Search

The article discusses the analysis of the Swedish cardiopulmonary resuscitation registry evaluated trends in characteristics, management, and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). It mentions that Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increased with the probability of survival increasing with mild neurological sequelae.

Competing Interests: Ingrid Glimelius: Support to the department for educational purposes from Kite‐Gilead and Jansen Cilag. Participate in a real‐world data collaboration with support to the department from Takeda. Karin Ekströms‐Smedby: Real‐world data collaboration with Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, Roche, BM. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to report.

There are some evidences that hypogammaglobulinemia in newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a predictor for inferior outcome, but the risk for infection-related admissions specifically related to hypogammaglobulinemia is not known. The aim was to explore if hypogammaglobulinemia in untreated DLBCL in a Swedish cohort was associated with inferior outcome, and to assess the relationship between low immunoglobulin (Ig) levels and infections. Using data from the Swedish Lymphoma Register, we retrospectively identified patients above18 years diagnosed with DLBCL, receiving anthracycline-based curative therapy during 2000-2015 in Southern Sweden with Ig-levels tested at baseline. Data on Ig levels and infections were collected from medical records. Five hundred eighty-five patients were included, median age was 69 years. Hypogammaglobulinemia was detected at baseline in 24%, the most common Ig deficiency was IgG (18%), followed by IgA (10%) and IgM (8%). Hypogammaglobulinemia was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8, p-value 0.018), but not when adjusted for International Prognostic Index (IPI). Low levels of Ig were associated with more infections during lymphoma treatment (p-value 0.013), also when adjusted for IPI (p-value < 0.001). Among patients with IgG deficiency, 47% had ≥ 1 infections versus 35% in patients with normal IgG (HR 1.2, p = 0.025). In conclusion, hypogammaglobulinemia was a frequent finding in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, with clinical impact in terms of treatment complications and outcome., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The role of consolidation radiotherapy in patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is controversial., Methods: The IELSG37 trial, a randomized noninferiority study, aimed to assess whether irradiation can be omitted in patients with PMBCL with complete metabolic response (CMR) after induction immunochemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 30 months after random assignment. Patients with CMR were randomly assigned to observation or consolidation radiotherapy (30 Gy). With a noninferiority margin of 10% (assuming a 30-month PFS of 85% in both arms), a sample size of 540 patients was planned with 376 expected to be randomly assigned., Results: The observed events were considerably lower than expected; therefore, primary end point analysis was conducted when ≥95% of patients were followed for ≥30 months. Of the 545 patients enrolled, 268 were in CMR after induction and were randomly assigned to observation (n = 132) or radiotherapy (n = 136). The 30-month PFS was 96.2% in the observation arm and 98.5% in the radiotherapy arm, with a stratified hazard ratio of 1.47 (95% CI, 0.34 to 6.28) and absolute risk difference of 0.68% (95% CI, -0.97 to 7.46). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99% in both arms. Nonrandomized patients were managed according to local policies. Radiotherapy was the only treatment in 86% of those with Deauville score (DS) 4 and in 57% of those with DS 5. The 5-year PFS and OS of patients with DS 4 (95.8% and 97.5%, respectively) were not significantly different from those of randomly assigned patients. Patients with DS5 had significantly poorer 5-year PFS and OS (60.3% and 74.6%, respectively)., Conclusion: This study, the largest randomized trial of radiotherapy in PMBCL, demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients achieving CMR with no survival impairment for those omitting irradiation.

