Search

[Background] Few women have been included in darunavir/cobicistat clinical development studies, and hardly any of them were antiretroviral experienced or treated with anything other than triple-based therapies., [Objectives] Our aim was to increase our knowledge about women living with HIV undergoing darunavir/cobicistat-based regimens., [Methods] A multicentre (21 hospitals), retrospective study including a centrally selected random sample of HIV-1 patients starting a darunavir/cobicistat-based regimen from June 2014 to March 2017 was planned. Baseline characteristics, 24 and 48 week viral load response (, [Results] Out of 761 participants, 193 were women. Similar characteristics were found for both sexes, except that the women had a longer duration of HIV infection (P = 0.001), and were less frequently pre-treated with darunavir/cobicistat in their previous regimen (P = 0.02). The main reason for using a darunavir/cobicistat-based regimen was simplification, without differences by sex, while monotherapy seems to be more frequently prescribed in women than in men (P = 0.067). The main outcomes, HIV viral load response, CD4+ lymphocyte count increase at 24 or 48 weeks, occurrence of adverse events, main reasons for changing and time to the modify darunavir/cobicistat regimen, did not show differences between the sexes., [Conclusions] No sex disparities were found in the main study outcomes. These results support the use of a darunavir/cobicistat-based regimen in long-term pre-treated women. Clinical Trial.gov No. NCT03042390., The CODAR study (Gesida Study no. 9316) was sponsored by SEIMC-GESIDA with support from Janssen. Other contributors were the RD12/0017/0017 project as part of Plan Nacional R + D + I and co-funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)-Subdirección General de Evaluación and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).

Objectives Maraviroc (MVC) is a suitable drug for aviraemic subjects on antiretroviral treatment (ART) developing toxicity. Its prescription requires prior tropism testing. It is unknown if proviral DNA genotypic tropism testing is reliable for guiding MVC initiation in aviraemic subjects, so this study was carried out to address this issue. Methods PROTEST was a phase 4, prospective, single-arm clinical trial carried out in 24 HIV care centres in Spain. MVC-naive HIV-1-infected patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL on stable ART during the previous 6 months who required an ART change because of toxicity and who had R5 HIV, as determined by proviral DNA genotypic tropism testing, initiated MVC with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and were followed for 48 weeks. Virological failure was defined as two consecutive viral load measurements > 50 copies/mL. Results Tropism results were available for 141 of 175 (80.6%) subjects screened: 60% had R5 and 85% of these (n = 74) were finally included in the study. Previous ART included protease inhibitors (PIs) in 62% of subjects, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in 36%, and integrase inhibitors (INIs) in 2%. Main reasons for treatment change were dyslipidaemia (42%), gastrointestinal symptoms (22%) and liver toxicity (15%). MVC was given alongside tenofovir (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) (54%) and abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC) (40%) in most patients. Eighty-four per cent of patients maintained a viral load < 50 copies/mL to week 48, whereas 16% discontinued treatment: two withdrew informed consent, one had an R5 to X4 shift between screening and baseline, one was lost to follow-up, one developed an adverse event (rash), two died from non-study-related causes, and five developed protocol-defined virological failure. Conclusions Initiation of MVC plus two NRTIs in aviraemic subjects based on genotypic tropism testing of proviral HIV-1 DNA is associated with low rates of virological failure for up to 1 year.

Different immune alterations have been described in HIV-infected patients with visceral leishmaniasis (VL). We aimed to identify the immunological factors involved in the lack of immunological recovery and VL relapses in HIV-infected patients with VL, by comparison with other HIV-infected patients.We carried out a cross-sectional study of 55 patients receiving suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) for at least 1 year: nine with previous relapsing VL, 20 with an immunodiscordant response (IDR) to cART (CD4 count 200 cells/μL) and no previous VL, and 26 with a concordant response (CR) to cART (CD4 count 350 cells/μL) without VL. Immunosenescence was investigated by analysing CD57(+) CD28(-) levels, immune activation by analysing CD38(+) HLA-DR(+) levels, inflammation by analysing interleukin (IL)-6 levels, and microbial translocation by analysing lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and soluble CD14 (sCD14) levels.In VL patients, the median time since VL diagnosis was 42 months, and all patients had had at least one relapse despite suppressive cART for a median time of 43 months. Patients with previously diagnosed VL had a higher CD8 T-cell activation level (P 0.001) than those with IDR. Also, levels of IL-6, LPS and especially sCD14, associated with bacterial translocation and additional monocyte activation, were significantly increased in patients with previous VL compared with patients with IDR (P = 0.048, P = 0.049 and P 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with previous VL had higher levels of CD8 T-cell senescence. Notably, the levels of immune activation and inflammation in patients with previous VL were not related to the time of VL diagnosis, the number of VL relapses, or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection.Our data demonstrate that VL patients had an even worse immunological status than patients with IDR, which was probably associated with increased microbial translocation and additional monocyte/macrophage activation. These data explain the observed lack of immunological recovery and the occurrence of VL relapses in HIV-infected patients with previous VL.