine the optimal body weight cutoff for selecting fixed doses of either 1 or 2 g cefazolin to produce exposures in pediatric surgery patients similar to a single 2‐g dose in adults. Regardless of dose used, cefazolin was well tolerated in pediatric patients. A total of 1102 plasma samples from 62 patients from 3 studies were available to assess the previous model. The pooled data set allowed for simplification of the model such that allometrically scaled clearance and volume parameters were found to provide a robust fit while removing unnecessary covariate relationships. Monte Carlo simulations using the final cefazolin population PK model suggested an optimal weight cutoff of 50 kg, in contrast to the previously suggested 60 kg for a single 2‐g dose. Patients at or above this 50‐kg cutoff would receive a 2‐g dose of cefazolin, and those below 50 kg but ≥25 kg would receive a 1‐g dose of cefazolin.
Published: 2020

38. Treatment With Once-weekly Semaglutide 2.4 mg Improves Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Adults With Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: STEP 2 Post Hoc Analysis

Author: David Lau, John E Deanfield, Melanie Davies, Timothy W Garvey, Ole K Jeppesen, Usman Khalid, Mikhail Kosiborod, Robert F Kushner, Peter N Laursen, Domenica M Rubino, and Subodh Verma
Subjects: Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Internal Medicine, General Medicine
Published: 2022

39. 899P Molecular characterization of gastro-entero-pancreatic advanced mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas: NIRVANA sub-study

Author: F. Spada, L. Gervaso, E. Pisa, A. Ranghiero, M. Rubino, and N. Fazio
Subjects: Oncology, Hematology
Published: 2022

40. Anastomosis porto cava termino lateral

Author: Carlos A Ormaechea, M Arcos Pérez, C. Muñoz Monteavaro, Raúl Praderi, and M Rubino
Subjects: hipertensión portal, tratamiento quirúrgico, hemorragias digestivas, RD1-811, Surgery
Abstract: Presentado en sesión de 2 de setiembre de 1959
Published: 2020

41. A Rare Case of Benign Luteomas of Pregnancy Masquerading as Malignancy

Author: Kelly Devlin, Jessica M. Rubino, Robert Shapiro, and Amber Payton
Subjects: Pregnancy, medicine.medical_specialty, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, business.industry, Luteoma, medicine.disease, Malignancy, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, Ovarian tumor, 0302 clinical medicine, Rare case, medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Radiology, Ovarian mass, business
Abstract: A luteoma is a benign ovarian mass that can have malignant characteristics on sonography. Pelvic sonography is used to help distinguish benign from malignant masses. The workup of adnexal masses during pregnancy may involve the use of both transabdominal and transvaginal sonography as well as Doppler imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, and serum tumor markers to identify the risk of malignancy. This study presents a case of a benign ovarian luteoma of pregnancy detected during sonography. The mass was removed during the first trimester due to malignant sonographic features. Counseling and treatment regarding ovarian masses should consist of a multidisciplinary team made up of physicians in maternal-fetal medicine, radiology, neonatology, and sonographers.
Published: 2020

42. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of myocardial work in cardiac amyloidosis and in genetic and non-genetic cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype

Author: G Palmiero, M Rubino, E Monda, M Lioncino, F Verrillo, E Vetrano, M Caiazza, A Fusco, A Cirillo, F Dongiglio, L Ascione, P Caso, and G Limongelli
Subjects: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, General Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND & PURPOSE. Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an infiltrative disorder characterized by left ventricular (LV) thickening with early systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Due to it poor prognosis, and the beneficial impact of novel treatments when started in early stages of disease, its forward detection is crucial. Aim of this study is comparing the diagnostic accuracy of classical and novel echocardiographic parameters in detecting CA among other forms of genetic and non-genetic cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype. METHODS. We enrolled 50 pts with CA (26 AL and 24 wtATTR) and 75 phenocopies (LVH group) [25 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) pts, 25 hypertensive (HypCM) pts, and 25 pts with non-severe aortic stenosis (AS)]. Standard and novel LV morpho-functional echo parameters [LV ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial contraction fraction (MCF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), relative regional strain ratio (RRSR), ejection fraction on strain ratio (EFSR)], and novel Myocardial Work (MW) parameters [Global Work Index (GWI), Global Constructive Work (GCW), Global Wasted Work (GWW), Global Work Efficiency (GWE)] were analyzed. RESULTS. LV standard, novel and MW-derived systolic parameters were more impaired in CA compared to LVH group. At ROC curve analysis, GCW showed the best performance in discriminating CA from other forms of LVH (AUC 0.886; 95% CI: 0.819-0.954; P CONCLUSIONS. Despite CA and LVH patients shows a similar phenotype, the systolic function differs greatly. In the present study, the GCW showed the best ability in detecting CA among other forms of LVH. Its reduction in CA seems reflect the infiltrative burden and its consequences on myocardial deformation properties, while its reduction in LVH group has been attributed elsewhere to fibrotic derangement. GCW showed to be a promising novel diagnostic and prognostic factor in this setting. Abstract Figure 1 Abstract Table 1
Published: 2022

43. Pathophysiological, haemodynamic and prognostic implications of left atrial dysfunction in cardiac amyloidosis and other cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype

Author: G Palmiero, M Rubino, M Lioncino, E Monda, E Vetrano, F Verrillo, F Dongiglio, A Fusco, A Cirillo, M Caiazza, L Ascione, P Caso, and G Limongelli
Subjects: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, General Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND & PURPOSE. Left atrial function (LAF) is a determinant of clinical status and outcome in many cardiac disorders, including cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Aim of this study is to explores the LAF in CA and other cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype, and its consequences on cardiovascular haemodynamics, right ventricular function and survival. METHODS. We enrolled 50 patients with CA (26 AL and 24 wtATTR) and 75 with hypertrophic phenotype (LVH group) [25 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) pts, 25 hypertensive pts (HypCM), and 25 pts with aortic stenosis (AS)]. LAF was analysed using the phasic method [LAEI as reservoir, LAPEF as conduit, LAAEF as active pump and TLAEF as total emptying function; see figure 1] by LA volumes determination. RESULTS. ATTR patients showed higher LA dimensions and impaired reservoir and total LA emptying function (TLAEF) compared to AL without differences LAF. Compared to the LVH group, CA patients showed higher LA dimension with impaired LAF in all phasic parameters, higher LV filling pressures and reduced biventricular function. We further divided CA and LVH patients into four subgroups based on the presence or absence of LA dysfunction (LADys+ for TLAEF values below the median: CONCLUSIONS. LAF is significantly more impaired in CA than LVH group and is associated with worst clinical status, RV dysfunction and higher LV filling and pulmonary pressure. Moreover, LADys is a frequent feature of CA and significantly associated with higher CV mortality. We suggests that LADys in LVH group could results from chronic pressure overload due to LA"s exposure to high LV diastolic pressure (impaired LV compliance). In CA, LADys could also be determined by direct LA infiltration. The pathophysiological result is a progressive LA remodelling with increased LA pressure, consequent backward transmission to the pulmonary venous system and, ultimately, RV dysfunction. TLAEF is parameter of LAF that correlates with increased pulmonary vascular resistance (measured elsewhere with cardiac catheterisation) and RV dysfunction. In CA, it seems promising as marker of the haemodynamic consequences of LADys and CV mortality. Abstract Figure 1 Abstract Figure 2
Published: 2022

44. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of right ventricular-arterial coupling in cardiac amyloidosis and in genetic and non-genetic cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype

Author: G Palmiero, M Rubino, E Monda, M Lioncino, F Verrillo, F Dongiglio, M Caiazza, E Vetrano, A Cirillo, A Fusco, L Ascione, P Caso, and G Limongelli
Subjects: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, General Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND & PURPOSE. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in cardiomyopathies is a consequence of chronic overload (i.e. aortic stenosis, AS) or direct involvement of systemic disorders (i.e. cardiac amyloidosis, CA). The Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion/Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) ratio has been recently proposed as a surrogate of RV-arterial coupling (RVAC). This study aims to compare RVAC between CA subgroups and between CA and other forms of genetic and non-genetic cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype. METHODS. We enrolled 50 patients with CA (26 AL and 24 wtATTR) and 75 cardiomyopathies with hypertrophy phenotype (LVH group) [25 pts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 25 hypertensive pts(HypCM), and 25 pts with AS]. Besides routine echocardiographic measurements, we analysed right chambers dimensions and classical and novel parameters of RV function [TAPSE, TAPSE/sPAP, St wave, global (RVGLS) and free-wall (RVFWS) strain]. RESULTS. Compared to AL, the ATTR group showed higher right chambers dimensions, without differences in all RV systolic parameters. Compared to the LVH group, CA patients showed no differences in RV dimensions while RV systolic parameters, including the TAPSE/sPAP ratio, were significantly reduced in the presence of significantly higher LV filling pressures. At ROC curve analysis, TAPSE (AUC 0.877; 95% CI: 0.811-0.943; p CONCLUSIONS. The RVAC is significantly impaired in CA compared to the LVH group but not between CA subgroups. Its reduction seems attributable to both increase LV filling pressure, due to the restrictive nature of the infiltrative cardiomyopathy, and reduced RV systolic function, due to either indirect RV chronic overload and direct myocardial infiltration. The TAPSE/sPAP ratio is a surrogate of RVAC and proved to be a novel echocardiographic parameter useful in both discriminating CA among genetic and non-genetic forms of LVH, and stratifying the prognosis. Abstract Table 1 Abstract Figure 1
Published: 2022

45. Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial

Author: Domenica M, Rubino, Frank L, Greenway, Usman, Khalid, Patrick M, O'Neil, Julio, Rosenstock, Rasmus, Sørrig, Thomas A, Wadden, Alicja, Wizert, W Timothy, Garvey, and Phillip, Toth
Subjects: Adult, Male, Patient Dropouts, Injections, Subcutaneous, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Weight Gain, Drug Administration Schedule, Placebos, Double-Blind Method, Weight Loss, Diabetes Mellitus, Odds Ratio, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Obesity, Exercise, Original Investigation, Body Weight, Liraglutide, Middle Aged, Overweight, United States, Treatment Outcome, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Diet Therapy
Abstract: IMPORTANCE: Phase 3 trials have not compared semaglutide and liraglutide, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues available for weight management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and adverse event profiles of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, vs once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (both with diet and physical activity), in people with overweight or obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity. Participants unable to tolerate 2.4 mg of semaglutide could receive 1.7 mg; participants unable to tolerate 3.0 mg of liraglutide discontinued treatment and could restart the 4-week titration. Placebo groups were pooled (n = 85). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was percentage change in body weight, and confirmatory secondary end points were achievement of 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss, assessed for semaglutide vs liraglutide at week 68. Semaglutide vs liraglutide comparisons were open-label, with active treatment groups double-blinded against matched placebo groups. Comparisons of active treatments vs pooled placebo were supportive secondary end points. RESULTS: Of 338 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 49 [13] years; 265 women [78.4%]; mean [SD] body weight, 104.5 [23.8] kg; mean [SD] body mass index, 37.5 [6.8]), 319 (94.4%) completed the trial, and 271 (80.2%) completed treatment. The mean weight change from baseline was –15.8% with semaglutide vs –6.4% with liraglutide (difference, –9.4 percentage points [95% CI, –12.0 to –6.8]; P
Published: 2022