Background: Most women who are high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) positive in a cervical cancer screening test will spontaneously heal from their infection. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) is recommended by the World Health Organization as a triage test for cervical screening, however its accuracy as a triage test has been questioned. In this study, we aimed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of VIA with and without Lugol's iodine as a triage test to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) among women who tested positive for hrHPV after self-sampling., Method: This two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) took place in Adama, Ethiopia. The women who tested positive for vaginal hrHPV (Anyplex ΙΙ, Seegene) after self-sampling were randomized to VIA with or without iodine and appointed to a midwife-led clinic. The result of the triage test was categorized as positive, negative, suspicion of cancer or inconclusive, and treated accordingly. Cervical biopsies were collected from women who were hrHPV positive to serve as a gold standard., Results: 22.4% (197/878) of women tested hrHPV positive. Sensitivity and specificity for VIA to detect CIN2+was 25.0% (95% CI 0.6 to 80.0) and 82.7% (95% CI 69.7 to 91.8), respectively. For VIA with iodine, the sensitivity was 50.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 93.2) and the specificity 86.3% (95% CI 71.4 to 93.0). The difference between the two methods was not statistically significant, p=0.5. The odds of detecting CIN2+ was 5.4 times higher if positive for VIA with iodine compared with a negative result. For VIA without iodine, the odds of detecting CIN2+ was 1.6 compared with a negative result. The odds of detecting CIN2+ was 6.4 times higher if the women were HIV positive than for those who were HIV negative., Conclusion: VIA with iodine improved detection of CIN2+ in women who were hrHPV DNA positive but was not significantly better than VIA alone., Trial Registration Number: NCT05125380., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Etoposide to standard R-CHOP is used for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in some countries. Due to the lack of randomized trials, a real-world data study using matching methods was used to test the potential effectiveness of R-CHOEP over R-CHOP., Patients and Methods: This study included patients from the Danish Lymphoma Register diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 at the age of 18-60 years with de novo DLBCL and age-adjusted IPI ≥2. R-CHOEP treated patients were matched 1:1 without replacement to R-CHOP treated patients using a hybrid exact and genetic matching technique. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: In total, 396 patients were included; 213 received R-CHOEP and 183 received R-CHOP. Unadjusted 5-year PFS and OS for R-CHOEP were 69% (95% Confidence intervals [CI]; 63%-76%) and 79% (CI;73%-85%) versus 62% (CI;55%-70%) and 76% (CI;69%-82%) for R-CHOP (log-rank test, PFS p = .25 and OS p = .31). A total of 127 patients treated with R-CHOEP were matched to 127 patients treated with R-CHOP. Matching-adjusted 5-year PFS and OS were 65% (CI; 57%-74%) and 79% (CI; 72%-84%) for R-CHOEP versus 63% (CI; 55%-73%) and 79% (CI;72%-87%) for R-CHOP (log-rank test, PFS p = .90 and OS p = .63)., Conclusion: The present study did not confirm superiority of R-CHOEP over R-CHOP for young patients with high-risk DLBCL., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Abstract: Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who experience first relapse/refractoriness can be categorized into early or late progression-of-disease (POD) groups, with a threshold of 24 months from MCL diagnosis. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) are the established standard treatment at first relapse, but their effectiveness compared with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in late-POD patients remains unknown. In this international, observational cohort study, we evaluated outcomes among patients at first, late POD beyond 24 months. The primary objective was progression-free survival from the time of second-line therapy (PFS-2) of BTKi vs CIT. Overall, 385 late-POD patients were included from 10 countries. Their median age was 59 years (range, 19-70), and 77% were male. Median follow-up from the time of second-line therapy was 53 months (range, 12-144). Overall, 114 patients had second-line BTKi, whereas 271 had CIT, consisting of rituximab-bendamustine (R-B; n = 101), R-B and cytarabine (R-BAC; n = 70), or other regimens (mostly cyclophosphamide-hydroxydaunorubicin-vincristine-prednisone]- or platinum-based; n = 100). The 2 groups were balanced in clinicopathological features and median time to first relapse. Overall, BTKi was associated with significantly prolonged median PFS-2 than CIT (not reached [NR] vs 26 months, respectively; P = .0003) and overall survival (NR and 56 months, respectively; P = .03). Multivariate analyses showed that BTKi was associated with lower risk of death than R-B and other regimens (hazard ratio, 0.41 for R-B and 0.46 for others), but similar to R-BAC. These results may establish BTKi as the preferable second-line approach in patients with BTKi-naïve MCL., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Abstract: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is dependent on a supportive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in which infiltration of CD163+ macrophages has a negative prognostic impact. This study explores how abundance and spatial localization of CD163+ cells are associated with the biology of MCL, using spatial multiomic investigations of tumor and infiltrating CD163+ and CD3+ cells. A total of 63 proteins were measured using GeoMx digital spatial profiling in tissue microarrays from 100 diagnostic MCL tissues. Regions of interest were selected in tumor-rich and tumor-sparse tissue regions. Molecular profiling of CD163+ macrophages, CD20+ MCL cells, and CD3+ T-cells was performed. To validate protein profiles, 1811 messenger RNAs were measured in CD20+ cells and 2 subsets of T cells. Image analysis was used to extract the phenotype and position of each targeted cell, thereby allowing the exploration of cell frequencies and cellular neighborhoods. Proteomic investigations revealed that CD163+ cells modulate their immune profile depending on their localization and that the immune inhibitory molecules, V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T-cell activation and B7 homolog 3, have higher expression in tumor-sparse than in tumor-rich tissue regions and that targeting should be explored. We showed that MCL tissues with more abundant infiltration of CD163+ cells have a higher proteomic and transcriptional expression of key components of the MAPK pathway. Thus, the MAPK pathway may be a feasible therapeutic target in patients with MCL with CD163+ cell infiltration. We further showed the independent and combined prognostic values of CD11c and CD163 beyond established risk factors., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Obesity, assessed by body mass index (BMI), is an established risk factor for 13 cancers. We aimed to identify further potential obesity-related cancers and to quantify their association with BMI relative to that of established obesity-related cancers., Methods: Using Cox regression models on 4,142,349 individuals in Sweden (mean age 27.1 years at weight measurement), we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between BMI and the risk of 122 cancers and cancer subtypes, grouped by topography and morphology. Cancers with a positive association (i.e., HR >1) at an α-level of 0.05 for obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ) vs. normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ) or per 5 kg/m 2 higher BMI, for which obesity is not an established risk factor, were considered potentially obesity related., Findings: After 100.2 million person-years of follow-up, 332,501 incident cancer cases were recorded. We identified 15 cancers in men and 16 in women as potentially obesity related. These were cancers of the head and neck, gastrointestinal tract, malignant melanoma, genital organs, endocrine organs, connective tissue, and haematological malignancies. Among these, there was evidence of differential associations with BMI between subtypes of gastric cancer, small intestine cancer, cervical cancer, and lymphoid neoplasms (P values for heterogeneity in HRs <0.05). The HR (95% confidence interval) per 5 kg/m 2 higher BMI was 1.17 (1.15-1.20) in men and 1.13 (1.11-1.15) in women for potential obesity-related cancers (51,690 cases), and 1.24 (1.22-1.26) in men and 1.12 (1.11-1.13) in women for established obesity-related cancers (84,384 cases)., Interpretation: This study suggests a large number of potential obesity-related cancers could be added to already established ones. Importantly, the magnitudes of the associations were largely comparable to those of the already established obesity-related cancers. We also provide evidence of specific cancer subtypes driving some associations with BMI. Studies accounting for cancer-specific confounders are needed to confirm these findings., Funding: Swedish Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, Mrs. Berta Kamprad's Cancer Foundation, Crafoord Foundation, Cancer Research Foundation at the Department of Oncology, Malmö University Hospital, and China Scholarship Council., Competing Interests: We declare no competing interests., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: The Swedish Lymphoma Register (SLR) was initiated in the year 2000 with the aim to monitor quality of care in diagnostics, treatment and outcome of all lymphomas diagnosed nationally among adults. Here, we present the first systematic validation of SLR records as a basis for improved register quality and patient care., Patients and Methods: We evaluated timeliness and completeness of register records among patients diagnosed with lymphoma in the SLR (n = 16,905) compared with the National Cancer Register for the period 2013-2020. Comparability was assessed through evaluation of coding routines against national and international guidelines. Accuracy of 42 variables was evaluated through re-abstraction of data from medical records among 600 randomly selected patients diagnosed in 2016-2017 and treated across all six Swedish healthcare regions.  Results: Completeness was high, >95% per year for the period 2013-2018, and >89% for 2019-2020 compared to the National Cancer Register. One in four patients was registered within 3 months, and 89.9% within 2 years of diagnosis. Registration instructions and coding procedures followed the prespecified guidelines. Missingness was generally low (<5%), but high for occasional variables, for example, those describing maintenance and consolidative treatment. Exact agreement of categorical variables was high overall (>80% for 24/34 variables), especially for treatment-related data (>80% for 17/19 variables)., Interpretation: Completeness and accuracy are high in the SLR, while timeliness could be improved. Finetuning of variable registration guided by this validation can further improve reliability of register reports and advance service to lymphoma patients and health care in the future.

Abstract: Little is known about risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) relapse in mature T-cell and natural killer cell neoplasms (MTNKNs). We aimed to describe the clinical epidemiology of CNS relapse in patients with MTNKN and developed the CNS relapse In T-cell lymphoma Index (CITI) to predict patients at the highest risk of CNS relapse. We reviewed data from 135 patients with MTNKN and CNS relapse from 19 North American institutions. After exclusion of leukemic and most cutaneous forms of MTNKNs, patients were pooled with non-CNS relapse control patients from a single institution to create a CNS relapse-enriched training set. Using a complete case analysis (n = 182), including 91 with CNS relapse, we applied a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model to select weighted clinicopathologic variables for the CITI score, which we validated in an external cohort from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry (n = 566). CNS relapse was most frequently observed in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (25%). Median time to CNS relapse and median overall survival after CNS relapse were 8.0 and 4.7 months, respectively. We calculated unique CITI risk scores for individual training set patients and stratified them into risk terciles. Validation set patients with low-risk (n = 158) and high-risk (n = 188) CITI scores had a 10-year cumulative risk of CNS relapse of 2.2% and 13.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 5.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-18.26; P = .018). We developed an open-access web-based CITI calculator (https://redcap.link/citicalc) to provide an easy tool for clinical practice. The CITI score is a validated model to predict patients with MTNKN at the highest risk of developing CNS relapse., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Advancements in treatments have significantly improved the prognosis for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and there is a growing population of survivors with an increased susceptibility to infections. We assessed the incidence of infections by clinical characteristics and treatment both before and after MCL diagnosis in Sweden. Patients with a diagnosis of MCL ≥ 18 years between 2007 and 2019 were included, along with up to 10 matched comparators. Infectious disease diagnosis and anti-infective drug dispensation were identified by the National Patient and the Prescribed Drug Registers, respectively. Patients and comparators were followed from the diagnosis/matching date until death, emigration, or June 30, 2020. Overall, 1559 patients and 15,571 comparators were followed for a median duration of 2.9 and 5 years, respectively. The infection rate among patients was twofold higher, RRadj = 2.14 (2.01-2.27), contrasted to the comparator group. There was a notable rise in infection rates already 4 years before MCL diagnosis, which reached a fourfold increase in the first year after diagnosis and persisted significantly increased for an additional 8 years. Among patients, 69% ( n  = 1080) experienced at least one infection during the first year of follow-up. Influenza, pneumonia, other bacterial infections, urinary tract infections, and acute upper respiratory infections were the most frequent. Notably, MCL remained to be the primary leading cause of death among patients (57%, n  = 467/817). Infections as the main cause of death were rare (2.6%, n  = 21). Our study highlights the importance of thoroughly assessing infectious morbidity when appraising new treatments. Further investigations are warranted to explore strategies for reducing infectious disease burden., Competing Interests: Mats Jerkeman received honoraria from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Kite/Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sobi, and Takeda and research support from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche. Ingrid Glimelius received research support from Takeda and participated in educational sessions arranged by Janssen Cilag, Abbvie, and Kite Gilead. Karin E. Smedby received honoraria from Incyte and Celgene, and research support from Janssen Cilag. The other authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose., (© 2024 The Author(s). HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Hematology Association.)

With the aim to advance the understanding of immune regulation in MCL and to identify targetable T-cell subsets, we set out to combine image analysis and spatial omic technology focused on both early and late differentiation stages of T cells. MCL patient tissue ( n = 102) was explored using image analysis and GeoMx spatial omics profiling of 69 proteins and 1812 mRNAs. Tumor cells, T helper (T H ) cells and cytotoxic (T C ) cells of early (CD57-) and late (CD57+) differentiation stage were analyzed. An image analysis workflow was developed based on fine-tuned Cellpose models for cell segmentation and classification. T C and CD57+ subsets of T cells were enriched in tumor-rich compared to tumor-sparse regions. Tumor-sparse regions had a higher expression of several key immune suppressive proteins, tentatively controlling T-cell expansion in regions close to the tumor. We revealed that T cells in late differentiation stages (CD57+) are enriched among MCL infiltrating T cells and are predictive of an increased expression of immune suppressive markers. CD47, IDO1 and CTLA-4 were identified as potential targets for patients with T-cell-rich MCL TIME, while GITR might be a feasible target for MCL patients with sparse T-cell infiltration. In subgroups of patients with a high degree of CD57+ T C -cell infiltration, several immune checkpoint inhibitors, including TIGIT, PD-L1 and LAG3 were increased, emphasizing the immune-suppressive features of this highly differentiated T-cell subset not previously described in MCL.

Background: Biological heterogeneity of large B cell lymphomas (LBCLs) is poorly captured by current prognostic tools, hampering optimal treatment decisions., Methods: We dissected the levels of 1,463 serum proteins in a uniformly treated trial cohort of 109 patients with high-risk primary LBCL (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01325194) and correlated the profiles with molecular data from tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) together with clinical data., Findings: We discovered clinically and biologically relevant associations beyond established clinical estimates and ctDNA. We identified an inflamed serum protein profile, which reflected host response to lymphoma, associated with inflamed and exhausted tumor microenvironment features and high ctDNA burden, and translated to poor outcome. We composed an inflammation score based on the identified inflammatory proteins and used the score to predict survival in an independent LBCL trial cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03293173). Furthermore, joint analyses with ctDNA uncovered multiple serum proteins that correlate with tumor burden. We found that SERPINA9, TACI, and TARC complement minimally invasive subtype profiling and that TACI and TARC can be used to evaluate treatment response in a subtype-dependent manner in the liquid biopsy., Conclusions: Altogether, we discovered distinct serum protein landscapes that dissect the heterogeneity of LBCLs and provide agile, minimally invasive tools for precision oncology., Funding: This research was funded by grants from the Research Council of Finland, Finnish Cancer Organizations, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, University of Helsinki, iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Orion Research Foundation sr, and Helsinki University Hospital., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests H.H. (all outside of the submitted work): Genmab: honoraria, safety committee; Gilead: honoraria, advisory board; Incyte: honoraria, advisory board; Nordic Nanovector: honoraria, safety committee; Novartis: honoraria, advisory board; Takeda: honoraria, advisory board. J.J. (all outside of the submitted work): BMS: consultancy; Gilead: consultancy; Incyte: consultancy; Novartis: consultancy; Orion Pharma: consultancy; Roche: consultancy. M.B. (all outside of the submitted work): Astra Zeneca: consultancy; BMS/Celgene: consultancy; Incyte: consultancy; Janssen: consultancy; Mundipharma: consultancy; Nanexa: consultancy; Pfizer: consultancy; Roche: consultancy; Schain Research: consultancy; WntResearch: consultancy. M.J. (all outside of the submitted work): Abbvie: honoraria, research funding; Astra Zeneca: honoraria, research funding; BMS: honoraria, research funding; Genmab: honoraria; Incyte: honoraria; Janssen: honoraria, research funding; Kite/Gilead: consultancy, honoraria, research funding; Novartis: honoraria; Orion: honoraria; Roche: honoraria, research funding. S.L. (all outside of the submitted work): Genmab: consultancy, research funding; Gilead: consultancy; Incyte: consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: research funding; Novartis: consultancy, honoraria, research funding; Roche: consultancy, research funding; Merck: consultancy; Bayer: research funding; Celgene: consultancy, research funding; Orion: consultancy., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing primary DLBCL of the CNS.The guideline covers clinical, imaging and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up.Algorithms for first-line and salvage treatments are provided.The author group encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe.Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors' collective expert opinion., Competing Interests: AJMF reports personal financial interests for advisory board membership for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Juno, Novartis, PletixaPharm and Roche; institutional financial interests as local Principal Investigator (PI) for ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, BeiGene, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Hutchison Medipharma, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics and Takeda; institution research grants from BTG Therapeutics; institutional funding from Roche; non‐financial interests as a member of the Global Outreach Committee of the EHA and as a member of the Board of Directors (President) of Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. GI reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Gilead, Incyte, Roche and as an invited speaker for Riemser; non‐financial interests as a member of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Onkologie (DGHO) and a leadership role for the German Lymphoma Alliance (Mitglied des Vorstandes). JKD reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Eli Lilly. DPA reports non‐financial interests as a member of an academic subcommittee for the British Society of Neuroradiologists. JECB reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Gilead and lecture honorarium from Novartis; institutional financial interests for funding of educational symposia from Roche and TEVA. TC reports personal financial interests for advisory board membership and consultancy for Janssen‐Cilag S.p.A; speaking honoraria from Takeda; participation in the Hema for the Future project for Sandoz. KC reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Atara, Celgene, Incyte, Janssen, Kite, Roche and Takeda; personal financial interests as an invited speaker for Incyte, Kite, Roche and Takeda; non‐financial interests as a member of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the EHA, and leadership roles with the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI; chair of UK NCRI T‐cell lymphoma study group). CPF reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, MorphoSys, Ono, Roche, SERB and Sobi; personal financial interests as an invited speaker for AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Roche and Takeda; institutional financial interests as coordinating PI for BeiGene and Roche; institutional financial interests as a steering committee member for Genmab and MorphoSys; non‐financial interests for an advisory role for Blood Cancer UK (clinical trials funding committee member) and Lymphoma Action (medical advisory panel member); non‐financial interests for leadership roles with Cure Leukaemia (clinical trials steering committee member) and the NCRI (chair of UK NCRI aggressive lymphoma study group). KHX reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for BTG. MP reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for BeiGene and Novartis; personal financial interests for expert testimony for Ventana Roche. ES reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for Riemser Pharma; personal financial interests for a writing engagement for Riemser Pharma; personal financial interests as an advisory board member for SERB Pharmaceuticals; institutional financial interests as a coordinating PI for Riemser Pharma and as a local PI for AbbVie, Riemser Pharma and Roche; non‐financial interests as a PI for AbbVie and Roche; non‐financial interests as a member of the DGHO and German Lymphoma Alliance. CS reports institutional funding from AstraZeneca. LS reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Kyowa Kirin and Takeda; personal financial interests as author royalties from Munksgaard Publishing and Springer Verlag; institutional financial interests as a steering committee member for Varian and ViewRay; non‐financial interests for leadership roles with the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (Vice Chair) and the Danish Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (Chair); non‐financial interests as a PI for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); non‐financial interests as a member of ASCO, American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO). EZ reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AbbVie, BeiGene, BMS, Curis, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Miltenyi Biomedicine and Roche; institutional financial interests for travel grants from BeiGene, Gilead, Janssen and Roche; institutional financial interests for trial sponsorship from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Janssen and Roche. CB reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for AbbVie, Pfizer and Sobi; personal financial interests as an advisory board member for BeiGene, Celltrion, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, Regeneron and Roche; institutional funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer and Roche. MJ reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Janssen and Novartis; personal financial interests as an invited speaker for Incyte; institutional financial interests as an invited speaker for Roche; institutional funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen and Roche; institutional financial interests as coordinating PI for BioInvent. MD reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Novartis and Roche; personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, Genmab, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly/Loxo, Novartis and Roche; institutional research grants from AbbVie, Bayer, Celgene, Janssen and Roche; institutional funding from Gilead/Kite; non‐financial interests as a member of ASCO, American Society of Hematology (ASH; subcommittee member), DGHO (prior Board member), EHA (Executive Board member), ESMO (Faculty member) and Lymphoma Research Foundation [LRF; Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Consortium member]. DM has declared no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. HemaSphere Published by John Wiley & Sons on behalf of European Hematology Association and by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: Adding ibrutinib to standard immunochemotherapy might improve outcomes and challenge autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in younger (aged 65 years or younger) mantle cell lymphoma patients. This trial aimed to investigate whether the addition of ibrutinib results in a superior clinical outcome compared with the pre-trial immunochemotherapy standard with ASCT or an ibrutinib-containing treatment without ASCT. We also investigated whether standard treatment with ASCT is superior to a treatment adding ibrutinib but without ASCT., Methods: The open-label, randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority TRIANGLE trial was performed in 165 secondary or tertiary clinical centres in 13 European countries and Israel. Patients with previously untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma, aged 18-65 years and suitable for ASCT were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to control group A or experimental groups A+I or I, stratified by study group and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index risk groups. Treatment in group A consisted of six alternating cycles of R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m 2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m 2 on day 1, intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2 on day 1, intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m 2 on day 1, and oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1-5) and R-DHAP (or R-DHAOx, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m 2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous or oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, intravenous cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m 2 for 3 h every 12 h on day 2, and intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 over 24 h on day 1 or alternatively intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1) followed by ASCT. In group A+I, ibrutinib (560 mg orally each day) was added on days 1-19 of R-CHOP cycles and as fixed-duration maintenance (560 mg orally each day for 2 years) after ASCT. In group I, ibrutinib was given the same way as in group A+I, but ASCT was omitted. Three pairwise one-sided log-rank tests for the primary outcome of failure-free survival were statistically monitored. The primary analysis was done by intention-to-treat. Adverse events were evaluated by treatment period among patients who started the respective treatment. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858258., Findings: Between July 29, 2016 and Dec 28, 2020, 870 patients (662 men, 208 women) were randomly assigned to group A (n=288), group A+I (n=292), and group I (n=290). After 31 months median follow-up, group A+I was superior to group A with 3-year failure-free survival of 88% (95% CI 84-92) versus 72% (67-79; hazard ratio 0·52 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-0·86]; one-sided p=0·0008). Superiority of group A over group I was not shown with 3-year failure-free survival 72% (67-79) versus 86% (82-91; hazard ratio 1·77 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-3·76]; one-sided p=0·9979). The comparison of group A+I versus group I is ongoing. There were no relevant differences in grade 3-5 adverse events during induction or ASCT between patients treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP or ibrutinib combined with R-CHOP/R-DHAP. During maintenance or follow-up, substantially more grade 3-5 haematological adverse events and infections were reported after ASCT plus ibrutinib (group A+I; haematological: 114 [50%] of 231 patients; infections: 58 [25%] of 231; fatal infections: two [1%] of 231) compared with ibrutinib only (group I; haematological: 74 [28%] of 269; infections: 52 [19%] of 269; fatal infections: two [1%] of 269) or after ASCT (group A; haematological: 51 [21%] of 238; infections: 32 [13%] of 238; fatal infections: three [1%] of 238)., Interpretation: Adding ibrutinib to first-line treatment resulted in superior efficacy in younger mantle cell lymphoma patients with increased toxicity when given after ASCT. Adding ibrutinib during induction and as maintenance should be part of first-line treatment of younger mantle cell lymphoma patients. Whether ASCT adds to an ibrutinib-containing regimen is not yet determined., Funding: Janssen and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MD reports research grants for clinical studies from AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Roche; speakers' honoraria from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche; travel support from Janssen and Roche; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Novartis, and Roche. JDo reports payment for expert testimony (once Advisory Board) from Lilly. EG reports grants from Janssen; honoraria (educational lecture) from Genmab, Gilead, Janssen, and Lilly; support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen and Roche; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Gilead/Kite and Miltenyi Biotec. MJ reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, and Roche; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Pierre Fabre. JW reports grants to his institution from GlaxoSmithKline/Novartis and Roche; honoraria for lectures from AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Servier, and Takeda; participation on an Advisory Board from AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. MHu reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genmab, Janssen, Merck, Roche, and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genmab, Janssen, Merck, Roche, and Takeda. UM reports travel support from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, and Roche; Advisory Board role for Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; participation in national Guideline committee for the German-Swiss-Austrian Guideline for Mantle Cell Lymphoma. JR reports participation on an Advisory Board for AstraZeneca. VV reports consulting fees from AbbVie, BeiGene, Gilead, Lilly, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen; payment for expert testimony from Gilead and Roche; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie and Gilead. MGdS reports a research grant from AstraZeneca; payment for Advisory Boards from AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for educational events from Gilead and Janssen-Cilag; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche; leadership in a scientific society (Sociedade Portuguesa de Hematologia); administration board on a patient advocacy group (Associação Portuguesa Contra a Leucemia). SL reports grants or contracts to her institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Genmab, HUTCHMED, Novartis, and Roche; consulting fees from AbbVie, Genmab, Gilead, Novartis, ORION Pharma, Roche, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, Incyte, and Novartis; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Incyte. StS reports grants or contracts from any entity from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; consulting fees from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem; receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, and Verastem. AK reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, BeiGene, EUSA Pharma, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda. RJ reports travel support for meeting attendance from BeiGene; meeting fee from Janssen. GH reports grants or contracts for clinical research from AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Pfizer, and Roche; consulting fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, and Roche; support for attending meetings or travel from Gilead/Kite and Janssen; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Miltenyi Biotec. CV reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Istituto Gentili, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Servier; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche. TvM reports payment or honoraria for educational lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Lilly; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for GE HealthCare and Gilead/Kite. SW reports payment to his institution from AbbVie, Stemline Therapeutics, and Takeda; payment for expert testimony from Stemline Therapeutics; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie and BeiGene; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Roche, and Stemline Therapeutics. PLZ reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi), and Takeda. UN reports consulting fees to his institution from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events to his institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, and Takeda; support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen, Gilead, Roche, and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Takeda. CH reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Pfizer; support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie and Janssen. MHa reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Falk Foundation, Gilead, Novartis, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi); payment for expert testimony from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (sobi). WK reports research grants provided to his institution from Amgen, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda. DG reports support for attending meetings and travel from Janssen. CS reports consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; support for attending meetings or travel from Gilead/Kite. MU reports institutional funding of the TRIANGLE trial from Janssen. ML reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, and Lilly; honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, and Lilly; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board with Acerta. All other authors (MT, OS, LJ, MC, LA, PH, FB, KS, JDi, CP, and EH) declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The popularity of tattoos has increased dramatically over the last few decades. Tattoo ink often contains carcinogenic chemicals, e.g., primary aromatic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and metals. The tattooing process invokes an immunologic response that causes translocation of tattoo ink from the injection site. Deposition of tattoo pigment in lymph nodes has been confirmed but the long-term health effects remain unexplored. We used Swedish National Authority Registers with full population coverage to investigate the association between tattoo exposure and overall malignant lymphoma as well as lymphoma subtypes., Methods: We performed a case-control study where we identified all incident cases of malignant lymphoma diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 in individuals aged 20-60 years in the Swedish National Cancer Register. Three random age- and sex-matched controls per case were sampled from the Total Population Register using incidence density sampling. We assessed exposure through a questionnaire in 2021, and data on potential confounders were retrieved from registers. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of malignant lymphoma in tattooed individuals., Findings: The study population consisted of 11,905 individuals, and the response rate was 54% among cases ( n  = 1398) and 47% among controls ( n  = 4193). The tattoo prevalence was 21% among cases and 18% among controls. Tattooed individuals had a higher adjusted risk of overall lymphoma (IRR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.99-1.48). The risk of lymphoma was highest in individuals with less than two years between their first tattoo and the index year (IRR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.03-3.20). The risk decreased with intermediate exposure duration (three to ten years) but increased again in individuals who received their first tattoo ≥11 years before the index year (IRR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.94-1.50). We found no evidence of increasing risk with a larger area of total tattooed body surface. The risk associated with tattoo exposure seemed to be highest for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (IRR 1.30; 95% CI 0.99-1.71) and follicular lymphoma (IRR 1.29; 95% CI 0.92-1.82)., Interpretation: Our findings suggested that tattoo exposure was associated with an increased risk of malignant lymphoma. More epidemiologic research is urgently needed to establish causality., Funding: The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

The transcription factor MYC is a well-described oncogene with an important role in lymphomagenesis, but its significance for clinical outcome in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains to be determined. We performed an investigation of the expression of MYC protein in a cohort of 251 MCL patients complemented by analyses of structural aberrations and mRNA, in a sub-cohort of patients. Fourteen percent (n=35) of patients showed high MYC protein expression with >20% positive cells (MYChigh), among whom only one translocation was identified, and 86% (n=216) of patients showed low MYC protein expression. Low copy number gains of MYC were detected in ten patients, but with no correlation to MYC protein levels. However, MYC mRNA levels correlated significantly to MYC protein levels with a R2 value of 0.76. Patients with a MYChigh tumor had both an independent inferior overall survival and an inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=2.03, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.2-3.4 and HR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.04-4.6, respectively) when adjusted for additional high-risk features. Patients with MYChigh tumors also tended to have additional high-risk features and to be older at diagnosis. A subgroup of 13 patients had concomitant MYChigh expression and TP53/p53 alterations and a substantially increased risk of progression (HR=16.9, 95% CI: 7.4-38.3) and death (HR=7.8, 95% CI: 4.4-14.1) with an average overall survival of only 0.9 years. In summary, we found that at diagnosis a subset of MCL patients (14%) overexpressed MYC protein, and had a poor prognosis but that MYC rearrangements were rare. Tumors with concurrent MYC overexpression and TP53/p53 alterations pinpointed MCL patients with a dismal prognosis with a median overall survival of less than 3 years. We propose that MYC needs to be assessed beyond the current high-risk factors in MCL in order to identify cases in need of alternative treatment.

Abstract: Despite improvements in treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), most patients eventually relapse. In this multicenter phase 1b/2 trial, we evaluated safety and efficacy of minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven venetoclax, lenalidomide, and rituximab (venetoclax-R2) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL and explored the feasibility of stopping treatment in molecular remission. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) at 6 months. After dose escalation, the recommended phase 2 dose was lenalidomide 20 mg daily, days 1 to 21; venetoclax 600 mg daily after ramp-up; and rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, then every 8 weeks. MRD monitoring by RQ-PCR was performed every 3 months. When MRD-negativity in the blood was reached, treatment was continued for another 3 months; if MRD-negativity was then confirmed, treatment was stopped. In total, 59 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 73 years. At 6 months, the ORR was 63% (29 complete remission [CR], 8 partial remission [PR]), and 40% (4 CR, 2 PR) for patients previously failing a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months, with median overall survival of 31 months. TP53 mutation was associated with inferior PFS (P < .01). Overall, 28 patients (48%) discontinued treatment in molecular remission, and 25 remain MRD negative after a median of 17.4 months. Hematological toxicity was frequent, with 52 of 59 (88%) patients with G3-4 neutropenia and 21 of 59 (36%) patients with G3-4 thrombocytopenia. To conclude, MRD-driven venetoclax-R2 is feasible and tolerable and shows efficacy in R/R MCL, also after BTK inhibitor failure. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03505944., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The SCHOLAR-2 retrospective study highlighted poor overall survival (OS) with standard of care (SOC) regimens among patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who failed a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). In the ZUMA-2 single-arm trial, brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel; autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable responses in patients with R/R MCL who had previous BTKi exposure. Here, we compared OS in ZUMA-2 and SCHOLAR-2 using three different methods which adjusted for imbalances in prognostic factors between populations: inverse probability weighting (IPW), regression adjustment (RA), and doubly robust (DR). Brexu-cel was associated with improved OS compared to SOC across all unadjusted and adjusted comparisons. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 0.38 (0.23, 0.61) for IPW, 0.45 (0.28, 0.74) for RA, and 0.37 (0.23, 0.59) for DR. These results suggest a substantial survival benefit with brexu-cel versus SOC in patients with R/R MCL after BTKi exposure.

The approval of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for the second-line treatment of high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has greatly affected salvage algorithms for this condition, and such therapies could have the potential to improve the course of relapsed or refractory LBCL. In this Review, we provide guidance for a rational management approach to the use of commercial CD19-directed CAR T cells in the second-line treatment of LBCL, addressing crucial questions regarding eligible histologies; age, comorbidity, and tumour biology restrictions; the handling of very aggressive tumour behaviour; and holding and bridging therapies. The guidance was developed in a structured manner and, for each question, consists of a description of the clinical issue, a summary of the evidence, the rationale for a practical management approach, and recommendations. These recommendations could help to decide on the optimal management of patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL who are considered for second-line CAR T-cell treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PC reports consultancy for BMS, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, and BeiGene; participation on speakers’ bureaus for BMS, Gilead Sciences, and Novartis; and travel grants from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Gilead Sciences, and Novartis. PD reports consultancy for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Gilead Sciences, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, and Riemser; participation on speakers’ bureaus for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Riemser, and Roche; and research support from Riemser, all to his institution. BG reports consultancy for BMS and Roche and research funding from Riemser. JGG reports consultancy for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Kite Gilead, and Novartis; and research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. MJ reports consultancy for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Autolus, Genmab, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; and research support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Roche. MJK reports honoraria from BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, and Roche; consulting or advisory roles for BMS/Celgene, Kite Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Adicet Bio; and research funding from Kite Gilead, all to her institution. FM reports consulting fees from Roche, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, BMS, AbbVie, Genmab, Miltenyi Biotec, Allogene Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. AM reports consultancy for BMS, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and research funding from Kite Gilead. AS reports consultancy for BMS, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; participation on speakers’ bureaus for BMS, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and travel grants from BMS, Celgene, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. AV reports consultancy for AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, BMS, Roche, and Amgen; honoraria from Roche, Gilead Sciences, BMS, and AbbVie; and travel grants from Roche, Gilead Sciences, and AbbVie. PLZ reports consultancy for ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Celltrion, EUSA Pharma, Incyte Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, MSD, Roche, Sandoz, Secura Bio, Servier Laboratories, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and participation on speakers’ bureaus for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Celltrion, EUSA Pharma, Incyte Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, MSD, Roche, Servier Laboratories, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: With modern treatments, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients more frequently experience long-lasting remission resulting in a growing population of long-term survivors. Follow-up care includes identification and management of treatment-related late-effects, such as secondary malignancies (SM). We conducted a population-based study to describe the burden of SM in MCL patients., Methods: All patients with a primary diagnosis of MCL, aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 in Sweden were included along with up to 10 individually matched population comparators. Follow-up was from twelve months after diagnosis/matching until death, emigration, or December 2019, whichever occurred first. Rates of SM among patients and comparators were estimated using the Anderson-Gill method (accounting for repeated events) and presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age at diagnosis, calendar year, sex, and the number of previous events., Results: Overall, 1 452 patients and 13 992 comparators were followed for 6.6 years on average. Among patients, 230 (16%) developed at least one SM, and 264 SM were observed. Relative to comparators, patients had a higher rate of SM, HR adj = 1.6 (95%CI:1.4-1.8), and higher rates were observed across all primary treatment groups: the Nordic-MCL2 protocol, R-CHOP, R-bendamustine, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and R-CHOP/Cytarabine. Compared to Nordic-MCL2, treatment with R-bendamustine was independently associated with an increased risk of SM, HR adj = 2.0 (95%CI:1.3-3.2). Risk groups among patients were those with a higher age at diagnosis (p < 0.001), males (p = 0.006), and having a family history of lymphoma (p = 0.009). Patients had preferably higher risk of melanoma, other neoplasms of the skin and other hematopoietic and lymphoid malignancies., Conclusions: MCL survivors have an increased risk of SM, particularly if treated with R-bendamustine. The intensive treatments needed for long-term remissions are a concern, and transition to treatment protocols with sustained efficacy but with a lower risk of SM is needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ingrid Glimelius received research support from Takeda and participated in the educational sessions arranged by Jansen Cilag. Sandra Eloranta received grants or contracts from Swedish Cancer Society, Åke Wiberg Foundations, Karolinska institutet foundations - Grant as PI paid to my institution. Nordic Cancer Union Grant paid to my institution - Support for attending meetings. Other financial or nonfinancial interests - Academic partner to Red Door Analytics. Red Door Analytics is a statistical consulting company operating in Stockholm, Sweden. I have not received financial compensation for my academic partnership at any time point. The other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The outcome for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has drastically improved with new treatments directed toward the tumor immune microenvironment, where macrophages play an important role. In MCL, the presence of M2 macrophages defined by CD163 expression in diagnostic biopsies has been associated with a worse prognosis. An alternative way to assess the abundance of M2 macrophages is by measuring the level of soluble CD163 in serum (sCD163). We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of sCD163 in 131 patients with MCL. We found that high sCD163 at diagnosis was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and shorter overall survival (OS) in 81 patients who were newly diagnosed and subsequently treated with chemoimmunotherapy. The same was seen in a cohort of 50 patients with relapsed MCL that were mainly treated within the phase 2 Philemon-trial with rituximab, ibrutinib, and lenalidomide. In patients who were newly diagnosed and had low levels of sCD163, 5-year survival was 97%. There was a moderate correlation between sCD163 and tissue CD163. The association with a poor prognosis was independent of MCL international prognostic index, Ki67, p53 status, and blastoid morphology, as assessed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. In this study, high sCD163 was associated with both shorter PFS and shorter OS, showing that high levels of the M2 macrophage marker sCD163 is an independent negative prognostic factor in MCL, both in the chemoimmunotherapy and ibrutinib/lenalidomide era. In addition, low sCD163 levels identify patients with MCL with a very good prognosis., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Currently, treatment allocation of patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) is mainly based on age and medical fitness. The combined MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI-c) allows to predict prognosis using clinical factors (MIPI) and the Ki-67 index. However, high p53 expression as surrogate for TP53 alterations has demonstrated to be an independent predictor for poor outcome. We aimed to define a clear high-risk group based on the combination of MIPI, Ki-67 and p53 expression/TP53 alteration. A total of 684 patients from the prospective European MCL-Younger and MCL-Elderly trials were evaluable. The classification of high-risk disease (HRD) as high-risk MIPI-c or p53 expression >50% versus low-risk disease (LRD) as low, low-intermediate or high-intermediate MIPI-c and p53 expression ≤50% allowed to characterize two distinct groups with highly divergent outcome. Patients with HRD had significantly shorter median failure-free survival (FFS) (1.1 vs. 5.6 years, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (2.2 vs. 13.2 years, p < 0.0001) compared to those with LRD. These major differences were confirmed in two validation cohorts from the Italian MCL0208 and the Nordic-MCL4 trials. The results suggest that this subset of HRD patients is not sufficiently managed with the current standard treatment and is asking for novel treatment strategies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) after relapse is associated with poor prognosis. No standard of care exists and available evidence for treatments is limited, particularly in patients who fail Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy. This multicentre retrospective chart review study, SCHOLAR-2, addresses this knowledge gap and reports on data collected from 240 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in Europe who were treated with BTKi-based therapy between July 2012 and July 2018, and had experienced disease progression while on BTKi therapy or discontinued BTKi therapy due to intolerance. The median overall survival (OS) from initiation of first BTKi therapy was 14.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-20.0) in the overall cohort, 5.5 months (95% CI 3.9-8.2) in 91 patients without post-BTKi therapy, and 23.8 months (95% CI 18.9-30.1) in 149 patients who received post-BTKi therapy (excluding chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment). In the latter group, patients received a median of one (range, one to seven) line of post-BTKi therapy, with lenalidomide-containing regimens and bendamustine plus rituximab being the most frequently administered; the median OS from initiation of first post-BTKi therapy was 9.7 months (95% CI 6.3-12.7). These results provide a benchmark for survival in patients with R/R MCL receiving salvage therapy after BTKi failure., (© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell malignancy currently considered incurable. Although some patients obtain prolonged remission after first-line chemoimmunotherapy, many will need several treatment lines. Here, we present a nationwide assessment of treatment strategies, time to progression and survival in MCL. All patients diagnosed with MCL 2006-2018 were identified in the Swedish Lymphoma Register. Information on all lines of therapy was extracted from the medical records. Overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) were assessed through August 2021. In total, 1367 patients were included (median age, 71 years) and median follow-up was 6.8 years. Two hundred and one (15%) were managed initially with watch-and-wait, but 1235 (90%) eventually received treatment. The most frequently used first-line regimens were rituximab-bendamustine (BR) (n = 368; 30%) and Nordic MCL2 (n = 342; 28%). During follow-up, 630 patients (46%) experienced relapse/progression and 546 (40%) received second-line treatment. The most frequently used second-line regimen was BR (n = 185; 34%) but otherwise a wide variety of second-line treatments were used. Further, 382 and 228 patients experienced a second or third relapse/progression, respectively. Median PFS after first (PFS-1), second (PFS-2), third (PFS-3), and fourth (PFS-4) treatment lines was 29.4, 8.9, 4.3, and 2.7 months. Patients with early progression, defined as a PFS-1 <24 months, had an inferior median OS of 13 versus 37 months in patients with later relapse. For patients treated with frontline BR, however, time to relapse had no impact on later outcome. By use of nationwide population-based data, we provide important benchmarks for future studies of all treatment lines in MCL., Competing Interests: MJ: Honoraria: Kite/Gilead, Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Genmab, MSD. Research support: Roche, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen. IG: Honoraria: Janssen, Takeda. Research support: Lokon Pharma. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease, emphasizing the need for prognostic biomarkers. In this study we aimed at comparing the prognostic value of two RNA-based risk scores, circSCORE and MCL35, in 149 patients from the MCL2 (ISRCTN87866680) and MCL3 (NCT00514475) patient cohorts. Both risk scores provided significant stratification of high versus low risk for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The circSCORE retained significant prognostic value in adjusted multivariable Cox regressions for PFS, but not for OS. Furthermore, circSCORE added significant prognostic value to MIPI in the pooled cohort (MCL2 and MCL3) for PFS and OS, and for PFS in MCL3 alone, outperforming Ki67 and MCL35. We suggest a new, combined MIPI-circSCORE with improved prognostic value, and with potential for future clinical implementation, if validated in a larger, independent cohort.

Background: Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, with 89% of cases occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling tests have been suggested as an innovative way to improve cervical cancer screening uptake and reduce the burden of disease. The objective of this review was to examine the effect of HPV self-sampling on screening uptake compared to any healthcare provider sampling in LMICs. The secondary objective was to estimate the associated costs of the various screening methods., Method: Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL (by Cochrane), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov up until April 14, 2022, and a total of six trials were included in the review. Meta-analyses were performed mainly using the inverse variance method, by pooling effect estimates of the proportion of women who accepted the screening method offered. Subgroup analyses were done comparing low- and middle-income countries, as well as low- and high-risk bias studies. Heterogeneity of the data was assessed using I 2 . Cost data was collected for analysis from articles and correspondence with authors., Results: We found a small but significant difference in screening uptake in our primary analysis: RR 1.11 (95% CI: 1.10-1.11; I 2  = 97%; 6 trials; 29,018 participants). Our sensitivity analysis, which excluded one trial that measured screening uptake differently than the other trials, resulted in a clearer effect in screening uptake: RR: 1.82 (95% CI: 1.67-1.99; I 2  = 42%; 5 trials; 9590 participants). Two trials reported costs; thus, it was not possible to make a direct comparison of costs. One found self-sampling more cost-effective than the provider-required visual inspection with acetic acid method, despite the test and running costs being higher for HPV self-sampling., Conclusion: Our review indicates that self-sampling improves screening uptake, particularly in low-income countries; however, to this date, there remain few trials and associated cost data. We recommend further studies with proper cost data be conducted to guide the incorporation of HPV self-sampling into national cervical cancer screening guidelines in low- and middle-income countries., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020218504., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The variable outcome to standard immunochemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients is a clinical challenge. Established risk factors, including high MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI), high proliferation (Ki-67), non-classic (blastoid/pleomorphic) morphology, and mutated TP53, only partly identify patients in need of alternative treatment. Deepened understanding of biological factors that influence time to progression and relapse would allow for an improved stratification, and identification of novel targets for high-risk patients. We performed gene expression analyses to identify pathways and genes associated with outcome in a cohort of homogeneously treated patients. In addition to deregulated proliferation, we show that thermogenesis, fatty acid degradation and oxidative phosphorylation are altered in patients with poor survival, and that high expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1A), an enzyme involved in fatty acid degradation, can specifically identify high-risk patients independent of the established high-risk factors. We suggest that complementary investigations of metabolism may increase the accuracy of patient stratification and that immunohistochemistry- based assessment of CPT1A can contribute to defining high-risk MCL.

Studies on late effects in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are becoming increasingly important as survival is improving, and novel targeted drugs are being introduced. However, knowledge about late effects is limited. The aim of this population-based study was to describe the magnitude and panorama of late effects among patients treated with or without high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT). The study cohort included all patients with MCL, recorded in the Swedish Lymphoma Register, aged 18 to 69 years, diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 (N = 620; treated with HD-ASCT, n = 247) and 1:10 matched healthy comparators. Patients and comparators were followed up via the National Patient Register and Cause of Death Register, from 12 months after diagnosis or matching to December 2017. Incidence rate ratios of the numbers of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and bed days were estimated using negative binomial regression models. In relation to the matched comparators, the rate of specialist and hospital visits was significantly higher among patients with MCL. Patients with MCL had especially high relative risks of infectious, respiratory, and blood disorders. Within this observation period, no difference in the rate of these complications, including secondary neoplasms, was observed between patients treated with and without HD-ASCT. Most of the patients died from their lymphoma and not from another cause or treatment complication. Taken together, our results imply that most of the posttreatment health care needs are related to the lymphoma disease itself, thus, indicating the need for more efficient treatment options., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas (PTCLs) are rare, aggressive lymphomas with poor outcomes, but limited-stage disease is infrequent and not well-described. This study reports outcomes and prognostic factors in limited-stage nodal PTCLs in a binational population-based setting. Patients were identified from the Danish and Swedish lymphoma registries. Adults diagnosed with limited-stage nodal PTCL (stage I-II) and treated with CHOP(-like) therapy ±radiotherapy between 2000 and 2014 were included. Medical records were reviewed by local investigators. A total of 239 patients with a median age of 62 years were included; 67% received 6-8 cycles of CHOP(-like) therapy and 22% received 3-4 cycles, of which 59% also received radiotherapy. Autologous stem cell transplant consolidation was administered to 16% of all patients. Median follow-up was 127 months with 5-years overall survival (OS) of 58% (95% CI: 53-65) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 53% (95% CI: 47-59). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 60 years and B-symptoms were unfavorable and ALK+ anaplastic large cell T-Cell lymphoma was favorable for survival outcomes. There was no difference in treatment-specific outcome (3-4 cycles vs. 6-8 cycles of CHOP(-like) ± radiotherapy). Low-risk patients (age < 60 without B-symptoms) had a 5-year OS of 77% (95% CI 67-89%). In the present study of limited-stage nodal PTCL, survival after curative intent chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy was inferior to that of limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but a subgroup of young patients without B-symptoms had very good outcomes. Treatment outcomes after 3-4 cycles versus 6-8 cycles of CHOP(-like) therapy were comparable., (© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) has been recognized for its ability to transform B lymphocytes and for its association with different types of cancers including Hodgkin lymphoma. In addition, EBV may also modulate the microenvironment of HL. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of EBV among HL cases in Ethiopia and to assess the tissue cellular composition of EBV-related and EBV-unrelated cases. We constructed a tissue microarray (TMA) of 126 consecutive cases of classical HL (CHL) and nodular lymphocyte predominant HL (NLPHL) from a tertiary cancer centre, Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and evaluated a panel of immunohistochemical markers. The quantification of immune cells was performed using HALO 2.3, a platform for image analysis from Indica Lab Inc. A total of 77/126 (61.1%) of HL cases expressed LMP1/EBER. Infiltration of CD8+, T-bet+ and FoxP3+ cells was higher in the microenvironment of EBV-related CHL, with P values of <0.001, <0.001 and <0.016, respectively. In contrast, the expression of PD1 was higher in the microenvironment of EBV-unrelated CHL cases (P < 0.001). Unlike in Western countries, the majority of HL cases in Ethiopia were associated with EBV. As FoxP3+ and PD1-expressing cells are thought to participate in down regulation of the immune response by different mechanisms, this finding highlights the previously unrecognized possibility that distinct immunosuppressive mechanisms may be ongoing within EBV positive and negative HL types. This may have important prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Aims: Trends in characteristics, management, and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) were studied in the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry (SCRR)., Methods and Results: The SCRR was used to study 106 296 cases of OHCA (1990-2020) and 30 032 cases of IHCA (2004-20) in whom resuscitation was attempted. In OHCA, survival increased from 5.7% in 1990 to 10.1% in 2011 and remained unchanged thereafter. Odds ratios [ORs, 95% confidence interval (CI)] for survival in 2017-20 vs. 1990-93 were 2.17 (1.93-2.43) overall, 2.36 (2.07-2.71) for men, and 1.67 (1.34-2.10) for women. Survival increased for all aetiologies, except trauma, suffocation, and drowning. OR for cardiac aetiology in 2017-20 vs. 1990-93 was 0.45 (0.42-0.48). Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation increased from 30.9% to 82.2%. Shockable rhythm decreased from 39.5% in 1990 to 17.4% in 2020. Use of targeted temperature management decreased from 42.1% (2010) to 18.2% (2020). In IHCA, OR for survival in 2017-20 vs. 2004-07 was 1.18 (1.06-1.31), showing a non-linear trend with probability of survival increasing by 46.6% during 2011-20. Myocardial ischaemia or infarction as aetiology decreased during 2004-20 from 67.4% to 28.3% [OR 0.30 (0.27-0.34)]. Shockable rhythm decreased from 37.4% to 23.0% [OR 0.57 (0.51-0.64)]. Approximately 90% of survivors (IHCA and OHCA) had no or mild neurological sequelae., Conclusion: Survival increased 2.2-fold in OHCA during 1990-2020 but without any improvement in the final decade, and 1.2-fold in IHCA during 2004-20, with rapid improvement the last decade. Cardiac aetiology and shockable rhythms were halved. Neurological outcome has not improved., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: CD70 is a costimulatory molecule that is transiently expressed on a small set of activated lymphocytes and is involved in T-cell-mediated immunity. However, the role of CD70 in B-cell malignancies remains controversial., Methods: We investigated the clinical relevance of CD70 genetic alterations and its protein expression in two diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohorts with different ethnic backgrounds. We also performed transcriptomic analysis to explore the role of CD70 alterations in tumour microenvironment. We further tested the blockade of CD70 in combination with PD-L1 inhibitor in a murine lymphoma model., Results: We showed that CD70 genetic aberrations occurred more frequently in the Chinese DLBCL cohort (56/233, 24.0%) than in the Swedish cohort (9/84, 10.8%), especially in those with concomitant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The CD70 genetic changes in DLBCL resulted in a reduction/loss of protein expression and/or CD27 binding, which might impair T cell priming and were independently associated with poor overall survival. Paradoxically, we observed that over-expression of CD70 protein was also associated with a poor treatment response, as well as an advanced disease stage and EBV infection. More exhausted CD8 + T cells were furthermore identified in CD70 high-expression DLBCLs. Finally, in a murine lymphoma model, we demonstrated that blocking the CD70/CD27 and/or PD1/PD-L1 interactions could reduce CD70 + lymphoma growth in vivo, by directly impairing the tumour cell proliferation and rescuing the exhausted T cells., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CD70 can play a role in either tumour suppression or oncogenesis in DLBCL, likely via distinct immune evasion mechanisms, that is, impairing T cell priming or inducing T cell exhaustion. Characterisation of specific dysfunction of CD70 in DLBCL may thus provide opportunities for the development of novel targeted immuno-therapeutic strategies., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shanghai Institute of Clinical Bioinformatics.)

Background: Achieving lasting remission for at least 2 years is a good indicator for favourable prognosis long term after Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study was to provide real-world probabilities, useful in risk communication and clinical decision-making, of the chance for lasting remissions by clinical characteristics., Methods: DLBCL patients in remission after primary treatment recorded in the Swedish Lymphoma register 2007-2014 (n = 2941) were followed for relapse and death using multistate models to study patient trajectories. Flexible parametric models were used to estimate transition rates., Results: At 2 years, 80.7% (95% CI: 79.0-82.2) of the patients were predicted to remain in remission and 13.2% (95% CI: 11.9-14.6) to have relapsed. The relapse risk peaked at 7 months, and the annual decline of patients in remission stabilised after 2 years. The majority of patients in the second remission transitioned into a new relapse. The probability of a lasting remission was reduced by 20.4% units for patients with IPI 4-5 compared to patients with IPI 0-1, and time in remission was shortened by 3.5 months., Conclusion: The long-term prognosis was overall favourable with 80% achieving durable first remissions. However, prognosis varied by clinical subgroups and relapsing patients seldom achieved durable second remissions., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

An expert panel convened by the European Alliance for Personalized Medicine (EAPM) reflected on achievements and outstanding challenges in Europe in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Through the prism of member state experience, the panel noted advances in outcomes over the last decade, but highlighted issues constituting barriers to better care. The list notably included availability of newer treatments, infrastructure and funding for related testing, and shortages of relevant skills and of research support. The prospect of improvements was held to reside in closer coordination and cooperation within and between individual countries, and in changes in policy and scale of investment at both national and EU levels.

Immunotherapy in cancer takes advantage of the exquisite specificity, potency, and flexibility of the immune system to eliminate alien tumor cells. It involves strategies to activate the entire immune defense, by unlocking mechanisms developed by tumor cells to escape from surrounding immune cells, as well as engineered antibody and cellular therapies. What is important to note is that these are therapeutics with curative potential. The earliest example of immune therapy is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, introduced in 1957, which is still an important modality in hematology, most notably in myeloid malignancies. In this review, we discuss developmental trends of immunotherapy in hematological malignancies, focusing on some of the strategies that we believe will have the most impact on future clinical practice in this field. In particular, we delineate novel developments for therapies that have already been introduced into the clinic, such as immune checkpoint inhibition and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of emerging strategies based on T-cell receptors and adoptive transfer of allogeneic natural killer cells., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Internal Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Publication of The Journal of Internal Medicine.)