Search

Investigation of the biological activity of viruses in vitro necessitates some means of identifying their presence within cells and assaying their activity. Since virus particles themselves are metabolically inert, their detection and quantitation is dependent on their cellular effects or on synthesis of viral antigens, enzymes, and the like. Virus-induced cell fusion is a cytopathic cellular response easily recognizable by microscopic examination, which has been exploited to considerable advantage in virology, as will be briefly discussed.

HIV-1 is characterised by extensive genetic variability encompassing at least 10 different phylogenetically related clades within the major group of HIV-1 subtypes. Most commercially available HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load assays have been optimised with clade B viruses and may yield misleadingly low RNA levels for nonclade B viruses that are increasingly found in Europe. In this study we compare the most recent versions of the Roche Amplicor HIV Monitor and the Chiron Quantiplex for ability to detect viraemia in a population of patients infected with a range of HIV-1 subtypes. EDTA-treated plasma was obtained from 206 patients. The Amplicor and Quantiplex assays were carried out in accordance with manufacturers' instructions. Results from 53/206 (25.7%) samples differed by0.4 log between Amplicor 1.5 and Quantiplex 3.0. A0.5 log and 1.0 log difference was detected between Amplicor 1.5 and Quantiplex 3.0 in 37/206 (17.9%) and 7/206 (3.4%) of samples, respectively. Overall, Amplicor 1.5 gave a median value of 0.22 log higher than Quantiplex 3.0. Discordant results were detected in 53 out of 206 (25.7%) samples. Of these 22 out of 123 (17.9%) samples were of UK origin, 18 out of 43 (41.9%) African, 1 out of 8 (12.5%) South American, 1 out of 6 (16.7%) North American, 4 out of 9 (44.4%) North European, 3 out of 11 (23.7%) South European and 3 out of 7 (42.3%) Asian samples, respectively. Serotyping revealed that discordant viral load results between Amplicor 1.5 and Quantiplex 3.0 occurred within samples from all subtypes (A-E). Despite the improvements made to both the Roche Amplicor and the Chiron Quantiplex assays discordant results were detected between the two assays in 25.7% of cases. In a substantial minority of patients there were major discrepancies between the two assays that were not explained by HIV subtype differences.

The prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV-1 by zidovudine monotherapy is well known, but increasingly combination anti-retroviral therapy is prescribed during pregnancy. In this prospective study, 19 pregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection who elected to take anti-retroviral therapy during the second and third trimesters were treated with zidovudine or zidovudine plus lamivudine. Fourteen women treated with zidovudine monotherapy had a mean 0.3 log(10) reduction in viral load and a mean 52 x 10(6)/L (17%) increase in CD4+ lymphocytes at delivery compared with pre-treatment samples. Genotypic mutations associated with decreased susceptibility to zidovudine were detected in 2 of 10 women at delivery. Five women with more advanced HIV-1 infection were treated with zidovudine plus lamivudine and a mean 1.5 log(10) reduction in viral load together with a mean 30 x 10(6)/L (33%) increase in CD4+ lymphocytes was observed in this group. However, four of five women in the dual therapy arm had the M184V mutation in the reverse transcriptase gene associated with decreased susceptibility to lamivudine at delivery. We conclude that zidovudine plus lamivudine reduced HIV-1 plasma viraemia to low levels in pregnant women with advanced HIV-1 disease but the rapid development of genotypic resistance to lamivudine indicates that additional therapy is required both for the long-term benefit of the mothers and to prevent the development of resistant virus that may be transmitted to the infant.

The envelope glycoproteins of HIV, gp120 and gp41, contain epitopes recognized by neutralizing antibodies. Studies of human sera from infected individuals indicate that group-specific neutralization antigens common to most isolates of HIV-1 exist, and that some HIV-2 antisera cross-neutralize HIV-1. Neutralization epitopes for HIV-1 have been identified and mapped, including a group-specific antigen on gp41, and a type-specific antigen on gp120. Neutralization "escape" mutants have been selected in vitro with a neutralizing mab to the type-specific antigenic loop. The CD4 antigen binds HIV-1 gp120 with high affinity and acts as the receptor on human and simian T-lymphocytes and monocytes for all strains of HIV-1, HIV-2, and SIV tested. Following binding to the CD4 receptor, HIV becomes internalized by a pH-independent process. The principle binding domain for gp120 is located in the N-terminal V domain of CD4. Anti-idiotypic sera to CD4 mabs recognizing the same site weakly neutralize HIVs of many strains, and soluble, recombinant forms of CD4 strongly neutralize HIV. Neither anti-CD4 mabs nor sCD4 inhibit the low level of plating of HIV observed on tumour cells in culture of glial (brain) and muscle origin, indicating that CD4 is not essential for infection of these cell types.