46. Model-Based Approach for Optimizing Ceftobiprole Dosage in Pediatric Patients

Author: Sebastian Schröpf, Anthony P. Cammarata, Kamal Hamed, Mark J Polak, Karine Litherland, Anne Smits, and Christopher M. Rubino
Subjects: Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, cephalosporin, Ceftobiprole, Population, Urology, Renal function, Clinical Therapeutics, Body weight, Pharmacokinetics, population pharmacokinetics, Humans, Medicine, Pharmacology (medical), Child, Infusions, Intravenous, education, Aged, Pharmacology, education.field_of_study, pediatric patients, business.industry, Infant, Newborn, PK Parameters, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cephalosporins, Community-Acquired Infections, Infectious Diseases, Target attainment, Population study, business, pharmacokinetics, ceftobiprole
Abstract: Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation cephalosporin for intravenous administration with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model characterizing the disposition of ceftobiprole in plasma using data from patients in three pediatric studies was developed. Model-based simulations were subsequently performed to assist in dose optimization for the treatment of pediatric patients with hospital-acquired or community-acquired pneumonia. The population PK data set comprised 518 ceftobiprole plasma concentrations from 107 patients from 0 (birth) to 17 years of age. Ceftobiprole PK was well described by a three-compartment model with linear elimination. Ceftobiprole clearance was modeled as a function of glomerular filtration rate; other PK parameters were scaled to body weight. The final population PK model provided a robust and reliable description of the PK of ceftobiprole in the pediatric study population. Model-based simulations using the final model suggested that a ceftobiprole dose of 15 mg/kg of body weight infused over 2 h and administered every 12 h in neonates and infants
Published: 2021

47. Population Pharmacokinetics of Rezafungin in Patients with Fungal Infections

Author: Shawn Flanagan and Christopher M. Rubino
Subjects: Oncology, Drug, medicine.medical_specialty, Antifungal Agents, Echinocandin, media_common.quotation_subject, Population, Serum albumin, Echinocandins, Pharmacokinetics, population pharmacokinetics, Internal medicine, Covariate, medicine, Humans, Pneumocystis jirovecii, Candidiasis, Invasive, Pharmacology (medical), education, Candida, media_common, Pharmacology, Body surface area, education.field_of_study, biology, business.industry, biology.organism_classification, echinocandin, Infectious Diseases, pharmacokinetic model, biology.protein, business, pharmacokinetics, medicine.drug
Abstract: Rezafungin is a novel antifungal agent of the echinocandin class with potent activity against species of Candida and Aspergillus, including subsets of resistant strains, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. The objective of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model to characterize the disposition of rezafungin in plasma following intravenous (IV) administration in healthy volunteers and in patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis. The population PK model was based on a previous model from phase 1 data; formal covariate analyses were conducted to identify any relationships between subject characteristics and rezafungin PK variability. A four-compartment model with linear elimination and zero-order drug input provided a robust fit to the pooled data. Several statistically significant relationships between subject descriptors (sex, infection status, serum albumin, and body surface area [BSA]) and rezafungin PK parameters were identified, but none were deemed clinically relevant. Previous dose justification analyses conducted using data from phase 1 subjects alone are expected to remain appropriate. The final model provided a precise and unbiased fit to the observed concentrations and can be used to reliably predict rezafungin PK in infected patients.
Published: 2021

48. Exposure-response relationships of brensocatib in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE)

Author: Ariel Teper, Kevin C. Mange, Christopher M. Rubino, Helen Usansky, Carlos Fernandez, and James D. Chalmers
Subjects: medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, Internal medicine, Non cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, Medicine, In patient, Exposure response relationships, business, Gastroenterology
Published: 2021

49. Mapping 3D Textiles onto their Models

Author: J. Schneider, Y. Wielhorski, M. Rubino, A. Mendoza, and S. Roux
Abstract: &nbsp
Published: 2021

50. Improved Chen-Smith image coder.

Author: Eduardo M. Rubino, Henrique S. Malvar, and Ricardo L. de Queiroz
Published: 1993

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Publication Type

Journal

Region

Database

Publisher

782 results on '"M. Rubino"'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources